請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74209
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Cheng Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 周禹呈 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:24:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 【中文部分】
工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2010),2010電子零組件暨顯示器產業年鑑,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2011),2011電子零組件暨顯示器產業年鑑,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2012),2012電子零組件暨顯示器產業年鑑,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2013),被動元件產業概況,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2014),2014電子零組件暨顯示器產業年鑑,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2015),2015電子零組件暨顯示器產業年鑑,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2017),被動元件產業概況與發展趨勢,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2018),2018電子零組件暨顯示器產業年鑑,新竹:工業技術研究院。 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 (2018),被動元件 MLCC 產業回顧與展望,新竹:工業技術研究院。 中國報告網(2016),2016-2022年中國MLCC行業產銷調研及十三五運行態勢預測報告,北京:觀研天下資訊諮詢有限公司。 奇力新(2019),2018公司年度報告,新竹:奇力新電子股份有限公司。 奇力新(2019),2019/05法說會,新竹:奇力新電子股份有限公司。 陳亭安(2006),被動元件產業供需模型與競爭分析,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 國巨(2019),2018公司年度報告,台北:國巨股份有限公司。 國巨(2019),2019/03法說會,台北:國巨股份有限公司。 湯明哲(2011),初版,策略精論:基礎篇,台北,旗標。 湯明哲(2011),初版,策略精論:進階篇,台北,旗標。 順絡(2019),2018公司年度報告,深圳:順絡電子股份有限公司。 韓培爾(2003),初版,社會科學研究方法Q&A,台北,風雲論壇。 楊明輝(2018),電容、電阻保持高景氣,電感價格保持平穩—被動元件行業專題報告,光大證券。 黎韜揚(2019),電容器(一):產業格局穩中有變,國產替代任重道遠。中信建投證券。 黎韜揚(2019),電容器(二):把握機遇提升規模效應,軍民融合實現技術突破,中信建投證券。 【外文部分】 Anand, J. 2004. M&A strategies in mature and declining industries: theoretical perspectives and implications. In Advances in mergers and acquisitions: 163-179. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Aaker, D. A., & Adler, D. A. 1984. Developing business strategies, vol. 200, New York, NY: Wiley. Anand, J., & Singh, H. 1997. Asset redeployment, acquisitions and corporate strategy in declining industries. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1): 99-118. Bain, J. S. 1956. Barriers to new competition: their character and consequences in manufacturing industries, vol. 329. Massachusetts, MA: Harvard University Press. Bernheim, D., & Whinston, M. D. 1990. Multimarket contact and collusive behavior. RAND Journal of Economics, 21: 1–26. Capron, L., Dussauge, P., & Mitchell, W. 1998. Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7): 631-661. Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. 1977. From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2): 241-261. Christensen, C. M. 2013. The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Massachusetts, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Gartner, Inc. 2019. Invest implications: Forecast analysis: PCs, ultramobiles and mobile phones, worldwide. Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114-135. Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary strategy analysis: Text and cases edition. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Hatten, K. J., & Hatten, M. L. 1987. Strategic groups, asymmetrical mobility barriers and contestability. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4): 329-342. Hunt, M. S. 1972. Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960-1970. Massachusetts, MA: Harvard University Press. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360. KOA Corporation. 2019. Annual Report 2018. Martin, S. 1988. Market Power and/or Efficiency? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(2): 331-335. Murata Corporation. 2019. Annual Report 2018. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Porter, M. E. 2008. The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1): 25-40. Paumanok Publications, Inc. 2018. Passive electronic components: World market outlook: 2019-2024. Reichmann, W. J. 1962. Use and abuse of statistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Rohm Corporation. 2019. Annual Report 2018. Rohm Corporation. 2018. Annual Report 2017. SEMCO Corporation. 2019. Annual Report 2018. Stewart, D. W., & Kamins, M. A. 1993. Secondary research: Information sources and methods, vol. 4, California, CA: Sage Publications. Taiyo Yuden Corporation. 2019. Annual Report 2018. TDK Corporation. 2019. Annual Report 2018. Weston, J. F., Mitchell, M., Mulherin, J. H., Siu, J. A., & Johnson, B. A. 2004. Takeovers, restructuring, and corporate governance. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74209 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 被動元件屬於電子零組件產業中相對低售價、低毛利、低技術門檻的一環,但其在電子零組件中具有保護主動元件,以及增加產品耐用度之不可替代性,不過由於終端電子產品大幅度受到景氣循環所影響,形塑被動元件產業需求暴漲暴跌的特殊現象,使得小廠商最終無法生存,產業呈現寡占市場結構。過去20年來全球被動元件產業歷經了數次大規模的結構變遷,對此,本研究希望探究廠商間背後策略的意涵?試圖找出過去成熟平穩的被動元件產業,發生結構變遷之主因,並聚焦在台灣廠商面臨這樣的競爭局勢下,應採取何種競爭策略?我們希望經由本研究的系統性分析為臺灣被動元件產業提供未來發展策略的建議。
本研究由全球被動元件產業結構變遷出發,研究涵蓋過去20年間被動元件產業之歷史背景、消長歷史與價值鏈分析,找出關鍵影響產業結構變遷之供需因素。接續,將聚焦於臺灣被動元件產業之績效表現,從產業歷史背景、市場結構、布局路徑與全球競爭地位角度,搭配五力分析與策略群分析,以期通盤探究產業脈絡,並找出臺灣相對於全球廠商之競爭優勢與劣勢,從而發展臺灣被動元件產業的關鍵成功因素。 透過上述分析,我們發現臺灣被動元件產業位處利基轉化群組,在高階市場需面對創新應用群組日韓廠商,在中低階市場則需面對基礎應用群組中國廠商。針對上述情況,本研究提出垂直競爭策略,以重塑亞洲被動元件供應鏈為目標,以及產品線策略搭配策略性外包與少數股權收購,以調節廠商的高低階產品產能,希望能夠透過彼此的良性互動,達成雙贏的局面。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Passive components are comparatively lower price, lower profit, and with lower level of technique among all electronic components. Despite of all these characteristics, passive components are indispensable for supporting and protecting active components in circuit design and therefore enhancing product durability. However, due to the demand volatility on many electronic devices, the market for passive components has also experienced even higher fluctuation. Such up-and-down shakes out many fringe firms and leave a few dominant firms in the global passive component industry. The present industry attempts to unravel the structural reasons leading to the formation of the current oligopolistic industry structure. Since Taiwan is the manufacturing power-house of global electronics industries, we are interested in exploring the competitive positions and future prospect of Taiwanese passive component industry within the context of global competition and structural changes.
Our research starts from an exploration on the historical background and the value chain analysis of the passive component industry during the past 20 years and identifies the supply and demand factors that influence the industrial structural changes. Having found these factors, we focus on the performance of Taiwan's passive components industry, from the perspective of industrial history, market structure and global competitive position. We layout global competitive status based on five-force and strategic group analysis, upon which Taiwanese players’ competitive advantages and future strategies are discussed. According to the discussion above, we found that the passive component industry in Taiwan is located in the middle among all strategic groups we identified. It faces Japanese and the Korean manufacturers in the high-end market, and Chinese manufacturers in the low-end market. We suggest that Taiwanese companies undertake vertical integration strategy, aiming at reshaping the passive component supply chain in the Asian market. Also, we suggest to shape product portfolio with subcontracting and minority equity acquisition to adjust the capacity of high-end and low-end products. Strategic Implications of our research are also discussed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:24:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06724051-1.pdf: 2853268 bytes, checksum: 4834c8aeb5ef93d5dec085d95a4467a9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員審定書 I 誌謝 II 中文摘要 III Abstract IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景暨動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 3 第三節 研究方法 4 第四節 論文章節架構 6 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 產業分析 8 第二節 策略群分析 16 第三節 併購策略 18 第三章 全球被動元件產業結構變遷 23 第一節 全球被動元件產業背景分析 23 第二節 全球被動元件產業價值鏈 36 第四章 臺灣被動元件產業競爭優勢分析 50 第一節 臺灣被動元件廠商的競爭動態 50 第二節 臺灣被動元件產業分析 57 第三節 全球被動元件產業策略群分析 67 第四節 臺灣廠商未來策略建議 71 第五章 結論與建議 74 第一節 研究結論 74 第二節 研究建議 77 參考文獻 78 【附錄】 82 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 全球被動元件產業結構變遷與台灣廠商發展策略之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on the Structural Change of Global Passive Component Industry and Major Taiwanese Companies’ Strategy | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 吳政衛(Cheng-Wei Wu) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳相勳(Sonic Wu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 被動元件,產業結構,競爭優勢,策略群組,併購策略, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Passive Component,Structural Change,Competitive Advantages,Strategic Group,M&A Strategy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 86 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901866 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.79 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。