請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74166
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳惠美(Hui-Mei Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ting Sun | en |
dc.contributor.author | 孫玉婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:22:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 何妍璘,(2000),陽明山國家公園登山步道吸引力影響因素之探討,國家公園學報,9(1),32-47。
2. 呂國彥、楊宏志,(1995),步道規劃準則,臺灣林業,21(7),32-43。 3. 李素馨、蘇群超,(1999),大坑登山步道遊憩環境與選擇行為關係之研究,戶外遊憩研究,12(4),21-42。 4. 林晏州,(1984),遊憩者選擇遊憩區行為之研究, 都市與計劃,10,33-49。 5. 林欣慧,(2002),解說成效對休閒效益體驗之影響研究-以登山健行為例,碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學運動休閒與管理研究所, 台北。 6. 侯傑議、林瑞興,(2005),登山健行常見的運動傷害,第九屆全國大專院校登山運動研討會論文輯,88-105。 7. 張春興,(1989),心理學,台北市:東華書局。 8. 張秀姝,(2017),台灣小百岳,台北市:台灣山岳文化。 9. 張良漢、吳崇旗、王偉琴,(2006),登山健行經驗對活動參與之研究,大專體育學刊,8(4),37-49。 10. 張惠芳,(2000),逃離與追尋─登山的社會學研究,碩士論文,國立台灣大學社會學研究所,台北。 11. 張賀融,(2016),推廣小百岳運動的現況與展望,2016全國登山研討會論文集,台北。 12. 教育部體育署,(2015),運動城市調查,台北:教育部體育署。 13. 曹正、李瑞瓊,(1989),觀光地區遊憩活動設施規劃設計準則研究報告,台北:交通部觀光局。 14. 呂國彥、楊宏志,(1995),步道規劃準則,臺灣林業,21(7),32-43。 15. 郭育任,(2007),台灣步道使用困難度分級之研究,第7屆全國登山研討會。 16. 陳水源,(1988),遊憩體驗實證之研究以陽明山國家公園爲例,戶外遊憩研究,1(1),39-75。 17. 林晏州、曾柏瑋,(2004),太魯閣國家公園遊客之步道選擇行為,國家公園學報,14 (2),1-20。 18. 黃志堅、羅紹麟,(2001),不同遊憩機會步道可接受限度指標因子建立之研究: 以藤枝森林遊樂區為例,林業研究季刊,23(1),25-32。 19. 黃淑君、薛毓屏、 林育慧, (1999),遊憩單車使用者對單車活動的實質環境屬性偏好之研究,戶外遊憩研究,12(4),43-60。 20. 黃淑為,(1999),影響登山步道環境屬性偏好因子之探討-以陽明山國家公園為例,碩士論文,國立台灣大學園藝學研究所,台北。 21. 黃瀟婷、柴彥威,(2009),面向LBS使用者的時間地理學研究評介,地理科學進展,2009,28(06):962-969。 22. 蔡博文、吳怡潔、 鍾明光,(2016),自發性地理資訊品質評估探討-蝴蝶 VGI案例分析,中國地理學會會刊,(56), 1-13。 23. 劉毓妮、林晏州,(1993),遊客對激流泛舟環境屬性之偏好,戶外遊憩研究,6(3),53-75。 24. 歐雙磐、侯錦雄,(2007),登山者遊憩專門化與登山類型偏好,戶外遊憩研究,20(4),51-74。 25. 台北市政府工務局,(2018),台北市親山步道,2018年10月9日,取自:https://www.geo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=47B98FD0FF9C5076&sms=C54BF6A5DBDB57B5&s=C9FCE0D2912F06DA 26. 台灣山林悠遊網,(2019),自然步道,2019年4月1日,取自:https://recreation.forest.gov.tw/Trail 27. 健行筆記,(2019),健行筆記行銷廣告簡介,2019年4月1日,取自:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tBygaRDtPdP-7N0ofx8r5t_pH6PFFNRm/view 28. 太鲁阁国家公园,(2019),步道探访,2019年4月1日,取自https://www.taroko.gov.tw/zh-tw/Tourism/Trail 29. Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., Lammers, R., Arp, C., White, D., Hinzman, L., & Busey, R. (2008). The arctic water resource vulnerability index: an integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater. Environmental Management, 42(3), 523-541. 30. Antoniou, M. G., Armah, A., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2010). Degradation of microcystin-LR using sulfate radicals generated through photolysis, thermolysis and e−transfer mechanisms. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 96(3-4), 290-298. 31. Arnberger, A., & Hinterberger, B. (2003). Visitor monitoring methods for managing public use pressures in the Danube Floodplains National Park, Austria. Journal for Nature Conservation, 11(4), 260-267. 32. Asakura, Y., & Iryo, T. (2007). Analysis of tourist behaviour based on the tracking data collected using a mobile communication instrument. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(7), 684-690. 33. Beaulieu, J. T., & Schreyer, R. (1985). Choices of wilderness environments--differences between real and hypothetical choice situations. In In: Stankey, George H.; McCool, Stephen F., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on recreation choice behavior; 1984 March 22-23; Missoula, MT. General Technical Report INT-184. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. p. 38-45 (Vol. 184). 34. Beeco, J. A., & Brown, G. (2013). Integrating space, spatial tools, and spatial analysis into the human dimensions of parks and outdoor recreation. Applied Geography, 38, 76-85. 35. Brown, G. G., & Donovan, S. (2013). Escaping the national forest planning quagmire: using public participation GIS to assess acceptable national forest use. Journal of Forestry, 111(2), 115-125. 36. Brown, G. G., & Reed, P. (2012). Social landscape metrics: measures for understanding place values from public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Landscape Research, 37(1), 73-90. 37. Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196-208. 38. Brown, G., Schebella, M. F., & Weber, D. (2014). Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 34-44. 39. Brunson, M., & Shelby, B. (1990). A hierarchy of campsite attributes in dispersed recreation settings. Leisure Sciences, 12(2), 197-209. 40. Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L. (1967). Content analysis of communications. New York: Macmillan. 41. Buhalis, D., & O'Connor, P. (2005). Information communication technology revolutionizing tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 30(3), 7-16. 42. Carlson, G. M., & Holyoak, T. (2009). Structural insights into the mechanism of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase catalysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284(40), 27037-27041. 43. Cole, D. N., & Hall, T. E. (2009). Perceived effects of setting attributes on visitor experiences in wilderness: Variation with situational context and visitor characteristics. Environmental Management, 44, 24-36. 44. COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB. 2016. Hiker and Skier Trip Classification. Retrieved from: http://www.hikingdenver.net/membership/tripclassifications/hike-classifications Accessed on 4 January 2019. 45. Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). 46. D’Antonio, A., Monz, C., Lawson, S., Newman, P., Pettebone, D., & Courtemanch, A. (2010). GPS-based measurements of backcountry visitors in parks and protected areas: Examples of methods and applications from three case studies. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(3), 42-60. 47. Edwards, D. (2009). Using GPS to Track Tourists Spatial Behaviour in Urban Destinations. Online unter: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1905286 (letzter Zugriff am 28.01.2013). 48. Edwards, D., Dickson, T., Griffin, T., & Hayllar, B. (2010). Tracking the urban visitor: Methods for examining tourists' spatial behaviour and visual representations. Cultural Tourism Research Methods, 104-114. 49. Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012). Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 571-590. 50. Fang, B., Ye, Q., Kucukusta, D., & Law, R. (2016). Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics. Tourism Management, 52, 498-506. 51. Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J. (2008). Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. Digital Mmedia, Youth, and Credibility, 5-27. 52. Flink, C. A., & Searns, R. M. (1993). Greenways: a guide to planning, desing, and development. Island Press. 53. Gearing, C. E., Swart, W. W., & Var, T. (1974). Establishing a measure of touristic attractiveness. Journal of Travel Research, 12(4), 1-8. 54. Gnoth, J. (1997). Tourism motivation and expectation formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(2), 283-304. 55. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211-221. 56. Growcock, A. J. (2005). Impacts of camping and trampling on Australian alpine and subalpine vegetation and soils. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Griffith University. 57. Guo, Y., Barnes, S. J., & Jia, Q. (2017). Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation. Tourism Management, 59, 467-483. 58. Harris, C., Driver, B. L., & Bergersen, E. P. (1984). Do Choices of Recreation Areas Reflect User Preferences for Site Attributes. In Proceedings of The Recreation Choice Behavior Symposium, University of Montana, Missoula, MT (March). 59. HIKING NEW ZEALAND. 2016a. Grading and fitness. Retrieved from: https://hikingnewzealand.com/grading-and-fitness/ Accessed on 10 January 2016. 60. HIKING NEW ZEALAND. 2016b. Search. Retrieved from: https://hikingnewzealand.com/search/?q=grading Accessed on 10 January 2019. 61. HILLWALK TOURS IRELAND. 2016. Hillwalk Tours-Ireland: Questions. Retrieved from: http://www.hillwalktours.com/hiking-ireland/questions Accessed on 7 January 2019. 62. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley (content analysis). 63. Hu, Y. H., Chen, Y. L., & Chou, H. L. (2017). Opinion mining from online hotel reviews–A text summarization approach. Information Processing & Management, 53(2), 436-449. 64. HUGO, M.L. (1999). A Comprehensive Approach Towards the Planning, Grading and Auditing of Hiking Trails as Ecotourism Products. Current Issues in Tourism, 2(2-3): 138-173. 65. HUGO, M.L. (2007). Energy Equivalent as a Measure of the Difficulty Rating of Hiking Trails, Tourism Geographies. An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 1(3):358-373. 66. Inskeep, E. (1991). Tourism planning: an integrated and sustainable development approach. Van Nostrand Reinhold. 67. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis (pp. 56-65). ACM. 68. Johnson, P. A., Sieber, R. E., Magnien, N., & Ariwi, J. (2012). Automated web harvesting to collect and analyse user-generated content for tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 15(3), 293-299. 69. Johnston, B. R., & Edwards, T. (1994). The commodification of mountaineering. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(3), 459-478. 70. Kassarjian, H. H.(1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8-18. 71. Kontopoulos, E., Berberidis, C., Dergiades, T., & Bassiliades, N. (2013). Ontology-based sentiment analysis of twitter posts. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 4065-4074. 72. Li, J., Xu, L., Tang, L., Wang, S., & Li, L. (2018). Big data in tourism research: A literature review. Tourism Management, 68, 301-323. 73. Liu, K., Siu, K. W. M., Gong, X. Y., Gao, Y., & Lu, D. (2016). Where do networks really work? The effects of the Shenzhen greenway network on supporting physical activities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 152, 49-58. 74. Liu, Y., Teichert, T., Rossi, M., Li, H., & Hu, F. (2017). Big data for big insights: Investigating language-specific drivers of hotel satisfaction with 412,784 user-generated reviews. Tourism Management, 59, 554-563. 75. Manning, R., Valliere, W., Anderson, L., McCown, R. S., Pettengill, P., Reigner, N., ... & Hallo, J. (2011). Defining, measuring, monitoring, and managing the sustainability of parks for outdoor recreation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 29(3). 76. McCool, S. F., Stankey, G. H., & Clark, R. N. (1985). Choosing recreation settings: Processes, findings, and research directions. In In: Stankey, George H.; McCool, Stephen F., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on recreation choice behavior; 1984 March 22-23; Missoula, MT. General Technical Report INT-184. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. p. 1-8 (Vol. 184). 77. NATIONAL PARK SERVICES (NPS). 2017. Shenandoah National Park. How to Determine Hiking Difficulty. Retrieved from: https://www.nps.gov/shen/planyourvisit/how-to-determine-hiking-difficulty.htm Accessed on 9 January 2019. 78. NATIONALPARKS (Finland). 2016. Trail Difficulty Classification. Retrieved from: http://www.nationalparks.fi/hikinginfinland/wheretogo/traildiffucultyclassification Accessed on 6 January 2019. 79. NORTHWEST HIKER. 2014 Retrieved from: http://www.nwhiker.com/HikeEval.html Accessed on 6 January 2019. 80. O’Connor, A., Zerger, A., & Itami, B. (2005). Geo-temporal tracking and analysis of tourist movement. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 69(1-2), 135-150. 81. Orellana, D., & Wachowicz, M. (2011). Exploring Patterns of Movement Suspension in Pedestrian Mobility. Geographical Analysis, 43(3), 241-260. 82. Orellana, D., Bregt, A. K., Ligtenberg, A., & Wachowicz, M. (2012). Exploring visitor movement patterns in natural recreational areas. Tourism Management, 33(3), 672-682. 83. O’reilly, T. (2005). Web 2.0: compact definition. 84. Philander, K., & Zhong, Y. (2016). Twitter sentiment analysis: Capturing sentiment from integrated resort tweets. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55(2016), 16-24. 85. RANDONNEE ADVENTURE Montreal. 2014. Trail Ratings. Retrieved from: http://randonnee.ca/trail-ratings/ Accessed on 6 January 2019. 86. Reisinger, J., & Mooney, R. (2010, October). A mixture model with sharing for lexical semantics. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1173-1182). Association for Computational Linguistics. 87. Shoval, N., & Isaacson, M. (2009). Tourist mobility and advanced tracking technologies. Routledge. 88. Taczanowska, K., González, L. M., Garcia-Massó, X., Muhar, A., Brandenburg, C., & Toca-Herrera, J. L. (2014). Evaluating the structure and use of hiking trails in recreational areas using a mixed GPS tracking and graph theory approach. Applied Geography, 55, 184-192. 89. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. O'Reilly Media, Inc. 90. U.S. National Park Service. 2001. Trails Management Handbook. 91. UTAH OUTSIDE. 2010. Hiking difficulty ratings. Got class? Now you do! Retrieved from: http://www.utahoutside.com/2010/07/hiking-trail-difficulty-ratings-got-class-now-you-do/ Accessed on 4 January 2019. 92. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 101-125. 93. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (1994). An introduction to mass media research. California: Wadsworth. 94. Woodman, T., Hardy, L., Barlow, M., & Le Scanff, C. (2010). Motives for participation in prolonged engagement high-risk sports: An agentic emotion regulation perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(5), 345-352. 95. Wu, M. Y., & Pearce, P. L. (2014). Chinese recreational vehicle users in Australia: A netnographic study of tourist motivation. Tourism Management, 43, 22-35. 96. Yousefi, M., & Marzuki, A. (2012). Travel motivations and the influential factors: The case of Penang, Malaysia. Anatolia, 23(2), 169-176. 97. Yuan, H., Xu, H., Qian, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). Make your travel smarter: Summarizing urban tourism information from massive blog data. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1306-1319. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74166 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 臺灣山岳資源豐富,山岳活動盛行,且登山健行有益健康,長久以來政府持續改善步道環境,推動登山健行普及化。遊憩活動之推行,必須同時考量活動難易度與環境吸引力。近年各單位紛紛積極推動步道分級,依據步道海拔高度、長度、坡度、行走難易度、路線特性、路面狀況等因素,劃分不同等級之難易程度與服務對象;同時提供各步道景觀遊憩資訊,幫助民眾做遊憩路逕選擇。然而,這些難易程度之劃分主要係由專業判斷,是否與健行者實際行為與體驗感受相符,尚待實證研究確認;不同難易等級步道,遊憩者之環境知覺與遊憩吸引力是否各異,亦值得進一步探究。
過去登山健行研究多採用行為觀察、問卷調查或日誌分析法,難精確掌握實際行為之空間分布;且研究空間尺度小,僅能針對單一或少數步道,無法綜觀大尺度之空間行為,亦無法進行各類步道之空間行為比較;而健行者知覺偏好,囿於研究者之問題設定,也限縮行為研究範疇。近年定位系統與地理標籤等技術發達,大眾可自由上傳資訊至社群平台分享。此等自發式地理資訊具有即時、取得便利、覆蓋區域全貌、資料細緻等優勢,同時能反映發佈者行為特性,為空間行為研究帶來突破性契機。因此,本研究主要應用自發性地理資訊探究健行之整體行為及步道之難易程度與環境吸引力。 研究對象為台灣小百岳之登山步道,並選擇「健行筆記平台」之資料進行分析。針對大眾自發上傳之1295條GPS軌跡數據,透過量化統計分析各步道之環境吸引力及困難度評級;並就使用者對各步道之評論內容進行質性分析,以界定使用者之困難度知覺與環境吸引力;再將質性與量化分析結果做綜合比對。 研究結果顯示,GPS軌跡共計1295條,步道之評論數共有1056條,涉及132條條小百岳相關步道,各個步道皆存在遊客上傳之GPS軌跡及步道之相關評論,平均每條步道的GPS軌跡數為9.74,平均每條步道的評論數為7.95。高吸引力步道主要吸引力屬性以自然環境吸引力為主,其中具視覺開闊度,具優美自然景觀為最主要屬性,其次踏面材質不易溼滑,交通方便,停車充足且安全亦為大眾提及最多之吸引力。簡單級別步道,大眾最常評判其困難度因子為遊客使用困難度,其次為適用對象。較簡單步道此等級遊客較注重坡度及體能。中等步道大眾最常提及除遊客使用困難度及體能。較困難等級步道之地形所占其評定比例最高,其次為適用對象及使用困難度。困難等級步道主要以體能進行評斷。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Taiwan's mountains are rich in resources. Mountain activities are healthy and prevalent. The government has continued to improve the trail environment for a long time and promote the popularization of mountaineering. The implementation of recreational activities must consider both the difficulty of activities and the attraction of the environment. In recent years, the government has actively promoted the classification of trails according to the altitude, length, slope, difficulty of walking, route characteristics, road conditions, and other factors. At the same time, trail information is provided to help the public with the trail selection. However, the division of these difficulty levels is mainly judged by the professional. Whether it is consistent with the actual behavior and experience of the people and remains to be confirmed by empirical research. The environmental awareness of the people with the different difficulty level trails and the attraction of the recreation are different, it is also worth further exploration.
In the past, hiking research mostly used behavior observation and questionnaire survey methods. It is difficult to accurately grasp the spatial distribution of actual behavior. However, the research space scale is small, only for single or a few trails which cannot represent the large-scale spatial behavior. The spatial behavior of each type of trail is difficult to be compared. While the pedestrian's perceptual preference is set by the researcher's problem and behavioral research is limited. In recent years, technologies such as positioning systems and geo-tags have developed, and the public is free to upload information to the community platform for sharing. This spontaneous geographic information has the advantages of instant, convenient, comprehensive coverage, and detailed data. It also reflects the behavioral characteristics of the publisher and brings breakthrough opportunities for spatial behavior research. Therefore, this study mainly uses volunteered geographic information to explore the overall behavior of hiking and the difficulty of the trail and the attractiveness of the environment. The research object was the hiking trail of Xiaobaiyue in Taiwan, and the data of the 'Hiking Biji' was selected for analysis. According to the 1295 GPS trajectory data uploaded by the public, the environmental attractiveness and difficulty rating of each trail are analyzed through quantitative statistics. The user's evaluation of each trail's comments is qualitatively analyzed to define the user's difficulty perception and Environmental attractiveness; a comprehensive comparison of qualitative and quantitative analysis results. The research results show that there are 1295 GPS trajectories and 1056 comments on the trails, involving 132 strips of Xiaobaiyue related trails. There are comments about GPS tracks and trails uploaded by tourists on each trail, and the average GPS tracks of each trail are 9.74. The average number of comments per trail is 7.95. The main attractive attributes of the high-attractive trails are mainly natural environment attractions, which have visual openness and beautiful natural landscape as the most important attributes. The most attractive trail with the attraction of which material is not easy to be slippery, the traffic is convenient, the parking is sufficient and the safety is also mentioned by the public. For Easiest level trails, the public most often judges the difficulty factor as the difficulty for visitors, followed by the applicable target. Moderate level pays more attention to the slope and physical fitness. Moderately Strenuous trails are most often mentioned in addition to the difficulty and physical fitness of visitors. The topography of the Strenuous grade trails has the highest proportion of ratings, followed by the applicable objects and the difficulty of use. Very Strenuous grade trails are mainly judged by physical fitness. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:22:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06628316-1.pdf: 13673442 bytes, checksum: c978e77b133b2e1120a136ba4dddc7b8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致谢 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iv 目 錄 vi 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 ixx 第一章 緒 論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 自發地理資訊 4 第二節 郊山健行吸引力 9 第三節 郊山健行困難度 14 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究架構 20 第二節 研究對象 21 第三節 研究素材-健行筆記 26 第四節 資料分析 31 第四章 結果分析 43 第一節 VGI資料分析 43 第二節 環境吸引力分析結果 48 第三節 困難度分析結果 59 第四節 綜合分析 69 第五章 結論與建議 75 第一節 結果與討論 75 第二節 研究限制 83 第三節 未來應用與建議 84 參考文獻 85 附錄1 步道內容分析摘要表-自然環境屬性 94 附錄2 步道內容分析摘要表-步道特色屬性 98 附錄3 步道內容分析摘要表-步道設施屬性 102 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用自發性地理資訊界定健行步道之難易程度與環境吸引力 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Applying Volunteered Geographic Information to Identify Attraction and Difficulty of Hiking Trails | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin),王正平(Cheng-Ping Wang),鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng),?宏明(Hung-ming Tu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 自發式地理資訊,郊山健行,吸引力,困難度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | VGI,hiking,attraction,hiking trails difficulty, | en |
dc.relation.page | 105 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201903147 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 13.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。