請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74122
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱顯比(Shean-Bii Chiu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hui-Chi Pao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 包蕙綺 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:20:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amihud, Y., Lev, B., & Travlos, N. G. (1990). Corporate control and the choice of investment financing: The case of corporate acquisitions. The journal of finance, 45(2), 603-616.
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647-691. Blackburn, V., & Lang, J. R. (1989). Toward a market/ownership constrained theory of merger behavior. Journal of Management, 15(1), 77-88. Bogan, V., & Just, D. (2009). What drives merger decision making behavior? Don’t seek, don’t find, and don’t change your mind. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(3), 930-943. Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of financial economics, 21(1), 3-40. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial economics, 58(1-2), 81-112. Faccio, M., & Masulis, R. W. (2005). The choice of payment method in European mergers and acquisitions. The journal of finance, 60(3), 1345-1388. Fanto, J. A. (2001). Quasi-rationality in action: a study of psychological factors in merger decision-making. Ohio St. LJ, 62, 1333. Ghosh, A., & Ruland, W. (1998). Managerial ownership, the method of payment for acquisitions, and executive job retention. The journal of finance, 53(2), 785-798. Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1969-1997. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1988). Corporate control contests and capital structure. Journal of financial economics, 20, 55-86. Hasbrouck, J. (1985). The characteristics of takeover targets q and other measures. Journal of Banking & Finance, 9(3), 351-362. Hernando, I., Nieto, M. J., & Wall, L. D. (2009). Determinants of domestic and cross-border bank acquisitions in the European Union. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(6), 1022-1032. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329. Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2002). The Q-theory of mergers. American Economic Review, 92(2), 198-204. King, M. R., & Santor, E. (2008). Family values: Ownership structure, performance and capital structure of Canadian firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(11), 2423-2432. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2), 471-517. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. The journal of finance, 57(3), 1147-1170. Lloyd, W. P., Modani, N. K., & Hand, J. H. (1987). The effect of the degree of ownership control on firm diversification, market value, and merger activity. Journal of Business Research, 15(4), 303-312. Martin, K. J. (1996). The method of payment in corporate acquisitions, investment opportunities, and management ownership. The journal of finance, 51(4), 1227-1246. Martin, K. J., & McConnell, J. J. (1991). Corporate performance, corporate takeovers, and management turnover. The journal of finance, 46(2), 671-687. Mitchell, M. L., & Mulherin, J. H. (1996). The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. Journal of financial economics, 41(2), 193-229. Odagiri, H., & Hase, T. (1989). Are mergers and acquisitions going to be popular in Japan too?: An empirical study. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7(1), 49-72. Owen, S., & Yawson, A. (2010). Corporate life cycle and M&A activity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(2), 427-440. Paine, F. T., & Power, D. J. (1984). Merger strategy: An examination of Drucker's five rules for successful acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 99-110. Shim, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). Does ownership matter in mergers? A comparative study of the causes and consequences of mergers by family and non-family firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(1), 193-203. Yao, D. A., & Dahdough, T. N. (1993). Information problems in merger decision making and their impact on development of an efficiencies defense. Antitrust LJ, 62, 23. 叶厚元. (2002). 并购决策风险的评价模型及几种风险防范措施. 何应龙和邓泽宏. (2004). 台湾公营企业民营化的策略与启示. 湖北社会科学(6), 69-70. 黄一鸣. (2001). 企业并购风险及其控制. 曾煌鈞. (2017). 淺談家族企業之治理. In 證券暨期貨月刊 (Vol. 35, pp. 32-47). 葉銀華. (2016). 泛公股企業之治理機制. 會計研究月刊(370), 21-25. 資誠聯合會計師事務所. (2018). 2018 臺灣併購白皮書. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-invest/assets/2018-taiwan-mna.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74122 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,台灣併購市場持續升溫,完成的併購案件數量與金額規模基本上呈現穩定成長,然而除了以個案分析形式研究併購案件,台灣併購事件的實證研究還有眾多議題可以做數值化呈現。過往海內外學者的研究主要是分析企業併購後的績效表現,並沒有針對經營策略做深入探究,因此本文依照台灣經濟新報TEJ+中的企業型態分類,統計自1995年台灣併購事件被資料庫紀錄至2018年,單一家族主導企業、公股主導企業、專業經理人治理企業和共治型態企業等四種經營型態的併購策略差異。
實證結果表明,台灣家族企業與非家族企業在面對併購策略時並沒有顯著決策的差異,公股企業執行併購策略的可能性低於非公股企業企業,專業經理人治理企業執行併購策略的可能性高於非專業經理人經營企業,共治型態企業執行併購策略的可能性低於非共治型態企業。另外我們還考量了併購策略前的經營者所有權,單一家族主導、公股主導以及共治型態企業的所有權和併購策略執行的可能性存在正相關,因此所有權結構會是這些企業考量併購策略的重要決定因素,而專業經理人治理企業併購的可能性則與專業經營者持股所有權無顯著差異。 最後我們還發現,將企業併購事件拆分為作為主併方和作為被併方時,家族企業、專業經理人經營企業與共治型態企業相較下會更積極採取作為主併方的策略,公股主導企業則依舊消極面對併購策略,而所有型態企業在作為被併方策略上是沒有決策差別的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, Taiwan M&A market has continued to heat up, and the number and size of completed M&A cases have grown steadily. However, in addition to case studies, there are many issues in the empirical study of Taiwan M&A events that can be numerically presented. In the past, the research of scholars mainly analyzed the performance of enterprises after mergers and acquisitions. They did not conduct in-depth exploration of business strategies. Therefore, according to the classification of enterprises in the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ). M&A events from 1995 to 2018 in Taiwan were recorded by the database. There are four types of M&A strategies, such as family enterprises, public-dominated enterprises, professional managers enterprises, and mixed-ownership type enterprises.
The empirical results show that there is no significant difference in decision-making between Taiwanese family business and non-family business of M&A strategy. Public-dominated enterprises are less likely to merge than nonpublic-dominated enterprises are. Professional managers enterprises are likely to merge than professional managers enterprises are. And mixed-ownership type enterprises are less likely to merge than nonmixed-ownership type enterprises are. In addition, we also consider the ownership of the operators before the M&A strategy. There is a positive correlation between the ownership of family-led, public-dominated and mixed-ownership type enterprises and the possibility of execution of M&A strategies. Therefore, the ownership structure will be important for these companies to consider M&A strategies. The possibility of professional manager firm to execute merger strategy is not significantly different from the percentage of professional manager’s shares holding. Finally, we also found that when the M&A events are split into merging events and merged events, family, professional managers, and mixed-ownership type companies will be more active in adopting merging strategies. And all types of companies have no decision-making differences in merged strategies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:20:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06723001-1.pdf: 1229253 bytes, checksum: dae6cb09a1fd2d957c9123723ac4f66b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………I
ABSTRACT…………..……………………………………………………………II 致謝………………………………………………………………………………………III 目錄………………………………………………………………………………………IV 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………………V 表目錄……………………………………………………………………………………VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景、動機與目的 1 第二節 研究方法與流程架構 4 第二章 文獻探討與假說 6 第一節 併購議題相關文獻 6 第二節 所有權相關文獻 10 第三章 研究方法 11 第一節 資料庫與樣本企業 11 第二節 併購事件 11 第三節 變數定義 12 第四章 研究結果 16 第一節 評估模型-不同型態的企業對併購事件 16 第二節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說一) 17 第三節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說二) 20 第四節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說三) 23 第五節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說四) 26 第六節 評估模型-所有型態的企業與併購事件 29 第七節 評估模型-所有權比重與併購事件 32 第八節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說五) 33 第九節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說六) 35 第十節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說七) 37 第十一節 邏輯迴歸分析(研究假說八) 39 第十二節 評估模型-所有型態的企業與主被併方併購事件 41 第五章 結論與後續研究建議 47 參考文獻 49 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣不同經營型態企業的併購策略差異 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A comparative study of the mergers strategies by different types of ownership within Taiwan’s firms | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳明賢(Ming-shen Chen),莊文議(Wen-I Chuang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 經營型態,家族企業,公股企業,企業併購,併購策略,所有權, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | family firm,government firm,merger,merger strategy,ownership, | en |
dc.relation.page | 50 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201903387 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。