請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73766完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳希立(Sih-Li Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sheng-Yang Weng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 翁聖揚 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:09:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] “Global status report,” UNEP, pp. 8 – 9, 2017.
[2] H. Hsiao, “Energy saving planning and application for building sectors”, Energy saving technologies for building sectors conference, pp. 9 – 10, 2014. [3] S. K. Soni, “Ground coupled heat exchangers: A review and applications,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews; 47: 83-92, 2015. [4] J. Chen et al. Simulation and experimental analysis of optimal buried depth of the vertical U-tube ground heat exchanger for a ground-coupled heat pump system. Renewable Energy; 73: 46-54, 2015. [5] L. Ozgener. A review on the experimental and analytical analysis of earth to air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews; 15: 4483- 4490, 2011. [6] A. Tzaferis, D. Liparakis, M. Santamouris, and A. Argiriou, “Analysis of the accuracy and sensitivity of eight models to predict the performance of earth-to-air heat exchangers,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 1992. [7] H. Ben Jmaa Derbel and O. Kanoun, “Investigation of the ground thermal potential in tunisia focused towards heating and cooling applications,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1091–1100, 2010. [8] J. Pfafferott, “Evaluation of earth-to-air heat exchangers with a standardised method to calculate energy efficiency,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 971–983, 2003. [9] V. Badescu, “Simple and accurate model for the ground heat exchanger of a passive house,” Renewable Energy, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 845–855, 2007. [10] V. Bansal, R. Misra, G. D. Agrawal, and J. Mathur, “Performance analysis of earth-pipe-air heat exchanger for winter heating,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1151–1154, 2009 [11] V. Bansal, R. Misra, G. D. Agrawal, and J. Mathur, “Performance analysis of earth-pipe-air heat exchanger for summer cooling,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 645–648, 2010. [12] R. Misra, V. Bansal, G. D. Agrawal, J. Mathur, and T. K. Aseri, “CFD analysis based parametric study of derating factor for Earth Air Tunnel Heat Exchanger,” Applied Energy, vol. 103, pp. 266–277, 2013. [13] A. Flaga-Maryanczyka, J. Schnotale, J. Radon, and K. Was, “Experimental measurements and CFD simulation of a ground source heat exchanger operating at a cold climate for a passive house ventilation system,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 68, pp. 562–570, 2014. [14] L. Ramírez-Dávila, J. Xamán, J. Arce, G. Álvarez, and I. Hernández-Pérez, “Numerical study of earth-to-air heat exchanger for three different climates,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 76, pp. 238–248, 2014. [15] G. Mihalakakou, “On the heating potential of a single buried pipe using deterministic and intelligent techniques,” Renewable Energy, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 917–927, 2003. [16] F. Ascione et al, “Earth-to-air heat exchangers for Italian climates,” Renewable Energy; 36: 2177-2188, 2011. [17] K. H. Lee and R. K. Strand, “The cooling and heating potential of an earth tube system in buildings,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 486–494, 2008. [18] A. Serageldin, “Earth-Air Heat Exchanger thermal performance in Egyptian conditions: Experimental results, mathematical model, and Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation,” Energy Conversion and Management, 122, 25–38, 2016. [19] J. Vaz, M. A. Sattler, R. da S. Brum, E. D. dos Santos, L. A. Isoldi, 'An experimental study on the use of Earth-Air Heat Exchangers(EAHE),' Energy and Buildings, Vol. 72, pp. 122–131, 2014 [20] Bansal, Vikas, Rohit Misra, Ghanshyam Das Agrawal, and Jyotirmay Mathur. “Performance evaluation and economic analysis of integrated earth–air–tunnel heat exchanger–evaporative cooling system,” Energy and Buildings, 55: 102-08, 2012. [21] V. Badescu and D. Isvoranu, “Pneumatic and thermal design procedure and analysis of earth-to-air heat exchangers of registry type,” Applied Energy, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1266–1280, 2011. [22] J.-U. Lee, T. Kim, and S.-B. Leigh, “Applications of building-integrated coil-type ground-coupled heat exchangers—Comparison of performances of vertical and horizontal installations,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 93, pp. 99–109, 2015. [23] Y. Hamada, H. Saitoh, M. Nakamura, H. Kubota, and K. Ochifuji, “Field performance of an energy pile system for space heating,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 517–524, 2007. [24] J. Gao, X. Zhang, J. Liu, K. S. Li, and J. Yang, “Thermal performance and ground temperature of vertical pile-foundation heat exchangers: A case study,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 28, no. 17-18, pp. 2295–2304, 2008. [25] D. Bozis, K. Papakostas, and N. Kyriakis, “On the evaluation of design parameters effects on the heat transfer efficiency of energy piles,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1020–1029, 2011. [26] Jalaluddin, A. Miyara, K. Tsubaki, S. Inoue, and K. Yoshida, “Experimental study of several types of ground heat exchanger using a steel pile foundation,” Renewable Energy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 764–771, 2011. [27] H. Park, S.-R. Lee, S. Yoon, and J.-C. Choi, “Evaluation of thermal response and performance of PHC energy pile: Field experiments and numerical simulation,” Applied Energy, vol. 103, pp. 12–24, 2013. [28] Y. Nam and H.-B. Chae, “Numerical simulation for the optimum design of ground source heat pump system using building foundation as horizontal heat exchanger,” Energy, vol. 73, pp. 933–942, 2014. [29] Sethi, V. P., and S. K. Sharma. “Experimental and economic study of a greenhouse thermal control system using aquifer water”, Energy Conversion and Management, 48: 306-19, 2007. [30] Hsu, Chien-Yeh, Yuan-Ching Chiang, Zi-Jie Chien, and Sih-Li Chen. 'Investigation on performance of building-integrated earth-air heat exchanger', Energy and Buildings, 169: 444-52, 2018. [31] P. Hollmuller, “Analytical characterisation of amplitude-dampening and phase-shifting in air/soil heat-exchangers,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 46, no. 22, pp. 4303–4317, 2003. [32] J.A. Heyns, D.G. Kröger, “Experimental investigation into the thermal-flow performance characteristics of an evaporative cooler,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 30, pp. 492–498, 2010. [33] ASHRAE Handbook 2005, Fundamentals (SI), “PSYCHROMETRICS,” American Society of Heating and, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineer, Ch.6, pp.6.1–4.10, 2005. [34] Y. A. Cengel and A. J. Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications. McGraw-Hill Education, fifth ed., 2015. [35] S. V. Patankar and D. B. Spalding, “A Calculation Procedure for Heat, Mass and Momentum Transfer in Three-dimensional Parabolic Flows”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 5(1872), 1787-1806 [36] S. V. Patankar, “Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow”, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1980. [37] A. A. Serageldin, 'Earth-Air Heat Exchanger thermal performance: Experimental results, mathematical model, and Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation”, Energy Conversion and Management, 2016 [38] 'Standard statistics of annual weather', Central Weather bureau [39] M. Khabbaz, 'Experimental and numerical study of an earth-to-air heat exchanger for air cooling in a residential building in hot semi-arid climate', Energy and Buildings, 2016. [40] ASHRAE Handbook 2015, HVAC Applications, 'Geothermal Energy', Ch. 34, pp.6.10, 2015. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73766 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 地下淺層溫能空氣熱交換器(Earth air heat exchanger)是一種使用地表下的穩定溫度作為熱傳主體的低耗能外氣節能系統。其理論與實驗在全世界有許多的研究，但在台灣，其相關研究則相當稀少。本論文主要藉由數值模擬分析、探討，分別針對土壤式空氣熱交換器與水式空氣熱交換器進行研究。土壤式空氣熱交換器所進行的模擬主要設施包括了四支52.95 m長、直徑為0.15 m並埋於4.7 m深度的PVC空氣管道，規劃風量為3150 CMH，通風時間設定為9:00至21:00間啟動系統進行通風。水式空氣熱交換器則為三支75m長、直徑為0.15m並埋於9.5m深度的PVC空氣管道，以及規劃風量為990 CMH，通風時間為9:00至21:00間啟動系統通風。
本研究將使用ANSYS Fluent version 16.0進行模擬分析，得出系統隨時間之各物理狀態，包含進出口溫濕度變化，以計算出各地道風熱交換系統之節能效益。針對筏基水溫能系統與土壤溫能系統之各初始參數，設定為入風量、全年四季之引用外氣溫度、地道風系統隨外氣條件改變之入口相對濕度，經由計算結果得出全年各季引入外氣條件下，全年之地道風系統出口乾球溫度、系統出口相對濕度、熱傳導量、筏基水溫度分佈、風管周邊2 m的土壤溫度分佈。其中，可透過熱傳導量得知節能效率，例如本系統於夏季之冷卻效能與冬季之暖氣效果，以利往後相關系統於各場域之規劃，配合選定之場域氣候特徵，改變與調整相關系統之設置；亦可透過濕度之變化，得知潛熱熱傳對於本系統節能效率之佔比，以利往後相關系統之場域選定，以加強其節能效率。經由分析筏基水溫度分佈，可得出本地道風系統所影響之周圍筏基水庫，與系統最佳效率運轉週期，以維持周圍筏基水庫之較低水溫與較高之熱傳導率，保持本系統之節能效率。經由分析周遭土壤溫度分佈，可得出本地道風系統所影響之土壤範圍與其溫度影響幅度，規劃較合適之回填土種類，以維持周圍土壤之較低溫度、較高熱傳導率、以及較高自我溫度調節能力，保持本系統之最高節能效率。 透過數值模擬分析，對於管材鐵、銅、鋁、PVC進行探討，了解管材對於本系統之影響，以選定更為合適之管材，增加熱傳導效率與節能效率。亦可利用風管內引用外氣的溫度分佈，得出有效熱交換長度以利往後其他案例之應用；此外，雖然入風速增加可提升熱傳能力，但外氣與管材之熱交換時間也隨著減少，因此，透過數值模擬分析並得出最佳熱傳量之風速。本研究將對於風速2 m/s、5 m/s、9 m/s、12 m/s進行系統效能探討。最後，本研究探討筏基水溫21℃、23℃、25℃與其水量全滿、0.75滿、半滿，對於系統節能效率之影響，與系統停機時，水溫之回復能力。藉由以上設置，可透過模擬計算本系統之空氣溫濕度調節能力、本系統於各季之節能效率、系統最佳效率運轉週期、管材對於本系統之影響、有效熱交換長度、周圍土壤之影響範圍與較適合之回填土種類、最佳熱傳導量之風速、水溫與水量變化之影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The earth air heat exchanger (EAHE) is a low-energy ventilation technique using the stable temperature of earth. In the past decade, many experimental studies deal with the performance evaluation of EAHE system worldwide; however, in Taiwan these kinds of researches are still uncommon.
This research focus on the performance of soil-based EAHE and water-based EAHE using numerical methods. Soil-based EAHE includes 4 PVC air pipes each with 52.95m in length, 0.15m in diameter and buried 4.7m beneath ground surface. Its arranged ventilation is 3150 CMH, working 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Water-based EAHE consists of 3 PVC air pipes each with 75m in length, 0.15m in diameter and buried 9.5m underground. Its arranged ventilation is 990 CMH, working 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. This research uses ANSYS Fluent for simulating various system status over time. Initial conditions are ventilation, seasonal introduced air temperatures and seasonal introduced air humidity. After simulation, EAHE system’s seasonal outlet temperature, outlet humidity, heat transfer rates, temperature distributions in raft foundation water and soil of 2 meters around air pipes can be generated. Through heat transfer rates, seasonal energy saving efficiency can be recognized, such as cooling load in summer and heating load in winter, as well as the percentage of latent heat transfer rates through the examination of humidity difference. This analysis benefits future applications for selecting suitable areas to adjust and improve the energy saving efficiency of EAHE systems. By analyzing raft foundation water temperature distribution, the range of water affected by EAHE and its most efficient operating period can be recognized to maintain stable water temperature and its heat transfer rate for preserving EAHE’s energy saving efficiency. Through analyzing surrounding soil temperature distribution, the range and extent of soil affected by EAHE can be realized. Selecting suitable soil allows soil to maintain its stable temperature, heat transfer rates and its self-recovering ability to sustain EAHE’s energy saving efficiency. From simulation results, the influence of pipe materials, such as stainless steel, copper, aluminum and PVC on the performance of EAHE can be known, thus suitable pipe materials can be determined. From temperature distribution of introduced air within air pipes, effective length for regulating can be discerned for future applications. Besides, although increasing airflow velocities promotes heat transfer rates, heat exchange time between introduced air and air pipes also decreases. Therefore, through simulation, the optimal airflow velocities are discovered. Airflow velocities of 2m/s, 5 m/s, 9 m/s and 12 m/s are considered in this research. Finally, the influence of water temperature 21℃, 23℃, 25℃ and water storage of full, 0.75-full, half-full on the performance of EAHE and recovery during shut down period is discussed. By the simulation with mentioned settings, systems’ seasonal air regulation, energy saving efficiency, efficient operating period, influence of pipe materials, effective length, affected range of surrounding soil and water, suitable soil types, appropriate airflow velocities, the influence of water temperature and water storage can be acknowledged. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:09:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06522307-1.pdf: 9313165 bytes, checksum: a9a6f3b77ed1eaf7da48f6332b51266c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF TABLES xviii NOMENCLATURE xix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger 3 1.2 Literature Review 4 1.2.1 Soil-Based Earth-Air Heat Exchanger 4 1.2.2 Water-Based Earth-Air Heat Exchanger 8 1.3 Objectives and Outline 10 Chapter 2 Fundamental theories of simulation 11 2.1 Introduction of FLUENT 11 2.2 Theoretical model 11 2.2.1 Governing equations 11 2.2.2 Turbulent model 12 2.2.3 Eulerian Wall Film model 14 2.3 FLUENT calculating process 16 2.4 Numerical approach 17 2.4.1 FLUENT analyzing process 17 2.4.2 FLUENT Meshing 17 2.4.3 Discrete Equations 18 2.4.4 Algorithms 18 2.4.5 S.I.M.P.L.E. solution 19 2.4.6 Convergence standard 19 Chapter 3 Soil-based Earth-Air Heat Exchanger 21 3.1 Theoretical Background 21 3.1.1 Conductive Heat Transfer 21 3.1.2 Forced Convective heat transfer 22 3.2 Heat and Moisture Transfer Model of EAHE 23 3.2.1 Governing Equations of Temperature 25 3.2.2 Formulation of Coupled Heat and Moisture Transfer 26 3.3 In-Situ Experimental Setup 30 3.4 Numerical simulation setup 34 3.4.1 Geometry and mesh setup 34 3.4.2 Simulation setup 38 3.5 Mesh test 48 3.6 Validation of EAHE Model 50 3.7 Results 51 3.7.1 Introduced ambient air over seasons 51 3.7.2 Influence of pipe materials 99 3.7.3 Influence of airflow velocities 102 3.7.4 Influence of soil types 105 3.7.5 Appropriate length with various airflow velocities 108 Chapter 4 Water-based Earth-Air Heat Exchanger 109 4.1 Theoretical Background 109 4.2 Simplified model of Water-based EAHE 110 4.3 In-Situ Experimental Setup 114 4.4 Numerical simulation setup 119 4.4.1 Geometry and mesh setup 119 4.4.2 Simulation setup 124 4.5 Mesh test 136 4.6 Validation of EAHE Model 137 4.7 Results 139 4.7.1 Introduced ambient air over seasons 140 4.7.2 Influence of pipe materials 167 4.7.3 Influence of airflow velocities 170 4.7.4 Influence of water temperature 173 4.7.5 Influence of water storage 176 4.7.6 Appropriate length with various airflow velocities 179 Chapter 5 Economic Aspect of EAHE systems 180 Chapter 6 Conclusions and Further research 182 REFERENCES 186 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 利用淺層溫能之地道風節能系統數值模擬與性能研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The simulation and analysis of energy saving EAHE system using shallow geothermal energy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李文興(Wen-Shing Lee),王榮昌(Jung-Chang Wang),陳輝俊(Hui-Jiunn Chen),張至中(Chih-Chung Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 地下空氣熱交換器,淺層溫能,外氣處理,通風空調,筏式基礎, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | earth-air heat exchanger,shallow geothermal energy,air pretreatment,ventilation,raft foundation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 190 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201903851 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 9.09 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。