請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73611
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童慶斌 | |
dc.contributor.author | Meng-Hui Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林孟慧 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:06:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adams, B., & Judd, K. (n.d.). Indicator framework, monitoring and reportng. 5.
AghaKouchak, A., Feldman, D., Hoerling, M., Huxman, T., & Lund, J. (2015). Water and climate: Recognize anthropogenic drought. Nature News, 524(7566), 409. Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1453–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3 Allen, Cameron, Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2016). National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008 Allen, Cameron, Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2019). Prioritising SDG targets: Assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 421–438. Bidegain Ponte, N., & Enríquez, C. R. (2016). Agenda 2030: A bold enough framework towards sustainable, gender-just development? Gender & Development, 24(1), 83–98. Biswas, A. K. (2004). Integrated water resources management: A reassessment: A water forum contribution. Water International, 29(2), 248–256. Board, F. S. (2016). Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Financial Stability Board, Basel, Switzerland. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. Carter, T. R., Parry, M., & Harasawa, H. (1994). IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptations. Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change. Climate ADAPT. (n.d.). Adaptation Support Tool. Retrieved May 10, 2019, from https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/knowledge/tools/adaptation-support-tool Collste, D., Pedercini, M., & Cornell, S. E. (2017). Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: Using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0457-x Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Paavola, J., Sari, I. M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., … Kusumadewi, S. D. (2017). Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science and Policy, 67, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.004 Dickens, C., Smakhtin, V., McCartney, M., O’Brien, G., & Dahir, L. (2019). Defining and Quantifying National-Level Targets, Indicators and Benchmarks for Management of Natural Resources to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 11(2), 462. Elder, M., Bengtsson, M., & Akenji, L. (2016a). An optimistic analysis of the means of implementation for sustainable development goals: Thinking about goals as means. Sustainability, 8(9), 962. Few, R., Martin, A., & Gross-Camp, N. (2017). Trade-offs in linking adaptation and mitigation in the forests of the Congo Basin. Regional Environmental Change, 17(3), 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1080-6 Forrester, J. W. (1973). Principles of systems: Text and workbook. Fritsche, U. (2018). Linkages between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the GBEP Sustainability Indictors for Bioenergy (GSI). Technical Paper for the GBEP Task Force on Sustainability. IINAS & IFEU. Darmstadt & Heidelberg: URL: Http://Iinas. Org/Tl_files/Iinas/Downloads/Bio/IINAS_IFEU_2018_Linkages_SDGs_and_GS Is. Pdf (Gesehen Am: 27.03. 2018). Fuso Nerini, F., Tomei, J., To, L. S., Bisaga, I., Parikh, P., Black, M., … Mulugetta, Y. (2018). Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Energy, 3(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5 Gomez-Echeverri, L. (2018). Climate and development: Enhancing impact through stronger linkages in the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2119), 20160444. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0444 Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. Griggs, D., Stafford Smith, M., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Gaffney, O., Glaser, G., … Shyamsundar, P. (2014). An integrated framework for sustainable development goals. Ecology and Society, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07082-190449 Guppy, L., Mehta, P., & Qadir, M. (2019). Sustainable development goal 6: Two gaps in the race for indicators. Sustainability Science, 1–13. Gusmão Caiado, R. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., Luiz de Mattos Nascimento, D., & Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1276–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102 Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & ter Maat, J. (2013). Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006 Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. Hui, C. (2006). Carrying capacity, population equilibrium, and environment’s maximal load. Ecological Modelling, 192(1–2), 317–320. International Risk Governance Council. (2017). An introduction to the IRGC risk governance framework (Revised Version 2017). International Risk Governance Council. IPCC. (2014a). AR5 Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from Cambridge University Press website: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/ IPCC. (2014b). AR5 Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from Cambridge University Press website: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf IPCC. (2018). SPECIAL REPORT on Global Warming of 1.5 oC. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ Isoard, S., & Winograd, M. (2013). Adaptation in Europe: Addressing risks and opportunities from climate change in the context of socio-economic developments. Publications Office of the European Union. Klein, R. J., Schipper, E. L. F., & Dessai, S. (2005). Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: Three research questions. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(6), 579–588. Konrad, M. T., Andersen, H. E., Gyldenkærne, S., & Termansen, M. (2017). Synergies and trade-offs in spatially targeted water quality and climate change mitigation policies. Land Economics, 93(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.2.309 Kroll, C. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: Are the rich countries ready? Bertelsmann Stiftung. Kumar, S., Kumar, N., & Vivekadhish, S. (2016). Millennium development goals (MDGS) to sustainable development goals (SDGS): Addressing unfinished agenda and strengthening sustainable development and partnership. Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 41(1), 1. Kurniawan, R., & Managi, S. (2017). Sustainable Development and Performance Measurement: Global Productivity Decomposition: Sustainable Development and Performance Measurement. Sustainable Development, 25(6), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1684 Landauer, M., Juhola, S., & Söderholm, M. (2015). Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation: A systematic literature review. Climatic Change, 131(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1395-1 Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I. C., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., … Arond, E. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 11. Lee, C.-C., Tung, C.-P., Liu, T.-M., Tsao, J.-H., Liu, G.-R., Chiang, Y.-C., & Huang, K.-C. (2015). Toward an innovative interdisciplinary method for vulnerability assessments: The case of Taiwan. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 6(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2014.256 Lim, B., Spanger-Siegfried, E., Burton, I., Malone, E., & Huq, S. (2004). Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Mainali, B., Luukkanen, J., Silveira, S., & Kaivo-oja, J. (2018). Evaluating Synergies and Trade-Offs among Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Explorative Analyses of Development Paths in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 10(3), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030815 Maru, Y. T., Smith, M. S., Sparrow, A., Pinho, P. F., & Dube, O. P. (2014). A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation pathways in remote disadvantaged communities. Global Environmental Change, 28, 337–350. May, P. J., Sapotichne, J., & Workman, S. (2006). Policy coherence and policy domains. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 381–403. McCollum, D., Gomez Echeverri, L., Riahi, K., & Parkinson, S. (2017). Sdg7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. McCollum, D. L., Echeverri, L. G., Busch, S., Pachauri, S., Parkinson, S., Rogelj, J., … Riahi, K. (2018). Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3), 033006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3 Moinuddin, M. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals Interlinkages and Network Analysis: A practical tool for SDG integration and policy coherence. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. Netherlands Statistics. (2016). Measuring the SDGs: An initial picture from the Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands. Nilsson, M. (2017). Important Interactions Among the Sustainable Development Goals under Review at the High-level Political Forum 2017 Working Paper No. 2017–06. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute. Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534, 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a Novotny, V. (1994). Water quality: Prevention, identification and management of diffuse pollution. Van Nostrand-Reinhold Publishers. Onda, K., LoBuglio, J., & Bartram, J. (2012). Global access to safe water: Accounting for water quality and the resulting impact on MDG progress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(3), 880–894. O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Ebi, K. L., Hallegatte, S., Carter, T. R., … van Vuuren, D. P. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 122(3), 387–400. Padgham, J. (2009). Agricultural development under a changing climate: Opportunities and challenges for adaptation. World Bank. Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions: A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF SDG INTERACTIONS. Earth’s Future, 5(11), 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632 Preston, B. L., Westaway, R. M., & Yuen, E. J. (2011). Climate adaptation planning in practice: An evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(4), 407–438. Sakiko Fukuda-Parr. (2018). Voluntary National Review Reports– what do they report? CDP Working Paper. Schmidt, T., Allison, C., Iliffe, M., Crawford, M., & Manolova, I. (2019). Transition risk framework: Managing the impacts of the low carbon transition on infrastructure investments. ERM. SDSN. (2015). Indicators and a Monitoring Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals: Launching a data revolution for the SDGs. Retrieved from Sustainable Development Solutions Network website: http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/FINAL-SDSN-Indicator-Report-WEB.pdf Shepherd, K., Hubbard, D., Fenton, N., Claxton, K., Luedeling, E., & de Leeuw, J. (2015). Policy: Development goals should enable decision-making. Nature News, 523(7559), 152. Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292. Spangenberg, J. H., Pfahl, S., & Deller, K. (2002). Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: Lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21. Ecological Indicators, 2(1–2), 61–77. Sultana, F. (2018). Water justice: Why it matters and how to achieve it. Water International, 43(4), 483–493. Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder (Vol. 3). Random House Incorporated. Thornton, T. F., & Comberti, C. (2017). Synergies and trade-offs between adaptation, mitigation and development. Climatic Change, 140(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0884-3 Tosun, J., & Leininger, J. (2017). Governing the interlinkages between the sustainable development goals: Approaches to attain policy integration. Global Challenges, 1(9), 1700036. Tung, C.-P., Tsao, J.-H., Tien, Y.-C., Lin, C.-Y., & Jhong, B.-C. (2019). Development of a Novel Climate Adaptation Algorithm for Climate Risk Assessment. Water, 11(3), 497. UKCIP. (2010). The UKCIP Adaptation Wizard. Retrieved from https://ukcip.ouce.ox.ac.uk/wizard/ UN Water. (2016a). STEP-BY-STEP MONITORING METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR 6.3.1 DRAFT. UN Water. (2016b). STEP-BY-STEP MONITORING METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR 6.4.2. Retrieved from http://www.unwater.org/publications/step-step-methodology-monitoring-water-stress-6-4-2/ UN Water. (2016c). STEP-BY-STEP MONITORING METHODOLOGY FOR SDG INDICATOR 6.5.1. Retrieved from http://www.unwater.org/publications/step-step-methodology-monitoring-integrated-water-resources-management-6-5-1/ UN Water. (2017a). STEP-BY-STEP MONITORING METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR 6.5.2. Retrieved from http://www.unwater.org/publications/step-step-methodology-monitoring-transboundary-cooperation-6-5-2/ UN Water. (2017b). STEP-BY-STEP MONITORING METHODOLOGY FOR SDG INDICATOR 6.6.1. Retrieved from http://www.unwater.org/publications/step-step-methodology-monitoring-ecosystems-6-6-1/ UN Water. (2018a). STEP-BY-STEP MONITORING METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR 6.3.2. Retrieved from http://www.unwater.org/publications/step-step-methodology-monitoring-water-quality-6-3-2/ UN Water. (2018b). STEP-BY-STEP MONITORING METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR 6.4.1. Retrieved from http://www.unwater.org/publications/step-step-methodology-monitoring-water-use-efficiency-6-4-1/ Unesco (Ed.). (2015). Water for a sustainable world. UNESCO. UNFCCC. (n.d.). What do adaptation to climate change and climate resilience mean? Retrieved May 12, 2019, from United Nations Climate Change website: https://unfccc.int/adaptation/items/4159.php United Nations. (1992a). Agenda 21. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21 United Nations. (1992b). Rio declaration on environment and development. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/RIO_E.PDF United Nations. (1992c). UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process/convention/what-united-nations-framework-convention-climate-change United Nations. (2015a). The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York: United Nations. United Nations. (2015b). The Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf United Nations. (2015c). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication van Noordwijk, M. (2017). Integrated natural resource management as pathway to poverty reduction: Innovating practices, institutions and policies. Agricultural Systems. von Stechow, C., Minx, J. C., Riahi, K., Jewell, J., McCollum, D. L., Callaghan, M. W., … Baiocchi, G. (2016a). 2° C and SDGs: United they stand, divided they fall? Environmental Research Letters, 11(3), 034022. Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., … Liermann, C. R. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467(7315), 555. Waage, J., Banerji, R., Campbell, O., Chirwa, E., Collender, G., Dieltiens, V., … Unterhalter, E. (2010). The Millennium Development Goals: A cross-sectoral analysis and principles for goal setting after 2015. The Lancet, 376(9745), 991–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61196-8 Weitz, N., Carlsen, H., Nilsson, M., & Skånberg, K. (2018). Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 agenda. Sustainability Science, 13(2), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0470-0 Westcott, M., Ward, J., Surminski, S., Sayers, P., & Bresch, D. N. (2019). Physical risk framework: Understanding the impacts of climate change on real estate lending and investment portfolios. ETH Zurich. Willows, R., Reynard, N., Meadowcroft, I., & Connell, R. (2003). Climate adaptation: Risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP Technical Report. Retrieved from UK Climate Impacts Programme website: https://www.ukcip.org.uk/wp-content/PDFs/UKCIP-Risk-framework.pdf World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press. Yokota, F., & Thompson, K. M. (2004). Value of information analysis in environmental health risk management decisions: Past, present, and future. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 24(3), 635–650. Zhou, X., & Moinuddin, M. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals Interlinkages and Network Analysis: A practical tool for SDG integration and policy coherence. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. 周新, 馮天天, & 徐明. (2018). 基於網絡系統的結構分析和統計學方法建構中國可持續發展目標的關鍵目標與核心指標. 33(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.16418 徐晃雄, 周 佳, 陳維婷, 羅敏輝, 李明安, 洪志誠, … 鄭兆尊. (2017). 臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2017——物理現象與機制. 台北市: 國家災害防救科技中心. 林裕彬, 蘇明道, 鄭克聲, 張良正, 洪念民, & 何智超. (2013). 臺灣地區各水資源分區因應氣候變遷水資源管理調適能力綜合研究. 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所. 童慶斌, 劉子明, 林嘉佑, 曹榮軒, & 李明旭. (2015). 氣候變遷水資源風險評估與調適決策之探討. 土木水利, 42(4), 30–45. 童慶斌, 李明旭, 蘇慧貞, 盧虎生, 林李耀, & 林幸助. (2016). 氣候變遷調適科技整合研究計畫(TaiCCAT)-跨領域脆弱度評估與回復力建構科技發展計畫(III). Retrieved from 科技部 website: https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=11398997 行政院永續發展委員會. (2016). 永續發展政策綱領. Retrieved from https://nsdn.epa.gov.tw/Nsdn_Article_Page.aspx?midnb1=BB&midnb2=B4&midnb3=0&midnb4=0 資誠. (2017). 邁向SDGs新經濟 企業找對方法了嗎?. Retrieved December 2, 2017, from 天下雜誌 website: https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5086373 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73611 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著工業革命以降的人類經濟發展,人為影響氣候變遷的程度逐漸增加,氣候變遷造成的全球平均升溫使得不同面向氣候風險也隨之增加,各種極端天氣的發生讓人類在環境、經濟、社會等三大永續發展面向面臨許多挑戰。因此希望藉由氣候調適行動讓人類可以為氣候變遷帶來的挑戰做足準備,藉以降低氣候風險,邁向永續發展。2015年聯合國通過的《巴黎協議》及《2030年議程》更是強調了氣候變遷及永續發展議題對現在人類的重要性,並須加速行動。
然而,在行動之前需要經歷完整的評估過程,了解議題因子間的互動關係,得以確保決策的合理性。因此本研究提出氣候調適及《2030年議程》提出的17項永續發展目標的決策整合框架,試圖發展得以評估跨領域、跨部門、不同國情、多元調適方案的評估方法與工具,確保氣候調適(Adapt-)不與永續發展目標(SDGs)偏離,而成「AdaptSDGs」。 AdaptSDGs的組成包含四個納入SDGs的氣候調適評估步驟(界定問題與設定目標、評估與分析現況風險、評估與分析未來風險、界定與評估調適選項)及四個輔助工具(氣候風險模板、研究方法樹狀圖、關鍵子目標互動系統、風險因子互動系統)所成的工具組,建構系統性科學分析方法與流程,使氣候調適及永續發展目標的決策具有科學支持。 本研究以臺灣對應SDG 6的水資源領域中的關鍵議題——「水資源供需平衡」的氣候調適評估進行AdaptSDGs的決策過程演示,以氣候風險模板分析關鍵議題的風險因子;利用研究方法樹狀圖決定以「專家問卷法」來進行臺灣的SDG 6子目標間的互動關係研究,問卷產出用於建立關鍵議題子目標互動系統;系統動力工具Vensim所建立的關鍵議題子目標互動系統,用來評估了解子目標間的權衡、協同、衝突等互動關係,幫助降低執行方案可能產生的子目標間衝突,增進氣候調適對永續發展之助益;同樣利用Vensim建構的風險因子互動系統則是幫助評估關鍵議題的氣候風險對SDGs指標表現的影響,藉此將氣候變遷因素加進國家SDGs的2030年目標訂定之中,確保目標訂定的合理性。 評估臺灣分區水資源調適方案於關鍵子目標「6.4:提高用水效率,確保可持續取用和供應淡水」的達標能力,對「6.1:普遍獲得安全飲用水」、「6.2:人人享有適當和公平的衛生條件」、「6.5:在各級進行水資源綜合管理」、「6.b:支持和加強地方社區參與改進水和環境衛生管理」、「1.a:為發展中國家提供充足可消除一切貧困的執行相關計畫和政策」、「11.1:人人獲得負擔得起的住房和基本服務」產生較大程度的正向影響,但造成「8.2:發展高附加值和勞動密集型行業,提升經濟生產力」的負向發展。 本研究提出AdaptSDGs作為氣候調適與永續發展目標的決策整合框架,雖工具建構上有不盡人意之處,但在案例研究後,已掌握可改善之處,期盼未來持續改善,協助完成氣候調適及SDGs決策的科學分析。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | After the industrial revolution, human's economic development is growing with a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions. The human influence on climate change cause different kinds of climate risks increasing, and here come much more challenges about sustainable development than ever, while various extreme weather events are happening. Therefore, climate adaptation makes people to prepare as enough as possible for the impact of climate change and to reduce the risk to sustainable development. It also emphasized the importance of climate change and sustainable development issues to human, and people have to accelerate the climate actions in The Paris Agreement and 2030 Agenda in 2015.
However, it needs complete accessing progress tp know the interaction between the factors of issues to make sure the relationship of decision-making. Thereby, this study provides an integrated decision-making framework, AdaptSDGs, for climate adaptation and 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) from 2030 Agenda. Moreover, AdaptSDGs aims to develop the accessing methods and tools for interdisciplinary, interdepartmental, diversified adaptation plans with its national conditions to ensure the adaptation plans would not lead to deviation from sustainable development.AdaptSDGs includes four climate adaptation accessing steps with the approach of SDGs (identifying problems and goals, assessing current climate risk, assessing future climate risk, identifying adaptation options) and a tool kit with four supporting tools (climate risk templates, research method tree, key targets interaction system, and risk factor interaction system) to build up systematic scientific analysis methods and processes for the scientific supports on the decision-making of climate adaptation and SDGs. This study takes Water supply and demand balance, the critical issue of SDG 6 in Taiwan to demonstrate how to do climate adaptation assessments with AdaptSDGs — deconstructing climate risk factors of the critical issue with climate risk template; research method tree guides to research the interaction of SDG 6 in Taiwan by 'expert questionnaire'; the result of export questionnaire is used to build up the Key Targets Interaction System (KTIS) with system dynamic tool, Vensim; Key Targets Interaction System (KTIS) helps to set up to address the trade-offs and synergies between SDG targets so as to reduce the conflicts between SDG targets from climate adaptation plans and to increase the benefits of climate adaptation to sustainable development; risk Factor Interaction System (RFIS) aims to assess the impact of climate risk on the performance of SDGs of critical issues, thereby adding climate change factors to the 2030 target of national SDGs to ensure the rationality of target setting with Vensim. Assessing the compliance of the Taiwan's regional water resources adaptation program with key sub-targets '6.4: Improving water efficiency, ensuring sustainable access and supply of fresh water', '6.1: Universal access to safe drinking water', '6.2: Appropriate for everyone and Fair sanitary conditions', '6.5: Integrated water resources management at all levels', '6.b: Support and strengthen local community participation in improving water and sanitation management', '1.a: Providing sufficient capacity for developing countries 'Executing related plans and policies for all poverty', '11.1: Access to affordable housing and basic services for all' has a significant positive impact, but results in '8.2: Developing high value-added and labor-intensive industries To promote the negative development of economic productivity. This study proposes AdaptSDGs as a decision-making integration framework for climate adaptation and sustainable development goals. Although there are some unsatisfactory tools in the construction of the tool, after the case study, we can grasp the improvement, and hope for continuous improvement in the future to help complete the climate — scientific analysis of adaptation and SDGs decision making. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:06:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06247004-1.pdf: 6898610 bytes, checksum: c65919127afe591e4168eb88967b79b2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 II
摘要 IV Abstract VI 目錄 VIII 圖目錄 XI 表目錄 XIII 第一章、 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.1.1 氣候變遷與永續發展 1 1.1.2 氣候變遷水資源管理的風險與調適 3 1.2 研究目的與研究問題 4 1.2.1 研究目的 4 1.2.2 研究問題 5 1.3 論文架構 5 第二章、 文獻回顧與探討 7 2.1 氣候變遷調適 7 2.1.1 氣候變遷風險與調適 8 2.1.2 氣候調適框架 10 2.2 永續發展 12 2.2.1 歷史脈絡演進 12 2.2.2 SDGs的機制 13 2.3 氣候變遷下的SDG 6——淨水與衛生 15 2.3.1 SDG 6的永續發展內涵 15 2.3.2 氣候變遷與水資源管理 16 2.4 跨領域議題評估方法 16 2.4.1 SDGs互動關係評估方法論 17 2.4.2 跨領域分析工具——系統動力模式 17 第三章、 AdaptSDGs框架與研究方法 20 3.1 AdaptSDGs框架發展原則 20 3.2 建構AdaptSDGs 框架 21 3.2.1 氣候調適演算法 21 3.2.2 AdaptSDGs框架介紹 22 3.3 AdaptSDGs工具組介紹 23 3.3.1 氣候風險模板 23 3.3.2 研究方法樹狀圖 24 3.3.3 關鍵子目標互動系統 28 3.3.4 風險因子互動系統 29 3.4 AdaptSDGs評估步驟詳述 31 3.4.1 步驟一:界定問題與設定目標 31 3.4.2 步驟二:評估與分析現況風險 32 3.4.3 步驟三:評估與分析未來風險 34 3.4.4 步驟四:界定與評估調適選項 35 第四章、 AdaptSDGs工具組輔助案例探討 37 4.1 背景概述 37 4.2 「水資源供需平衡」的氣候風險模板分析 39 4.3 建立「水資源供需平衡」之KTIS 41 4.3.1 決定研究策略 41 4.3.2 建立子目標間連結 43 4.3.3 判斷作用方向性、呈現影響強度:專家問卷 44 4.3.4 建立KTIS:系統動力模式 46 4.4 建立「水資源供需平衡」的RFIS 49 4.4.1 臺灣水資源供水系統動力模式 49 4.4.2 納入關鍵子目標之指標變數 52 4.5 KTIS評估「水資源供需平衡」的調適選項 59 4.5.1 統整潛在調適選項 60 4.5.2 設定KTIS初始值,進行模擬 62 第五章、 結果與討論 64 5.1 專家問卷 64 5.1.1 子目標間互動組合結果分析 64 5.1.2 互動強度結果 65 5.2 KTIS評估調適選項 65 5.3 小結 66 第六章、 結論與建議 67 6.1 結論 67 6.2 建議 69 參考文獻 72 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 氣候調適與聯合國永續發展目標決策整合框架:以臺灣水資源永續發展目標為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Integrated Decision Framework on Climate Adaptation and UN SDGs: SDG 6 in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳金鏞,李明旭 | |
dc.subject.keyword | AdaptSDGs,氣候變遷決策,系統動力模式,水資源管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | AdaptSDGs,climate change decision-making,system dynamic model,water resource management, | en |
dc.relation.page | 83 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904036 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.74 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。