Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7336
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李吉仁
dc.contributor.authorYu-Te Liuen
dc.contributor.author柳育德zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-19T17:41:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-11
dc.date.available2021-05-19T17:41:43Z-
dc.date.copyright2019-07-11
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-07-02
dc.identifier.citationAlsos, G.A., Hytti, U., & Solvoll, S. (2016). Entrepreneurs’ social identity and the preference of causal and effectual behaviours in Start-Up Processes. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28, 234-258.
Alvord, S.H., Brown, L.D., & Letts, C.W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and social transformation. The journal of applied behavioral science, 40(3), 260-282
Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory- assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 630–651.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2012). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 47(3), 370-384.
Bagozzi, R.P., & Dholakia, U. (1999). Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 63, 19-32.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review 84, 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E.A., (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(1), 87-99.
Baron, R. A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 275-294.
Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 328–340.
Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52(9), 1331–1344.
Baum, J.B., & Locke, E.A., (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skills, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of applied psychology, 89(4), 587-598.
Behrens, J., & Patzelt, H. (2017). Corporate entrepreneurship managers’ project terminations: Integrating portfolio-level, individual-level, and firm-level effects. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
Berends, H., Jelinek., M., Reyman, I., & Stultiens, R. (2014). Product innovation processes in small firms: Combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 616-635.
Birley, S., & Westhead, P., (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 7-31.
Boyd N.G., & Vozikis G.S. (1994). The Influence of Self-Efficacy on the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18, 63–77.
Cardon, M.S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matheme, B., & Davis, C. (2005). A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 23-45.
Carsrud, A. & Brannback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial Motivations: What do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9-26.
Carsrud, A., Brannback, M., Elfving J., & Brandt K. (2017). Motivations: the entrepreneurial mind and behavior. Revisiting The Entrepreneurial Mind, Springer. Ch13, 185-209.
Carter, N. M., Gartner, W.B., Shaver, K.G., & Gatewood, E.J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 18, 13-39.
Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390.
Chen, C.C., Greene, P,G,, & Crick, A. (1998). Does Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy Distinguish Entrepreneurs from Managers? Journal of Business Venturing 13, 295–316.
Choi, Y.R., & Shepherd, D.A. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of Management, 30(3), 378-395.
Dacin, M.T., Dacin, P.A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future direction. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S.D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 287–309.
DeTienne, D.R., Shepherd, D.A., & DeCastro, J.O., (2008). The fallacy of “only the strong survive”: the effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions for under-performing firms. Journal of Business. Venturing, 23 (5), 528–546.
DeTienne, D. R., & Chandler, G. N. (2010). The impact of motivation and causation and effectuation approaches on exit strategy. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30(1), 1–13.
DeTienne D.R., McKelvie, A., Chandler, G.N., (2015). Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test. Journal of Business Venturing, 30. 255-272
Douglas, E. J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 231–251.
Dunkelberg, W., Moore, C., Scott, J., & Stull, W. (2013). Do entrepreneurial goals matter? Resource allocation in new owner-managed firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 225-240.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Engel, Y., Dimitrova, N.G., Khapova, S.N., & Elfring, T. (2014). Uncertain but able: Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and novices’ use of expert decision-logic under uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 1, 12–17.
Engel, Y., Burg, E., Kleijn, E., & Khapova, S.N. (2017). Past career in future thinking: How career management practices shape entrepreneurial thinking. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(2), 122-144.
Fauchart, E. & Gruber, M. (2011). Dawinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935-957.
Fayolle, A. (2013). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25, 692-701.
Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2016). Theory evaluation, entrepreneurial processes, and performativity. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 544–549.
Golden, B.R., (1992). The Past Is the Past--Or Is It? The Use of Retrospective Accounts as Indicators of past Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 848-860.
Gupta, K. V., Chiles, H. T., & McMullen, S. J. (2016). A process perspective on evaluating and con- ducting effectual entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 540–544.
Harms, R., & Schiele, H. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 95–116.
Haynie, J.M., Shepherd, D.A., & McMullen, J.S. (2009). An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of management studies, 46(3), 337-361.
Jiang, Y., & Rüling, C.-C. (2019). Opening the Black Box of Effectuation Processes: Characteristics and Dominant Types. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 43(1), 171-202.
Johansson, A., & McKelvie, A. (2012). Unpacking the antecedents of effectuation and causation in a corporate context. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 32(17), 1-15.
Laine, I., & Galkina, T. (2017). The interplay of effectuation and causation in decision-making: Russian SMEs under institutional uncertainty. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, 905-941.
Langley A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
March, J.G., & Simon, H.A., (1958). Organizations. New York
Mitchell, R. K., Smith, J. B., Morse, E. A., Seawright, K. W., Peredo, A. M., & McKenzie, B. (2002). Are entrepreneurial cognitions universal? Assessing entrepreneurial cognitions across cultures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 9–32
Mitchell, J. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 138–154.
Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Murneiks, C.Y., Mosakowski, E., & Cardon, M.S., (2014). Pathways of Passion: Identity Centrality, Passion, and Behavior Among Entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1583-1606.
Perry, J. T., Chandler, G. N., & Markova, G. (2012). Entrepreneurial effectuation: a review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4), 837–861.
Pettigrew, A. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organizational Sciences, 1(3), 267-292.
Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S.D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. Journal of Private Equity, 9, 45–62.
Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Song, M., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: the logic of an effectual approach. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 1–18.
Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Wiltbank, R. (2016). Response to Arend, Sarooghi, and Burkemper (2015): Co-creating effectual entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 528–536.
Reymen, I., Andries, P., Berends, H., Mauer, R., Stephan, U., & van Burg, E. (2015). Understanding dynamics of strategic decision-making in venture creation: a process study of effectuation and causation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(4), 351–379.
Reynolds, P. D., W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio, L. Cox, & M. Hay (2002). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2002, Executive Report. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.
Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review 26(2): 243–263.
Sarasvathy, S.D. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 203–220.
Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005). Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21, 385–406.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Sciences New York (Vol. 2010). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sarasvathy, S., & Dew, N. (2008). Effectuation and over-trust: debating Goel and Karri. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 727–737.
Sarasvathy, S.D., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113–135.
Scott, W.R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 257-279.
Shepherd, D., Patzelt, H., & Baron, R. (2013). “I care about nature, but ...”: Disengaging values in assessing opportunities that cause harm. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1251–1273.
Shepherd, D.A., Williams, T.A., & Patzelt, H. (2014). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision-making: review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 1-36.
Shepherd, D.A., & Patzelt, H. (2017). Researching Entrepreneurial Decision-making Trailblazing in Entrepreneurship (pp. 257-285): Springer.
Simon, H.A. (1964). On the concept of organizational goal. Administrative science quarterly, 9: 1–22.
Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative Behavior: A study of decision-making process in administrative organizations. 4th ed, New York: Free Press.
Sitoh, M.K., Pan, S.L., & Yu, C.Y. (2014). Business models and tactics in new product creation: The interplay of effectuation and causation processes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61, 213–224.
Smolka, K.M., Verheul, I., Burmeister-Lamp, K., & Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. (2016). Get it together! Synergistic effects of causal and effectual decision-making logics on venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 40, 1-34.
Stroe, S., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2018). Effectuation or causation: An fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self-efficacy. Journal of Business Research. 89, 265-272.
Tan, W., Williams, J., & Tan, T., (2005). Defining the ‘social’ in ‘social entrepreneurship’: Altruism and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 353-365.
Tseng E.W.K. (1998). Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64-73.
Townsend, D.M., Busenitz, L.W., & Arthurs, J.D., (2010). To start or not to start: Outcome and ability expectations in the decision to start a new venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 192-202.
VanSandt, C.V., Sud, M., & Marme, C., (2009). Enabling the Original Intent: Catalysts for Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 419-428.
Villani, E., Linder, C., & Grimaldi, R. (2018). Effectuation and causation in science-based new venture creation: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Research, 83, 173-185.
Welter, C., Mauer, R., & Wuebker, R. J. (2016). Bridging behavioral models and theoretical concepts: effectuation and bricolage in the opportunity creation framework. Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 10(1), 5-20.
Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D.R., Cardon, M.S., (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25. 361-375.
Williams, D. W., & Grégoire, D. A. (2014). Seeking commonalities or avoiding differences? Re-conceptualizing distance and its effects on internationalization decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 253–284.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
York, J. G., O'Neil, I., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2016). Exploring environmental entrepreneurship: identity coupling, venture goals, and stakeholder incentives. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 695-737.
Wood R.E., & Bandura A. (1989). Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 407-415.
Zhao H., Seibert, S.E., & Lumpkin, G.T., (2010). The Relationship of Personality to Entrepreneurial Intentions and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381-404.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7336-
dc.description.abstract新創事業處於高度不確定性、資源稀少、目標模糊的脈絡之下,創業家因此需要面臨極大的決策壓力與挑戰。對創業家而言,每個決策都攸關公司行進的軌跡與成敗的命運。創業研究學者以往投注許多心力在研究創業家的決策邏輯,其中又以Sarasvathy(2001及2008)所提出的實效理論(Effectuation Theory) 最受到研究關注,她主張在新創脈絡之下,創業家決策通常採取資源導向邏輯,而非傳統的目標導向邏輯。實效理論自提出後累積相當多的理論討論與實證研究,然而,在諸多針對實效理論的討論中,依然無法針對一個核心問題提出清楚的解釋,那就是,為何創業家會在相同的決策情境下,使用不同的決策邏輯?
本論文以探索性的研究方法,提出目前在實效理論研究中較少觸及的「創業初心」 (Original Aspiration) 這個概念,及其對創業決策的影響,希望能夠為前述問題提出更多的洞見。我們定義「創業初心」為創業家開啟創業旅程的初衷。面對將要來臨的眾多挑戰,創業家懷抱堅定且強大的初心,方能義無反顧投入每段事業旅程。我們透過多重個案研究法,歷經三年時間,收集了八家臺灣新創公司的142個關鍵決策,並進一步訪談挖掘每個決策背後的邏輯。
我們發現創業初心與一般短期的動機與目標不同。初心是創業家眾多關鍵決策的判準原則,亦有持續不易異動的特性。我們進一步整理關鍵決策並進行跨個案比較,發現初心又分為商業導向 (commercial-centric) 及非商業導向 (non-commercial-centric),並對於創業家使用實效邏輯進行決策的傾向 (tendency) 產生不同影響。我們的研究顯示,非商業導向的初心使得創業家有較高傾向採用實效邏輯;反之,商業導向初心則有較高傾向使用目標導向的決策邏輯 (causation)。此外,對於目標模糊性 (attitude toward goal ambiguity) 及合作夥伴的態度 (attitude toward partnership) 為解釋初心如何影響實效傾向的重要因子。最後,本論文根據上述發現建立一個概念性的架構,以完整描繪初心與實效決策傾向之間的關聯,並提出對創業研究與實效理論進一步發展的潛在貢獻。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUnder entrepreneurial context characterized by high uncertainty, ambiguity, scare resource, and intense pressure, every critical decision significantly affects the destiny of new ventures. Entrepreneurship researchers have thus dedicated substantial efforts to exploring how and why entrepreneurs make decisions differently from both non-entrepreneurs and other entrepreneurs. Among entrepreneurial decision-making research, effectuation theory (Sarasvathy 2001, 2008) has provided a solid framework and emerged as a main research stream. Yet the extant literature still left a puzzle as to why different entrepreneurs use effectual logic differently, even under similar context.
In this dissertation, we aim to tackle a critical yet less explored factor, the original aspiration, which affects entrepreneurs’ decision-making logic through the lens of effectuation theory. We postulate that original aspiration, which refers to the entrepreneur’s initial and most dominant aspiration in the venture-creation process, as an undiscovered key antecedent of effectuation tendency which might offer insights to solve the puzzle. Based on a qualitative and process research on 142 entrepreneurs’ decision events from eight start-ups over a three-year time span, we discover the distinctive nature of original aspiration and its significant role on entrepreneurial decision-making over the entrepreneurial process. Subsequently, we classify original aspirations into non-commercial-centric and commercial-centric types, and offer evidences that different types of original aspiration lead to various effectuation tendency. Non-commercial-centric entrepreneurs have a high tendency to engage with effectuation logic, while commercial-centric entrepreneurs tend to use more causal logic. Furthermore, we uncover that attitude toward goal ambiguity and partnership as two manifestation factors underlying the relationship between original aspiration and effectuation tendency. We then develop a conceptual model depicting how original aspiration shapes effectual tendency. These findings extend effectuation theory by advancing one of its most fundamental suppositions and showing how original aspirations influence the thinking behind the critical decisions along the entrepreneurial journey. Overall, our research endeavors to highlight a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of entrepreneurs, hence broadens the knowledge of entrepreneurship research.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:41:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-D00724005-1.pdf: 861482 bytes, checksum: 0a5158ffc87f377aee6c6e386bfd915d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 1: Introduction 1
CHAPTER 2: Literature Review 8
CHAPTER 3: Research Method 18
CHAPTER 4: The Nature of Original Aspiration 27
CHAPTER 5: The Relationship between Original Aspiration and Effectuation Tendency 38
CHAPTER 6: Discussion and Conclusions 52
REFERENCES 84
dc.language.isoen
dc.title創業初心對創業關鍵決策的影響:基於實效理論視角的探索性研究zh_TW
dc.titleExploring the Role of Original Aspiration in Entrepreneurial Journey through the Lens of Effectuation Theoryen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear107-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee邱奕嘉,林舒柔,林博文,吳政衛
dc.subject.keyword實效理論,創業決策,創業初心,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordEffectuation,Entrepreneurial Decision-making,Original Aspiration,en
dc.relation.page90
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201901124
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2019-07-02
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2024-07-11-
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf841.29 kBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved