Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73320Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡季廷(Chi-Ting Tsai) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuan-Ting Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李冠霆 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:28:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-06-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 石雅如，2014，〈拉丁美洲轉型正義概況〉，《台灣國際研究季刊》，10(2)，頁107-128。
吳乃德，2006，〈轉型正義和歷史記憶：台灣民主化的未竟之業〉，《思想季刊》，2，頁1-34。 吳親恩，2007，〈台灣民眾的政治信任差異：政治人物、政府與民主體制三個面向的觀察〉，《台灣政治學刊》，11(1)，頁147-200。 李怡俐，2012，〈轉型正義的機制及脈絡因素—以台灣為例〉，《台灣人權學刊》，1(2)，頁145-176。 李怡俐，2016，〈拉丁美洲在轉型正義上的困境與出路—以美洲人權法院的回應為中心〉，《臺大法學論叢》，45(3)，頁827-909。 邱稔壤，1999，〈皮諾契時代致力之人權爭議及其發展〉，《問題與研究》，38(4)，頁31-53。 林瓊珠、蔡佳泓，2010，〈政黨信任、機構信任與民主滿意度〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，35，頁147-194。 施正鋒，2007，〈轉型正義的探討—由分配到認同〉，《台灣史學雜誌》，3，頁3- 31。 施正鋒，2013，《轉型正義》，台北：台北國際研究學會。 黃紀、王德育，2012，《質變數與受限依變數的迴歸分析》，台北：五南出版社。 葉浩，2008，〈價值多元式轉型正義理論：一個政治哲學進路的嘗試〉，《台灣政 治學刊》，12(1)，頁11-51。 蔡佳泓，2009，〈台灣民眾的民主評價：以2004年為例的驗證性因素分析〉，《社會科學論叢》，3(1)，頁151-184。 蔡東杰，1997，〈民主化理論的釐清與重構：以拉丁美洲為例〉，《問題與研究》，36(8)，頁67-80。 Aguero, F. 1998. “Legacies of Transitions: Institutionalization, the Military, and Democracy in South America.” Mershon International Studies Review 42(2): 383-404. Akhavan, P. 2001. “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?.” American Journal of International Law 95(1): 7-31. Barahona de Brito, A., Gonzalez-Enriquez, C., & Aguilar, P. 2001. The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bargsted, M., Castillo, J. C., & Somma, N. S. 2017. “Political Trust in Latin America.” in Zmerli, E. S., & der Meer, T. V. eds., Handbook of Political Trust (Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing): 395-417. Boraine, A. L. 2006. “Transitional Justice: A Holistic Interpretation.” Journal of International Affairs 60(1): 17-27. Brant, R. 1990. “Assessing Proportionality in the Proportional Odds Model for Ordinal Logistic Regression.” Biometrics 46: 1171-1178. Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. 1998. Trust and Governance. NY: Russel Sage Foundation. Braithwaite, J. 2003. “Principles of Restorative Justice.” in von Hirsch, A., Roberts, J. V., Bottoms, A. E., Roach, K., & Schiff, M. eds., Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (Oxford: Hart Publishing): 1-20. Carothers, T. 2001. “The Many Agendas of Rule of Law Reform in Latin America.” in Domingo P., & Sieder, R. eds., Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform (London: University of London): 6-16. Caraway, T. L., Cook, M. L., & Crowley, S. 2015. Working Through the Past: Labor and Authoritarian Legacies in Comparative Perspective. US: Cornell University Press. Carmody, M. F. 2018. Human Rights, Transitional Justice, and the Reconstruction of Political Order in Latin America. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. 2003. “Trust in Government – the Significance of Attitudes Towards Democracy, the Public Sector and Public Sector Reforms.” in Stein Rokkan Center for Social Studies, Bergen University Research Foundation, Working paper 7: 1-28. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. 2005. “Trust in Government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography.” Public Performance & Management Review 28(4): 487-511. Chang, C. C. 2013. “A Comparative Analysis of How Corruption Erodes Institutional Trust.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 9(1): 73-92. Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. 1986. “Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government.” British Journal of Political Science 16: 431-453. Clark, J.N. 2008. “The three Rs: retributive Justice, restorative justice, and reconciliation.” Contemporary Justice Review 11(4): 331-350. Couso, J. 2011. “Trying Democracy in the Shadow of an Authoritarian Legality: Chile’s Transition to Democracy and Pinochet’s Constitution of 1980.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 29(2): 394-415. Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12(3): 289-314. Dalton, R. J. 1999. “Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” in Norris, P. eds., Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance (NY: Oxford University Press): 57-77. Della Porta, D. 2000. “Social Capital, Beliefs in Government and Political Corruption.” in Pharr, S. & Putnam, R. eds., Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (NJ: Princeton University Press): 202-228. Denters, B., Gabriel, O., & Torcal, M. 2007. “Political confidence in representative democracies: Socio-cultural vs. political explanations.” in van Deth, J. W., Montero, J. R. & Westholm, A. eds., Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis (NY: Routledge): 66-87. Diamond, L., Linz, J. J., & Lipset, S. M. 1989. Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. US: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. Duthie, R. 2005. “Transitional Justice and Social Reintegration.” Stockholm: Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: 1-33. Easton, D. 1965. A System Analysis of Political Life. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Easton, D. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 435-457. Ecevit, Y. A., & Karakoç, E. 2017. “The perils of semi-presidentialism: Confidence in political institutions in contemporary democracies.” International Political Science Review 31(8): 4-20. Elster, J. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. NY: Cambridge University Press. Elster, J. 2006. Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy. NY: Cambridge University Press. Ellner, S. 2012. “The Distinguishing Features of Latin America’s New Left in Power the Chávez, Morales, and Correa Governments.” Latin American Perspectives 39(1): 96-114. Friedman, R., & Jillions, A. 2015. “The pitfalls and politics of holistic justice.” Global Policy 6(2): 141-150. Fullerton, A. S., & Xu, J. 2012. “The proportional odds with partial proportionality constraints model for ordinal response variables.” Social Science Research 41(1): 182-198. Fuks, M., Paulino, R. O., & Casalecchi, G. A. 2018. “Socialization and Political Regimes: The Impact of Generation on Support for Democracy in Latin America.” Brazilian Political Science Review 12(1): 1-12. Gamson, W. A. 1968. Power and Discontent, Homewood. IL.: The Dosey Press. Garcia-Godos, J. 2015. “It’s About Trust: Transitional Justice and Accountability in the Search for Peace.” in Bailliet, C. M., & Larsen, K. M. eds., Promoting Peace Through International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 321-343. Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12(2): 313-331. Goldstone, R. J. 1996. “Justice as a Tool for Peace-Making: Truth Commissions and International Criminal Tribunals.” Journal of International Law and Politics 28: 485-503. Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. 2013. Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. González-Ocantos, E. 2016. “Evaluations of Human Rights Trials and Trust in Judicial Institutions: Evidence from Fujimori’s Trial in Peru.” The International Journal of Human Rights 20(4): 445-470. Gregori, B., Staub, K. E., & Winkelmann, R. 2011. “Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model.” IZA Discussion Papers, No. 5443, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn: 1-32. Hamber, B. 2002. “Are Lessons Transferable? The Importance of Research for Policy on Transitional Justice Mechanisms.” Paper presented at the “Empirical Research Methodologies of Transitional Justice Mechanisms Conference”, Stellenbosch, South Africa: 1-20. Handlin, S. 2012. “Social Protection and the Politicization of Class Cleavages During Latin America’s Left Turn.” Comparative Political Studies 46(12): 1582-1609. Hetherington, M. J. 1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 92(4): 791-808. Hite, K., & Morlino, L. 2004. “Problematizing the Links between Authoritarian Legacies and Good Democracy.” in Hite, K., & Cesarini, P. eds., Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press): 25-84. Horne, C. M. 2012. “Assessing the Impact of Lustration on Trust in Public Institutions and National Government.” Comparative Political Studies 45(4): 412-446. Horne, C. M. 2013. “Entries on Transitional Justice Debates, Controversies, and Key Questions: Trust and Transitional Justice.” in Stan, L., & Nedelsky, N. eds., Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice Volume 1 (NY: Cambridge University Press): 252-259. Horne, C. M. 2017. Building Trust and Democracy: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. OK: The University of Oklahoma Press. Huyse, L. 1995. “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past.” Law & Social Inquiry 20(1): 51-78. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press. Kim, H. J., & Sikkink, K. 2012. “How Do Human Rights Prosecutions Improve Human Rights after Transition.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law 7: 69-90. Lambourne, W. 2009. “Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding after Mass Violence.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice 3(1): 28-48. Levi, M. 1998. “A State of Trust.” in Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. eds., Trust in Governance (NY: Russel Sage Foundation): 77-101. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475-507. Leonardo, V. 2014. “Latin America: A Backlash in Human Rights?.” Harvard International Review 36(2): 17-21. Listhaug, O., & Wiberg, M. 1995. “Confidence in Political and Private Institutions.” in Klingemann, H. D., & Fuchs, D. eds., Citizens and the State (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 298-323. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. 2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Texas: Stata Press. Lutz, E. L., & Sikkink, K. 2001. “The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Chicago Journal of International Law 2: 1-34. Mainwaring, S., Brinks, D., & Pérez-Liñán, A. 2007. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945-2004.” in Munck, G. L. eds., Regimes and Democracy in Latin America—Theories and Methods (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 123-162. McCullagh, P. 1980. “Regression Models for Ordinal Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 42(2): 109-142. Mégret, F., Vagliano, R. 2017. “Transitional justice and human rights.” in Lawther, C., Moffett, L., & Jacobs, D. eds., Research Handbook on Transitional Justice (MA: Edward Elgar Publishing): 95-116. Miller, A. H. 1974. “Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970.” The American Political Science Review 68(3): 951-972. Mishler, W., & Rose, R. 2001. “What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 34(1): 30-62. Mihr, A. 2012. “Transitional Justice and The Quality of Democracy-From Democratic Institution Building to Reconciliation,” in Mihr, A. eds., Transitional Justice: Between Criminal Justice, Atonement and Democracy (Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht): 11-48. Moghalu, K. C. 2004. “Reconciling fractured societies: An African perspective on the role of judicial prosecutions.” in Thakur, R., & Malcontent, P. eds., Sovereign Impunity to International Accountability: The Search for Justice in a Worlds of States (Tokyo: United Nations Press), pp. 197-223. Ndulo, M. B., & Duthie, R. 2009. “The Role of Judicial Reform in Development and Transitional Justice.” International Center for Transitional Justice Research Brief: 1-4. Newton, K. 2007. “Social and Political Trust,” in Dalton, R., & Klingemann, H. D. eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (NY: Oxford University Press): 342-351. Norris, P. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. NY: Oxford University Press. Nye, J. S., Zelikow P., & Kang, D. C. 1997. Why People Don’t Trust Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pion-Berlin, D. 2004. “The Pinochet Case and Human Rights Progress in Chile: Was Europe a Catalyst, Cause of Inconsequential?” Journal of Latin America Studies 36(3): 479-505. Pérez-Liñán, A., & Mainwaring, S. 2013. “Regime Legacies and Levels of Democracy: Evidence from Latin America.” Comparative Politics 45(4): 379-397. O’Connell, J. 2005. “Gambling with the Psyche: Does Prosecuting Human Rights Violators Console Their Victims.” Harvard International Law Journal 46(2): 295-345. O’Connell, A. 2006. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Response Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Offe, C. 1996. Varieties of Transitions: The East European and East German Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., & Reiter, A. G. 2010a. “The Justice Balance: When Transitional Justice Improves Human Rights and Democracy.” Human Rights Quarterly 32: 980-1007. Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., & Reiter, A. G. 2010b. Transitional Justice in Balance—Comparing processes, Weighing efficacy. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press. Osiel, M. J. 2010. “Why Prosecute-Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity.” Human Rights Quarterly 22: 118-147. Quinn, J. R. 2017. “The development of transitional justice.” in Lawther, C., Moffett, L., & Jacobs, D. eds., Research Handbook on Transitional Justice (MA: Edward Elgar Publishing): 11-33. Reátegui, F. 2011. Transitional Justice Handbook for Latin America. Brazilian Ministry of Justice Amnesty Commission. Schmitter, P. C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” Review of Politics 36: 85-131. Skidmore, T. E., Smith, P. H., & Green, J. N. 2010. “Dynamics of Political Transformation.” in Skidmore, T., Smith, P., & Green, J. eds., Modern Latin America 7th edition (NY: Oxford University Press): 376-402. Slomczynski, K. M., Powałko, P., & Krauze, T. 2017. “Non-unique Records in International Survey Projects: The Need for Extending Data Quality Control.” Survey Research Methods 11(1): 1-16. Speck, P. K. 1987. “The Trial of the Argentine Junta: Responsibilities and Realities.” The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 18(3): 491-534. Sriram, C. L. 2003. “Revolutions in Accountability: New Approach to Past Abuses.” American University International Law Review 19(2): 310-429. Sikkink, K., & Walling, C. B. 2007. “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research 44(4): 427-445. Sikkink, K. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecution Are Changing World Politics. NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Sikkink, K., & Kim, H. J. 2013. “The Justice Cascade: The Origins and Effectiveness of Prosecutions of Human Rights Violation.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9: 269-285. Smith, P. H. 2005. Democracy in Latin America: Political Change in Comparative Perspective. NY: Oxford University Press. Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. 2003. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28(3): 5-44. Stromseth, J. E., Wippman, D., & Brooks, R. 2006. Can Might Make Rights? Building the Rule of Law after Military Interventions. NY: Cambridge University Press. Sundquist, J. L. 1980. “The Crisis of Competence in Our National Government.” Political Science Quarterly 95(2): 183-208. Sugar, D. 2009. “Courts, Human Rights, and Transitional Justice: Lesson from Chile.” Journal of Law and Society 36(2): 272-281. Teitel, R. G. 2000. Transitional Justice. UK: Oxford University Press. Teitel, R. G. 2003. “Transitional Justice Genealogy.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69-94. Teitel, R. G. 2005. “The Law and Politics of Contemporary Transitional Justice.” Cornell International Law Journal 38: 837-862. Thoms, Oscar, N. T., Ron, J., & Paris, R. 2008. “The Effects of Transitional Justice Mechanisms: A Summary of Empirical Research Findings and Implications for Analysis and Practitioners.” Centre for International Policy Studies working paper, University of Ottawa: 1-92. Thoms, O. N. T., Ron, J., & Paris, R. 2010. “State-level Effects of Transitional Justice: What Do We Know?.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice 4(3): 329-345. Tyler, T. M. 1998. “Trust and Democratic Governance.” in Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. eds., Trust in Governance (NY: Russel Sage Foundation): 269-294. van Zyl, P. 1999. “Dilemmas of Transitional Justice: The Case of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” Journal of International Affairs 52(2): 646-667. van Zyl, P. 2011. “Promoting Transitional Justice in Post Conflict Societies.” in Reátegui, F. eds., Transitional Justice Handbook for Latin America (Brazil: Brazilian Ministry of Justice Amnesty Commission): 45-68. Warren, M. 1999. Democracy and Trust. NY: Cambridge University Press. Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather N. T., & Platow, M. J. 2008. “Retributive and Restorative Justice.” Law Human Behavior 32: 375-389. William, P. R. & Scharf, M. P. 2002. Peace with Justice: War Crimes and Accountability in the Former Yugoslavia. Lenham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Williams, R. 2006. “Generalized ordered logit/ partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables.” The Stata Journal 6(1): 58-82. Williams, R. 2016. “Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 40(1): 7-20. Zalaquett, J. 1990. “Confronting Human Rights Violations Committed by Former Governments: Applicable Principles and Political Constraints.” Hamline Law Review 13: 623-660. Corrales, J. 2018. “Can Latin American Democracy Withstand the Populist Assault?.” https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/06/opinion/can-latin-american-democracy-withstand-the-populist-assault.html, retrieved 2018/11/16, 16:20. Dancy, Geoff, Lessa, F., Marchesi, B., Payne, L. A., Pereira, G., & Sikkink, S. 2014. “The Transitional Justice Research Collaborative: Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide with New Data.” available at www.transitionaljusticedata.com, 2018/11/25, 19:45. Del Ponte, C. 2005. “Address at Goldman Sachs.” http://www.icty.org/x/file/Press/PR_attachments/cdp-goldmansachs-050610-e.htm, retrieved 2018/4/15, 18:35. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ). 2009. “What is Transitional Justice.” https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Global-Transitional-Justice-2009-English.pdf, retrieved 2018/3/28, 19:40. Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R., & Jaggers, K. 2018. “PolityTM IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2017 Dataset Users’ Manuel.” http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2017.pdf, retrieved 2019/4/6, 21:35. The Independent. 2000. “Guatemalan Leader Admits Civil War Atrocities.” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/guatemalan-leader-admits-civil-war-atrocities-711312.html, retrieved 2019/5/22 01:38. The World Bank. 2002. “Initiatives in Legal and Judicial Reform.” http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BRAZILINPOREXTN/Resources/3817166-1185895645304/4044168-1186409169154/18initiativesFinal.pdf, retrieved 2019/5/21, 01:56. Tolbert, D. 2018. “The Role of Transitional Justice in Countries Emerging from Conflict.” https://impakter.com/role-transitional-justice-countries-emerging-conflict/, retrieved 2019/5/13, 17:15. United Nations (UN). 2008. “What Is Transitional Justice: A Backgrounder.” https://www.tjwg.org/data/media/20160416220409.pdf, retrieved 2019/5/20, 22:30. United Nations (UN). 2010. “United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice.” https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/TJ_Guidance_Note_March_2010FINAL.pdf, retrieved 2018/4/2, 12:00. United Nations Security Council (UNSC). 2004. “The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies.” http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/unga07/law.pdf, retrieved 2018/4/2, 14:00. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73320 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在第三波民主化後，拉丁美洲國家脫離過去的威權政體，朝民主社會邁進。對一個新興民主政權來說，建立民眾對政治機構的信任，是讓政權能否長久維持下去的重要因素。因此，這些國家能否順利實施轉型正義，弭平人權受難者在威權時代所受到的傷害，進一步影響對政府的評價，便顯得非常重要。雖然對於一個新興民主政權而言，要實施哪種轉型正義機制，仍必須面臨正義與和平的兩難，然而在國際組織、人權團體的呼籲下，越來越多國家開始願意採取課責程度較高的機制，並形成一股「正義流瀑」的趨勢。
本文首先回顧了轉型正義、政治機構信任與拉丁美洲民主化脈絡的相關研究；接著下來，本文從文獻當中，梳理出刑事審判有助於民眾對司法機構信任，以及複合轉型正義機制有助於民眾對總體政治機構信任，這兩個主要假設。此外，本文同時將威權政體類型設為調節變項，觀察威權遺緒所造成之影響。最後，本文彙整拉丁美洲12國的政治機構信任數據，以及轉型正義實施情況的資料，利用廣義有序勝算對數模型，針對前述議題進行分析。 結果發現，實施刑事審判確實有助於提升民眾對司法機構的信任。然而，國際轉型正義中心所倡議的「全面途徑」並無助於提升拉美地區民眾對整體政治機構之信任。此外，本文也發現威權遺緒的強弱確實會影響民眾對政治機構的評價。根據研究發現，本文將能藉此彌補既有文獻在此議題研究上之不足，同時也可以透過拉丁美洲地區的經驗，作為我國未來實施轉型正義的借鏡。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | For newly established democratic countries in Latin America after the third wave of democratization, the most vital issue is how to build up citizens’ trust of the government so that the government can achieve democratic consolidation and make the regime last for long time. In order to achieve this goal, the new government has to implement transitional justice, which is able to punish human rights abusers and compensate for victims and their families.
Although the country still need to face a dilemma between justice and peace while choosing transitional justice mechanisms, more and more countries are willing to take the mechanisms with higher accountability, such as judicial trials, after the appeal of international organizations and human rights non-governmental organizations. This situation has become a trend so called as justice cascade. In order to understand the causal relationship between transitional justice and institutional trust, this thesis starts from reviewing the literatures related to transitional justice, institutional trust as well as the democratization in Latin America, which enable us to build a whole picture of this issue and establish two hypotheses based on these three topics. The first one is the citizens’ trust in judicial institutions will enhance after a new democratic government implementing judicial trials on human rights abusers. The second hypothesis is the citizens’ trust in political institutions will increase after the government executes multi transitional justice measures, which is also known as holistic approach, at the same time. In addition, this thesis also takes the previous regimes types as a moderator for testing the moderating effect caused by legacies of authoritarian regime. After raising these two hypotheses, we collect the data from Latino barometer and Transitional Justice Research Collaborative during 1995 to 2010. By conducting the statistical tests with generalized ordinal logit model, we not only find that the implementation of judicial trials will enhance the citizens’ trust in judicial institutions but approve that the holistic approach won’t increase the citizens’ trust in political institutions. Besides, we also find the authoritarian legacies will affect citizens’ institutional trust. In the end, we hope this thesis can make some contributions in academic field and bring positive impact for the policies of the transitional justice made by Taiwanese government. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:28:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04322039-1.pdf: 1604653 bytes, checksum: 5b9daa9dcd858bfe98d8095b25c15f8b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………….i
誌謝………………………………………………………………………ii 中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………...iii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………..iv 表目錄……………………………………………………………………x 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………...xi 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機與問題意識………………………………………...1 第二節 文獻回顧……………………………………………………...5 第三節 章節安排…………………………………………………….28 第二章 轉型正義機制對機構信任之影響…………………………..30 第一節 刑事審判與司法機構信任之關係………………………….30 第二節 複合機制對總體機構信任之影響………………………….34 第三節 小結………………………………………………………….37 第三章 研究方法與研究架構………………………………………..38 第一節 資料來源與變數設計………………………………………38 第二節 統計方法與模型設定……………………………………….48 第四章 資料與實證模型分析…………………………………………52 第一節 資料初步分析……………………………………………….52 第二節 實證模型分析……………………………………………….57 第三節 小結………………………………………………………….77 第五章 結論……………………………………………………………84 第一節 研究發現……………………………………………………. 84 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議………………………………….89 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………..91 中文部分……………………………………………………………...91 西文部分……………………………………………………………...92 網路資料…………………………………………………………….104 附錄一…………………………………………………………………106 各國審判次數與司法機構信任關係圖…………………………….106 附錄二…………………………………………………………………108 各國轉型正義機制種類與總體機構信任關係圖………………….108 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 轉型正義是否提升民眾對政治機構之信任？—以拉丁美洲12國為例(1996-2010) | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Do Transitional Justice Measures Enhance Institutional Trust? -An Empirical Study of 12 Countries in Latin America (1996-2010) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 顏永銘(Yung-Ming Yen) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張佑宗(Yu-tzung Chang),蘇彥斌(Yen-Pin Su) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 轉型正義,拉丁美洲,民主化,政治機構信任,廣義有序勝算對數模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Transitional Justice,Latin America,Democratization,Institutional Trust,Generalized Ordinal Logit Model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 109 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900788 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-06-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 政治學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.