請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73277
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳雅美 | |
dc.contributor.author | Bei-Yu Hu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 胡倍瑜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:26:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-06-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aguilar-Navarro, S. G., Amieva, H., Gutierrez-Robledo, L. M., & Avila-Funes, J. A. (2015). Frailty among Mexican community-dwelling elderly: a story told 11 years later. The Mexican Health and Aging Study. Salud Publica Mex, 57 Suppl 1, S62-69.
Avila-Funes, J. A., Helmer, C., Amieva, H., Barberger-Gateau, P., Goff, M. L., Ritchie, K., . . . Dartigues, J.-F. (2008). Frailty among community-dwelling elderly people in france: the three-city study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 63(10), 1089-1096. Bandeen-Roche, K., Xue, Q. L., Ferrucci, L., Walston, J., Guralnik, J. M., Chaves, P., . . . Fried, L. P. (2006). Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 61(3), 262-266. Bentur, N., Sternberg, S. A., & Shuldiner, J. (2016). Frailty Transitions in Community Dwelling Older People. Isr Med Assoc J, 18(8), 449-453. Bergman, H., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J., Hogan, D. B., Hummel, S., Karunananthan, S., & Wolfson, C. (2007). Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm--issues and controversies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 62(7), 731-737. Binder, E. F., Schechtman, K. B., Ehsani, A. A., Steger-May, K., Brown, M., Sinacore, D. R., . . . Holloszy, J. O. (2002). Effects of exercise training on frailty in community-dwelling older adults: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc, 50(12), 1921-1928. Ble, A., Cherubini, A., Volpato, S., Bartali, B., Walston, J. D., Windham, B. G., . . . Ferrucci, L. (2006). Lower Plasma Vitamin E Levels Are Associated With the Frailty Syndrome: The InCHIANTI Study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 61(3), 278-283. doi:10.1093/gerona/61.3.278 Bock, J.-O., König, H.-H., Brenner, H., Haefeli, W. E., Quinzler, R., Matschinger, H., . . . Heider, D. (2016). Associations of frailty with health care costs – results of the ESTHER cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 128. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1360-3 Bohannon, R. W. (2001). Dynamometer measurements of hand-grip strength predict multiple outcomes. Percept Mot Skills, 93(2), 323-328. doi:10.2466/pms.2001.93.2.323 Borrat-Besson, C., Ryser, V.-A., & Wernli, B. (2013). 15 Transitions between frailty states – a European comparison Active ageing and solidarity between generations in EuropeFirst results from SHARE after the economic crisis. Bouillon, K., Kivimaki, M., & Hamer, M. (2013). Measures of frailty in population-based studies: an overview. BMC Geriatr, 13. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-64 Boyd, C. M., Xue, Q. L., & Simpson, C. F. (2005). Frailty, hospitalization, and progression of disability in a cohort of disabled older women. Am J Med, 118. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.062 Carpenter, C. R., Bassett, E. R., Fischer, G. M., Shirshekan, J., Galvin, J. E., & Morris, J. C. (2011). Four sensitive screening tools to detect cognitive dysfunction in geriatric emergency department patients: brief Alzheimer's Screen, Short Blessed Test, Ottawa 3DY, and the caregiver-completed AD8. Acad Emerg Med, 18(4), 374-384. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01040.x Chang, C. I., Chan, D. C., Kuo, K. N., Hsiung, C. A., & Chen, C. Y. (2011). Prevalence and correlates of geriatric frailty in a northern Taiwan community. J Formos Med Assoc, 110(4), 247-257. doi:10.1016/s0929-6646(11)60037-5 Chen, C. Y., Wu, S. C., Chen, L. J., & Lue, B. H. (2010). The prevalence of subjective frailty and factors associated with frailty in Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 50 Suppl 1, S43-47. doi:10.1016/s0167-4943(10)70012-1 Chen, L.-J., Chen, C.-Y., Lue, B.-H., Tseng, M.-Y., & Wu, S.-C. (2014). Prevalence and Associated Factors of Frailty Among Elderly People in Taiwan. International Journal of Gerontology, 8(3), 114-119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2013.12.002 Cheng, M. H., & Chang, S. F. (2017). Frailty as a Risk Factor for Falls Among Community Dwelling People: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. J Nurs Scholarsh, 49(5), 529-536. doi:10.1111/jnu.12322 Cigolle, C. T., Ofstedal, M. B., Tian, Z., & Blaum, C. S. (2009). Comparing models of frailty: the Health and Retirement Study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 57(5), 830-839. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02225.x Collard, R. M., Boter, H., & Schoevers, R. A. (2012). Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc, 60. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x Collins, J. M., & Paul, P. B. (1994). Functional Health, Social Support, and Morale of Older Women Living Alone in Appalachia. Journal of Women & Aging, 6(3), 39-52. doi:10.1300/J074v06n03_04 Daubney, M. E., & Culham, E. G. (1999). Lower-extremity muscle force and balance performance in adults aged 65 years and older. Phys Ther, 79(12), 1177-1185. de Vries, N. M., Staal, J. B., van Ravensberg, C. D., Hobbelen, J. S., Olde Rikkert, M. G., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. (2011). Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev, 10(1), 104-114. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001 Dent, E., Kowal, P., & Hoogendijk, E. O. (2016). Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 31, 3-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007 Drey, M., Pfeifer, K., Sieber, C. C., & Bauer, J. M. (2011). The Fried frailty criteria as inclusion criteria for a randomized controlled trial: personal experience and literature review. Gerontology, 57(1), 11-18. doi:10.1159/000313433 Economic, U. N. D. o. (2005). Living arrangements of older persons around the world (Vol. 240): United Nations Publications. Ensrud, K. E., Ewing, S. K., Cawthon, P. M., Fink, H. A., Taylor, B. C., & Cauley, J. A. (2009). A comparison of frailty indexes for the prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and mortality in older men. J Am Geriatr Soc, 57. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02137.x Ensrud, K. E., Ewing, S. K., & Taylor, B. C. (2007). Frailty and risk of falls, fracture, and mortality in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 62. doi:10.1093/gerona/62.7.744 Ensrud, K. E., Ewing, S. K., & Taylor, B. C. (2008). Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women. Arch Intern Med, 168. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2007.113 Eurostat. (2015). People in the EU – statistics on an ageing society. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/People_in_the_EU_%E2%80%93_statistics_on_an_ageing_society#The_elderly_living_alone Fisher, G. S., Baker, A., Koval, D., Lishok, C., & Maisto, E. (2007). A field test of the Cougar Home Safety Assessment (version 2.0) in the homes of older persons living alone. Aust Occup Ther J, 54(2), 124-130. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00604.x Flacker, J. M. (2003). What is a geriatric syndrome anyway? J Am Geriatr Soc, 51(4), 574-576. Fried, L. P., Ferrucci, L., & Darer, J. (2004). Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol: Med Sci, 59. doi:10.1093/gerona/59.3.M255 Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., & Walston, J. (2001). Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol: Med Sci, 56A. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146 Gallucci, M., Ongaro, F., Amici, G. P., & Regini, C. (2009). Frailty, disability and survival in the elderly over the age of seventy: Evidence from “The Treviso Longeva (TRELONG) Study”. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48(3), 281-283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.02.005 Gill , T. M., Baker , D. I., Gottschalk , M., Peduzzi , P. N., Allore , H., & Byers , A. (2002). A Program to Prevent Functional Decline in Physically Frail, Elderly Persons Who Live at Home. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(14), 1068-1074. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020423 Gill, T. M., Gahbauer, E. A., Allore, H. G., & Han, L. (2006). Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(4), 418-423. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.4.418 Gobbens, R. J., van Assen, M. A., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. (2010a). Determinants of frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 11(5), 356-364. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.008 Gobbens, R. J., van Assen, M. A., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. (2010b). The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 11(5), 344-355. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003 Haslbeck, J. W., McCorkle, R., & Schaeffer, D. (2012). Chronic Illness Self-Management While Living Alone in Later Life:A Systematic Integrative Review. Research on Aging, 34(5), 507-547. doi:10.1177/0164027511429808 Hooyman, N., & Kiyak, H. A. (2011). Social Gerontology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. 9: Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Huang, L. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2002). The health status and needs of community elderly living alone. J Nurs Res, 10(3), 227-236. Hubbard, R. E., O'Mahony, M. S., & Woodhouse, K. W. (2009). Characterising frailty in the clinical setting--a comparison of different approaches. Age Ageing, 38(1), 115-119. doi:10.1093/ageing/afn252 Iliffe, S., Tai, S. S., Haines, A., Gallivan, S., Goldenberg, E., Booroff, A., & Morgan, P. (1992). Are elderly people living alone an at risk group? BMJ : British Medical Journal, 305(6860), 1001-1004. Jörg, W. H., Ruth, M., & Doris, S. (2012). Chronic Illness Self-Management While Living Alone in Later Life: A Systematic Integrative Review. Research on Aging, 34(5), 507-547. doi:10.1177/0164027511429808 Jung, H.-W., Kim, S.-W., & Ahn, S. (2014). Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population: comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models. PLoS One, 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087958 Jung, H. W., Kim, S. W., Ahn, S., Lim, J. Y., Han, J. W., Kim, T. H., . . . Kim, C. H. (2014). Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population: comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models. PLoS One, 9(2), e87958. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087958 Kadar, M., Ibrahim, S., Razaob, N. A., Chai, S. C., & Harun, D. (2018). Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale among the Malay speaking elderly in Malaysia. Aust Occup Ther J, 65(1), 63-68. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12441 Kehusmaa, S., Autti-Rämö, I., Helenius, H., Hinkka, K., Valaste, M., & Rissanen, P. (2012). Factors associated with the utilization and costs of health and social services in frail elderly patients. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 204-204. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-204 Kharicha, K., Iliffe, S., Harari, D., Swift, C., Gillmann, G., & Stuck, A. E. (2007). Health risk appraisal in older people 1: are older people living alone an 'at-risk' group? Br J Gen Pract, 57(537), 271-276. Kiely, D. K., Cupples, L. A., & Lipsitz, L. A. (2009). Validation and comparison of two frailty indexes: The MOBILIZE Boston Study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 57(9), 1532-1539. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02394.x Lang, P. O., Michel, J. P., & Zekry, D. (2009). Frailty syndrome: a transitional state in a dynamic process. Gerontology, 55(5), 539-549. doi:10.1159/000211949 Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9(3), 179-186. Lee, J. S., Auyeung, T. W., Leung, J., Kwok, T., & Woo, J. (2014). Transitions in frailty states among community-living older adults and their associated factors. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 15(4), 281-286. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.12.002 Li, T., Wang, H. L., Yang, Y. H., Galvin, J. E., Morris, J. C., & Yu, X. (2012). [The reliability and validity of Chinese version of AD8]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi, 51(10), 777-780. Lopez, D., Flicker, L., & Dobson, A. (2012). Validation of the frail scale in a cohort of older Australian women. J Am Geriatr Soc, 60(1), 171-173. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03746.x Macklai, N. S., Spagnoli, J., Junod, J., & Santos-Eggimann, B. (2013). Prospective association of the SHARE-operationalized frailty phenotype with adverse health outcomes: evidence from 60+ community-dwelling Europeans living in 11 countries. BMC Geriatrics, 13(1), 3. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-3 Makizako, H., Shimada, H., Doi, T., Tsutsumimoto, K., & Suzuki, T. (2015). Impact of physical frailty on disability in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 5(9). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008462 Merchant, R. A., Chen, M. Z., Tan, L. W. L., Lim, M. Y., Ho, H. K., & van Dam, R. M. (2017). Singapore Healthy Older People Everyday (HOPE) Study: Prevalence of Frailty and Associated Factors in Older Adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 18(8), 734.e739-734.e714. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.020 Michel, J. P., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., & Cederholm, T. (2015). Frailty, Exercise and Nutrition. Clin Geriatr Med, 31(3), 375-387. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2015.04.006 Mitnitski, A. B., Mogilner, A. J., & Rockwood, K. (2001). Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci World, 1. doi:10.1100/tsw.2001.58 Moreira, V. G., & Lourenco, R. A. (2013). Prevalence and factors associated with frailty in an older population from the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: the FIBRA-RJ Study. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 68(7), 979-985. doi:10.6061/clinics/2013(07)15 Newman, A. B., Gottdiener, J. S., McBurnie, M. A., Hirsch, C. H., Kop, W. J., Tracy, R., . . . Fried, L. P. (2001). Associations of subclinical cardiovascular disease with frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 56(3), M158-166. Ng, T. P., Jin, A., Feng, L., Nyunt, M. S., Chow, K. Y., Feng, L., & Fong, N. P. (2015). Mortality of older persons living alone: Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies. BMC Geriatr, 15, 126. doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0128-7 Nourhashemi, F., Andrieu, S., Gillette-Guyonnet, S., Vellas, B., Albarede, J. L., & Grandjean, H. (2001). Instrumental activities of daily living as a potential marker of frailty: a study of 7364 community-dwelling elderly women (the EPIDOS study). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 56(7), M448-453. Op het Veld, L. P. M., van Rossum, E., Kempen, G. I. J. M., de Vet, H. C. W., Hajema, K., & Beurskens, A. J. H. M. (2015). Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), 77. doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0078-0 Porter, E. J. (1994). Older widows' experience of living alone at home. Image J Nurs Sch, 26(1), 19-24. Robertson, D. A., Savva, G. M., Coen, R. F., & Kenny, R. A. (2014). Cognitive function in the prefrailty and frailty syndrome. J Am Geriatr Soc, 62(11), 2118-2124. doi:10.1111/jgs.13111 Robertson, D. A., Savva, G. M., & Kenny, R. A. (2013). Frailty and cognitive impairment--a review of the evidence and causal mechanisms. Ageing Res Rev, 12(4), 840-851. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2013.06.004 Rochat, S., Cumming, R. G., Blyth, F., Creasey, H., Handelsman, D., Le Couteur, D. G., . . . Waite, L. (2010). Frailty and use of health and community services by community-dwelling older men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project. Age Ageing, 39(2), 228-233. doi:10.1093/ageing/afp257 Rockwood, K., Andrew, M., & Mitnitski, A. (2007). A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 62(7), 738-743. Rockwood, K., & Mitnitski, A. (2006). Limits to deficit accumulation in elderly people. Mech Ageing Dev, 127(5), 494-496. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2006.01.002 Rockwood, K., & Mitnitski, A. (2007). Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 62(7), 722-727. Sasaki, H., Kasagi, F., Yamada, M., & Fujita, S. (2007). Grip strength predicts cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and elderly persons. Am J Med, 120(4), 337-342. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.04.018 Shim, E. Y., Ma, S. H., Hong, S. H., Lee, Y. S., Paik, W. Y., Seo, D. S., . . . Yoon, J. L. (2011). Correlation between Frailty Level and Adverse Health-related Outcomes of Community-Dwelling Elderly, One Year Retrospective Study. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 32(4), 249-256. doi:10.4082/kjfm.2011.32.4.249 Sternberg, S. A., Wershof Schwartz, A., Karunananthan, S., Bergman, H., & Mark Clarfield, A. (2011). The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J Am Geriatr Soc, 59(11), 2129-2138. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x Steverink, N., Slaets, J. P. J., Schuurmans, H., & van Lis, M. (2001). Measuring frailty: Developing and testing the GFI (Groningen frailty indicator). Gerontologist, 41, 236-237. Svensson, S., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2012). A Comparison between Two Instruments for Assessing Dependency in Daily Activities: Agreement of the Northwick Park Dependency Score with the Functional Independence Measure. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2012, 769513. doi:10.1155/2012/769513 Theou, O., Rockwood, M. R., Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K. (2012). Disability and co-morbidity in relation to frailty: how much do they overlap? Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 55(2), e1-8. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.001 Tinetti, M. E., Inouye, S. K., Gill, T. M., & Doucette, J. T. (1995). Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence: Unifying the approach to geriatric syndromes. JAMA, 273(17), 1348-1353. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520410042024 Tomassini, C. (2006). The oldest old in Great Britain: change over the last 20 years. POPULATION TRENDS-LONDON-, 123, 32. Topinkova, E. (2008). Aging, disability and frailty. Ann Nutr Metab, 52 Suppl 1, 6-11. doi:10.1159/000115340 Trombetti, A., Hars, M., Hsu, F. C., Reid, K. F., Church, T. S., Gill, T. M., . . . Fielding, R. A. (2018). Effect of Physical Activity on Frailty: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. doi:10.7326/m16-2011 van Doorslaer, E., Masseria, C., Koolman, X., & for the, O. H. E. R. G. (2006). Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(2), 177-183. doi:10.1503/cmaj.050584 Vaughan, L., Corbin, A. L., & Goveas, J. S. (2015). Depression and frailty in later life: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging, 10, 1947-1958. doi:10.2147/cia.s69632 Vina, J., Rodriguez-Manas, L., Salvador-Pascual, A., Tarazona-Santabalbina, F. J., & Gomez-Cabrera, M. C. (2016). Exercise: the lifelong supplement for healthy ageing and slowing down the onset of frailty. J Physiol, 594(8), 1989-1999. doi:10.1113/jp270536 Walston, J., McBurnie, M. A., Newman, A., Tracy, R. P., Kop, W. J., Hirsch, C. H., . . . Fried, L. P. (2002). Frailty and activation of the inflammation and coagulation systems with and without clinical comorbidities: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med, 162(20), 2333-2341. Waltz, C., Strickland, O., & Lenz, E. (1985). Measurement in nursing research.Philadelphia: Davis.: Wiley Online Library. Wang, C. Y., Hu, M. H., Chen, H. Y., & Li, R. H. (2012). Self-reported mobility and instrumental activities of daily living: test-retest reliability and criterion validity. J Aging Phys Act, 20(2), 186-197. WHO. (2002). Active ageing: a policy framework. Wong, C. H., Weiss, D., Sourial, N., Karunananthan, S., Quail, J. M., Wolfson, C., & Bergman, H. (2010). Frailty and its association with disability and comorbidity in a community-dwelling sample of seniors in Montreal: a cross-sectional study. Aging Clin Exp Res, 22(1), 54-62. doi:10.3275/6675 Woo, J., Yu, R., & Leung, J. (2018). Predictive Ability of Individual Items of the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) Scale Compared With the Summative Score. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 19(5), 444-449. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.11.006 Woods, N. F., LaCroix, A. Z., & Gray, S. L. (2005). Frailty: emergence and consequences in women aged 65 and older in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 53. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53405.x Wu, C., Smit, E., Xue, Q. L., & Odden, M. C. (2017). Prevalence and Correlates of Frailty among Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. doi:10.1093/gerona/glx098 Xue, Q.-L. (2011). The Frailty Syndrome: Definition and Natural History. Clinics in geriatric medicine, 27(1), 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.009 內政部統計處. (2011). 內政部統計通報. Retrieved from http://www.moi.gor.tw/ 吳沄蓁, & 趙淑員. (2011). 社區獨居老人的健康需求、需求滿意度及影響因素探討-以彰化縣某鄉鎮為例. [Health needs, needs satisfaction and correlated factors among elderly people living alone in community]. 弘光學報(63), 44-64. doi:10.6615/har.201106.63.05 吳佩穎. (2011). 偏遠地區老年男性衰弱盛行率及相關危險因子探討. 成功大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2011年) 吳淑瓊, & 張明正. (1997). 台灣老人健康照護之現況分析. 台北: 國立台灣大學公共衛生研究所暨衛生政策研究中心. 呂貝蕾, 張淑玲, 陳晶瑩, 吳治勳, 張靜怡, & 陳慶餘. (2010). 門診慢性病老人衰弱症之分析. [Frailty Status and Associated Factors in Outpatient Older People with Chronic Disease]. 台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌, 5(1), 36-49. 周建卿. (1985). 老人對社會家庭應如何適應: 中華日報. 秦毛魚, 邱啟潤, 蕭正光, & 盧德發. (2003). 社區獨居老人自覺健康狀態及醫療服務使用相關性之探討. 國家發展委員會. (2016). 中華民國人口推估(105至150年)數據-中推估. 國家衛生研究院. (2016). 2013 年「國民健康訪問調查」結果報告. 梁碧雲. (2007). 獨居老人之孤獨經驗研究-以新竹市四位老人為例. 莊裕寬. (1998). 從社區照顧談平宅關懷獨居老人的具體作法. 福利社會季刊, 15-20. 陳玉敏. (2001). 獨居老年人之自我照顧需求. [Self-Care Needs of the Elderly Living Alone]. 榮總護理, 18(3), 223-233. doi:10.6142/vghn.18.3.223 陳燕禎. (1998). 老人社區照顧--關懷獨居老人的具體作法. 社區發展季刊, 83, 244-254. 黃秋華. (2001). 台北市獨居老人使用社會福利服務之研究. 東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文, 臺中. 楊培珊. (1999). 台北市獨居老人生活暨需求概況─ 以文山區為例. 台大社會學刊(27), 143-188. 楊淵韓, 李明濱, & 劉景寬. (2009). 極早期阿茲海默氏失智症之篩檢. 臺灣醫界, 52(9), 8-10. 葉淑娟, 施智婷, 莊智薰, & 蔡淑鳳. (2004). 社會支持系統與老人生活滿意度之關係-以高雄市老人為例. [The Relationship between Social Supports and Life Satisfaction for Elderly in Kaohsiung]. 中山管理評論, 12(2), 399-427. doi:10.6160/2004.06.06 鄒曉婷, 郭冠良, 何清幼, 吳岱穎, 陳淑廷, & 周佑霖. (2016). 獨居與非獨居長者健康狀況之比較. [The Impact of Living Alone on Health Condition among the Elderly]. 北市醫學雜誌, 13(1), 47-60. doi:10.6200/tcmj.2016.13.1.05 衛生福利部. (2016). 長期照顧十年計畫 2.0. 衛生福利部. (2018). 新制長期照顧給付及支付基準問答集. Retrieved from file:///D:/Users/user/Downloads/107.04.13--新制長期照顧給付及支付基準問答集(公告版).pdf. 衛生福利部統計處. (2013). 社會統計名詞定義. Retrieved from https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-10020-6fa95a81-675c-4325-8d84-e8c9e4f5c7f1.html. 衛生福利部統計處. (2018). 列冊需關懷獨居老人人數按鄉鎮市區別分. Retrieved from https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-22128-02e7027a-e4fb-44fc-8ef5-93f1373e4536.html. 鄭丁靚, 黃安君, & 彭莉甯. (2016). 國際肌少症研究診斷標準彙整. 台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌, 11(4), 213-224. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73277 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究背景與目的:
在人口高齡化及失能比例增加的影響下,為了延緩長者失能時間以降低醫療服務的支出,WHO於2002年提出活躍老化的概念強調維持長者健康為重要的課題。臺灣長期照顧十年計劃2.0政策也擴大服務對象至衰弱長者,受到衰弱目前沒有統一的定義影響,發展出不同的衰弱評估量表,其中長照2.0政策公布是使用Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF)量表進行社區衰弱篩檢。然而,此量表尚未有研究證實可有效的評估臺灣社區長者。本研究目的將以較普及的Fried’s Frailty Phenotype量表作為黃金量表,驗證SOF量表是否可有效評估臺灣的社區長者。除此之外,因考量到獨居長者在心理健康及社會支持方面與一般社區長者有差異,所以也進一步探討獨居長者與一般社區長者在不同的評估量表是否有差異。 研究方法: 本研究採橫斷性問卷調查,以立意取樣的形式進行收案;收案對象分別為臺北市南港區65歲以上的一般社區長者369位及列冊關懷獨居長者102位。資料分析分為三個部分(1)將Fried’s Frailty Phenotype量表為黃金量表,以斯皮爾曼等級相關係數(Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient)驗證SOF量表的同時效度。(2)將兩種量表與IADL失能及跌倒以AUC及複迴歸進行預測效度的驗證。(3)以卡方檢定、多元邏輯斯迴歸分析 (Multiple logistic regression analysis)比較一般社區長者與獨居長者在控制共變數後兩種量表的結果,並探討獨居長者適用於哪一種評估工具。 研究結果: 使用Fried’s Frailty Phenotype量表評估為衰弱的長者佔10.6%、衰弱前期的長者佔57.7%;使用SOF量表評估為衰弱的長者佔8.1%、衰弱前期的長者佔36.3%。以Fried’s Frailty Phenotype量表為黃金量表時,與SOF量表之間達中度相關 (r =0.510 , p <0.001)。兩種量表對於失能及跌倒的結果沒有一致的方向顯是哪一種量表有較好的鑑別度。在使用AUC分析結果顯示SOF量表預測跌倒的鑑別力較佳(AUCSOF=0.657,AUC Fried’s Frailty Phenotype =0.642, p <0.001 ),Fried’s Frailty Phenotype量表預測IADL失能的鑑別力較佳(AUCSOF=0.657,AUC Fried’s Frailty Phenotype =0.642, p <0.001)。以獨居長者及一般社區長者比較在兩種量表的結果,顯示兩族群在不同量表評估結果有差異(p <0.001),兩族群在Fried’s Frailty Phenotype量表的差異較以SOF量表評估結果大,代表在控制共變數後,無論使用哪個量表,獨居長者皆比一般社區長者有較高的風險進入衰弱或衰弱前期。(Fried’s Frailty Phenotype:OR衰弱前期=0.309,p <0.001; OR衰弱=0.092,p <0.001。SOF:OR衰弱前期=1.185,p =0.707; OR衰弱=0.304,p =0.002)。透過預測跌倒及失能的結果顯示Fried’s Frailty Phenotype較能偵測獨居長者發生跌倒及失能的風險,所以獨居長者較適合使用Fried’s Frailty Phenotype(AUC跌倒=0.688;AUC失能=0.676)。 結論與建議: SOF量表可以作為有效評估臺灣社區長者衰弱的工具,但獨居長者較適合使用fried等人提出的量表。本研究結果支持政策上使用SOF量表進行臺灣社區長者的衰弱篩檢。另一方面,本研究結果發現生理指標為社區長者及獨居長者最常見的衰弱指標,因此建議可以在評估社區長者時,除了使用SOF 量表也加入「緩慢」;獨居長者方面,建議也加入「緩慢」及「虛弱」指標進行評估。隨著預防失能的議題受到重視,以有效的評估工具進行衰弱篩檢才可提供預防及失能服務提供給最需要的族群。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background and purpose:Disability have become a critical issue in Taiwan due to the rapidly growing aging population. In 2002, WHO introduced the concept of active aging as well as emphasizing the importance of disability prevention for the elderly. Taiwan’s Ten-Year Long-Term Care 2.0 policy has also expanded long-term care service to the older adults with frailty, in order to prevent further disability. However, the tools for measuring frailty remains controversial, especially in Taiwan. It is more common in the world to use Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index to measure frailty. However, Taiwanese governments use the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index (SOF index) to assess the degree of frailty for the purpose of easy application. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the tool properties of the SOF index and the Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index in general community-dwelling older adulating living in Nai-King communities in Taiwan. In addition, since previous studies have indicated that older adults living alone may be lack of social support, and therefore may be with poor mental health comparing to other community-dwelling older adults. Thus, the present study also intended to discuss whether there were different assessment results between the group of older adults living alone and community-dwelling older adults when using the two frailty scales.
Method:This study was a cross-sectional survey study and the data was collected using purposive sampling. We collected 369 general community-dwelling older adults and 102 older adults who were living alone from Nangang District of Taipei City. All participants were above 65 years old. For data analysis, (1) Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient was adopted to understand the association between frailty as measured by the Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index and the SOF index. (2) Area under the curve (AUC) analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to test respective models by measuring the predictive validity of fall and IADL disability from Frailty Phenotype index and SOF index. (3) Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression analysis were applied to evaluate the applicable index for elderly who lives alone. Results:Using the Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index, 10.6% and 57.7% of the overall participants were assessed as frail and prefrail respectively. Using the SOF index, 8.1% and 36.3% were assessed as frail and prefrail respectively. The Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient showed moderate association (r = 0.510, p < 0.001) between the Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index and the SOF index. However, these two frailty indexes were inconsistent with their ability to predict fall and disability. Besides, this study also compares with the difference between the older adults who lived alone and the community-dwelling older adults. The result of AUC showed that the SOF predicted fall better (AUCSOF=0.657, AUC Fried’s Frailty Phenotype =0.642, p <0.001) and the Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index predicted IADL disability better (AUCSOF=0.657, AUC Fried’s Frailty Phenotype =0.642, p <0.001). With covariates included, using the Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index showed that older adults who were living alone had a higher risk of becoming prefrail (OR prefrail = 0.309, p <0.001) and frail (OR frailty = 0.092, p <0.001) when compared to the general community-dwelling older adults. However, using the SOF index showed that older adults who were living along had an equal risk of becoming prefrail (OR prefrail = 1.185, p = 0.707) and higher risk of becoming frail (OR frailty = 0.304, p < 0.001) comparing to the general community-dwelling older adults. Moreover, the AUC comparisons revealed Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index is more sensitive to predict the risk of fall and disability (AUC fall = 0.688; AUC disability =0.676). Therefore, people who live alone suitable for using Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index to evaluate their frailty status. Conclusions and recommendations:We found that the SOF index is a validated tool to evaluate frailty especially for general community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. However, the Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index is more sensitive for the elderly who lived alone. Our study findings support the long-term care policy which used the SOF index to screen and measure frailty regulations by the Taiwanese governments. We recommend that the SOF index and indicators of slowness should be combined used for measuring the status of frailty among older adults who live in the community. In addition, we also recommend that the SOF index and indicators of slowness and weakness should be combined used for measuring the status of frailty among older adults who live alone. To support healthy aging and disability prevention is an important challenge for public health in Taiwan, with a good tool to t evaluate frailty status will greatly contribute to success. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:26:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05848021-1.pdf: 1840405 bytes, checksum: 8bd86ebd90c9dc7d18bb6c5c25fd42a7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
中文摘要 II ABSTRACT IV 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與研究重要性 1 第二節 研究缺口與研究目的 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 衰弱 6 第二節 衰弱評估方法 14 第三節 獨居長者 23 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 研究架構及研究假說 27 第二節 研究對象與收案方式 29 第三節 測量工具與測量方法 30 第四節 問卷信效度分析 39 第五節 統計方法 41 第四章 研究結果 46 第一節 問卷預試信效度分析結果 47 第二節 正式收案信度分析結果 48 第三節 一般社區長者及列冊關懷獨居長者與社會人口特質之分析結果50 第四節 不同衰弱評估量表中各指標在兩族群長者評估結果 54 第五節 不同衰弱評估量表與跌倒及失能之雙變項分析結果 58 第六節 不同族群在FRIED’S FRAILTY PHENOTYPE量表及SOF量表結果之比較 61 第七節 不同衰弱評估量表對於跌倒之ROC曲線 69 第八節 不同衰弱評估量表對於失能之ROC曲線 75 第九節 不同衰弱評估量表對於跌倒及失能之影響 81 第十節 一般社區長者及列冊關懷獨居長者在不同衰弱量表之差異 86 第十一節 小結 87 第五章 討論 89 第一節 量表信度與專家效度 89 第二節 FRIED’S FRAILTY PHENOTYPE量表與SOF量表的衰弱盛行率比較 91 第三節 兩種量表的效標關聯效度 93 第四節 一般社區長者與列冊關懷獨居長者在兩個衰弱量表是否有差異 97 第五節 研究限制 99 第六章 結論與建議 100 第一節 研究結論 100 第二節 建議 102 第七章 參考文獻 105 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | Study of Osteoporotic Fractures(SOF)衰弱量表的信效度驗證-以臺灣社區長者及獨居長者分別探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Validity and Reliability of Osteoporotic Fractures(SOF) scale:Cases of the Elderly Living in Community and Elderly Persons Living Alone in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳淑瓊,游曉微 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 衰弱,衰弱量表比較,效標關聯效度,獨居長者, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Frailty,Comparison of frailty index,Criterion-related Validity,Elderly Living Alone, | en |
dc.relation.page | 114 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901058 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-06-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.8 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。