請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73260
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 洪美仁(Mei-Jen Hung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Cai-Rou Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊彩柔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:25:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-12-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-12-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 李仲彬,2013,〈政府創新的類型與分佈:我國地方政府1999-2010年間的觀察〉,《公共行政學報》,(44):73-112。 李仲彬,2018,〈與生俱來與後天培養:影響公務人員創新態度與行為的因素分析〉,《公共行政學報》,(54):1-40。 馬彩瑛,2015,《從協力創新觀點探討臺中市愛心食物銀行之運作》,台中:國立中興大學國家政策與公共事務研究所碩士論文。 彭俊亨,2010,《協力創新在公部門應用之研究:文建會推動文化創意產業發展政策為例》,台北:國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。 黃建實,2020,〈協力治理如何使得公部門創新?〉,《公共行政學報》,(58):149-156。 游蕙瑜,2020,《以資料治理與協力觀點探究資料公益專案-以D4SG資料英雄計畫為例》,台北:國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。 陳啟光、陳玉真、于長禧、蔡政和,2006,〈政府機關之間為民服務創新作為擴散過程之探討〉,《品質學報》,13(3):329-343。 張世杰,2011,〈公共治理與地方創新:宜蘭縣社區林業計畫的推展經驗〉,《空大行政學報》,22(特刊):113-158。 廖洲棚、廖興中、黃心怡,2018,〈開放政府服務策略研析調查:政府資料開放應用模式評估與民眾參與公共政策意願調查〉,國家發展委員會委託之研究(報告編號:NDC-MIS-106-003)。 唐錦超譯,2006,《創新的擴散》,台北:遠流。譯自:Everett M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovation. 2006. Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 51-56. Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. Ansell, C., Torfing, J. (2014). Public innovation through collaboration and design. New York, NY: Routledge. Badger, E. (2013). Are civic hackathons stupid. Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/life/2013/07/are-hackathons-stupid/6111/ Baldridge, J. V., Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 165-176. Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. G., Voorberg, W. H. (2013). From public innovation to social innovation in the public sector: A literature review of relevant drivers and barriers. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Berry, F. S. (1994). Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 22(3), 442-456. Berry, F. S., Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 223-260): Routledge. Biernat, M., Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender-and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 72(3), 544. Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1), 15-33. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross‐Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55. Clausen, T. H., Demircioglu, M. A., Alsos, G. A. (2019). Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors. Public Administration, 98(1), 159-176. Damanpour, F., Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495-522. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. Eggers, W. D., Singh, S. K. (2009). The Public Innovator's Playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government: Ash Institute, Harvard Kennedy School. Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174-1185. Gregg, M. (2015). Hack for good: Speculative labour, app development and the burden of austerity. The Fibreculture Journal, (25), 183-201. Hansson, K., Belkacem, K., Ekenberg, L. (2015). Open government and democracy: A research review. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 540-555. Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821-830. Head, B. W., Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration Society, 47(6), 711-739. Hou, Y., Lampe, C. (2017, June). Sustainable hacking: characteristics of the design and adoption of civic hacking projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. ACM, 125–134. Johnson, P., Robinson, P. (2014). Civic hackathons: Innovation, procurement, or civic engagement? Review of Policy Research, 31(4), 349-357. Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J. (2007). Meta-governance as network management. In Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 199-214). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Liu, C.-K., Hsieh, T. (2017). Lessons learned from using data science to empower change agents across data silos. Paper presented at the Data Science for Social Good Conference, Chicago. Lopes, A. V., Farias, J. S. (2020). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0(0), 1-17. McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33-43. Mintrom, M., Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-148. Osborne, S. P., Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335-1350. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press. Schrock, A. R. (2016). Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media Society, 18(4), 581-599. Scott, T. A., Thomas, C. W. (2017). Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: Why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies? Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 191-214. Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration Society, 43(8), 842-868. Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2017). Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 826-839. Tang, H. (1998). An integrative model of innovation in organizations. Technovation, 18(5), 297-309. Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11. Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899. Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of local government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311-335. Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591-615. Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, S., Liu, C., Hsieh, T. (2017). Data for Social Good: A case study of building an effective public-private partnership on domestic violence prevention. Paper presented at the Data Science for Social Good Conference, Chicago. Wegrich, K. (2019). The blind spots of collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 21(1), 12-20. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73260 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著社會問題日益複雜,政府常需要仰賴民間的技術與創意共同協作。近年來出現了一種新的資料協力模式—資料英雄計畫,成為政府妥善應用數據資料的新合作模式。本文以資料英雄計畫作為研究個案,應用Sørensen與Torfing(2011)提出的協力式創新架構與Rogers(1995)創新擴散因素進行分析。研究方法上,將以公部門社福領域專案為研究對象,採取半結構式的深度訪談來回答主要的研究問題:申請之動機、公部門之條件與環境、協力過程的優勢與障礙、公部門實際採用後之影響與擴散其他機關的可能因素。 研究結果發現,公部門參與計畫的動機主要受到早期專案的成功案例、組織所遇到的痛點等因素影響。支持公部門進入協作場域關鍵的條件則在於長官的支持與組織內資源的配合。另根據訪談結果整理出三個協作優勢與四個協作障礙,優勢包括:能發揮不同專業背景之長、資料英雄們對公益的熱情與使命感、以及專案顧問的專案經驗與轉譯;障礙則包括溝通成本高、資料品質不佳、政府對於外部參與者的質疑、與政府承辦人角色定位的尷尬。在創新擴散方面,本研究發現資料英雄計畫具備許多吸引潛在採用者的創新特徵,並主要透過人際關係互動來傳遞計畫的活動訊息與創新成果,促使組織的領導者決策加入協作創新,影響或推動其他公部門的組織變革。也因為資料英雄計畫具備彈性、公益等特性,對於政府而言不僅可以促進不同網絡間的交流,亦能降低公部門開發的風險,只是在協作過程中政府仍需注意成果品質的把關與參與同仁們的壓力。 最後針對研究結果給予反思與建議,前者包括各方行動者的動機、公部門內部創新的困難與現實、城鄉差距造成創新能量差異等。後者對政府之建議包括:注意協作隱含的公務人力成本、改善資料品質、建立創新成果的評估指標、開放創新週期、創新策略的採取。另外說明本研究之限制,並建議未來研究者可進一步探究之方向。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With the increasing complexity of social issues, the government usually depends on nongovernmental technology and innovation for collaboration. Recently, a new collaborative data governance, D4SG Fellowship Program, has occurred and become a new pattern for government to use data properly. As the case in the study, D4SG Fellowship Program is analyzed by using the framework for collaborative innovation from Sørensen and Torfing (2011) as well as diffusion of innovation from Rogers (1995). As for its research method, the study focuses on social welfare projects of public sectors with semi-structured interview to answer the major research questions: motivations for application, conditions and surroundings of public sectors, advantages and barriers during collaboration, impacts of collaborative data governance on a public sector and possible causes of its diffusion to other public sectors. The result indicates that the public sector’s motivations for participating in the project mainly results from its prior experiences from successful projects, pain points confronting it, etc. The key points of a public sector’s involvement in collaborative fields lie in supportive superiors and available internal resources. Besides, three collaborative advantages and four collaborative barriers are summed up according to the interview. Advantages include: specialists from different fields, data scientists’ passion for and sense of duty in social welfare, and mentors’ experiences and translation in the projects; barriers include high communication cost, poor data quality, the government’s distrust of external participants, and lack of clarification of governmental case officers’ role. In terms of diffusion of innovation, the study found that D4SG Fellowship Program has lots of innovation characteristics to attract potential adopters, and conveys a project’s information and the outcome of its innovation mainly through interpersonal channels, which leads to an organization leader’s decision to participate in collaborative innovation, making influence on or bring reformation to other public sectors. Due to flexibility and public benefit D4SG Fellowship Program provides, the government not only can facilitate the communication among different networks, but it can also reduce the development risks of public sectors. However, the government should note outcome quality of a collaboration as well as pressure on colleagues participating in it. Finally, reflections and suggestions are provided based on its result. Reflections on the result involve motivations for all the participants, difficulties of innovation inside the public sectors and the innovation gaps caused by urban-rural gap, and so on. Suggestions for the government include: noting labor cost of collaboration, improving data quality, setting up evaluation index of innovation, being open to innovations, and adoption of innovative strategies. Besides, the result shows the limitations of the study, and recommendations for what future researchers could further look at are following at the end. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:25:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1412202019162100.pdf: 4424703 bytes, checksum: 6281698a11ac770399ca29feac73c21b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 資料英雄計畫介紹 4 第三節 研究目的與研究問題 8 第二章 文獻回顧 10 第一節 公部門創新 10 第二節 從協力治理至協力式創新 21 第三節 文獻發現與未來進展 28 第三章 研究架構與方法 31 第一節 研究架構 31 第二節 研究方法 38 第四章 資料英雄計畫協力過程分析 42 第一節 初始條件-公部門申請之動機與條件 42 第二節 互動場域-協力創新過程之優勢與障礙 51 第三節 公共創新產出與評估-專案之採用與評估 67 第四節 創新擴散分析 84 第五章 結論與建議 99 第一節 研究發現 99 第二節 反思與建議 103 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 112 參考文獻 114 附錄 訪談大綱 120 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 政府資料之協力式創新-以資料英雄計畫為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Collaborative Innovation for Government Data: The Case Study of D4SG Fellowship Program | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭乃沂(Nai-Yi Hsiao),李仲彬(Chung-Pin Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 協力治理,創新,協力創新,資料英雄計畫, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | collaborative governance,innovation,collaborative innovation,D4SG Fellowship Program, | en |
dc.relation.page | 121 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004422 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-12-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1412202019162100.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。