請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73192完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林建甫 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Ying Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳姿穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:21:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-10 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-10 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 陳旭昇(2013),《時間序列分析: 總體經濟與財務金融之應用》,第二版,台北:東華書局。
Abdullah, D. A., & Hayworth, S. C. (1993). “Macroeconometrics of stock price fluctuations.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 50-67. Apergis, N., & Miller, S. M. (2006). “Consumption asymmetry and the stock market: empirical evidence.” Economics Letters, 93(3), 337-342. Asprem, M. (1989). “Stock prices, asset portfolios and macroeconomic variables in ten European countries.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 13(4-5), 589-612. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Sohrabian, A. (1992). “Stock prices and the effective exchange rate of the dollar.” Applied Economics, 24(4), 459-464. Binswanger, M. (2000). “Stock returns and real activity: is there still a connection?.” Applied Financial Economics, 10(4), 379-387. Bjørnland, H. C., & Leitemo, K. (2009). “Identifying the interdependence between US monetary policy and the stock market.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2), 275-282. Chen, N. F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). “Economic forces and the stock market.” Journal of Business, 383-403. Fama, E. F., & Schwert, G. W. (1977). “Asset returns and inflation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 115-146. Fama, E. F. (1981). “Stock returns, real activity, inflation, and money.” The American Economic Review, 71(4), 545-565. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1989). “Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 23-49. Fama, E. F. (1990). “Stock returns, expected returns, and real activity.” The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1089-1108. Gay, R. D. (2016). “Effect of macroeconomic variables on stock market returns for four emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, and China.” The International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online), 15(3), 119. Gregoriou, A., Hunter, J., & Wu, F. (2009). “An empirical investigation of the relationship between the real economy and stock returns for the United States.” Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(1), 133-143. Hassapis, C., & Kalyvitis, S. (2002). “Investigating the links between growth and real stock price changes with empirical evidence from the G-7 economies.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42(3), 543-575. Humpe, A., & Macmillan, P. (2009). “Can macroeconomic variables explain long-term stock market movements? A comparison of the US and Japan.” Applied Financial Economics, 19(2), 111-119. Kwon, C. S., & Shin, T. S. (1999). “Cointegration and causality between macroeconomic variables and stock market returns.” Global Finance Journal, 10(1), 71-81. Lee, B. S. (1992). “Causal relations among stock returns, interest rates, real activity, and inflation.” The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1591-1603. Maysami, R. C., & Koh, T. S. (2000). “A vector error correction model of the Singapore stock market.” International Review of Economics & Finance, 9(1), 79-96. Mukherjee, T. K., & Naka, A. (1995). “Dynamic relations between macroeconomic variables and the Japanese stock market: an application of a vector error correction model.” Journal of Financial Research, 18(2), 223-237. Rahman, M. (2008). “Influences of money supply and oil price on US stock market.” North American Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 2(2). Ratanapakorn, O., & Sharma, S. C. (2007). “Dynamic analysis between the US stock returns and the macroeconomic variables.” Applied Financial Economics, 17(5), 369-377. Rjoub, H., Türsoy, T., & Günsel, N. (2009). “The effects of macroeconomic factors on stock returns: Istanbul Stock Market.” Studies in Economics and Finance, 26(1), 36-45. Schwert, G. W. (1990). “Stock returns and real activity: A century of evidence.” The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1237-1257. Sirucek, M. (2012). “Macroeconomic variables and stock market: US review.” Solnik, B., Boucrelle, C., & Le Fur, Y. (1996). “International market correlation and volatility.” Financial Analysts Journal, 52(5), 17-34. Wongbangpo, P., & Sharma, S. C. (2002). “Stock market and macroeconomic fundamental dynamic interactions: ASEAN-5 countries.” Journal of Asian Economics, 13(1), 27-51. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73192 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究採用向量誤差修正模型探討美國標普500指數與貨幣供給M2、美國十年期與三個月期公債殖利率利差、美國投資級公司債信用利差、零售銷售數據以及每月非農就業新增人數等五個經濟變數間的關聯性,研究的資料期間為2000年1月至2018年12月之月資料。
實證結果顯示(1) 變數間有五組共整合關係,標普500指數與貨幣供給、零售銷售數據與非農就業數據呈正相關;而與美公債殖利率利差呈負相關。(2) 美公司債信用利差、零售銷售數據與貨幣供給皆「Granger領先」標普500指數。(3) 當向量誤差修正模型分別受到來自標普500指數本身、零售銷售數據以及非農就業數據的衝擊時,標普500指數會呈現正向反應;當模型受到來自美公司債信用利差與美公債殖利率利差的衝擊時,標普500指數則會呈現負向反應。(4)預測誤差變異分解的結果為總體經濟變數對標普500指數價格波動的解釋力在第36個月時達47%,顯示對美國市場而言,總體經濟變數的衝擊會對美股價格造成一定程度的影響。其中又以標普500指數本身、零售銷售數據以及美公司債信用利差的解釋力最佳。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study applies the vector error correction model (VECM) to investigate the relationship between the US S&P 500 Index and five macroeconomic variables (money supply M2, the spread between 3-month and 10-year treasury yield, US investment-grade credit spread, retail sales and nonfarm payroll) over the period from January 2000 to December 2018.
The empirical results demonstrate that (1) there are five cointegration relationships. The S&P 500 Index is positively related to money supply, retail sales and nonfarm payroll, and is negatively related to the US treasury yield spread. (2) US investment-grade credit spread, retail sales and money supply do “Granger-cause” the S&P 500 Index. (3) When the VECM model faces the shock from the S&P 500 Index, retail sales and nonfarm payroll, the S&P 500 Index will react positively. However, when the model encounters the shock from the US investment-grade credit spread and the US treasury yield spread, the S&P 500 Index will react negatively. (4) The result of the forecast error variance decomposition shows that the macroeconomic variables’ explanatory power toward S&P 500 Index reaches 47% after 36 months. This indicates that for the US market, the shock from the macroeconomic variables influences the US stock prices to a certain degree. Moreover, the S&P 500 Index, retail sales and US investment-grade credit spread have better explanatory power among all the other variables. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:21:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06323047-1.pdf: 1342769 bytes, checksum: 9828b8ab6140d703c8adad2d252c556b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 論文架構 6 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 股票報酬與實體經濟活動的關聯性 7 第二節 全球股市實證研究 7 第三節 美股實證研究 9 第三章 研究方法 12 第一節 單根檢定 12 第二節 Johansen共整合關係檢定 14 第三節 向量誤差修正模型 15 第四節 Granger因果關係檢定 17 第五節 衝擊反應函數 18 第六節 預測誤差變異分解 19 第四章 實證結果分析 20 第一節 資料來源與說明 20 第二節 單根檢定結果 24 第三節 共整合檢定實證結果 27 第四節 向量誤差修正模型實證結果 30 第五節 Granger因果關係檢定實證結果 31 第六節 向量誤差修正模型的穩定性檢驗 33 第七節 衝擊反應函數實證結果 34 第八節 預測誤差變異分解實證結果 37 第五章 結論與建議 39 第一節 結論 39 第二節 研究限制與建議 40 參考文獻 41 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 預測誤差變異分解 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 衝擊反應函數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Granger因果關係檢定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 向量誤差修正模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 美國總體經濟變數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 標普500指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共整合關係檢定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Forecast Error Variance Decomposition | en |
| dc.subject | S&P 500 Index | en |
| dc.subject | Cointegration Test | en |
| dc.subject | Vector Error Correction Model | en |
| dc.subject | Granger Causality Test | en |
| dc.subject | Impulse Response Function | en |
| dc.subject | US Macroeconomic Variables | en |
| dc.title | 美國股市與總體經濟變數間的動態關聯性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Dynamic Relationship Between US Stock Market and the Macroeconomic Variables | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 翁永和,許振明,林世昌 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 美國總體經濟變數,標普500指數,共整合關係檢定,向量誤差修正模型,Granger因果關係檢定,衝擊反應函數,預測誤差變異分解, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | US Macroeconomic Variables,S&P 500 Index,Cointegration Test,Vector Error Correction Model,Granger Causality Test,Impulse Response Function,Forecast Error Variance Decomposition, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901223 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.31 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
