請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73166
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳東升 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dung-Sheng Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭珮宸 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Pei-Chen Cheng | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:20:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
石鎮嘉,2007。〈兒童遊戲權之研究_從聯合國兒童權利公約第三十一條檢視我國兒童遊戲權之保障〉。國立臺北教育大學文教法律研究所。 成令方,2002。〈醫「用」關係的知識與權力〉。台灣社會學(3),頁 11-71。 吳采玲,2017。〈家庭主婦抑或是家「停」主婦?國小志願服務歷程之研究〉。臺北市立大學人文藝術學院國民小學教師在職進修公民與社會教學,台北。 吳嘉苓,2011。〈 編排風險:多胚胎孕育的多重社會科技網絡〉。《台灣社會學》22,頁 111-156。 李芳瑾,2007。〈誰的媽媽不「模範」?台灣「理想母親」形象的論述建構。東海大學社會學系,台中。 李惠明,2007。中年女性參與讀書會對生命發展影響之研究。臺灣師範大學社會教育學系。 林國明,2014,〈審議的不平等:台灣公民會議的言說互動〉。《台灣社會學》27:1-50。 林秀蓉,2016,《教保服務人員對戶外遊戲場安全認知與安全維護關係之相關研究》。發布地點:國立臺南大學幼兒教育學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 邱育芳,1996,〈婦女社區參與和現代母職的實踐:以主婦聯盟的社區運動為例分析〉。新竹:清華大學博碩士論文。 俞彥娟,2005,〈女性主義對母親角色研究的影響:以美國婦女史為例〉。女學學誌(20):1-40。 洪清淵,2012,〈鄰里公園兒童遊戲設施選用與安全檢驗方法之研究—以桃園縣八德市為例〉。桃園:國立中央大學,土木工程學系碩士在職專班,碩士論文。 范代希,2017,。〈另類科學母職與順勢療法〉。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究(41),頁 51-104。 范雲,2003,〈政治轉型過程中的婦女運動:以運動者及其生命傳記背景為核心的分析取向〉。《台灣社會學》5:133-193。 范雲,2010,〈說故事與民主討論—一個公民社會內部族群對話論壇的分析〉。《臺灣民主季刊》7(1):65-105。 唐文慧 ,2011,〈 為何職業婦女決定離職?結構限制下的母職認同與實踐〉。《台社會研究季刊》(85),頁 201-265。 夏曉鵑,2006,〈新移民運動的形成―差異政治、主體化與社會性運動〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》61:1-71。 孫鳳吟,2003。〈故事媽媽的社會支持之探究─ 以高雄縣中崙社區快樂故事劇團為例〉。未出版之碩士論文論文,國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄。 張育華、王芳萍、拔耐.茹妮老王(秋月),2014。《伏流潛行:女性社運工作者練功手記》。台北:財團法人導航基金會。 張靜文,1998,〈參與讀書會之成年女性其母職角色認同與轉換歷程之研究〉。台北:國立臺灣師範大學碩博士論文。 曹愛蘭,1996,〈女性與社會運動〉。《婦女與兩性研究通訊》,40,頁 1-3。 梁莉芳,2018,〈養育「無污染」的孩子:有機食品論述、風險管理與母職實作〉。《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》,42,頁 73-125。 莊雅仲,2013,《民主台灣:後威權時代的社會運動與文化政治》。香港:香港中文大學。 莊韻親,2009,〈當個怎樣的母親?戰後台灣法律中的母職建構〉。台北:臺灣大學法律學系,碩博士論文。 許素彬、張耐、王文瑛,2006。〈身心障礙幼兒家長支持團體運作之研究與評估:以領航父母為例〉。《臺大社會工作學刊》,13,頁 1-40。 陳東升,2006,〈審議民主的限制-台灣公民會議的經驗〉。《臺灣民主季刊》, 3(1),頁 77-104。 陳東升、林祐聖 ,2018,〈當社區營造遇到參與式預算:兩個社區的比較研究〉。《台灣社會學》,35,頁 109-149。 陳芳君,2009,〈艾班尼澤.霍華德(Ebenezer Howard,1850-1928)與其「田園城市」理論〉。《史學研究》,22,頁 177-215。 陳昭如,2014,〈父姓的常規,母姓的權利:子女姓氏修法改革的法社會學考察〉。《臺大法學論叢》, 43(2),頁 271-380。 陳素秋,2013,〈差異化的女性公民社會參與:以過程中主體出發〉。《教育與多元文化研究》8:67-103。 陳素秋,2015,〈鑲嵌於性別符碼體系的社會資本生產與運用:以台灣兩個社區的女性參與為例〉。《台灣社會學》30:99-139。 陳錦煌、翁文蒂,2003,〈以社區總體營造推動終身學習、建構公民社會〉。《國家政策季刊》,2(3),頁 63-90。 傅仰止,2014,〈公民意識的社會參與效應:志願結社及日常接觸〉。《台灣社會學刊》, 55,頁 179-226。 黃淑玲等,2017,《性別主流化:臺灣經驗與國際比較》。臺北市:五南。 黃淑玲、伍維婷,2016,〈當婦運衝撞國家:婦權會推動性別主流化的合縱連橫策略〉。《台灣社會學》32:1-55。 黃競涓,2008,〈女性主義對審議式民主之支持與批判〉。《臺灣民主季刊》, 5(3),頁 33-69。 楊佳羚,2014,〈「從太陽花到大腸花:社會運動中的性別議題」會議記錄〉。《「從太陽花到大腸花:社會運動中的性別議題」會議記錄》。高雄市。 葉欣怡、陳東升、林國明、林祐聖,2016,〈參與式預算在社區-文化部推展公民審議及參與式預算實驗計畫〉。《國土及公共治理季刊》,4(4),頁 29-40。 潘淑滿,2005,〈台灣母職圖像〉。《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》20:41-91。 蔡麗玲,1998。〈母職作為女性主義實踐〉。新竹:國立清華大學社會人類學研究所,碩士論文。 蔡榮一,2007,《公園遊戲設備檢驗機構認證機制建立之研究》。發表地點:國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 蕭國邦,2010。〈公共空間的意識形態印記─臺北新公園政治地景的權力流變〉。臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所,碩士論文。 謝素真、徐畢卿,2004。〈 從支持性團體歷程分析看自閉兒母親的轉變〉。《護理雜誌》, 51(3),頁 34-41。 劉若凡,2015,〈成為他自己:全人,給未來世代的教育烏托邦〉。新北市:衛城出版。 劉華真,2008,〈重新思考「運動軌跡」:台灣、南韓的勞工與環境運動〉。《台灣社會學》16:1-47。 謝國雄等,2007,《以身為度、如是我做:田野工作的教與學》。台北市:群學。 鍾燕宜等,2010,〈發展遲緩兒童母親親職壓力之初探〉。《身心障礙研究季刊》8(2):83-98。 藍佩嘉,2004,〈女人何苦為難女人?僱用家務移工的三角關係〉。台灣社會學(8):43-97。 藍佩嘉,2012,〈質性個案研究:紮根理論與延伸個案方法〉。61-92,收錄於瞿海源編,《社會及行為科學研究法》。台北:東華。 藍佩嘉,2014,〈做父母、做階級:親職敘事、教養實作與階級不平等〉。《台灣社會學》27:97-140。 魏惠娟,2002,《學習型學校 : 從概念到實踐》。台北市:五南。 蘇芊玲,1996,《不再模範的母親。台北市:女書文化出版。 顧燕翎主編,1996,《女性主義理論與流派》。臺北市:女書文化。 翻譯書籍 Arendt, Hannah著、王寅麗譯,2009,《人的境況》。上海:上海人民出版社。 Beauvoir, Simone de著、邱瑞鑾譯,2013,《第二性》。台北:貓頭鷹出版。 Biss, Eula著、吳妍儀譯,2016,《疫苗:兩種恐懼的拔河》。臺北市:如果。 Bourdieu, Pierre著、陳逸淳譯,2012,《所述之言:布赫迪厄反思社會學文集》。台北市:麥田。 Bourdieu, Pierre, & Wacquant, Loic J. D著、李猛、李康譯,2009,《布赫迪厄社會學面面觀》。台北:麥田。 Chow, EstherNgan-Ling, Berheide, Catherine White著、王金鈴等譯,2004,《全球視角∶婦女、家庭與公共政策》。上海:社會科學文獻出版社。(Chow, Esther Ngan-Ling, Berheide, Catherine White, 1994, Women, the Family and Policy –A Global Perspective. New York: State University of New York.) Corsaro, William A. 著、程福財譯,2014,《童年社會學》。上海:上海社會科學院。(Corsaro, William A., 1997, The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Pine Forge Press) Donath, Orna著、林佑柔譯,2016,《後悔當媽媽》。新北市:遠足文化。 Goffman, Erving著、曾凡慈譯,2010,《污名:管理受損身分的筆記》。台北:群學。(Goffman, Erving, 1963, Notes On The Management OF Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.) Griffith, Alison I., and Dorothy E. Smith著、呂明蓁等譯,2008,《母職任務與學校教育的拔河》。台北:高等教育出版社。(Griffith, Alison I., and Dorothy E. Smith, 2005, Mothering for schooling. London: Routledge.) Hanson, Clare著、章梅芳譯, 2010,《懷孕文化史:懷孕、醫學和文化;1750-2000》。北京市:北京大學出版社. James, Allison , Chris Jenks, and Alan Prout著、何芳譯,2014,《童年論》。上海:上海社會科學院。(James, Allison , Chris Jenks, and Alan Prout, 1998, Theorizing childhood. Chicago: Teachers College Press.) Johnson, Allan G.著、成令方等譯,2008[1997],《性別打結:拆解父權違建》。台北市:群學。 Korczak, Janusz著、林蔚譯,2016,《如何愛孩子:波蘭兒童人權之父的教育札記》台北:心靈工坊。 Lancy, David F.著、陳信宏譯,2017,《童年人類學》。臺北市:貓頭鷹出版。 Lareau, Annette著、李怡慧譯,2015,《家庭優勢》。新北市:群學。 May, Rollo著、朱侃如譯,2004 ,《焦慮的意義》。臺北縣:立緒文化。 Mills, C. Wright著、張君玫與劉鈐佑譯,1995,《社會學的想像》。臺北市:巨流。 Ourm, Anthony M著、周維萱等譯,2012,《政治社會學 : 當代世界的權力和參與》。臺北市:巨流。 Pariser, Eli著、宋瑛堂譯,2013,《搜尋引擎沒告訴你的事》。台北:左岸文化。 Parker, Simon著、王志弘、徐苔玲譯,2007,《遇見都市 : 理論與經驗》。台北市:群學。 Putnam, Robert著、北京大學出版社譯,2011《獨自打保齡──美國社區的衰落與復興》。北京:北京大學出版社。 Schwarzer, Alice著,婦女新知編譯組譯,2001,《拒絕做第二性的女人:西蒙‧波娃訪問錄》。台北市:女書文化。 Stone, Lawrence著、刁筱華譯,2000,《英國十六至十八世紀的家庭、性與婚姻》。臺北市:麥田出版。 Turkle, Sherry著、洪慧芳譯,2018,《重新與人對話:迎接數位時代的人際考驗,修補親密關係的對話療法》。台北:時報。 Wyness, Michael著、王瑞賢等譯,2009,《童年與社會: 兒童社會學導論》。台北心理出版社。 Young, Iris Marion著,2017,《正義與差異政治》臺北市:商周。 英文文獻 Althusser, Louis. 2001. "Ideology and ideological state apparatus." In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 85-126. New York: Monthly Review Press. Anderson, Elijah. 2011. The cosmopolitan canopy : race and civility in everyday life: New York, NY : W.W. Norton & Co., 2012, c2011. Apple, Rima D. 1995. "Constructing Mothers: Scientific Motherhood in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries1." Social History of Medicine 8 (2):161-178. Ariès, Philippe. 1962. Centuries of childhood : a social history of family life (L'enfant et la vie familiale sous l'Ancien Régime). Translated by Robert Baldick. New York: Vintage Books. Bassin, Donna , Margaret Honey, and Meryle Mahrer Kaplan. 1994. "introduction." In Representations of motherhood edited by Donna Bassin, Margaret Honey and Meryle Mahrer Kaplan. New Haven: Yale University Press. Benjamin, Jessica 1994. "The Omnipotent Mother: A Psychoanalytic Study of Fantasy and Reality" In Representations of motherhood, edited by Donna Bassin, Margaret Honey and Meryle Mahrer Kaplan, 129-146. New Haven: Yale University Press. Benkler, Yochai. (2007). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom: Yale University Press. Bennett, W. Lance, & Segerberg, Alexandra. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. Berger, Peter L, and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge: Penguin UK. Bohn, Simone. (2017). Mothers in Electoral Politics: A Research Agenda In Simone Bohn & Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız (Eds.), Mothers in public and political life. Bradford, ON: Demeter Press, 2017. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1988). Homo academicus (Peter Collier, Trans.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1990). The Logic of Practice (Richard Nice, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1999 [1993]). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society (La Misère Du Monde) (Priscilla Parkhurst Ferguson, Trans.). CA: Stanford University Press. Bourgois, Philippe, and Jeffrey Schonberg. 2009. Righteous Dopefiend. CA: University of California Press. Brown, Wendy. 1992. "Finding the Man in the State." Feminist studies 18 (1):7-34. Buechler, Steven M. 1995. "New Social Movement Theories." The Sociological Quarterly 36 (3):441-464. Burawoy, Michael, Alice Burton, Ann Arnett Ferguson, Kathryn J. Fox, Joshua Gamson, Nadine Gartrell, and Leslie Hurst. 1991. Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press. Carneiro, Rosamaria, 2017, "The Mothers at Home to the Mothers on the Streets: Caring, politics, and the right to have rights " In Mothers in public and political life, edited by Simone Bohn and Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız, 251-268. Bradford, ON: Demeter Press. Chesley, Noelle. 2011. "STAY-AT-HOME FATHERS AND BREADWINNING MOTHERS: Gender, Couple Dynamics, and Social Change." Gender and Society 25 (5):642-664. Collins, Patricia Hill. (1986). Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14-S32. Crittenden, Ann. (2002). The Dark Little Secret of Family Life. In The price of motherhood: Why the most important job in the world is still the least valued (pp. 110-129): Macmillan. Demirci-Yilmaz, Tuba (2017). On the Margins of Politicized Motherhood: Mothers’ human right activism revisited in Turkey form the 1970s to the 1990s. In Simone Bohn & Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız (Eds.), Mothers in public and political life (pp. 212-250). Bradford, ON: Demeter Press, 2017. Edin, Kathryn, & Kefalas, Maria. (2005). Promises I can keep : why poor women put motherhood before marriage: Berkeley : University of California Press, c2005. Duffy, M. (2007). Doing the Dirty Work: Gender, Race, and Reproductive Labor in Historical Perspective. Gender & Society, 21(3), 313-336. Duvall, Evelyn Millis. (1946). Conceptions of Parenthood. American Journal of Sociology, 52(3), 193-203. Elder, Laurel, & Greene, Steven. (2012). The Politics of Parenthood: Causes and Consequences of the Politicization and Polarization of the American Family. New York: SUNY Press. ELVIN-NOWAK, YLVA, & THOMSSON, HELÉNE. (2001). MOTHERHOOD AS IDEA AND PRACTICE:A Discursive Understanding of Employed Mothers in Sweden. Gender & Society, 15(3), 407-428. Everitt, Joanna. (2006). Gender-Role Orientations and the Conversion of Social Capital into Political Engagement. In Brenda Lee O'Neill & Elisabeth Gidengil (Eds.), Gender and social capital (pp. 273-292). New York: Routledge. Firinci Orman, Turkan. (2013). My Dream Playground Workshop: Involving Children in Participatory Design. ARCHHIST'13 Conference- Politics in the History of Architecture as Cause & Consequence. April 2013. Fraser, Nancy. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text(25/26), 56-80. Fraser, Nancy. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books. Gerbaudo, Paolo (2012). Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Gilbert, Sandra M. (2013). The Problem That (Still?) Has No Name: Our Brilliant Careers in a World without Work. College English, 76(1), 29-34. Griffith, Alison I, & Smith, Dorothy E. (1987). Constructing cultural knowledge: Mothering as discourse. Women and education: A Canadian perspective, 3(1), 87-103. Hartmann, Heidi, Bravo, Ellen, Bunch, Charlotte, Hartsock, Nancy, Spalter-Roth, Roberta, Williams, Linda, & Blanco, Maria. (1996). Bringing Together Feminist Theory and Practice: A Collective Interview. Signs, 21(4), 917-951. Hays, Sharon. (2003). Flat broke with children : women in the age of welfare reform. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Hays, Sharon (1998). The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven,. CT: Yale University Press. Hewlett, Sylvia Ann (2002). ‘Executive Women and the Myth of Having It All’ (Vol. 80). Hofner, Mirjam. (2017). Motherliness and Women’s Emancipation in the Published Articles of Ika Freudenberg: a discursive approach In Simone Bohn & Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız (Eds.), Mothers in public and political life (pp. 97-117). Bradford, ON: Demeter Press, 2017. hooks, bell. (2015[1982]). Ain't I a woman : black women and feminism ([2nd ed.] ed.). New York: Routledge. Itaboral, Nathalie Reis. (2017). Between the Private and the Public: paradoxes of motherhood and politics in Brazil In Simone Bohn & Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız (Eds.), Mothers in public and political life (pp. 167-192). Bradford, ON: Demeter Press. Jeremiah, Emily. (2006). Motherhood to mothering and beyond: Maternity in recent feminist thought (Vol. 8). Johnston, Deirdre D., & Swanson, Debra H. (2003). Invisible Mothers: A Content Analysis of Motherhood Ideologies and Myths in Magazines. Sex Roles, 49(1), 21-33. Johnston, Deirdre D., & Swanson, Debra H. (2004). Moms Hating Moms: The Internalization of Mother War Rhetoric. Sex Roles, 51(9), 497-509. Kimura, Aya Hirata 2016. Radiation Brain Moms and Citizen Scientists: The Gender Politics of Food Contamination after Fukushima. Duke University Press Books. Kinser, Amber E. (2008). Mothering in the third wave. Canada: Demeter Press. Knowles-Yánez, Kimberley L. . (2005). Children’s Participation in Planning Processes. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(1). Kozlovsky, Roy. (2016). The architectures of childhood: children, modern architecture and reconstruction in postwar. England: Routledge. Knowles-Yánez, Kimberley L. 2005. "Children’s Participation in Planning Processes." Journal of Planning Literature 20 (1). Lareau, Annette. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 747-776. MacKinnon, Catharine (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 8(4), 635-658. Marwick, Alice E., & boyd, danah. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. 13(1), 114-133. Marwick, Alice, & Ellison, Nicole B. (2012). “There Isn't Wifi in Heaven!” Negotiating Visibility on Facebook Memorial Pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 378-400. Marwick, Alice Emily. (2013). Status update : celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age: New Haven : Yale University Press. Matchar, Emily. (2013). Homeward bound : why women are embracing the new domesticity (First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. Melucci, Alberto. (1980). The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Information (International Social Science Council), 19(2), 199-226. Moreno, Maria (2017). On Andariegas, Carishinas, and Bad Mothers: challenges to the political participation of indigenous women in the Ecuadorian Andes In Simone Bohn & Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız (Eds.), Mothers in public and political life (pp. 141-166). Bradford, ON: Demeter Press. Nader, Laura. (1972). Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained From Studying Up. In Dell Hymes (Ed.), Reinventing Anthropology (pp. 284-311). New York: Pantheon. North, Peter. (2006). Alternative Currency Movements As a Challenge to Globalisation?: A Case Study of Manchester's Local Currency Networks. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited Nussbaum, Martha C. (2005). Women's bodies: Violence, security, capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 167-183. O'Reilly, Andrea. (2004). From motherhood to mothering : the legacy of Adrienne Rich's Of woman born. Albany: State University of New York Press. O'Reilly, Andrea. (2014) Ain’t I a Feminist: Matricentric Feminism, Feminist Mamas, and Why Mothers Need a Feminist Movement Theory of Their Own. Motherhood Hall of Fame, Columbia Teacher’s College. O'Reilly, Andrea. (2016). Matricentric Feminism: Theory, Activism, and Practice. Canada: Demeter Press. O'Reilly, Andrea , & Ruddick, Sara (2009). A Conversation About Maternal Thinking. In Maternal thinking : philosophy, politics, practice (pp. 14-38). Toronto: Demeter Press. Ogunyankin, Grace Adeniyi (2014). Dancing without Drums: Using Maternalism as a Political Strategy to Critique Neoliberalism in Ibadan, Nigeria. In Melinda Vandenbeld Giles (Ed.), Mothering in the Age of Neoliberalism. Canada: Demeter Press Orgad, Shani. (2019). Heading Home: Motherhood, Work, and the Failed Promise of Equality: Columbia University Press. Piven, Frances Fox. (1990). Ideology and the state: Women, power, and the welfare state. In Linda Gordon (Ed.), Women, the State, and Welfare (pp. 250-264). Polletta, Francesca, & Lee, John. (2006). Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/II (English). Le colportage d'histoires est-il bon pour la démocratie ? Rhétorique dans la délibération publique après le 11 septembre (French), 71(5), 699-723. Punch, Samantha 2002. "Research with Children:The Same or Different from Research with Adults?" Childhood 9 (3):321-341. Reich, Jennifer A. (2014). Neoliberal Mothering and Vaccine Refusal:Imagined Gated Communities and the Privilege of Choice. Gender & Society, 28(5), 679-704. Risman, Barbara J. (2004). "Gender As a Social Structure:Theory Wrestling with Activism." Gender & Society 18 (4):429-450. Risman, Barbara J. (2009). From Doing To Undoing: Gender as We Know It. Gender & Society, 23(1), 81-84. Rothman, barbara katz. (1989). Recreating Motherhood. Rubin, Gayle. (1997). The Traffic in Women: Notes on the "Political Economy" of Sex. In Linda Nicholson (Ed.), The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory (pp. 27-62). New York: Routledge. Rubin, Stacey E., & Wooten, H. Ray. (2007). Highly Educated Stay-at-Home Mothers: A Study of Commitment and Conflict. The Family Journal, 15(4), 336-345. Ruddick, Sara. (1983). Thinking about Mothering: and Putting Maternal Thinking to Use. Women's Studies Quarterly, 11(4), 4-7. Sen, Amartya. (2001). the many faces of gender inequality--when misogyny becomes a health problem. The New Republic, 35-40. Shapiro, Eve. (2015). Gender circuits : bodies and identities in a technological age: New York : Routledge. Silva, Elizabeth Bortolaia. 1996. Good Enough Mothering?: Feminist Perspectives on Lone Motherhood. New York: Routledge published. Silva, Elizabeth Bortolaia. (1996). Good Enough Mothering?: Feminist Perspectives on Lone Motherhood. New York: Routledge published. Singh, Ilina. (2004). Doing their jobs: mothering with Ritalin in a culture of mother-blame. Social Science & Medicine, 59(6), 1193-1205. Skocpol, Theda. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers (Vol. 992). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Smart , Carol (1996). Deconstructing Motherhood In Elizabeth Bortolaia Silva (Ed.), Good Enough Mothering? feminist perspectives on lone mothering (pp. 37-55). New York: Routledge. Smith, Carolyn D, & Kornblum, William. (1996). In the field: Readings on the field research experience: Praeger Publishers. Sánchez-Jankowski, Martín (2016). Burning Dislike : ethnic violence in high schools. Oakland, California University of California Press. Steiner, Leslie Morgan et. al. (2007). Mommy wars : stay-at-home and career moms face off on their choices, their lives, their families (2007 Random House Trade Paperback ed. ed.). New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks. Tronto, Joan C. (1989). Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring. Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing, 172-187. Trussell, Dawn E., & Shaw, Susan M. (2012). Organized Youth Sport and Parenting in Public and Private Spaces. Leisure Sciences, 34(5), 377-394. Wall, Glenda. (2001). Moral Constructions of Motherhood in Breastfeeding Discourse. Gender and Society, 15(4), 592-610. West, Candace, & Zimmerman, Don H. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151. Westervelt, Amy (2018). Forget "Having It All": How America Messed Up Motherhood--and How to Fix It. New York: Seal Press. Willis, Paul. (1977). Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. UK: Saxon House. Wrigley, Julia. (1989). Do Young Children Need Intellectual Stimulation? Experts' Advice to Parents, 1900-1985. History of Education Quarterly, 29(1), 41-75. Yang, Chia-Ling. (2017). The political is the personal: women’s participation in Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement. Social Movement Studies, 16(6), 660-671. Zelizer, Viviana A. Rotman. (1985). Pricing the priceless child : the changing social value of children. New York: Basic Books. 政府報告 監察院,2007年,《公園兒童遊樂設施管理維護情形訪查研析報告──以臺北市、臺北縣、桃園縣以及新竹市為範疇》。台北市 : 監察院。 曾柏瑜、李梅君,2017,《開放政府觀察報告:2014-2016》。台北市:開放文化基金會。 中華民國消費者文教基金會,2017,《消費者報導12月號》。中華民國消費者文教基金會,頁46-57。網址:https://www.consumers.org.tw/contents/events_ct?id=422。 報章雜誌 丹扉,1965,〈節育關鍵〉。聯合報,第14版,1月16日。 自由時報,2019年,〈屏東闢兒童遊戲設施 先聽兒童意見〉。自由時報網路新聞,4月23日。參考網址:https://tinyurl.com/y3qma8vd。 谷冰,1952,〈保護兒童樂園〉。聯合報,第6版,6月22日。 法務部,2012年,〈校園遊樂設施安全性問題多 兒童安全令人擔憂〉,法務部消費者保護。5月21日。瀏覽日期:2019年2月23日。參考網址:https://www.moj.gov.tw/cp-42-62126-d5749-001.html。 曾多聞,2015,〈該帶孩子參與政治抗議活動嗎?〉 。親子天下。刊登日期:2015年8月21日。瀏覽日期:2018年10月10日。參考網址:https://reurl.cc/MWoN3。 葉冠玟,2019年,〈人流成長十倍!北市府公園處處長用 2 招,讓公園變得好好玩〉。刊登於《經理人月刊》,2018 年 12 月號;發布於2019年1月1日。瀏覽日期:2019年1月11日。 鄭語謙,2014,〈親子共學團體:孩子不是人肉盾牌〉。聯合報,2014年04月28日。瀏覽日期:2018年10月10日。 孺子牛,2011,〈請愛護孩子,別把上街當逛街!〉,孺子牛個人部落格。刊登日期:3月8日。瀏覽日期:2018年10月10日。參考網址:https://reurl.cc/6XRLV。 親子天下編輯部,2016年,〈Y世代「無人機父母」:育兒困擾是長輩,不是孩子〉。《親子天下雜誌》,81期,2016年08月。 雙冀,1970,〈各行其是〉。經濟日報,第8版,5月14日。 謝宜暉,2019,〈讓孩子冒險,不是恐龍家長,而是培養韌性〉。刊登於鳴人堂,2019年5月2日。參考網址:https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/11967/3789357?fbclid=IwAR10WzRdpUhonwvWkP9USDnA9Q_pbnUFtkSgZ4Vh4b531_AKlshX7CHWwFw。 藍佩嘉,2015,〈「童年」的社會學分析:從國家主人翁到消費福利主體〉。巷子口社會學,4月4日。參考網址:https://twstreetcorner.org/2015/04/04/lanpeichia-2/。 Blackjack,2017,〈台灣人,請不要拿小孩當工具了!尤其是抗議活動!! 〉,blackjack的blog個人部落格。刊登日期:2017年10月20日。瀏覽日期:2018年10月10日。參考網址:http://blackjackintw.blogspot.com/2017/10/blog-post_98.html。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73166 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 透過一年半的田野紀錄與15位核心成員的深度訪談,本文嘗試以「做媽媽」的互動論立場出發,回答一個女性主義的關懷:特殊群體的經驗如何轉化為得受社會承認且具有正當性的立場,並轉化為對該群體更友善的制度性安排?這個問題在台灣的公園兒童遊戲場設計進程中,出現一個可供切入的案例。台灣遊戲場長期是以政府主導、遊具廠商提供專業意見,以及里長(代表民意)決策的方式進行;繼而形成以安全為主要追求的設計邏輯。2015年起,台北與新北市有一群過去沒有政治參與經驗的媽媽們,因為不滿政府規劃方式,組成「還我特色公園行動聯盟」(簡稱特公盟),開啟一連串從對公部門的陳情抗議、到與公部門和設計師合開會議的政治參與活動;同時連帶著媽媽網的動員力,在三年內改造雙北共33座大小公園,包括城市指標型公園如華山,也包括五公頃內社區鄰里公園。這個「媽媽民主」的現象中浮現了兩個問題:首先,這群無政治參與經驗、居住空間分散的媽媽們,如何長期持續地組織集體行動,並生產另類論述?再者,他們的參與如何與公共領域互動,並如何影響了公共領域?本文將指出,特公盟透過持續、集體且有意識地「做媽媽」,將不同於主流的想像透過持續互動,具現化到現實世界中。首先透過以社群媒體中介的媽媽網絡,形成次級公共領域,將教養日常與遊戲場議題緊密交織,同時透過個體化參與,降低集體動員的成本;接著透過共作材料和實體會面,有效轉化媽媽們對兒童遊戲場的觀點,形成另類論述、並包裝在日常教養的展演中具現化為互動邏輯。最後帶著成形的論述和協商互動技巧,媽媽們帶著孩子進入公部門並與政府協商,一邊參與公園事務一邊堅持「做媽媽」,透過互動逐漸改變政府單位對母職的想像,也透過具體遊具的落成物質化他們的另類兒童遊戲論述。從生產具體物件、論述知識到互動實踐,這群媽媽在教養中同時做參與,逐漸打造出新的實在,挑戰既有的社會母職意識形態。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Via half and a year of fieldwork as well as in-depth interviews with 15 core members, this article tries to answer a crucial question in feminism studies: how to transform a perspective from a particular group into socially recognized and institutionalized supports? Issue of public parks in Taiwan offers a possibility to expand the theoretical concern. In the article, I look into a group of a-political mothers, mostly housewives, who established a non-profit organization Parks and Playgrounds for Children by Children (abbreviated as PfC) in October 2015. They fight against the mainstream idea of male and profession dominance in playground designing. Without previous experience in public participation, they mobilize a series of collective actions such as protests on streets, engagements in the inner meetings of designer and public officers. Supported by parental networks, mothers remade 33 public playgrounds, including indicatory city playgrounds and neighborhood playgrounds. The gendering democracy leaves two empirical questions: firstly, how these physically separated mothers continuously participate in collective action as well as producing alternative discourses; and secondly, what impacts they have brought to the public sphere throughout their interactions. In this article, I try to argue that the way members of PfC consciously, collectively, and continuously “do mothers” is the mechanism that materialized their advocacy, making an alternative reality. First of all, they mobilize mothers through parental networks on social media, forming a subaltern counter-public sphere and intertwining their mothering daily work with public participation. Then, through co-editing materials and face-to-face encounters, they transform members’ ideas of playing and care-giving via intense interactions. Covered by parental performing, members elaborate an alternative discourse and embody the discourse in the everyday world. Finally, with the discourse and tactics of participation ready, members enter the public sectors with their children playing beside them. In addition to the physical impacts such as materialization of new ideas into playing facilities, they also bring an impact on interactional level. By insisting on doing participation and taking care of children simultaneously, they gradually change the attitude public sector held toward both the playgrounds and toward mothers. From the production of materials, discourses, and practices, these mothers claim the necessity of public engagement in motherhood and build a new reality to challenge the pre-existing ideology. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:20:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06325019-1.pdf: 11119830 bytes, checksum: 1bb8b919241d2e4d51b9d8f99ac6ab2f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………… i
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………… ii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………… iii 謝辭………………………………………………………………………………… iv 圖表目錄…………………………………………………………………………… vii 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………… 1 第一節、前言與研究問題……………………………………………………… 3 第二節、文獻回顧……………………………………………………………… 9 (一)打造理想媽媽:密集親職的社會部署與新時代媽媽的焦慮………… 10 (二)從「好媽媽」到「做好媽媽」:母職研究的實作轉向……………… 13 (三)公共參與中的母職實作…………………………………………………16 (四)小結:聚焦集體行動──做媽媽、建構實在,與次級公共領域…… 34 第三節、研究方法………………………………………………………………42 第四節、章節安排………………………………………………………………50 第二章 公園管理的避險邏輯………………………………………………………53 第一節、公園遊戲場的報章再現………………………………………………54 (一)政府壟斷期:1950-1970年代鳥瞰式的專業規劃……………………56 (二)營利管理期:1980-2000年代市場邏輯下的安全檢驗………………62 (三)公民參與期:2010年後公民參與的萌芽……………………………70 (四)小結:政府的退場與使用者觀點的納入…………………………… 75 第二節、打造「安全遊戲場」………………………………………………… 77 (一)生產安全(單調)遊具:國家安全標準定義下的兒童安全………… 79 (二)執行安全遊戲場:維管人員的全面避險……………………………… 84 第三節、總結:權威剛走、避險正夯的公園遊戲場………………………… 90 第三章 轉化為母經驗………………………………………………………………94 第一節、成為特公媽媽…………………………………………………………95 (一)「成為」母親:反省「生小孩」動機敘事…………………………… 95 (二)招募特公人:將參與埋線於教養日常………………………………… 98 (三)「拼湊共作」:持續參與的小機制…………………………………… 106 (四)小結:社群媒體與動員機制………………………………………… 114 第二節、論述的生產:自由遊戲與其意義……………………………………118 (一)孩子要冒險:新型遊具中的「風險掌握」練習…………………… 119 (二)孩子是獨立個體:對抗性(使用者)觀點的建立………………… 122 (三)小結:新遊具、與新的教養觀點…………………………………… 125 第三節、總結:成為積極公民…………………………………………………126 第四章 當冒險媽媽碰上避險文化……………………………………………… 130 第一節、日常照顧中的碰撞………………………………………………… 130 第二節、與公部門相遇……………………………………………………… 135 (一)沒想過媽媽?參與機制對母親的排除……………………………… 135 (二)啟動媽媽網:特公媽媽的策略……………………………………… 139 (三)重塑「特工」策略:倡議論述的轉變策略………………………… 144 第三節、總結:重塑媽媽形象……………………………………………… 150 第五章 結論……………………………………………………………………… 157 第一節、從私到公──媽媽民主的意義…………………………………… 157 第二節、由公返私──「我是公民媽媽」………………………………… 160 第三節、媽媽民主的想像…………………………………………………… 166 第四節、研究限制與未來研究方向………………………………………… 169 (一)田野資料限制………………………………………………………… 169 (二)個別遊戲場的異質性並未細緻處理………………………………… 169 (三)不同縣市的遊具改革媽媽團體之差異……………………………… 171 (四)不同遊戲場倡議團體的角色差異…………………………………… 172 附錄:參考文獻…………………………………………………………………… 173 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 做媽媽、做公民──雙北遊戲場改革的媽媽民主 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Doing Mother and Doing Citizen: (En)gendering Democracy in Playground Revolution in Taipei and New Taipei City | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 范雲;石易平 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yun Fan;Yi-Ping Shih | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 還我特色公園行動聯盟,媽媽民主,次級公共領域,新型態母職, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Parks and Playgrounds for Children by Children,engendering democracy,subaltern counter-publics,new motherhood institution, | en |
dc.relation.page | 186 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901259 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-08 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-2.pdf | 10.86 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。