請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73140完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張育森(Yu-Sen Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Chen Liao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 廖婉蓁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:19:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王雁、馬武昌. 2004. 扶芳藤、紫藤等7種藤本植物光能利用特性及耐陰性比較研究. 林業科學研究 17:305-309.
王昭月、曾夢蛟. 2010. 利用葉綠素螢光與有效授粉估測甜椒之耐熱性. 台灣農業研究 59:237-248. 吳俊偉. 2003. 環境綠化植物耐陰性指標之研究. 國立臺灣大學園藝系研究所碩士論文. 臺北. 周明燕. 1994a. 觀葉植物設施栽培技術. 亞熱帶地區花卉設施栽培技術 47:203-210. 周明燕. 1994b. 觀賞植物設施栽培. 臺南區農業專訊 10:8-10. 林樹燕、張慶峰、陳其旭. 2007. 10種園林植物的耐陰性. 東北林業大學學報 35:32-34. 姚銘輝、盧虎生、朱鈞. 2002. 葉綠素螢光與作物生理反應. 科學農業 50:31-41. 唐道城、張志英、趙梁軍. 2001. 一串紅花芽型態分化進程. 園藝學報 28:367-369. 張聖顯. 2004. 景觀與盆栽觀賞皆宜之山菜豆. 花蓮區農業專訊 47:16-18. 張錦興. 1997. 天南星科盆栽植物之生產技術. 臺南區農業專訊 21:10-14. 許涵鈞. 2008. 粗肋草栽培環境及品種介紹. 高雄區農業專訓 64:18-19. 陳忠偉. 2008. 不同光適應性植物之葉綠素螢光特性探討. 國立中興大學生命科學研究所碩士學位論文. 臺中. 游智偉. 2006. 不同光量及養分對四種臺灣原生闊葉樹苗光合作用及葉綠素螢光反應之影響. 國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文. 臺北. 劉敏莉. 2011. 葉綠素螢光在作物耐熱性篩選之應用 高雄區農業改良場研究彙報 21:1-17. 蔡宛育、陳彥樺. 2012. 馬拉巴栗. 臺中區農業改良場特刊 112:153-160. 關學瑞. 2003. 室內垂吊植物耐陰性的研究. 東北林業大學碩士學位論文. 哈爾濱. Abrams, M.D. and M.E. Kubiske. 1990. Leaf structural characteristics of 31 hardwood and conifer tree species in central wisconsin: Influence of light regime and shade-tolerance rank Forest Ecol. Mgt. 31:245-253. Alexander, J.D., J.R. Donnelly, and J.B. Shane. 1995. Photosynthetic and transpirational responses of red spruce understory trees to light and temperature. Tree Physiol. 15:393-398. Bazzaz, F.A. 1979. The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 10:351-371. Bjorkman, O., N.K. Boardman, J.M. Anderson, S.W. Thorne, D.J. Goodchild, and N.A. Pyliotis. 1972. Effect of light intensity during growth of Atriplex patula on the capacity of photosynthetic reactions, chloroplast components and structure. Carnegie Inst. Washington Yrbk. 71:115-135. Boardman, N.K. 1977. Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28:355-377. Braswell, J.H., T.M. Blessington, and J.A. Price. 1982. Influence of production and postharvest light levels on the interior performance of two species of Scheffleras. HortScience 17:48-50. Cano, F.J., D. Sanchez-Gomez, A. Gasco, J. Rodriguez-Calcerrada, L. Gil, C.R. Warren, and I. Aranda. 2011. Light acclimation at the end of the growing season in two broadleaved oak species. Photosynthetica 49:581-592. Chaerle, L. and D.V.D. Straeten. 2000. Imaging techniques and the early detection of plant stress. Trends Plant Sci. 5:495-501. Conover, C.A. and R.T. Poole. 1980. Interior quality of Dracaena angustifolia Roxb. 'Honoriae' as influenced by light and fertilizer during production. HortScience 15:24-26. Corre, W.J. 1983. Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants I. The influence of light intensity. Acta Bot. Neerlandica 32:49-62. Crawford, R.M.M. 1961. The photoperiodic reaction in relation to development in Salvia splendens. Ann. Bot. 25:78-84. Crookston, R.K., K.J. Treharne, P. Ludford, and J.L. Ozbun. 1974. Response of beans to shading. Crop. Sci. 15:412-416. Ehleringer, J. and D. Sandquist. 2010. Photosynthesis: physiological and ecological considerations, p. 244-269. In: Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger (eds.). Plant physiology 5th ed. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA. Fails, B.S., A.J. Lewis, and J.A. Barden. 1982. Light acclimatization potential of Ficus benjamina. HortScience 107:762-766. Gates, D.M. 1968. Tranpiration and leaf temperature. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 19:211-238. Grant, O.M., Ł. Tronina, H.G. Jones, and M.M. Chaves. 2007. Exploring thermal imaging variables for the detection of stress responses in grapevine under different irrigation regimes. J. Expt. Bot. 58:815-825. Hlavinka, J., J. Naus, and M. Spundova. 2013. Anthocyanin contribution to chlorophyll meter readings and its correction. Photosyn. Res. 118:227-295. Holmgren, P. 1968. Leaf Factors Affecting light‐saturated photosynthesis in ecotypes of Solidago virgaurea from exposed and shaded habitats. Physiol. Plant. 21:676-698. Jiang, Y., R.N. Carrow, and R.R. Duncan. 2005. Physiological acclimation of seashore paspalum and bermudagrass to low light. Scientia Hort. 105:101-115. Johnson, D.M., W.K. Smith, T.C. Vogelmann, and C.R. Brodersen. 2005. Leaf architecture and direction of incident light influence mesophyll fluorescence profiles. Amer. J. Bot. 92:1425-1431. Krause, G.H. and E. Weis. 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 42:313-349. Kubatsch, A., H. Gru¨neberg, and C. Ulrichs. 2007. The effect of low light intensity and temperature on growth of Schefflera arboricola in interior landscapes. HortScience 42:65-67. Kuo, Y.L. and C.L. Yeh. 2015. Photosynthetic capacity and shade tolerance of 180 native broadleaf tree species in Taiwan. Taiwan J. Sci. 30:229-243. Maxwell, K. and G.N. Johnson. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practocal guide. J. Expt. Bot. 51:659-668. Walters, M.B. and P.B. Reich. 1999. Low-light carbon balance and shade tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ? New Phytol. 143:143-154. McConathy, R.K. 1983. Tulip-poplar leaf diffusion resistance calculated from stomatal dimensions and varying environmental parameters. Forest Sci. 29:139-148. Nemali, K.S. and M.W.V. Iersel. 2004. Acclimation of wax begonia to light intensity: changes in photosynthesis, respiration, and chlorophyll concentration. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci 129:745-751. Poole, R.T. and C.A. Conover. 1992. Paclobutrazol and indoor light intensity influence water use of some foliage plants. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 105:178-180. Ritchie, G.A. 2006. Chlorophyll fluorescence: What is it and what do the numbers mean? USDA Forest Serv. Proc. RMRS:34-43. Roháček, K. and M. Barták. 1999. Technique of the modulated chlorophyll fluorescence: basic concepts, useful parameters, and some applications. Photosynthetica 37:339-363. Sarracino, J.M., R. Merritt, and C.K. Chin. 1992. Light acclimatization potential of Leea coccinia and Leea rubra grown under low light flux. HortScience 27:404-406. Schwarz, P.a., T.J. Fahey, and T.E. Dawson. 1997. Seasonal air and soil temperature effects on photosynthesis in red spruce (Picea rubens) saplings. Tree Physiol. 17:187-194. Sims, D.A. and R.W. Pearcy. 1992. Response of leaf anatomy and photosynthetic capacity in Alocasia macrorrhiza (Araceae) to a transfer from low to high light. Amer. J. Bot. 79:449-455. Stoll, M. and J.G. Jones. 2007. Thermal imaging as a viable tool for monitoring plant stress. J. Intl. Sci. Vigne Vin 41:77-84. Valladares, F. and U. Niinemets. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evolution Systematics 39:237-257. Xia, L., R. ChengGang, W. Man, S. Jing, and Z. JianChu. 2010. Response of photosynthesis of leaves to light and temperature in Eichhornia crassipes in Jiangsu Province. Jiangsu Acad. Agr. Sci. 26:943-947. Yizhu, C., L. Xiaoping, X. Li, and G. Junyan. 1995. The application of chlorophyll fluorescence technique in the study of responses of plants to environmental stresses. J. Trop. Subtropical Bot. 3:79-86. Yingmei, Z., C. Huijuan, Y. Zhongfa, D. Quanquan, and T. Jian. 2010. The diurnal variation of light parameters and the main impact factors of Cassava South China 8. Chinese Agr. Sci. Bul. 26:371-375. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73140 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本試驗以常見30種觀賞植物為主,調查在人工環境光強度150 μmol•m-2•s-1,氣溫32±0.5℃環境下,放置一小時後用紅外線熱像儀調查觀賞植物葉溫差值ΔT(℃),以及利用GFS-3000調查在光強度400、800及1200 μmol•m-2•s-1下植物的光合作用潛力值。結果發現。30種觀賞植物,屬於陽性植物有17種,葉溫差範圍為-3.1℃至-0.47℃,最低依次為新幾內亞鳳仙花(Impatiens hawkeri)的 -3.03℃、五彩石竹(Dianthus barbatus)的 -3.07℃、雞冠花(Celosia cristata)的 -3.10℃;而屬於陰性植物有13種,葉溫差範圍為-0.16℃至4.95℃,最高依次為密葉蔓綠絨(Philodendron ‘Temptation II’)的4.95℃、萊姆黃金葛(Scindapsus aureum ‘All Gold’)的2.22℃、娃娃朱蕉(Cordyline terminalis ‘Dolly’)的1.74℃,是個簡單且迅速的區分兩類植物之調查方法。然而,此方法需特別注意葉片角度與水分狀態,否則會產生很大的誤差值。在光合作用潛力方面,陰性植物再3-7 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1之間,最低為銀后粗肋草(Aglaonema ‘Silver Queen’)的 3.0 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1、萊姆黃金葛(Scindapsus aureum ‘All Gold’)的 4.0 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1、阿波羅千年木(Dracaena deremensis ‘Compacta’)的 4.4 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1;陽性植物光合作用潛力在7-12 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1之間,最高依次為馬櫻丹(Lantana camara)的 10.7 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1、繁星花(Pentas lanceolata)的 11.6 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1、檸檬香蜂草(Melissa officinalis)的 11.8 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1,兩種調查方法與光補償點都具有高度相關性(R=0.8399與R=0.8990),但調查方法相較於傳統的光補償點迅速,因此可作為快速評估植物光適應性的方法。
光馴化主要為植物自行調整光補償點(light compensation point, LCP)的特性,這種能力各種屬的品種間差異頗大。利用一串紅(Salvia splendens ‘Vista Red’)、粗肋草(Aglaonema ‘Silver Queen’)、新幾內亞鳳仙花(Impatiens hawkeri ‘Divine Blue Pearl’)與山菜豆(Radermachera sinica),模擬植物從原生環境,經過3、7、10或14天短時間馴化,後再移至室內環境14或21天,調查其生理與外觀品質,並以外觀品質為基準,找出非破壞性判斷馴化狀況的調查方法。結果顯示,植物在不同光強度下,會改變外觀及生理狀況來適應環境,透過本次試驗得知植物在生產後移至室內環境前,以100 μmol•m-2•s-1馴化7-10天或許可後續提高觀賞品質,但會因植物種類不同有些差異,且可以葉溫差作為調查馴化狀況的非破壞性指標。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This trial inspected the temperature difference of leaves after exposed to light intensity 150 μmol•m-2•s-1 and 32±0.5℃ degrees in 30 common ornamental plants and used GFS-3000 to determine the photosynthesis potential under light intensity 400, 800, 1200 μmol•m-2•s-1. The results showed that the temperature changes of sun plants and shade plants are -3.1℃ to -0.47℃ and -0.16℃ to 4.95℃, respectively. It is a very simple and fast way but the angle of the leaf and moisture condition should be tended to avoid large deviation. The photosynthesis potential values of shade and sun plant are 3-7 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1and 7-12 μmol CO2•m-2•s-1, respectively. This survey method is more rapid than the conventional method; therefore, it can be used as the approach to determine the light requirements of plants.
The light intensity at the production phase has huge impacts on the quality of ornamental plants. Most of the production of ornamental plants in Taiwan use shade cultivation with light intensity of 100 μmol•m-2•s-1 and 200 μmol•m-2•s-1, therefore being more suitable for common low light intensity environment of indoor. However, the light saturation points of ornamental plants on the market right now (most>400 μmol•m-2•s-1) are higher than the current production light intensity. To ensure the production quality, industry reduced the light intensity at the production phase to prolong the production time. But a few kinds of plants can grow under the full light condition and quickly showed the etiolation and defoliation phenomenon if moved into indoor environment and lower the ornamental life span. Therefore, before the sales, at least 3 to 6 months of acclimation treatment is essential for plants to adapt to weak light before the sale to preserve the reputation. The light acclimation is that plants can adjust their LCP on their own. This ability is very different from each species. In this chapter, we use the Salvia splendens ‘Vista Red’, Aglaonema ‘Silver Queen’, Impatiens hawkeri ‘Divine Blue Pearl’, Radermachera sinica to mimic the situation that plants were moved from native growing environment to indoors for 2 to 3 weeks after the 3, 7, 10 or 14-days light acclimation treatment to access the conditions of acclimation by observing the exterior and physiological quality of plants in non-destructive survey methods. Results indicated that plants altered their exterior and physiological to adapt to different environments. Based on the outcomes of this trial, we can know that the ornamental quality can be improved by 100 μmol•m-2•s-1 acclimation for 7-10 days before being moved into the low light condition but the effects are various from each species and the temperature difference can be used as the non-destructive indicators to investigate the acclimation conditions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:19:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R03628125-1.pdf: 10991168 bytes, checksum: 258a100a5ec65f881c678f976ae29e79 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要(Abstract)………………………………………………………….…...……..i
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….......iii 目錄(Contents)…………………………………………………………………….…....v 表目錄(List of tables)…………………………………………………………….…...vii 圖目錄(List of figures)……………………………………………………………….viii 第一章 前言(Introduction)………………………………………………………….....1 第二章 前人研究(Literature review)……………………………………………….....3 一、 植物於不同光強度下生長的生理變化…..…………………..………..3 二、 不同耐陰特性植物葉片溫度之變化…………………..………….…...8 第三章 植物光線需求分類……………………………...……………………….……9 摘要(Abstract)……………………………………………………………..…...9 一、 前言(Introduction)…………………………………………….….….......10 二、 材料與方法(Material and Methods)……………………………….….....11 三、 結果(Results)………………………………………………………..…...15 四、 討論(Discussion)………………………………………………………...16 五、 結論(Conclusion)…………………………...................………..…..…....18 第四章 光馴化對四種觀賞植物葉綠素螢光之影響……………………...……..…30 摘要(Abstract)……………………………………………………………..…30 一、 前言(Introduction)…………………………………………….………....31 二、 材料與方法(Material and Methods)……………………………………..32 三、 結果(Results)………………………………………………………….....34 四、 討論(Discussion)………………………………………………………...37 五、 結論(Conclusion)………...……………………………………………...39 第五章 光馴化對四種觀賞植物葉溫差值及葉綠素計讀值之影響………...……..68 摘要(Abstract)……………………………………………………………...…68 一、 前言(Introduction)……………………………………………..….……..69 二、 材料與方法(Material and Methods)………………………………..…...69 三、 結果(Results)………………………………………………………….....71 四、 討論(Discussion)……………………………………………………..….74 五、 結論(Conclusion)………...……………………………………………...75 第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………………….……..…100 一、 結論(Conclusion)………………………………………………….....…100 二、 建議(Suggestion)………...……………………………….…………….100 參考文獻(Reference)……………………………………………………………..…102 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 光馴化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 光適應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 耐陰性指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 觀賞植物 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Light adaptation | en |
| dc.subject | Ornamental plant | en |
| dc.subject | Shade tolerance index | en |
| dc.subject | Light acclimation | en |
| dc.title | 觀賞植物耐陰性指標與光適應之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Studies on Shade Tolerance Index and Light Adaptation of Ornamental Plants | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉德銘(Der-Ming Yeh),陳右人,吳俊偉(Chun-Wei Wu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 觀賞植物,耐陰性指標,光適應,光馴化, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Ornamental plant,Shade tolerance index,Light adaptation,Light acclimation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901321 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 10.73 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
