請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72926
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李培芬(Pei-Fen Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Kai Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王俊凱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:10:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 江文全 (2017)。【流浪犬源頭管理多元策略之可能】 #1台灣寵物源頭管理的總體思考。2017年2月22日,取自:
https://thought-of-animal.com/index.php/database/62-2016-04-05-09-13-40/408-2017-02-22-02-55-17.html 朱何宗 (2009)。犬隻疾病對太魯閣國家公園常見食肉目動物之風險評估。國立東華大學碩士論文,花蓮。 社團法人台灣懷生相信動物協會 (2016)。街犬問題分析及數量調查。臺北市動物保護處。臺北市。 社團法人台灣懷生相信動物協會 (2017)。街犬問題分析及數量調查。臺北市動物保護處。臺北市。 周蓮香、莊子聿 (2002)。陽明山國家公園園區內棄野犬族群調查研究。內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。臺北市。 林曜松、周蓮香、林健洲 (2000)。陽明山國家公園龍鳳谷遊憩區流浪犬之社會結構與行為互動。內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。臺北市。 林曜松、謝伯娟 (1999)。陽明山國家公園棄養動物與外來種生物對環境影響之研究。內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。臺北市。 農委會動植物防疫檢疫局 (2015)。104年度台灣地區各縣市流浪狗數調查結果。2018年9月18日,取自:https://animal.coa.gov.tw/html/index_06_0621_dog.html 鄭筑云 (2003)。墾丁國家公園內社頂地區自由活動犬隻對台灣梅花鹿 (Cervus nippon taiouanus)的潛在衝擊。國立屏東科技大學碩士論文,屏東。 顏士清、翁綉茗、龔明祥、曾建閔、張世欣、蘇迎晨、...、朱有田 (2015)。陽明山國家公園麝香貓的分布、活動模式與潛在生存威脅。國家公園學報,25:58-65。 Amaral, A. C., Ward, M. P., & da Costa Freitas, J. (2014). Estimation of roaming dog populations in Timor Leste. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 113:608-613. Asquith, P. J. (1989). Provisioning and the study of free‐ranging primates: History, effects, and prospects. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 32:129-158. Avis, S. P. (1999). Dog pack attack: hunting humans. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 20:243-246. Beck, A. M. (2002). The ecology of stray dogs: a study of free-ranging urban animals. City of West Lafayette: Purdue University Press. Boutin, S. (1990). Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68:203-220. Carding, A. H. (1969). The significance and dynamics of stray dog populations with special reference to the UK and Japan. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 10:419-446. Carbó-Ramírez, P., & Zuria, I. (2011). The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100: 213-222. Coppinger, R., & Schneider, R. (Eds.). (1995). Evolution of working dogs. The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people, 21-47. Daniels, T. J., & Bekoff, M. (1989). Population and social biology of free-ranging dogs, Canis familiaris. Journal of Mammalogy, 70:754-762. Deplazes, P., van Knapen, F., Schweiger, A., & Overgaauw, P. A. (2011). Role of pet dogs and cats in the transmission of helminthic zoonoses in Europe, with a focus on echinococcosis and toxocarosis. Veterinary Parasitology, 182:41-53. Feldmann, B. M., & Carding, T. H. (1973). Free-roaming urban pets. Health Services Reports, 88:956-962. Fu, Z. F. (1997). Rabies and rabies research: past, present and future. Vaccine, 15:S20-S24. Hughes, J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157:341-351. ICAM (2008). International Companion Animal Management Coalition: Humane Dog Population Management Guidance. http://www.icam-coalition.org. Accessed on 1 November, 2018. Irion, D. N., Schaffer, A. L., Famula, T. R., Eggleston, M. L., Hughes, S. S., & Pedersen, N. C. (2003). Analysis of genetic variation in 28 dog breed populations with 100 microsatellite markers. Journal of Heredity, 94:81-87. Kitala, P., McDermott, J., Kyule, M., Gathuma, J., Perry, B., & Wandeler, A. (2001). Dog ecology and demography information to support the planning of rabies control in Machakos District, Kenya. Acta tropica, 78:217-230. Kneafsey, B., & Condon, K. C. (1995). Severe dog-bite injuries, introducing the concept of pack attack: a literature review and seven case reports. Injury, 26:37-41. Kruuk, H., & Snell, H. (1981). Prey selection by feral dogs from a population of marine iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus). Journal of Applied Ecology, 18:197-204. Langley, R. L. (2009). Human fatalities resulting from dog attacks in the United States, 1979–2005. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, 20:19-25. Larson, G., & Bradley, D. G. (2014). How much is that in dog years? The advent of canine population genomics. PLoS Genetics, 10:e1004093. Levy, J. K., Woods, J. E., Turick, S. L., & Etheridge, D. L. (2003). Number of unowned free-roaming cats in a college community in the southern United States and characteristics of community residents who feed them. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 223:202-205. Lindsey, S. L. (1987). The effect of food availability on the social organization and behavior of captive coyotes (Canis latrans) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Fort Collins. Nielsen, A. B., Van Den Bosch, M., Maruthaveeran, S., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2014). Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems, 17: 305-327. Macpherson, C. N. (2005). Human behaviour and the epidemiology of parasitic zoonoses. International Journal for Parasitology, 35:1319-1331. Manor, R., & Saltz, D. (2004). The impact of free-roaming dogs on gazelle kid/female ratio in a fragmented area. Biological Conservation, 119:231-236. Marks, B. K., & Duncan, R. S. (2009). Use of forest edges by free-ranging cats and dogs in an urban forest fragment. Southeastern Naturalist, 8:427-436. Mooney, H. A., & Cleland, E. E. (2001). The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98:5446-5451. Orams, M. B. (2002). Feeding wildlife as a tourism attraction: a review of issues and impacts. Tourism Management, 23:281-293. Perri, A. (2016). A wolf in dog's clothing: initial dog domestication and Pleistocene wolf variation. Journal of Archaeological Science, 68:1-4. Robertson, I. D., Irwin, P. J., Lymbery, A. J., & Thompson, R. C. A. (2000). The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasitic zoonoses. International Journal for Parasitology, 30:1369-1377. Rodda, G. H., Fritts, T. H., & Conry, P. J. (1992). Origin and population growth of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis, on Guam. Pacific Science, 46:46-57. Sincich, T. (1986). Business Statistics by Example (2ne ed.), Dellen: San Francisco. Slater, M. R., Di Nardo, A., Pediconi, O., Dalla Villa, P., Candeloro, L., Alessandrini, B., & Del Papa, S. (2008). Free-roaming dogs and cats in central Italy: Public perceptions of the problem. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 84:27-47. Species Survival Commission. (2000). IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. Auckland, New Zealand: IUCN, Species Survival Commission, Invasive Species Specialist Group. Sullivan, T. P. (1990). Responses of red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) populations to supplemental food. Journal of Mammalogy, 71:579-590. Tenzin, T., Ahmed, R., Debnath, N. C., Ahmed, G., & Yamage, M. (2015). Free-roaming dog population estimation and status of the dog population management and rabies control program in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 9: e0003784. Totton, S. C., Wandeler, A. I., Zinsstag, J., Bauch, C. T., Ribble, C. S., Rosatte, R. C., & McEwen, S. A. (2010). Stray dog population demographics in Jodhpur, India following a population control/rabies vaccination program. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 97:51-57. Wandeler, A. I., Budde, A., Capt, S., Kappeler, A., & Matter, H. (1988). Dog ecology and dog rabies control. Review of Infectious Diseases, 10:S684-S688. Wandeler, A. I., Matter, H. C., Kappeler, A., & Budde, A. (1993). The ecology of dogs and canine rabies: a selective review. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 12:51-71. Weier, J., & Herring, D. (2000). Measuring Vegetation (NDVI & EVI). https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/MeasuringVegetation/measuring_vegetation_1.php. Accessed on 2 September, 2018. Wierzbowska, I. A., Hędrzak, M., Popczyk, B., Okarma, H., & Crooks, K. R. (2016). Predation of wildlife by free-ranging domestic dogs in Polish hunting grounds and potential competition with the grey wolf. Biological Conservation, 201:1-9. WHO (1990). Guidelines for Dog Population Management. World Health Organization: Geneva. Wroe, S., Clausen, P., McHenry, C., Moreno, K., & Cunningham, E. (2007). Computer simulation of feeding behaviour in the thylacine and dingo as a novel test for convergence and niche overlap. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274:2819-2828. WSPA (2007). Surveying Roaming Dog Populations: Guidelines on Methodology. World Society for the Protection of Animals. http://groups.google.com/group/dog-population-survey-guidelines. Accessed on 2 September, 2018. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72926 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 遊蕩犬隻對人以及野生動物皆造成了負面影響,為了有效的執行減少遊蕩犬隻數量的相關辦法,遊蕩犬隻的數量及分布調查是相當重要的。本研究以照相捕捉法調查臺北市內共104個里,並將遊蕩犬隻再細分為流浪犬與放養家犬,估算全臺北市的遊蕩犬隻數量;探討相互獨立的環境因子[人口數、常態化差值植生指標(NDVI值)]對遊蕩犬隻數量有何影響。並依照樣區的環境類型分為市區組、綠地組與河濱組,以及是否有人為餵食分為餵養組與無餵養組,比較各種樣區間的遊蕩犬隻數量是否有所不同,探討調查遊蕩犬隻時所需的努力量,比較與先前臺北市各行政區的遊蕩犬隻數量估計,並以總樣區的5%、10%、15%與20%的調查樣區進行遊蕩犬隻數量估算,了解樣區至少要達總樣區多少比例可以使估算結果夠精準。結果顯示,全臺北市遊蕩犬隻數量的95%信賴區間為3977 ± 1247隻,若再分為流浪犬和放養家犬,則分別為2385 ± 865隻與1592 ± 445隻;NDVI值對於遊蕩犬隻與流浪犬而言都是正相關的影響因子,但對於放養家犬則沒有影響;在市區中的遊蕩犬隻、流浪犬與放養家犬數量都低於河濱或綠地。結果顯示綠地組的累積調查遊蕩犬隻數量比市區與河濱較早達到收斂,但由於市區組的犬隻數量本來就較少,因此仍建議相較於市區組,河濱與綠地的樣區需要較高的努力量;與先前的調查比較各區遊蕩犬隻數量時,發現雖然全台北市的總量估算沒有差異,但在各區的數量仍有差異,先前的調查是以海拔100公尺區分兩種樣區,再依照各行政區的兩種樣區比例進行估算,因此建議未來若要進行犬隻調查時不能僅以海拔作為估算的唯一參考指標,而要多加比較其他環境因子,另外調查時需要至少抽樣20%以上總樣區,才可以使估算結果接近實際值;本次調查中除了流浪犬外也調查到了大量的放養家犬,表示未來相關單位若要有效減少遊蕩犬隻數量,除了針對流浪犬的TNR或精準捕捉外,飼主責任教育也是相當關鍵的一環。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Roaming dogs have caused disturbance on both people and wildlife. The abundance and distribution investigation of roaming dogs is important for executing the plan of reducing roaming dog. This study investigated roaming dogs in 104 villages of Taipei, and divided them into stray dogs and free-range owned dogs to estimate the number of roaming dogs in Taipei and studied their preferences of environmental conditions. Divided the plots into city group, green space group and riverside park group by their environment, and divided the plots into feeding group and non-feeding group by whether people feeding roaming dog or not, then compared the number of roaming dogs and the number of days required for the investigation with each group, and compared the number of roaming dogs of each district with previous research. Estimating the number of roaming dogs in Taipei by 5% of total villages in Taipei, 10% of total villages in Taipei, 15% of total villages in Taipei and 20% total villages in Taipei to understand how many plots should be investigated for estimating the number of roaming dogs exactly. The result show that the 95% confidence interval of the estimate of roaming dogs is 3977 ± 1247, and the 95% confidence interval of the estimates of stray dogs and free-range owned dogs are 2385 ± 865 and 1592 ± 445. Both roaming dog and stray prefer to live in high Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) area, but free-range owned dogs doesn’t, all of them in city group are fewer than green space group and riverside park group. Although the result shows that the number of days required for the investigation of green space group is fewer than city group and riverside park group, roaming dogs are few in city originally, so we still suggest that it should take more times to investigate roaming dogs in riverside park group and green space group than city group. The estimate of total roaming dogs in Taipei is similar to previous research, but they are different in each district, previous research had divided the plot into two parts by an altitude of 100 meters, then the number of roaming dogs had been computed on the ratio of two kinds of landforms in each district. So it should estimate the number of roaming dogs by not only altitude, but also other environment conditions. To estimate the number of roaming dogs exactly, researchers should investigate more than 20% of total plots. This study has investigated not only stray dogs, but also free-range owned dogs. To reduce the population of roaming dog, I suggest not only implementing the program of TNR (Trap Neuter Return) and capture accurately, but also enhancing the responsibility of pet owners. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:10:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R06b44017-1.pdf: 2703166 bytes, checksum: 33f812654aceb2577164234a29d1487b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 前言 1 材料與方法 4 研究樣區 4 研究物種和類型 4 調查方式 4 遊蕩犬隻數量估算 5 影響犬隻的環境因子 6 不同類型樣區所需努力量比較 7 抽樣樣區數須佔總樣區多少比例 7 與先前臺北市犬隻數量調查比較 8 結果 9 遊蕩犬隻數量估算 9 影響犬隻的環境因子 9 不同類型樣區所需努力量比較 10 抽樣樣區數須佔總樣區多少比例 10 與先前臺北市犬隻數量調查比較 11 討論 12 遊蕩犬隻數量估算 12 影響犬隻的環境因子 13 不同類型樣區所需努力量比較 14 抽樣樣區數須佔總樣區多少比例 14 與先前臺北市犬隻數量調查比較 15 結論 16 參考文獻 17 附錄一、調查人員表 41 附錄二、2016年補助民間團體辦理臺北市街犬絕育防疫TNVR執行計畫執行成果報告中對各區的遊蕩犬隻數量估算 42 附錄三、2018遊蕩犬隻調查結果 43 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺北市遊蕩犬隻數量調查 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Survey of roaming dogs in Taipei | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯佳吟,張琪如 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 遊蕩犬隻,流浪犬,放養家犬,數量估算,樣區型態, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Roaming dogs,Stray dogs,Free-range owned dogs,Population estimate,Environment conditions, | en |
dc.relation.page | 45 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901752 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.64 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。