請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72912
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉奇璋 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tai-Jung Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林玳戎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:10:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
王啟祥(2000)。博物館教育的演進與研究。科技博物,4:5-19。 內政部(2018)。107年第9週內政統計通報:15歲以上人口教育程度。台北市:內政部統計處。 巫紅霏、周蓮香(1996)。榕果的世界。台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。 吳明烈、李藹慈、賴弘基(2010)。我國終身學習的發展困境與因應策略。台灣教育,666:13-25。 成忻(2013)。使用博物館行動展示盒對教學表徵與學習動機的影響:教師生涯規劃與教育專業發展第九屆學術研討會論文集。桃園市:中原大學教研所既師資培育中心,155-171。 李尉慈(2012)。行動兒童博物館學習系統設計與實施- 以「行動戲箱」為例。(碩士論文)。台北市:國立臺北教育大學數位科技設計學系。 林慧姍(2013)。使用博物館行動展示盒進行動手做探究活動對七年級學生演化單元學習的影響:教師生涯規劃與教育專業發展第九屆學術研討會論文集。桃園市:中原大學教研所既師資培育中心,127-141。 胡哲明、林雨德、溫媺純(2012)。大學博物館行動展示盒及教材之製作與推廣。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC100-2511-S-002-002-),未出版。 翁秀玉、段曉林(1997)。科學本質在科學教育上的啟示與作法。科學教育月刊, 210:210。 殷寶寧(2012)。以認知架構為基礎的教學模式進行國小學童水溶液概念改變之研究。文資學報,7:48-81。 教育部(1991)。發展與改進成人教育五年計劃綱要。台北市:教育部。 教育部(1998)。邁向學習社會白皮書。台北巿:教育部。 教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。台北巿:教育部。 教育部(2012)。教育施政理念與政策。台北市:教育部。 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。台北市:教育部。 教育部(2016)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校-自然科學領域。台北市:教育部。 張珮珊、賴吉永、溫媺純(2017)。科學探究與實作課程的發展、實施與評量:以實驗室中的科學論證為核心之研究。科學教育學刊,25.4:355-389。 張慧端、Barbara, H. Z.(1992)。美國博物館的推廣與外借活動實施概快調查。博物館學季刊,6:75-83。 張譽騰(2008)。大學博物館的危機與轉機。臺灣大學:2008大學博物館與博物館群國際學術研討會論文集。 黃光男、蘇瑤華(2012)。臺灣的大學博物館現況兼論「亞洲大學藝術館」的建立。博物館簡訊,6:6-12。 黃俊儒(2018)。猜猜新聞背後是什麼?整合科學與媒體的跨領域教學。科學教育學刊,26.4:353-375。 黃淑芳(1997)。現代博物館教育:理念與實務。台北市:台灣省立博物館。 黃達三(2004)。學生動物分類及脊椎動物概念的發展:跨年齡研究。科學教育學刊,12.3:289-310。 黃萬居、葉欣儒、張萬居(2005)。以認知架構為基礎的教學模式進行國小學童水溶液概念改變之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊,1-33。 邱玉枝(2005)。探討實物觀察教學策略對國中生學習生物分類的效益。(碩士論文)。彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學生物學系。 邱美虹(2016)。科學模型與建模:科學素養中的模型認知與建模能力。臺灣化學教育,11。 曾喜育(2004)。臺灣產榕屬植物分類之研究。(博士論文)。臺中市:中興大學森林學系。 靳知勤(1995)。非制式科學教育研究的現況與展望-一九九五美國科學研究學會紀實。博物館學季刊,9.4:71-79。 靳知勤(2007)。 科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養-台灣學術精英的看法。 科學教育學刊,15.6:627-646。 郭鴻銘、沈青嵩(1976)。科學素養之涵義。科學教育月刊,創刊號:9-16。 陳均伊、張惠博、郭重吉(2008)。中彰地區國中學生對於九年一貫自然課的經驗與態度之研究。科學教育學刊,16.5:495-514。 楊景盛、董曜瑜、陳秀溶、王國華(2017)。社會性科學議題情境下論證式探究教學與課程對七年級學生科學學習成就、論證能力和科學素養之影響。科學教育學刊,25.S:485-500。 趙庭周、楊大榮、許繼宏(2001)。榕樹在西雙版納熱帶雨林中的地位和綜合和综合利用價值。林業科學研究,14.4:441-445。 漢寶德(1999)。博物館談片:博物館學季刊論文集。台中市:自然科學博物館。 盧秀琴、方慧娟(2017)。「昆蟲學特論」課程培育國小在職教師的科技學科教學知識(TPACK)。科學教育學刊,25.1:75-96。 蔡佳蓁(2015)。參與國立臺灣科學教育館科學巡迴教育活動民眾學習動機之探討。博物館學季刊,29.1:37-53。 謝州恩、劉湘瑤(2013)。省思九年一貫自然與生活科技課程綱要中的科學本質內涵。科學教育研究與發展季刊,66:53-76。 魏明通(1997)。科學教育。台北市:五南圖書。 鄭淑芬、林怡蓉、胡哲明、溫媺純、林雨德(2014)。大學博物館行動展示盒之發展與教案之設計。台北市:國立臺灣博物館-想的與跳的:博物館中的教與學及其超越,317-338。 鄭湧涇(2005)。我國科學教育改革的回顧與展望。科學教育月刊。 蘇美玲、林晏州(1999)。都市公園使用者休閒態度之研究-以台北市大安森林公園為例。戶外遊憩研究,12.1:61-86。 Alexander EP, Alexander M. (2008) Museums in motion: An introduction to the history and functions of museums. Lanham & New York: AltaMira Press. 10: 257-289. Allen S. (2004) Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science education. 88.S1: S17-S33. Anstett MC, Hossaert-McKey M, Kjellberg F. (1997) Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevoled mutualism. Trends Ecol Evol. 12: 94-9. Ananiadou K, Claro M. (2009) 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. ASTC Newsletter. (1994) Informal science education efforts on rise, but their impact remains unclear, study suggest. ASTC Newsletter. 22.3: 1-3. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J & Kunin WE. (2006) Parallel declines in pollinatorsand insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science. 313: 351-354. Borges RM. (2015) How to be a fig wasp parasite on the fig–fig wasp mutualism. Current Opinion in Insect Science. 8: 34-40. Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher. 18: 32-42. Brown K, Mairesse F. (2018) The definition of the museum through its social role. Curator: The Museum Journal. 61.4: 525-539. Carlton R. (1963) On scientific literacy. NEA Journal. 52.4: 33-35. Christidou V. (2011) Interest, Attitudes and Images Related to Science: Combining Students' Voices with the Voices of School Science, Teachers, and Popular Science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 6.2: 141-159. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Hillsdale. Cook JM, Stuart AW. (2005) Figs and fig wasps. Curr Biol. 15: R978-R980. Corner EJH. (1962) The Classification of Moraceae. Gardens Bulletin. Sing. 19: 187-252. DeBoer GE. (2000) Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 37.6: 582-601. Delors J, Al I, Amagi I, Carneiro R, Chung F, Geremek B, Gorham W, Kornhauser A, Manley M, Quero MP, Savane M, Singh K, Stavenhagen R, Suhr MW, Nanzhao Z. (1996) Learning: the Treasure Within. Paris: UNESCO. DeVellis RF. (1991). Guidelines in scale development. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park. Calif: Sage. Dierking L. (2005) Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming science and technology education. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos. 12: 145-160. Driver R, Asoko H, Leach J, Scott P, Mortimer E. (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational researcher. 23.7: 5-12. Durant J. (1993) What is scientific literacy. Science and culture in Europe. 129-137. Falk J. (2005) Free‐choice environmental learning: framing the discussion. Environmental Education Research. 11: 265-280. Falk J, Dierking L. (2000) Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Altamira Press. Falk J, Dierking L. (2010) The 95 percent solution. American Scientist, 98.6: 486-493. Falk J, Storksdieck M. (2005) Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89.5: 744-778. Faure E, Herrera F, Kaddoura A, Lopes H, Petrovsky AV, Rahnema M, Ward FC. (1972) Learning to be. Paris: UNESCO. Feinstein N. (2011) Salvaging science literacy. Science education. 95.1: 168-185. Galil J. (1973) Topocentric and ethodynamic pollination. From in Pollination and Dispersal. In NBM. Brantjes and HF. Linskens. (editors). p 85-100. Galil J, Neeman G. (1977) Pollen transfer and pollination in the common fig (Ficus carica L.). New Phytologist. 79: 163-171. Hong JC, Lu CC, Hwang MY, Kuo YC, Wang CC, Chou CY. (2015) Larvae phobia relevant to anxiety and disgust reflected to theenhancement of learning interest and selfconfidence.Learning and Individual Differences. 42: 147-152. Hooper-Greenhill E. (2007) Museums and education: Purpose, pedagogy, performance. Routledge. Hunter MCR, Hunter MD. (2008) Designing for conservation of insects in the built environment. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 1: 189-196. Hurd PD. (1958) Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational leadership, 16.1: 13-16. ICOM. (2007) Resolutions Adopted by ICOM’s 22nd General Assembly. Vienna, Austria Jones MG, Brader‐Araje L, Carboni LW, Carter G, Rua MJ, Banilower E, Hatch H. (2000) Tool time: Gender and students' use of tools, control, and authority. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 37.8: 760-783. Kim KC. (1993) Biodiversity, conservation and inventory: why insects matter. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2: 191-214. Lambert FR, Marshall AG. (1991) Keystone characteristics of bird-dispersed Ficus in a Malaysian lowland rain forest. The Journal of Ecology. 79.3: 793-809. Matthews RW, Flage LR, Matthews JR. (1997) Insect as teaching tools in primary and secondary education. Annu Rev Entomol. 42: 269-289 Marsick VJ, Volpe M. (1999) The nature and need for informal learning. Advances in developing human resources, 1.3: 1-9. McCarthy CB. (2005) Effects of thematic‐based, hands‐on science teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 42.3: 245-263. National Research Council. (2013) Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press. National Science Teachers Association. (1982) Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. (An NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: Author. NGSS Lead States. (2013) Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Osborne J. (2010) Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science. 328.5977: 463-466. Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. (2002) Quality of agroecological matrix ina tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in southernMexico. Conservation Biology. 16: 174-182. Shen BS. (1975) Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In Communication of scientific information. Karger Publishers. 44-52. Singh PK. (2004) Museum and education. Orissa His Res J. 47: 69-82. Talanquer V, Novodvorsky I, Tomanek, D. (2010) Factors influencing entering teacher cadidates’ preferences for instructional activities: A glimpse into their orientations towards teaching. International Journal of Science Education. 32.10: 1389-1406. Tough A. (2002) The iceberg of informal adult learning. New Approaches to Lifelong Learning (NALL) working Paper, 49-2002. Ulrich RS, Addoms DL. (1981) Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park. Journal of Leisure Research. 13.1: 43-65. Verkerke W. (1989) Structure and function of the fig. Experientia. 45: 612-622. Walker JP, Sampson V. (2013) Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument‐driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 50.5: 561-596. Wiebes JT. (1979) Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Annual review of ecology and systematics. 10.1: 1-12. Yager RE. (1993). Science‐technology‐society as reform. School Science and Mathematics, 93.3: 145-151. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72912 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 現今的社會提倡「活到老學到老」,又因日新月異的科技演進以及環境的急遽變遷,培養大眾具備科學素養,為許多國家的教育政策導向。而學校教育僅為人一生中學習的冰山一角,其他學習的發生多屬非正式教育。在這之中,博物館為重要的教育推廣場域,其所發展出的「行動展示盒」,能打破地域限制增加教育推廣的機會。本研究依據行動展示盒的特性,結合多種學習理論,以榕樹與榕小蜂的共生關係作為學習主題,發展「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒。在2019年1月29日至2月28日間,於大安森林公園實際展演本行動展示盒,邀請民眾參與體驗學習。在民眾操作本行動展示盒前與後,分別填寫研究者設計之相應前測、後測問卷,本研究便以問卷收集與行動展示盒的使用現場觀察,評估民眾在體驗行動展示盒前後的學習興趣與知識概念變化。本次研究活動共回收170份有效問卷,問卷分析後的結果顯示,「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒的使用,對於參與民眾的學習興趣與知識概念皆有顯著提升,且民眾對於「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒的體驗也有高度的滿意。於此次展示活動的現場參與觀察中,研究者也得出普遍參與民眾在學習體驗過程中,不論其年齡或個人背景的差異,皆產生良好的探索學習經驗。本研究發現於科學教育與終身學習的運用中,行動展示盒為一種活潑且有成效的學習體驗手法,且為適合一般大眾產生學習行為的管道媒介。另因行動展示盒的內容呈現豐富多元,能因應不同族群的學習者,將此手法結合各種學習主題,能更加助於落實科學教育與終身學習。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Today's society advocates ' Never too late to learn'. Because of the technological evolution improves every day and the rapid changes in the environment, training the public to have scientific literacy has become the educational policy orientation of many countries. School education is only the tip of the iceberg for people to learn in their lifetime. Most of the learning takes place in informal education. Among them, museum is an important continuing education space, and its 'loan box' can break the geographical restrictions and increase the opportunities for education promotion. Based on the characteristics of the loan box, this study combines a variety of learning theories, using the mutualism relationship between Figs and the Fig wasp as the learning theme, and developing the loan box of 'Life History of Fig Wasps'. During the period from January 29th to February 28th, 2019, the loan box was actually displayed in Da-Aan Forest Park to invite people to participate in experiential learning. Before and after the operation of the loan box, the relevant pre-test and post-test questionnaires designed by the researcher were filled out. The study used the questionnaire and the loan box experiential observation to evaluate the people's learning interest and concept knowledge changes before and after experiencing the loan box. A total of 170 valid questionnaires were collected in this research activity. The results of the questionnaire analysis showed that the use of the loan box of the “Life History of Fig Wasps” significantly improved the learning interest and concept knowledge of the participating people, and the people’s experience of the loan box of the “Life History of Fig Wasps” is also highly satisfied. In the loan box experiential observation, the researchers also found that the general participation in the process of learning and experience, regardless of their age or personal background, produced good exploration and learning experience. This study finds that in the application of science education and lifelong learning, the loan box is a lively and effective learning experience, and is a pipeline suitable for the general public to generate learning behavior. In addition, because the content of the loan box is rich and diverse, it can respond to the learners of different groups and combine this technique with various learning themes to help implement science education and lifelong learning. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:10:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04632011-1.pdf: 21366968 bytes, checksum: 11ed9a12ffcc4cfba21798fc38540d44 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書……………………………………………………………………….i
謝辭…………………………………………………………………………………..iii 摘要…………………………………………………………………………………....v Abstract……………………………………………………………………………....vii 第壹章 前言…………………………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究動機與背景……………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的與問題……………………………………………………4 (一) 研究目的……………………………………………………4 (二) 研究問題……………………………………………………5 第貳章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………………..7 第一節 科學教育的發展與目標……………………………………………7 (一) 國內外科學教育發展………………………………………7 (二) 科學教育目標:科學素養…………………………………8 (三) 科學教育的推廣方式……………………………………..10 第二節 非正式教育之全民終身學習導向………………………………..11 第三節 博物館教育與學習理論的應用…………………………………..15 第四節 行動展示盒的起源及發展………………………………………..19 第五節 行動展示盒內容規劃概念………………………………………..23 第六節 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒主題選用依據…………………..25 第參章 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………29 第一節 研究架構規劃……………………………………………………..29 第二節 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒設計……………………………..30 (一) 設定「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒使用對象與場域…..30 (二) 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒內容教案開發…………..32 第三節 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒體驗活動流程…………………..45 第四節 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒使用成效評估方法……………..47 第肆章 研究結果……………………………………………………………………53 第一節 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒使用成效之問卷分析…………..53 (一)「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒作為一種科學教育推廣手法的成效如何?………………………………………………….….54 (二)「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒的應用是否助於一般大眾落實非正式的終身學習?……………………………………….….59 (三)體驗「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒的學習者的學習興趣分析結果為何?…………………………………………….…….63 第二節 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒體驗觀察………………….…….67 第三節 結論………………………………………………………………..73 第伍章 討論與改進建議……………………………………………………………77 第一節 研究結果討論……………………………………………………..77 第二節 改進建議…………………………………………………………..78 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………..81 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 「榕小蜂生活史」行動展示盒開發與使用之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Loan Box Development and Teaching Practice of “Life History of Fig Wasps” | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉湘瑤,賴麗娟 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 科學教育,終身學習,博物館行動展示盒,榕樹,榕小蜂, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | science education,lifelong learning,museum loan box,figs,fig wasps, | en |
dc.relation.page | 90 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901775 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 20.87 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。