請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72904
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳韻之 | |
dc.contributor.author | Pei-Hsuan Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張珮璇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:09:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, de Wijer A, Steenks MH BF.Interexaminer reliability of six orthopaedic tests in diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21(3):273-285. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01143.x.
2. de Wijer A, Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, Steenks MH BF. Reliability of clinical findings in temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 1995;9(2):181-191. 3. Leher A, Graf K, PhoDuc JM, Rammelsberg P. Is there a difference in the reliable measurement of temporomandibular disorder signs between experienced and inexperienced examiners? J Orofac Pain. 2005;19(1):58-64. 4. Weijs WA, Hillen B. Relationships between Masticatory Muscle Cross-section and Skull Shape. J Dent Res. 1984;63(9):1154-1157. doi:10.1177/00220345840630091201. 5. Hsu CW, Shiau YY, Chen CM, Chen KC LH. Measurement of the size and orientation of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B. 2001;25(1):45-49. 6. Raadsheer MC, Van Eijden TM, Van Spronsen PH, Van Ginkel FC, Kiliaridis S, Prahl-Andersen B. A comparison of human masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39(12):1079-1084. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(94)90061-2. 7. Bakke M, Tuxetv A, Vilmann P, Jensen BR, Vilmann A, Toft M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Eur J Oral Sci. 1992;100(3):164-171. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01734.x. 8. Bertram S, Brandlmaier I, Rudisch A, Bodner G, Emshoff R. Cross-sectional characteristics of the masseter muscle: An ultrasonographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(1):64-68. doi:10.1054/ijom.2002.0259. 9. Duráo APR, Morosolli A, Brown J, Jacobs R. Masseter muscle measurement performed by ultrasound: A systematic review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2017;46(6). doi:10.1259/dmfr.20170052. 10. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):291-305. doi:10.1177/10454411970080030401. 11. Greene CS, Laskin DM. Long-term evaluation of treatment for myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome: a comparative analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;107(2):235-238. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0246. 12. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6-27. doi:10.11607/jop.1151. 13. Manfredini D, Nardini LG. AAOP Current Concepts.Pdf. Quinessence; 2010. 14. de Leeuw, Reny and Klasser GD. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis and Management. Vol 5th ed. (Huffman L, ed.). chicago: Quinessence; 2013. 15. Rantala MAI, Ahlberg J, Suvinen TI, et al. Temporomandibular joint related painless symptoms, orofacial pain, neck pain, headache, and psychosocial factors among non-patients. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003. doi:10.1080/00016350310004089. 16. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T, Von Korff M. Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: reliability of clinical examiners. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(5):574-579. 17. Clark GT, Oakley ME, Flack V. Predicting response to treatment for temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992. 18. Okeson J. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. Vol 7th ed. St Louis, United States: Elsevier - Health Sciences Division; 2012. 19. Arangio GA, Chen C, Kalady M, Reed JF. Thigh Muscle Size and Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Rehabilitation. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 1997;26(5):238-243. doi:10.2519/jospt.1997.26.5.238. 20. Adams GR, Hather BM, Baldwin KM, Dudley GA. Skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain composition and resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(2):911-915. doi:10.1152/jappl.1993.74.2.911. 21. Lomo T, Westgaard RH, Dahl HA. Contractile properties of muscle: control by pattern of muscle activity in the rat. Proc R Soc London - Biol Sci. 1974;187(1086):99-103. doi:10.1098/rspb.1974.0064. 22. Pette D. The Adaptive Potential of Skeletal Muscle Fibers. Can J Appl Physiol. 2009;27(4):423-448. doi:10.1139/h02-023. 23. Grunheid T, Langenbach GEJ, Korfage JAM, Zentner A, Van Eijden TMGJ. The adaptive response of jaw muscles to varying functional demands. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(6):596-612. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp093. 24. Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Izumi M, et al. Ultrasonographic features of the masseter muscle in female patients with temporomandibular disorder associated with myofascial pain. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2004;98(3):337-341. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.068. 25. Costa YM, Ariji Y, Ferreira DMAO, et al. Muscle hardness and masticatory myofascial pain: Assessment and clinical relevance. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(8):640-646. doi:10.1111/joor.12644. 26. Eriksson PO, Thornell LE. Histochemical and morphological muscle-fibre characteristics of the human masseter, the medial pterygoid and the temporal muscles. Arch Oral Biol. 1983;28(9):781-795. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(83)90034-1. 27. Eriksson PO, Eriksson A, Ringqvist M, Thornell LE. Special histochemical muscle-fibre characteristics of the human lateral pterygoid muscle. Arch Oral Biol. 1981;26(6):495-507. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(81)90008-X. 28. Heymsfield SB, Adamek M, Gonzalez MC, Jia G, Thomas DM. Assessing skeletal muscle mass: Historical overview and state of the art. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5(1):9-18. doi:10.1007/s13539-014-0130-5. 29. Watanabe M, Sasaki K, Kawata T, Kubo K, Ogawa T. Outer shape changes of human masseter with contraction by ultrasound morphometry. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;51(2):146-153. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.06.009. 30. Kiliaridis S, Kälebo P. Masseter Muscle Thickness Measured by Ultrasonography and its Relation to Facial Morphology. J Dent Res. 1991;70(9):1262-1265. doi:10.1177/00220345910700090601. 31. Serra MD, Duarte Gavião MB, dos Santos Uchôa MN. The Use of Ultrasound in the Investigation of the Muscles of Mastication. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(12):1875-1884. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.05.009. 32. Liao LJ, Lo WC. High-Resolution Sonographic Measurement of Normal Temporomandibular Joint and Masseter Muscle. J Med Ultrasound. 2012;20(2):96-100. doi:10.1016/j.jmu.2012.04.003. 33. Silva Andresen Strini PJ, Silva Andresen Strini PJ, De Souza Barbosa T, Duarte Gavião MB. Assessment of thickness and function of masticatory and cervical muscles in adults with and without temporomandibular disorders. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(9):1100-1108. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.04.006. 34. Poveda-Roda R, Moreno P, Bagán J, Margaix M. Myofascial Pain: Ultrasound Width of the Masseter Muscle. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018;32(3):298-303. doi:10.11607/ofph.1944. 35. Paula Midori Castelo, Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião, Luciano José Pereira, Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim. Masticatory muscle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(February):149-156. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl089. 36. Mc R, Tmgj VE, Fc VG, Human PB. Human jaw muscle strength and size in relation to limb muscle strength and size. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;(10):398-405. 37. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Strobl H. Ultrasonographic cross-sectional characteristics of muscles of the head and neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999. doi:10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70302-1. 38. Chang KV, Lin CS, Lin CP, Wu WT, Özçakar L. Recognition of the lateral pterygoid muscle and plate during ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(5):UL01-UL02. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/27724.9932. 39. Raadsheer MC, Kiliaridis S, Van Eijden TM, Van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41(4):323-332. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(95)00136-0. 40. Dupont AC, Sauerbrei EE, Fenton P V., Shragge PC, Loeb GE, Richmond FJR. Real-time sonography to estimate muscle thickness: Comparison with MRI and CT. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29(4):230-236. doi:10.1002/jcu.1025. 41. Cicchetti D V. Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284. 42. Norton NS, Netter FH, Machado CAG. Netter’s Head and Neck Anatomy for Dentistry, Third Edition. Vol Third edit. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 20187. 43. Benington PCM, Gardener JE, Hunt NP. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod. 1999. doi:10.1093/ejo/21.6.659. 44. Caldera AH, Zambra RF, Hernán Valenzuela P, Víctor Retamal V. Masseter muscle deep measured by ultrasound per facial index related to sex . Int J Morphol. 2012. doi:10.4067/S0717-95022012000300033. 45. Close PJ, Stokes MJ, L’Estrange PR RJ. Ultrasonography of masseter muscle size in normal young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00246.x. 46. Egwu OA, Njoku CO, Ewunonu EO, Ukoha UU, Eteudo AN, Mgbachi CE. Assessment of Masseter Muscle Thickness in an Adult Nigerian Population: an Ultrasound Based Study. Int J Biomed Res. 2012;3(3):143-146. doi:10.7439/ijbr.v3i3.304. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72904 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究目的:咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛屬顳顎關節疾患臨床症狀之大宗,現今主要使用觸診作其狀態評估依據,但信賴度不佳。由於咀嚼肌厚度等物理性質的改變,會反映出咀嚼肌狀態的變化,進而可能是一個診斷上的輔助。使用超音波作為咀嚼肌厚度影像量測的設備,具有即時、便利、舒適度、檢查費用相對低廉的優勢。因此,本研究目的為建立可信賴之使用超音波量測咀嚼肌厚度(咬肌、顳肌前部、外翼肌)的方法,分析其肌肉厚度資料,歸納與闡釋其中之規則性。
研究方法:本實驗共納入四十八名經無肌筋膜疼痛之受試者,在儀器效度與操作方法信賴度驗證後,利用標準化之超音波量測模式,於B型超音波下量測受試者之咬肌、顳肌、以及外翼肌的厚度並加以分析。 結果:右側咬肌厚度介於12.13±2.35mm至16.26±2.43mm,左側上段咬肌厚度介於12.75±3.19mm至16.49±2.52mm,雙側數據並無統計上顯著差異,而大部分的咬肌測量位置顯示為與性別和身體質量指數顯著相關(P<0.05),去除性別變項的影響時,身體質量指數與咬肌厚度均呈無顯著相關。而咬肌厚度與最大開口度、下顎對稱性的程度,無論是哪個量測位置,均無統計上顯著相關。右側顳肌前部厚度介於5.19±0.77mm至5.30±0.77mm,左側顳肌前部厚度介於5.06±0.71mm至5.26±0.72mm,雙側數據並無統計上顯著差異,而右側顳肌前部在緊咬時與左側顳肌前部在放鬆、緊咬ㄌ、最大張口等三動作下與性別呈現顯著相關(P<0.05)。除右側顳肌前部緊咬時無顯著關係,其餘量測位置與動作狀態下均顯示與身提質量指數顯著相關。雙側顳肌前部無論處於何種動作狀態下皆顯示與年齡為沒有顯著關係。 右側外翼肌中段在最下開口狀態下中段厚度為14.65±1.38 mm,左側外翼肌中段厚度為14.68±1.11 mm。外翼肌中段肌肉厚度,左右兩側無顯著差異(P<0.05),與性別呈現顯著相關(P<0.05),和身體質量指數則無顯著相關。左側外翼肌中段外,在最大開口下與年齡呈顯著相關(P<0.05)。 結論:顏面部咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛為顳顎關節症候群臨床表現病症之一,現今臨床檢查方式為觸診,然觸診的施測者間信度並不高。在肌筋膜疼痛族群中,其咀嚼肌尺寸可能因病症而有所變化,而本實驗使用過去已廣泛運用於量測軀幹骨骼肌厚度之超音波作為測量,並建立可信賴之操作模式。於此操作下,針對無肌筋膜疼痛族群取得咬肌、顳肌前部與外翼肌的肌肉厚度數值,顯示雙側無顯著差異,並與過去近似研究對比,本實驗之受試者在咬肌厚度上來得厚。而經分析後得知咬肌厚度受到性別與身體質量指數影響較多,顳肌前部厚度與身體質量指數高度相關,而外翼肌厚度則與性別和年齡相關。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Myofascial pain dysfunction (MPDS) is a common symptom of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Physical muscle palpation is the main method of examination. However, the inter rater reliability of muscle palpation was not well. Considering the thickness of masticatory muscles vary by their condition, using the real-time, convenient, cost effective ultrasound to measure the muscle thickness would be a suitable investigation method. The purpose of this study is to build a reliable and accurate method of measuring masticatory muscle thickness by ultrasound and elucidate the collecting data.
Methods: 48 participants diagnosed with no MPDS were included in this study. After the validity and reliability of the ultrasound measuring protocol were confirmed, the masticatory muscle thickness was measured and analyze. Results: The right masseter muscle thickness was from 12.13±2.35mm to 16.26±2.43mm. The left masseter muscle thickness was from 12.75±3.19mm to 16.49±2.52mm. There was no significant difference between the data of right side and left side. Most of the measuring positions showed that gender and BMI were strongly correlated to the masseter muscle thickness (P<0.05) While removing the impact of gender, BMI was not significantly correlated to the masseter muscle thickness . Neither the amount of maximal mouth opening nor the symmetry of the mandible had significant effect on the masseter muscle thickness.The right anterior temporalis muscle thickness was between 5.19±0.77mm and 5.30±0.77mm,the left anterior temporalis muscle thickness was between 5.06±0.71mm and 5.26±0.72mm. The right side data had no significant difference with the left side. Gender had a significant correlation with right anterior temporalis muscle under clenching, left anterior temporalis muscle under relaxing, clenching and maximum mouth opening. (P<0.05) Unless the right anterior temporalis muscle under clenching, all the other measuring positions correlate to the BMI. Age had no impact on the thickness of the anterior temporalis muscle.The right lateral pterygoid muscle thickness was 114.65±1.38 mm in the middle while the left lateral pterygoid muscle thickness was 14.68±1.11 mm in the middle There was no significant difference between the right side and left side of the middle lateral pterygoid muscle thickness. Gender was a significant factor effecting the muscle thickness (P<0.05) while the BMI was not. Age was also correlated to the left lateral pterygoid muscle thickness measured from the middle part. Conclusion: Muscle palpation is the main method of examining myofascial pain Nowadays. However the inter-rater reliability was not well. The muscle size of the patient with MPDS might vary with the muscle condition. In the present study, we built up a protocol of measuring masticatory muscle thickness by ultrasound and the validity and reliability were good. Following this protocol, we gathered the data of masseter muscle, anterior temporalis muscle and lateral pterygoid muscle thickness from participants without MPDS. After statistical analysis, the masseter muscle, anterior temporalis muscle and lateral pterygoid muscle thickness have no significant difference between the right and left side. Comparing to the previous similar study, the masseter muscle thickness in present study was thicker. Gender and BMI had most of the impact on masseter muscle thickness, but BMI was more strongly correlated to the anterior temporalis muscle thickness. However, the lateral pterygoid muscle thickness was correlated to gender and age. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:09:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05422021-1.pdf: 33104676 bytes, checksum: 473789128082fdd0d7245bd142ec434c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝誌 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 viii 表目錄 x 圖目錄 xii 第一張 背景 第二章 文獻回顧與查證 3 第一節 顳顎關節障礙症候群之臨床表徵 3 第二節 顏面部咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛之臨床檢查方法及其信賴度 3 第三節 咀嚼肌厚度與肌筋膜疼痛之關聯性 4 第四節 顏面部咀嚼肌解剖構造及功能 5 第五節 顏面部咀嚼肌物理性質之影像學研究方法 7 第六節 超音波量測顏面部咀嚼肌厚度之方法 8 第七節 以超音波量測顏面部咀嚼肌厚度的操作影響因素 10 第八節 研究目的 11 第三章 實驗材料與方法 13 第一節 實驗所需儀器及相關配備 13 第二節 超音波量測厚度之效度驗證 13 第三節 實驗對象 14 第四節 實驗流程與影像數據測量 15 第四章 實驗結果 18 第一節 超音波量測厚度與表面積之效度驗證 18 第二節 實驗對象之基本資料 18 第三節 施測者間與施測者內信度 19 第四節 咬肌厚度 19 第五節 顳肌厚度 21 第六節 外翼肌厚度 23 第五章 討論 24 第一節 本實驗使用之超音波量測方法其緣由 24 第二節 使用超音波量測咀嚼肌厚度之信賴度 26 第三節 無肌筋膜疼痛族群之咀嚼肌厚度分析 27 第六章 總結 30 第七章 未來展望 31 文獻列表 32 附錄 表格與圖片 39 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以超音波量測無肌筋膜疼痛族群咀嚼肌厚度之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Research on ultrasonic measurement of masticatory muscles thickness of group without myofacial pain dysfunction | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 施庭芳,張凱閔 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 肌筋膜疼痛,顳顎關節疾患,信賴度,超音波,肌肉厚度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | myofascial pain,temporomandibular disorders,reliability,ultrasound,muscle thickness, | en |
dc.relation.page | 108 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201804283 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 32.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。