請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72374
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林楨家(Jen-Jia Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ju Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林邑孺 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:38:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-28 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 交通部統計處(2016)。「民眾日常使用運具狀況調查」摘要分析。台北:交通部統計處。
李業錦、朱紅(2013)。北京社會治安公共安全空間結構及其影響機制—以城市110警情為例。地理研究,32(5): 942-951。 張芳全、余民寧(2002)。國家發展指標之指標建構研究。教育與社會研究: 4: 71-110。 章殷超、溫在弘、賴美淑(2009)。利用地理資訊系統探討肝癌病患就醫地理可近性與醫院選擇間之相關性。臺灣公共衛生雜誌: 28(6): 517-529。 黃羽瑄(2010)。醫療可近性對臺灣地區中風病人死亡率的影響。國立中央大學博士論文。 廖坤榮(2004)。臺灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效。政治科學論叢: 22: 181-219。 廖培珊(2015)。社會發展指標與生活品質。國土及公共治理季刊: 3(1): 20-31。 臺南市政府民政局(2016)。人口統計資料。網站:http://www.tainan.gov.tw/agr/population.asp?nsub=I4A100 (2016年9月5日) 臺南市政府交通局(2012)。家戶旅次特性調查分析。臺南市政府交通局綜合規劃科。 臺南市政府交通局(2015)。交通工程:機車與自行車交通工程設計經驗-六都交通運輸論壇。網站:http://goodideas-campus.com/taichung-liudu/%E5%85%AD%E9 %83%BD%E8%AB%96%E5%A3%87_%E5%A0%B4%E6%AC%A1%E4%BA%8C%E7%B0%A1%E5%A0%B1.pdf (2016年8月12日) 鄭詩華(1981)。臺灣人民生活品質之分析。臺灣銀行季刊: 32(3): 67-90。 蘇昭銘、王張煒、何文基(2015)。中小型鄉鎮接駁公車之路線設計方法。運輸計劃季刊: 44(4): 313–332。 謝育惠(2013)。學校可及性對高中學生學習表現之影響─ 桃園縣之實證分析。臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文。 Banister, D., and Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life for the elderly: The transport dimension. Transport Policy, 11(2), 105-115. Barcaccia, B., Esposito, G., Matarese, M., Bertolaso, M., Elvira, M., and De Marinis, M. G. (2013). Defining quality of life: A wild-goose chase?. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 185-203. Bramston, P., Bruggerman, K., and Pretty, G. (2002). Community perspectives and subjective quality of life. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education,49(4), 385-397. Crompton, J. (2004). Beyond economic impact: An alternative rationale for the public subsidy of major league sports facilities. Journal of sport management, 18(1), 40-58. Currie, G. (2004). Gap analysis of public transport needs: Measuring spatial distribution of public transport needs and identifying gaps in the quality of public transport provision. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1895), 137-146. Currie, G. (2010). Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 31-41. Curtin, K. M., Hayslett-McCall, K., and Qiu, F. (2010). Determining optimal police patrol areas with maximal covering and backup covering location models. Networks and Spatial Economics, 10(1), 125-145. Deller, S. C., Tsai, T. H. S., Marcouiller, D. W., and English, D. B. (2001). The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2), 352-365. Deller, S. C., Tsai, T. H. S., Marcouiller, D. W., and English, D. B. (2001). The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2), 352-365. Escuder-Mollon, P., Esteller-Curto, R., Ochoa, L., and Bardus, M. (2014). Impact on Senior Learners’ Quality of Life through Lifelong Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131(2), 510-516. Farrington, J., and Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 1-12. Feikin, D. R., Nguyen, L. M., Adazu, K., Ombok, M., Audi, A., Slutsker, L., and Lindblade, K. A. (2009). The impact of distance of residence from a peripheral health facility on pediatric health utilisation in rural western Kenya. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 14(1), 54-61. Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(3), 199-215. Greenwood, B. M., Greenwood, A. M., Bradley, A. K., Williams, K., Hassan-King, M., Shenton, F. C., and Hayes, R. J. (1987). Factors influencing susceptibility to meningococcal disease during an epidemic in The Gambia. West Africa.Journal of Infection, 14(2), 167-184. Group, T. E. (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy, 16(3), 199-208. Hagerty, M.R., Cummis, R.A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A.C., Peterson,M. Sharpe,A. Sirgy,J. Sharpe,J.V., Vogal, J. Sirgy J.and Vogal, J. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicator Research, 55(1), 1–96. Janky, J. M., and Schipper, J. F. (1996). Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent, 5, 552-772. Jansen-Verbeke, M., and Van Rekom, J. (1996). Scanning museum visitors. Urban tourism marketing. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 364-375. John H. F. (2007). The new narrative of accessibility: Its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5), 319-330. Kamruzzaman, M., and Hine, J. (2011). Participation index: A measure to identify rural transport disadvantage?. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 882-899. Kenyon, S., Rafferty, J., and Lyons, G. (2003). Social exclusion and transport in the UK: a role for virtual accessibility in the alleviation of mobility-related social exclusion?. Journal of Social Policy, 32(3), 317-338. Kolodinsky, J. M., DeSisto, T. P., Propen, D., Putnam, M. E., Roche, E., and Sawyer, W. R. (2013). It is not how far you go, it is whether you can get there: Modeling the effects of mobility on quality of life in rural New England. Journal of Transport Geography, 31(1), 113-122. Kusow, A. M., Wilson, L. C., and Martin, D. E. (1997). Determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The effects of residential location. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 20(4), 655-664. Lee, R. J., and Sener, I. N. (2016). Transportation planning and quality of life: Where do they intersect?. Transport Policy, 48(1), 146-155. Levinson, D. M. (1998). Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), 11-21. Lim, C., and Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American sociological review, 75(6), 914-933. Lyons, W. (2002). Partnerships, information and public safety: Community policing in a time of terror. Policing, An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 25(3), 530-542. Mesch, G. S., and Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and behavior, 30(4), 504-519. Metz, D. H. (2000). Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transport Policy, 7(2), 149-152. Misener, L., and Mason, D. S. (2006). Creating community networks: Can sporting events offer meaningful sources of social capital?. Managing Leisure, 11(1), 39-56. Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing leisure, 6(4), 201-219. Noorali, R., Luby, S., and Rahbar, M. H. (1999). Does use of a government service depend on distance from the health facility?. Health policy and planning, 14(2): 191-197. Nutley, S. (2003). Indicators of transport and accessibility problems in rural Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(1), 55-71. Nutley, S. D. (1980). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related welfare: The case of rural Wales. Geoforum, 11(4), 335-352. O'Regan, K. M., and Quigley, J. M. (1998). Accessibility and economic opportunity. The University of California Transportation Center, 362, 1-66. Parks, V. (2004). Access to work: The effects of spatial and social accessibility on unemployment for native-born black and immigrant women in Los Angeles. Economic Geography, 80(2), 141-172. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., and Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70-93. Pospěch,P., Delín, M., and Spěšná, D. (2009). Quality of life in Czech rural areas. Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 55(6), 284-295 . Preston, J., and Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(3), 151-160. Ryan, J., and Han, G. (1999). Vehicle-ownership model using family structure and accessibility application to Honolulu, Hawaii. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1676), 1-10. Spinney, J. E., Scott, D. M., and Newbold, K. B. (2009). Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: A time-use perspective of elderly Canadians. Transport Policy, 16(1), 1-11. Steg, L., and Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59-69. Stock, R. (1983). Distance and the utilization of health facilities in rural Nigeria. Social Science and Medicine, 17(9), 563-570. Swersey, A. J. (1994). The deployment of police, fire, and emergency medical units. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 6, 151-200. Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J. C., and Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52-69. World Health Organization, Louisa,H., andWillem,K. (1994). Quality of Life Assessment : An Annotated Bibliography, Geneva : World Health Organization. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72374 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 衡量人類福祉( well-being )不能單純的以物質上的經濟數據為依據,如國內生產總值(Gross Domestic Product, GDP)數據並不足以得知人民生活狀況,因此發展出生活品質( Quality of oLife ,簡稱QoL)此概念,涵蓋人民生活的各個層面,也是現今社會、政府單位與國際組織日益重視的議題。文獻顯示可及性(accessibility )與生活品質有密切的相關性,但過去研究多數集中在都市地區,鄉村地區的生活品質與可及性的關聯仍很少於現今學術界見到,故本研究以此為主題探討。
本研究目的在了解可及性對於鄉村地區生活品質的影響。首先,針對相關文獻分成「鄉村地區與運輸」與「生活品質與運輸」兩個主題進行回顧,因臺南縣市合併後境內運輸系統發展與環境條件不一,是運輸系統差異明顯的地區,故選定臺南市為研究區域。根據行政院研究發展考核委員會定義偏遠地區鄉鎮,將境內區分為鄉村地區偏遠程度高、低與最低三種等級,再進一步透過訪談、相關文獻評析提出理論假說。繼而取得內政部生活意象調查資料、臺南市旅運需求調查資料以整理變數資料,進行階層次序羅吉特模式分析,檢定可及性是否會對鄉村地區生活品質產生影響。 本研究經過訪談與文獻回顧後,將生活品質實證結果分成:健康維護、經濟生活、社會參與、公共安全、環境品質、文化休閒與學習生活等七個面向,可及性則分為近程、中程與遠程。實證結果發現:醫療院所在近程可及性對健康維護面向的滿意度有正向顯著影響;農會、銀行、郵局休閒設施可及性對經濟生活面向滿意度達到正向顯著關係,商業區可及性對經濟生活面向為負向顯著關係;文化設施遠程可及性對環境品質面向達到正向顯著關係;社會參與面向和宗教設施、體育設施可及性有正向顯著關係,宗教設施是正向顯著關係,體育設施在遠程可及性有負向關聯;公共安全面向受到警察局、消防局和商業區可及性的正向影響;體育設施遠程可及性則在文化休閒面向有負向影響。 過去文獻認為增加可及性即可增加居民生活品質,但上述發現顯示,如果想要改善居民的生活品質,需要了解居民是哪項生活品質滿意度低,再改善該面向的近、中或遠程可及性,甚至部分結果顯示增加可及性不一定會讓每個面向的生活品質提升;但總體而言除了改善可及性,易行性的增加是可以間接提升鄉村地區居民生活品質的方式。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Most rural areas in the world suffer challenges of providing sufficient transportation services to residents. Lacking public transport systems and private vehicle ownerships in rural areas limits individual accessibility to facilities and services and may result in a lower quality of life. This research aims to clarify the influences of accessibility on quality of life in rural areas.
The study data was collected from Tainan, Taiwan, where contains areas with diverse rural levels and is suitable to this research. The observations of quality of life surveys, which were conducted by the Ministry of the Interior in 2012-2014, were used as the study sample and analyzed using hierarchical ordered logit models. The accessibility variables were determined according to literature reviews and stakeholder interviews. The empirical evidence reveals that area accessibility is positively related to a resident's quality of life in rural areas. Quality of life was divided into seven categories in this research: health, economic, leisure, culture, social involvement, safety and sport. Accessibility was classified into three levels: long distance, medium distance and short distance. The empirical evidence reveals the following findings: 1) short distance accessibility of medical facilities is positively related to health satisfaction; 2) accessibility of farm associations, banks, post offices and leisures facilities is positively related to economic satisfaction while accessibility of commercial facilities is negatively associated with economic satisfaction, 3) Long distance accessibility of culture facilities is positively related to environment satisfaction; 4) social envolvement satisfaction is positively related to long distance accessibility of religious and sport facilities; 5) safety satisfaction is positively related to accessibility of police offices, fire stations and commercial facilities; and, 6) long distance accessibility of sport facilities is negatively related to culture and leisure satisfaction. The previous studies commonly argued that enhancing accessibility in an area contributes to higher quality of life. However, the empirical findings of this research imply that the above argument is not always true. The influences of accessibility on QoL are different among QoL perspectives. Moreover, enhancing mobility could contribute to a higher quality of life. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:38:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04228005-1.pdf: 2939250 bytes, checksum: 3b3c251762e70747879882a68aa4d748 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究範疇 5 第四節 研究流程與內容 16 第五節 研究方法 20 第二章 文獻回顧 22 第一節 鄉村地區與運輸 22 第二節 生活品質與運輸 26 第三節 綜合評析 30 第三章 研究設計 33 第一節 課題研析 33 第二節 假說研提 44 第三節 分析方法 77 第四章 資料調查與分析 83 第一節 資料蒐集 84 第二節 敘述統計 86 第三節 空間分布 94 第五章 實證分析 96 第一節 模式估計 96 第二節 假說驗證 101 第三節 意涵討論 110 第六章 結論與建議 118 第一節 結論 118 第二節 建議 123 參考文獻 128 附錄一:訪談紀錄 134 附錄二:模式估計 156 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 可及性對鄉村地區生活品質的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Accessibility Impacts on Quality of Life in Rural Areas | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 溫在弘(Tzai-Hung Wen),衛萬明(Wann-Ming Wey) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 鄉村地區,可及性,生活品質,階層線性模式,次序羅吉特式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | rural area,accessibility,quality of life,hierarchical linear model,ordered logit model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 165 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201704196 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.87 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。