請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72308
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 羅筱鳳(Hsiao-Feng Lo) | |
dc.contributor.author | Bie-Chuan Chu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 朱百川 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:34:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-21 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
王貴彥、史秀捧、張建恒、梁衛理. 2000. TDR法、中子法、重量法測量土壤含水量的比較研究. 河北農業大學學報 23:23-26. 田雲生、戴振洋. 2014. 蔬菜節水節肥栽培技術與設施. 水資源管理會刊. 16(1):18-24. 行政院農業委員會. 中華民國105年農業統計要覽. 行政院農業委員會編印. 臺北. 姚銘輝、盧虎生、朱鈞. 2002. 葉綠素螢光與作物生理反應. 科學農業. 50:31-41. 張恒月、郭屹立、王磊、魏巍、丁聖彥. 2009. 乾旱和復水對大豆葉片光合生理特性及產量的影響. 河南大學學報39:183-188. 張斐章、張麗秋、黃浩倫. 2003. 類神經網路:理論與實務. 東華書局. 臺北. 臺灣. 陳家宙、陳明亮、何圓球. 2001. 各具特色的當代土壤水分測量技術. 湖北農業科學. 3:25-28. 曾燕翔、邱永嘉. 2014. 時域反射儀應用於土壤含水量與導電度關係之研究. 2014. 第八屆地下水資源及水質保護研討會暨2014兩岸地下水與水文地質應用研討會論文集. 國立成功大學編印. p. A1-25-A1-30. 經濟部水利署. 2017. 105水利署統計書刊. 經濟部水利署. 臺北. 臺灣. 戴振洋、郭俊毅. 2006. 小油菜 “金寶-台中 3 號” 之育成及栽培技術. 臺中區農業技術專刊. 169:7-12. 謝明憲. 2014. 黃金廊道設施果菜滴灌節水栽培之應用. 臺南區農業專訊. 臺南區農業改良場編印. 87期. Abedi, T. and H. Pakniyat. 2010. Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress in ten cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Czech J. Genet. Plant breed. 46:27-34. Arunyanark, A., S. Jogloy, C. Akkasaeng, N. Vorasoot, T. Kesmala, R.C.N. Rao, G.C. Wright, and A. Patanothai. 2008. Chlorophyll stability is an indicator of drought tolerance in peanut. J. Agronomy & Crops Sci. 194:113-125. Asada, K. 1987. Production and scavenging of active oxygen in photosynthesis. Photoinhibition 1:227-287. Asada, K. 1999. The water–water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygen and dissipation of excess photons. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999 50:601-639. Ashraf, M. and S. Mehmood. 1990. Response of four Brassica species to drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 30:93-100. Assaha, D.V., L. Liu, A. Ueda, T. Nagaoka, and H. Saneoka. 2016.Effects of drought stress on growth, solute accumulation and membrane stability of leafy vegetable, huckleberry (Solanum scabrum Mill.). J. Environ. Biol. 37:107-114. Dixon et al., 1998 Fotovat, R., M. Valizadeh, and M. Toorchi. 2007. Association between water-use efficiency components and total chlorophyll content (SPAD) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under well-watered and drought stress conditions. J. Food Agr. Environ. 5:225-227. Good, A.G. and J.L. Maclagan. 1993. Effects of drought stress on the water relations in Brassica species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:525-529. Harb, A., D. Awad, and N. Samarah. 2015. Gene expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under controlled severe drought. J. Plant Interactions 10:109-116. Hsaiao, T.C., and E. Acevedo. 1974. Plant responses to water deficits, efficiency and drought resistance. Agricultural Meteorol. 14:59-84. Kato, M., and S. Shimizu. 1987. Chlorophyll metabolism in higher plants. VII. Chlorophyll degration in senescing tobacco leaves; phenolic-dependent peroxidative degradation. Can J. Bot. 65:729-735. Kramer, P.J., and J.S. Boyer. 1995. Water relation of plant and soil. Academic press. MA. USA. Lauer, M.J., and J.S. Boyer. 1992. Internal CO2 measured directly in leaves abscisic acid and low leaf water potential cause opposing effects. Plant Physiol. 98:1310-1316. Lou, H.H., Y.L. Zhang, and W.F. Zhang. 2016. Effects of water stress and rewatering on photosynthesis, root activity, and yield of cotton with drip irrigation under mulch. Photosynthetica 54:65-73. Mittler. R. 2002. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. TRENDS Plant Sci. 7:405-410. Moran, J.F., M. Becana, I. Iturbe-Ormaetxe, S. Frechilla, R.V. Klucas, and P. Aparicio-Tejo. 1994. Drought induces oxidative stress in pea plants. Plant. 194:346-352. Naderikharaji, R., H. pakniyat, and A.R. Biabani. 2008. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic rate of four rapeseed (Brassica napus) cultivars. J. Applied Sci. 8:4460-4463. Nakano, Y., and K. Asada. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 22:867-880. Photon Systems Instruments. 2014. PlantPen PRI 200 & NDVI 300 instruction manual. Photon Systems Instruments. Drásov. Czech Republic. Schaedle M., and J.A. Bassham. 1977. Chloroplast glutathione reductase. Plant Physiol. 59:1011-1012. Shakeel A.A., X.Y. Xie, L.C. Wang, M.F. Saleem, C. Man, and W. Lei. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6:2026-2032. Silva, M.A., J.L. Jifon, J.A.G.D. Silva, and V. Sharma. 2007. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 19:193-201. Souza, R.P., E.C. Machado, J.A.B. Silva, A.M.M.A. Lagôa, and J.A.G. Silveira. 2004. Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cow pea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ. Exp. Bot. 51:45-56. Spectrum Technologies, Inc. SPAD 502 plus chlorophyll meter product manual. 2006. Spectrum Technologies, Inc. IL. USA. Taiz, L., and E. Zeiger. 2015. Plant physiological fifth edition. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers. MA. USA. Topp, G.C., J.L. Davis, and A.P. Annan. 1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resour. Res. 16:574-582. Uddling. J., J. Gelang-Alfredsson, and K. Piikki, and H. Pleijel. 2007. Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth. Res. 91:37-46. Willekens, H., S. Chamnongpol, M. Davey, M. Schraudner, C. Langebartels, M.V. Montagu, D. Inzé, and W.V. Camp. 1997. Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO J. 16:4806-4816. Wright, P.R., J.M. Morgan, and R.S. Jessop. 1996. Comparative adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (B. juncea) to soil water deficits: plant water relations and growth. Field Crops Res. 49:51-64. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72308 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 臺灣104年農業灌溉用水占總用水量70%,農業灌溉用水中有60%為地面灌溉,然而地面灌溉之水分利用效率不佳,使用水量高於作物所需水量。本研究以小油菜‘青龍’(Brassica rapa ‘Qing Long’)與小白菜‘鳳京’(Brassica rapa var. chinensis ‘Feng-Jing’)為試驗材料,進行持續斷水試驗與斷水復水試驗。持續斷水試驗調查兩作物在停止灌溉後、漸漸進入乾旱逆境時的非破壞性生理特性SPAD、葉綠素螢光FV/FM、NDVI、PRI以及破壞性生理特性地上部之鮮重、乾重、乾物率、葉片水分潛勢與抗氧化酵素活性,並搭配介質泥炭土體積含水量(volumetric water content, VWC),挑選出適合的非破壞性生理特性作為灌溉指標;斷水復水試驗則調查兩作物在不同供水處理下之地上部鮮重及乾重,並測定泥炭土之VWC,了解兩作物適合之復水值。小油菜試驗重複I中,適合作為灌溉指標的非破壞性生理特性為葉綠素螢光FV/FM,而需採收之泥炭土VWC臨界推薦值為30%;推薦復水之泥炭土VWC為38%。小油菜試驗重複II中,沒有非破壞性生理特性適合作為灌溉指標,採收之泥炭土VWC臨界推薦值為20%;推薦復水之泥炭土VWC為18%。小油菜試驗重複III並無乾旱逆境。小白菜試驗重複I,沒有非破壞性生理特性適合作為灌溉指標,採收之泥炭土VWC臨界推薦值為20%;推薦復水之泥炭土VWC為39%。小白菜試驗重複II,適合作為灌溉指標的非破壞性生理特性為葉綠素螢光FV/FM與NDVI,而採收之泥炭土VWC臨界推薦值為20%;推薦復水之泥炭土VWC為22%。小白菜試驗重複III沒有非破壞性生理特性適合作為灌溉指標,而採收之泥炭土VWC臨界推薦值為20%;推薦復水之泥炭土VWC為18%。綜之,葉綠素螢光FV/FM比其他非破壞性生理特性較適合作為灌溉指標,但仍不夠穩定。於晴天或陰晴參雜時,建議兩作物在泥炭土VWC低至30%之前復水,陰天則建議泥炭土VWC低至20%之前復水。保守的建議為兩作物在泥炭土VWC低至40%之前即復水。亦利用類神經網路預測小白菜產量之分級,成功預測之正確率達31%,若有更多試驗單位將可提升預測產量之正確率,邁向智慧農業。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In Taiwan, 70% of all consumed water was agriculture irrigation water, in which 60% was used in surface irrigation during 2015. However, water use efficiency of surface irrigation is low due to the irrigation water applied is more than plant requirement. In present study, rape ‘Qing Long’ (Brassica rapa) and pak-choi ‘Feng-Jing’ (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) were used as the materials for experiments of (1) water dis-supply and (2) re-water after water dis-supply, for 3 replications. In water dis-supply experiment, non-destructive physiological characters including SPAD, chlorophyll fluorescence FV/FM, NDVI and PRI, and destructive physiological characters including fresh weight, dry weight and dry matter ratio of shoots, leaf water potential and antioxidant enzymes activities, as well as volumetric water content (VWC) of peat medium were investigated after water dis-supply to select suitable character as irrigation indicator. In re-water after water dis-supply experiment, shoot fresh weight and dry weight of 2 crops were investigated under different irrigation treatments. Peat VWC was also measured to select suitable indicator for re-watering. In rape experiment replication I, the suitable non-destructive physiological character is chlorophyll fluorescence FV/FM. The recommended peat VWC for harvest is 30% and for re-watering 38%. In rape experiment replication II, any non-destructive physiological character was not suitable as an irrigation indicator. The recommend peat VWC for harvest is 20% and for re-watering 18%. In rape experiment replication III, the plants did not face drought stress. In pak-choi experiment replication I, no non-destructive physiological character was suitable as an irrigation indicator. The recommended peat VWC for harvest is 20% and for re-watering 39%. In pak-choi experiment replication II, the suitable irrigation indicator for non-destructive physiological character is chlorophyll fluorescence FV/FM and NDVI. The recommended peat VWC for harvest is 20%, and for re-watering 22%. In pak-choi experiment replication III, no non-destructive physiological character was suitable as an irrigation indicator. The recommend peat VWC for harvest is 20%, and for re-watering 18%. In conclusion, chlorophyll fluorescence FV/FM has the potential to be an irrigation indicator, but is still not stable. The recommended peat VWC for irrigation is 30% during sunny days or unstable weather, and 20% during rainy days. Peat VWC never below 40% is conservatively suggested. Artificial neural network was also used to predict classification of pak-choi yield. The accuracy rate is 31%. More experimental units are needed to increase the accuracy of predicting the classification of pak-choi yield and reach intelligence agriculture. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:34:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05628131-1.pdf: 5536487 bytes, checksum: a3bf2491e8bc6a244f2c0529ec2fc0bd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………...i
英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iii 第一章 前言…………………………………………………………………….………1 第二章 前人研究……………………………………………………………….………2 一、 非破壞性指標…………………………………………………………….2 二、 破壞性調查……………………………………………………………….5 三、 土壤水分狀態評估……………………………………………………….9 四、 類神經網路……………………………………………………………...10 第三章 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………...12 一、 育苗栽培…………………………………………………………...…....12 二、 試驗處理…………………………………………………………...……13 三、 各試驗栽培曆…………………………………………………...............14 四、 統計分析……………………………………………………………...…18 五、 類神經網路……………………………………………………………...18 第四章 結果…………………………………………………………………………...20 一、 小油菜試驗……………………………………………………………...20 (一) 小油菜試驗重複I……………………………………………20 (二) 小油菜試驗重複II…………………………………………………22 (三) 小油菜試驗重複III………………………………………………24 二、 小白菜試驗……………………………………………………………...26 (一) 小白菜試驗重複I…………………………………………………26 (二) 小白菜試驗重複II………………………………………………28 (三) 小白菜試驗重複III………………………………………………30 三、 類神經網路預測小白菜產量…………………………………………...33 第五章 討論…………………………………………………………………………..34 第六章 結論……………………………………………………….………………….41 第七章 參考文獻……………………………………………………….……………103 附錄…………………………………………………………………………………108 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 小油菜與小白菜節水灌溉之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study on water-saving irrigation of rape (Brassica rapa) and pak-choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊雯如(Wen-Ju Yang),林淑怡(Shu-I Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 斷水,節水灌溉,小油菜,小白菜,生理指標,類神經網路, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | water dis-supply,saving-water irrigation,rape (Brassica rapa),pak-choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis),physiological indicator,artificial neural networks, | en |
dc.relation.page | 139 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803686 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.41 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。