請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72269
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮(Chyi-Rong Chiou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhong-Jia Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳仲佳 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:32:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王培蓉、林俊成 (2010) 買賣自然-淺論為生態系服務付費。林業研究專訊 17(1):23-27。
李俊鴻、陳郁蕙、陳雅惠 (2011) 森林生態系服務功能及其價值探討。林務局一百年度委辦計畫研究報告。行政院農業委員會林務局。臺灣台北。 林俊成、林裕仁、邱祈榮、王怡穩 (2013) 全球森林認證現況與未來發展。林業研究專訊 20(1):7-12。 林業試驗所 (2016) 臺灣森林經營驗證標準草案 第1-1版。行政院農業委員會林業試驗所。臺灣台北。 林業試驗所蓮華池研究中心 (2016) 管理系統文件與經營計畫。行政院農業委員會林業試驗所蓮華池研究中心。臺灣南投。 邱祈榮 (2015) 森林生態系服務價值評估應用於林業政策訂定之探討。行政院農委會林務局。臺灣台北。 邱祈榮、林俊成 (2012) 森林價值知多少-自然資產與生態系統服務之簡介。林業研究專訊 19(6):36-42。 邱祈榮、林俊成、林裕仁、莊媛卉 (2013) FSC第四版與第五版森林管理驗證原則與準則之比較。中華林學季刊46(3):327-342。 邱祈榮、柳婉郁 (2016) 森林生態系服務價值估算與驗證機制研析。行政院農委會林務局。臺灣台北。 邱祈榮、陳乃維、莊媛卉 (2017) FSCTM森林生態系服務驗證介紹與現況。林業研究專訊24(2):83-87。 莊媛卉 (2014) 非用材林產品驗證標準之探討。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文。 陳雅惠、李俊鴻 (2013) 以生態系服務功能補償(PES)促進林業部門發展綠色經濟。台灣林業 39(3):23-28。 陳雅惠、李俊鴻、陳郁蕙 (2011) 淺談生態系統暨生物多樣性經濟學(TEEB)。台灣林業 37(3):17-21。 農業委員會林務局 (2012) 以生態系統服務功能補償(PES)概念促進我國社區保育區設立之探討。行政院農業委員會林務局。臺灣台北。 Barbier, E. B. (2011). Transaction costs and the transition to environmentally sustainable development. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 58-69. Bayon, R., Hawn, A., Hamilton, K. (2009). Voluntary Carbon Markets: An International Business Guide to What They Are and How They Work. Earthscan, London. Bennett, G., Hamrick, K., Ruef, F., Goldstein, A., and McCarthy, B. (2016). Verified Value: Investigating Potential Supply and Demand for Verified Ecosystem Services Benefits from Responsibly Managed Forests. A report prepared for the Forest Stewardship Council by Ecosystem Marketplace, a Forest Trends initiative. Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC. Brest, P. (2010). The power of theories of change. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(2), 47-51. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. nature, 387(6630), 253. D’Angelo, C. (2017). Private land gift drives vast expansion of Chile’s national parks. The World Post 15 March. (Also available at http: //www. huffingtonpost.com/entry/kristine-douglas-tompkins-chile-national-parks_us_58c73514e4b0598c66992e6f, accessed 31 May 2017). Daily, G. (Ed.). (1997). Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press. Ehrlich, P.R., and Ehrlich, A.H. (1981). Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Random House, New York. FSC (2012) FSC International Standard - FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship FSC-STD-01-001 (V5-0) EN. Retrieved on September 26, 2012, from http://ic.fsc.org/ FSC (2015). Global Strategic Plan 2015 – 2020. Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn. FSC (2015). International Generic Indicators FSC-STD-60-004 V1-0 EN. Retrieved on June 4, 2018, from https://ic.fsc.org/en FSC (2017). ForCES: Creating Incentives to Protect Forests by Certifying Ecosystem Services. Final Report of the UN Environment/GEF-funded Project ‘Expanding FSC Certification at Landscape Level through Incorporating Additional Ecosystem Services (ID 3951)’. Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn. Goldstein, A., Gonzalez, G., and Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. (2014). Turning over a New Leaf: State of the Forest Carbon Markets 2014, ed. Peters-Stanley, M. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. Washington, DC. Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological economics, 69(6), 1209-1218. Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis, 1, 110-139. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., and Cheshire, D. (2006). Defining and identifying environmental limits for sustainable development. A scoping study. Final overview report to Defra, Project Code NR0102. University of Nottingham, Centre for Environmental Management, Nottingham. Hedden-Dunkhorst, B., Braat, L., & Wittmer, H. (2015). TEEB emerging at the country level: Challenges and opportunities. Ecosystem Services, 14, 37-44. Hubbart, J. (2011). Environmental Biophysics. Retrieved from http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/152577 IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC Guideline for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC. Kanagawa, Japan. Jaung, W., and Putzel, L. (2013). Forest Certification for Ecosystem Services: Analysis of Market Conditions (International Market Assessment Part II). Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. Jaung, W., Bull, G. Q., Putzel, L., Kozak, R., & Elliott, C. (2016a). Bundling forest ecosystem services for FSC certification: an analysis of stakeholder adaptability. International Forestry Review, 18(4), 452-465. Jaung, W., Bull, G. Q., Sumaila, U. R., & Putzel, L. (2018). Estimating water user demand for certification of forest watershed services. Journal of environmental management, 212, 469-478. Jaung, W., Putzel, L., Bull, G. Q., & Kozak, R. (2016b). Certification of forest watershed services: AQ methodology analysis of opportunities and challenges in Lombok, Indonesia. Ecosystem Services, 22, 51-59. Jaung, W., Putzel, L., Bull, G. Q., Guariguata, M. R., & Sumaila, U. R. (2016c). Estimating demand for certification of forest ecosystem services: A choice experiment with Forest Stewardship Council certificate holders. Ecosystem Services, 22, 193-201. Jaung, W., Putzel, L., Bull, G. Q., Kozak, R., & Elliott, C. (2016d). Forest Stewardship Council certification for forest ecosystem services: An analysis of stakeholder adaptability. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 91-98. Meijaard, E., Sheil, D., Guariguata, M. R., Nasi, R., Sunderland, T., & Putzel, L. (2011). Ecosystem services certification: Opportunities and constraints. Occasional Paper 66. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Meijaard, E., Wunder, S., Guariguata, M. R., & Sheil, D. (2014). What scope for certifying forest ecosystem services? Ecosystem Services, 7, 160-166. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. Overdevest, C. (2010). Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1), 47-76. Peters-Stanley, M., Bennett, G., and Cardono, S. (2015). PES Markets: The Nature of Market Scale, Expectations, Needs & Opportunities. Unpublished. Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC. Peters-Stanley, M., Gonzalez, G., Yin, D., (2013). Covering new ground: state of the forestCarbon Markets 2013. Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, D.C. Savilaakso, S., & Guariguata, M. R. (2017). Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: How to enhance local adoption? Ecosystem Services, 28, 55-66. Savilaakso, S., Meijaard, E., Guariguata, M. R., Boissiere, M., & Putzel, L. (2015). A review on compliance and impact monitoring indicators for delivery of forest ecosystem services (Vol. 188). CIFOR. TEEB. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). United Nations Environment Programme. TEEB. (2013). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity 2013: Guidance Manual for TEEB Country Studies. Version 1.0.The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). United Nations Environment Programme. UN Environment (2011). Project Document: Expanding Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certification at Landscape Level through Incorporating Additional Ecosystem Services. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Westman, W. E. (1977). How much are nature's services worth? Science 197(4307): 960-964. Wischmeier, W.H., and Smith, D.D. (1965). Predicting Rainfall-Erosion Losses from Cropland East of the Rocky Mountains: Guide for Selection of Practices for Soil and Water Conservation. Agricultural Handbook 282, U.S. Department of Agricultural, Washington, D.C. 47p. Wischmeier, W.H., and Smith, D.D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses – a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook 537: 1578-1582. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72269 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目前生態系服務市場的發展,因缺乏良好的監測系統或認證制度,使得市場規模與需求無法擴展。FSC期望能透過生態系服務認證的建立,針對生物多樣性保育、集水區服務、碳吸存與碳儲存、土讓保育、遊憩服務,揭露更多林地的現況資訊,消弭過去資訊不全或不對等的情形,讓生態系服務買賣雙方能更順利地進入市場,強化全球森林保育之誘因。
本研究透過FSC的全球生態系服務認證試驗地的案例,以及FSC發布之生態系服務認證程序書以及其他相關文獻,以文獻回顧的方式探討目前FSC生態系服務認證的進展與阻礙。綜合分析後發現,目前生態系服務認證依然受限於生態系服務產出量化的困難,進而影響認證的需求。而碳吸存與碳儲存則依然最具有前景與市場潛力,試驗地中僅越南香山以碳吸存與碳儲存取得FSC生態系服務認證,為全球首例。最後綜合環境條件與FSC程序書的要求,蓮華池為台灣最適合發展生態系服務認證者,可選擇生物多樣性保育、集水區服務與遊憩服務進行認證。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The market scale and demand of ecosystem service face challenges on development and expansion because of the lack of well-designed monitoring system and certification system. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), an independent, non-government, and not for profit organization, established ecosystem service certification system on the fields, including watershed services, biological diversity conservation, soil conservation, carbon sequestration and storage, and recreation services. In order to encourage buyers and sellers to enter the market and enhance the motivations on global forest conservation, the information of forest management and environment resources will be documented and communicated to the public for mitigating the problem of incomplete and asymmetric information (on the market).
The goal of this study is to discuss the progresses and challenges of FSC ecosystem service certification system. The pilot projects of Forest Certification for Ecosystem Services and FSC Ecosystem Services Procedure are literature reviewed and comprehensive analyzed. As the result, we discovered that, firstly, the current ecosystem service certification is limited by the difficulty of quantifying ecosystem services, which in turn of declining the demand of certification. Secondly, carbon sequestration and storage are still the most promising and potential services in the market. In the pilot, the city, Huong Son, Vietnam, obtained the FSC Ecosystem Service Certification on carbon sequestration and storage service, and become the first certified place in the world. Finally, according to the environmental conditions in Taiwan and the requirements of the FSC Ecosystem Services Procedure, Lianhuachi Research Center (LRC) is recommended to be the most suitable place on certifying ecosystem services. Because of rich biodiversity and water supply, Lianhuachi Research Center (LRC) could consider, in advance, biological diversity conservation, watershed services and recreation services for certification. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:32:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04625062-1.pdf: 2229710 bytes, checksum: b92d211789ded6b3aa73957902a4ecdc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第壹章、緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究目的 2 第三節、研究流程 3 第貳章、文獻回顧 4 第一節、生態系服務概念之緣起與發展 4 第二節、台灣生態系服務之研究 13 第參章、研究方法 17 第一節、研究材料與範圍限制 17 第二節、研究方法 17 第肆章、生態系服務認證 18 第一節、森林認證系統 18 第二節、FSC生態系服務認證 21 第三節、生態系服務認證市場調查 28 第伍章、生態系服務認證案例分析 32 第一節、智利(Chile) 35 第二節、印尼(Indonesia) 41 第三節、尼泊爾(Nepal) 49 第四節、越南(Vitnam) 57 第五節、生態系服務獲利經營方式 63 第六節、ForCES計畫認證結果 68 第陸章、FSC生態系服務認證程序書之建立 71 第一部分:影響呈現 72 第二部分:市場工具-應用FSC生態系服務聲明 78 第三部分:對驗證機構之要求 82 第柒章、綜合討論 84 第一節、生態系服務認證面臨之挑戰 84 第二節、台灣發展生態系服務認證之可行性 86 第捌章、結論 89 第玖章、參考文獻 91 附錄、《FSC生態系服務認證程序書》細項 97 第一部分:影響呈現(Impact Demonstration) 97 第二部分:市場工具-應用FSC生態系服務聲明(Market tools - Using FSC ecosystem services claims) 109 第三部分:對驗證機構之要求(Requirements for certification bodies) 120 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | FSC生態系服務認證系統之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The study on FSC Ecosystem Services Certification System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林俊成,林裕仁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 森林管理委員會,FSC,生態系服務,生態系服務認證, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Forest Stewardship Council,FSC,Ecosystem Services,Ecosystem Services Certification, | en |
dc.relation.page | 128 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803720 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。