請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72253
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童慶斌(Ching-Pin Tung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Kai Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳威凱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:31:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
王文科、王智弘 (2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17, 29-50。 王光旭(2015)。社會網絡分析在公共行政領域研究的應用。調查研究-方法與應用,34,67-134。 江吟梓譯、蘇文賢譯、Lichtman, M.(2010)。教育質性研究:實用指南。台北市:學富文化。 何宗宜、劉政榮(2006)。公眾參與地理資訊系統在我國的發展初探。測繪通報,8,33-37。 何明錦、李泳龍、戴政安(2009)。公眾參與都市防災空間系統規劃之研究-Google Earth之應用。建築學報,68_S,89-102。 李長晏、曾士瑋 (2010)。城市氣候治理理論初探-策略變遷、治理模式與風險評估。城市學學刊,1(2),37-73. 李永展 (2014)。邁向韌性社會: 脆弱度觀點。經濟前瞻,156,23-26。 吳杰穎、康良宇(2007)。區防災推動之探討:以「社區防救災總體營造計畫」為例。社區發展季刊,116,213-231。 林意玲(2003)。新聞深度採訪報導。基督教論壇報社內訓練。 林書楷 (2013)。PPGIS 促進溝通之成效-美濃國家自然公園案例分析。台灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文。 林嘉佑(2016)。因應氣候變遷之供水系統調適能力建構與監測修正調適路徑之研究。台灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所博士論文。 林子倫 (2016)。台灣城市氣候治理的困境與挑戰:多層次治理的觀點。因應氣候變遷從地方做起: 台灣推動氣候變遷調適的過程、經驗與知識,121-153。台北:詹氏出版。 周桂田 (2017)。氣候變遷社會學:高碳社會及其轉型挑戰。台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。 周素卿、盧鏡臣(2017)。地方政府氣候變遷計畫的治理特性:台北、新北與屏東的。台灣的都市氣候議題與治理,415-457。台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。 科技部(2016)。台灣氣候變遷科學報告2016_第一冊。台北市,台灣。 科技部「台灣氣候變遷調適科技整合研究計畫」團隊 (2017)。台灣氣候變遷科學報告2017_衝擊與調適面向。國家災害防救科技中心編印。 徐震 (1982)。我國推行社區發展的回顧。社區發展季刊,18,31-43。 袁方編 (2002)。社會研究方法。台北市:五南出版。 國家科學委員會(現稱科技部) (2011)。台灣氣候變遷科學報告2011。台北市,台灣。 國家災害防救科技中心 (2016)。台灣氣候變遷災害衝擊風險評估報告。 莊永忠、廖學誠 (2011)。PPGIS與傳統民眾參與方式在社區議題討論與居民參與程度上之比較研究:以宜蘭縣龜山島社區為例。地理研究,55,89-120。 莊翰華、吳郁萍 (2000)。社區總體營造之闡釋。社區發展季刊,90,170-181。 許耿銘 (2017)。都市水患風險脆弱性之初探:臺南市空間與非空間因素的分析。政治科學論叢,74,149-191。 陳亮全、劉怡君、陳海立(2006)。防災社區指導手冊。新北市:行政院災害防救委員會。 陳向明 (2009)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南出版。 陳可慧、曾敏惠、劉怡君、陳亮全(2010年4月)。地方政府推動防災社區之初探:以桃園縣政府「防災社區倍增專案」為例。「2010 年全國災害危機處理學術研討會」發表之文章,長榮大學。 黃富順 (2002)。台灣地區社區大學的發展與省思。成人教育,69,29-42。 黃源協、劉素珍 (2009)。社會資本對台灣社區發展之政策意涵。行政暨政策學報,48,155-192。 黃源協、劉素珍、莊俐昕、林信廷 (2010)。社區社會資本與社區發展關聯性之研究。公共行政學報,(34),29-75。 黃源協、莊俐晞、劉素珍 (2015)。社區能力與社區生活品質之研究: 對社區治理能力與社區發展的意涵。公共行政學報,(49),1-36。 畢恆達 (1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。台北:巨流出版。 童慶斌、劉子明、林嘉佑、曹榮軒、李明旭 (2015)。氣候變遷水資源風險評估與調適決策之探討。土木水利,42(4),30-45. 經濟建設委員會(現稱國家發展委員會) (2012)。國家氣候變遷調適政策綱領。台北市,台灣。 經濟部 (2014)。水資源領域行動方案(102-106年)。台北市,台灣。 萬文隆 (2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37(4),17-23。 詹火生、黃源協、陳小紅、薛承泰、古允文(2014)。永續社會系列:社會正義與社區參與。台北市:五南圖書。 葉俊榮 (2015)。氣候變遷治理與法律,2。台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。 劉怡君、陳亮全(2015)。防災社區之回顧與課題。災害防救科技與管理學刊,4(2),59-81。 劉怡君、曾敏惠(2012)。本土防災社區的推動與深化。災害防救電子報,86,1-11。 蔡博文(2008)。PPGIS資料與功能需求:部落地圖案例分析。台灣地理資訊學刊,6,49-61。 蔡元芳、蘇文瑞、鄭于綸 (2009)。導入公眾參與式地理資訊系統於互動式社區防災資訊網建置之研發.。華岡地理學報,(24),39-49。 潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理出版。 鍾明光、蔡博文、盧道杰 (2012)。利用行動者網絡理論檢視公眾參與地理資訊系統對社區發展轉向之影響 以美濃黃蝶翠谷為案例。 地理學報,(64),21-44。 蘇麗瓊、田基武 (2004)。新故鄉社區營造計畫與社區營造條例草案的介紹。社區發展季刊,107,5-21。 二、外文部分 三船康道(1995)。地域、地區防災手法。日本:株式會社Ohmsha。 Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254-269. Anderson, S. (2015). Getting ahead of the curve: When climate adaptation has to get radical. London, England: IIED. Ayers, J., & Dodman, D. (2010). Climate change adaptation and development I: The state of the debate. Progress in Development Studies, 10(2), 161-168. Ayers, J., & Forsyth, T. (2009). Community-based adaptation to climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(4), 22-31. Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010). An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27(3), 172-181. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. Cultural theory: An anthology, 1, 81-93. Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey, H. Launder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education, culture, economy and society (pp. 46-58). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Bulkeley, H., & Kern, K. (2006). Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK. Urban studies, 43(12), 2237-2259. Bulkeley, H., Schroeder, H., Janda, K., Zhao, J., Armstrong, A., Chu, S. Y., & Ghosh, S. (2011). The role of institutions, governance, and urban planning for mitigation and adaptation. Cities and climate change: Responding to an urgent agenda, 62696, 125-159. Brandes, S. B., & Levin, D. (2014). “Like My Status” Israeli teenage girls constructing their social connections on the Facebook social network. Feminist Media Studies, 14(5), 743-758. Brown, G. (2012). Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 25(2), 7-18. Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2013). A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(4), 455-473. Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122-136. Calderwood, P. E. (2000). Learning Community: Finding Common Ground in Difference. Teachers College Press. New York. Cannon, T. (2014). Rural livelihood diversification and adaptation to climate change. In J. Ensor, R. Berger, & S. Huq (Eds.), Community-based adaptation to climate change (pp. 55-76). Dunsmore, England: Practical Action Publishing. Chaskin, R. J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, A. (2001). Building community capacity. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. Christenson JA, Robinson JW (1989). Community Development in Perspective. Lowa State University Press. Ames. Corfee-Morlot, J., Cochran, I., Hallegatte, S., & Teasdale, P. J. (2011). Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Climatic change, 104(1), 169-197. Coulton, C. (2005). The place of community in social work practice research: Conceptual and methodological developments. Social work research, 29(2), 73-86. Crittenden, K. S. (2001). Can this town survive? Case study of a buried philippine town. Natural Hazards Review, 2(2), 72-79. Delanty, G. (2003). Community: key ideas. London, UK: Routlege. Dodman, D., & Carmin, J. (2015). Urban adaptation planning: The use and limits of climate science. London, England: IIED. Dodman, D., & Mitlin, D. (2013). Challenges for community-based adaptation: Discovering the potential for transformation. Journal of International Development, 25(5), 640-659. Dumaru, P. (2010). Community-based adaptation: Enhancing community adaptive capacity in Druadrua Island, Fiji. WIRES: Climate Change, 1(5), 751-763. Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS — a people's GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616-637. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. Ensor, J., & Berger, R. (2009). Understanding Climate Change Adaptation: Lessons from community-based approaches. Dunsmore, England: Practical Action Publishing. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (1998). What is it and how do you use it? Washington, WA: FEMA. Few, R., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2007). Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7(1), 46-59. Forsyth, T. (2017a). Community based adaptation. In H. von Storch (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Forsyth, T. (2017b). Community-based adaptation to climate change. In H. von Storch (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, Canada: Empirical Press. Geertman, S. (2002). Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(1), 21-35. G.P. Green, A. Haines. (2008). Asset building and community development (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, London . Giddens, A. (2000). The third way and its critics. Cambridge, England: Polity. Gil‐Rivas, V., & Kilmer, R. P. (2016). Building community capacity and fostering disaster resilience. Journal of clinical psychology, 72(12), 1318-1332. Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. California, CA: Sage publications. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (1998). Empowerment, marginalization, and “community-integrated' GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(2), 67-76. Hassan, M. M. (2005). Arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh: Spatial mitigation planning with GIS and public participation. Health Policy, 74(3), 247-260. Hawkins, R. L. (2010). Fickle families and the kindness of strangers: Social capital in the lives of low-income single mothers. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(1), 38-55. IPCC (2007), Climate Change 2007: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Johnston, G., & Percy-Smith, J. (2003). In search of social capital. Policy & Politics, 31(3), 321-334. Jordan, G. (2002). GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: Putting people before the technology. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 232-245). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (Vol. 154). Sage. Knoke, D. (2011). Policy networks. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, 210-222. Kretzmann, J. P., & McNight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from inside out–a path towards finding and mobilizing community assets. Evanston, IL: Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University. Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through Interviews and Dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry ,12(3): 480–500. Kyem, P. A. K. (2002). Promoting local community participation in forest management through a PPGIS application in Southern Ghana. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographical information systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Laverack, G. (2006). Evaluating community capacity: Visual representation and interpretation. Community Development Journal, 41(3), 266-276. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry , 75. Sage. Liu, W., Sidhu, A., Beacom, A. M., & Valente, T. W. (2017). Social network theory. The international encyclopedia of media effects, 1-12. Lowe, J. S. (2008). Limitations of community development partnerships: Cleveland Ohio and Neighborhood Progress Inc. Cities, 25(1), 37-44. Magee, T. (2012). A field guide to community based adaptation. London, England: Routledge. Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, 11. Mattessich, P., Monsey, B., & Roy, C. (1997). Community building: What makes it work. A review of factors influencing successful community building. St. Paul (MN): Amherst Wilder Foundation. Meng, Y., & Malczewski, J. (2010). Web-PPGIS Usability and Public Engagement: A Case Study in Canmore, Alberta, Canada. Journal of the Urban & Regional Information Systems Association, 22(1). Obermeyer, N. J. (1995). The hidden GIS technocracy. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 78-83. Obst, P., Zinkiewicz, L., & Smith, S. G. (2002). Sense of community in science fiction fandom, Part 1: Understanding sense of community in an international community of interest. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 87-103. Ognyanova, K., Chen, N. T. N., Ball-Rokeach, S. J., An, Z., Son, M., Parks, M., & Gerson, D. (2013). Online participation in a community context: Civic engagement and connections to local communication resources. International Journal of Communication, 7, 24. Pelling, M., O’Brien, K., & Matyas, D. (2015). Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133(1), 113-127. Pickles, J. (1995). Ground truth : The social implications of geographic information systems. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Poortinga, W. (2012). Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health & place, 18(2), 286-295. Puddifoot, J. E. (2003). Exploring personal and shared sense of community identity in Durham City, England. Journal of community psychology, 31(1), 87-106. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rambaldi, G., Chambers, R., McCall, M. K., & Fox, J. (2006). Practical ethics for PGIS practitioners, facilitators, technology intermediaries and researchers. Participatory Learning and Action, 54, 106-113. Reid, H., Alam, M., Berger, R., Cannon, T., Huq, S., & Milligan, A. (2009). Community-based adaptation to climate change: An overview Participatory Learning and Action (Vol. 60, pp. 11-33). London, England: IIED. Rice, E., Milburn, N. G., & Monro, W. (2011). Social networking technology, social network composition, and reductions in substance use among homeless adolescents. Prevention Science, 12(1), 80-88. Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W., Hammer, S. A., & Mehrotra, S. (2010). Cities lead the way in climate–change action. Nature, 467(7318), 909. Roulston, K. (2010). Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative research, 10(2), 199-228. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2007). Community organizing and development (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon. Satterthwaite, D., Huq, S., Reid, H., Pelling, M., & Lankao, P. R. (2007). Adapting to climate change in urban areas: The possibilities and constraints in low and middle income nations. London, England: IIED. Schipper, E. L. F., Ayers, J., Reid, H., Huq, S., & Rahman, A. (2014). Community-based adaptation to climate change: Scaling it up. Abingdon, England: Routledge. Scott, J. (2007). Social network analysis: A handbook. London, England: SAGE Publications. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507. UKCIP (2011).UK Adaptation Wizard. UNFCCC (2013).Compilation of information on mitigation benefits of actions, initiatives and options to enhance mitigation ambition. UNDP & GEF. (2003). Adaptation Policy Framework: Users Guidebook. UNEP. (2012). 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues. UNISDR. (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Paper presented at the Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (A/CONF. 206/6), Geneva, Switzerland. UNISDR. (2015a). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Williams, P. (2013). We are all boundary spanners now? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 17-32. Wiseman, J. (2006). Local Heroes? Learning from Recent Community Strengthening Initiatives in Victoria 1. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 95-107. 三、網頁部分 互動國際數位股份有限公司官網(2018/03/02瀏覽): http://www.igis.com.tw/。 國家災害防救科技中心官網(2018/01/06瀏覽): https://www.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/。 Story Map官網(2018/01/06瀏覽): https://storymaps.arcgis.com/en/。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72253 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國際上逐漸強調因應氣候議題之過程須納入不同利害關係人共同形成夥伴治理。台灣在氣候變遷下面臨著更嚴峻的考驗,尤其超過七成人口居住於都會區,顯然都市之氣候治理將成為重要議題,然而都市並非均質狀態,因此應該於治理過程中從更小的社區尺度思考如何發展因地制宜之調適策略。國際上已經提出「社區氣候調適」(Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change,簡稱CBA)之思維,強調從社區的角度思考面對氣候議題時的因應方式,但是目前台灣較缺乏此部分之作為。因此本研究之目的有二: 1.分析與掌握國內都市社區的運作模式,並以社區調適之觀點探討「氣候調適六步驟」的操作程序,針對部分的次步驟與工作項目提出建議,以協助建立都市社區適用之氣候調適步驟; 2.採用新的地理資訊技術—「故事地圖」(Story Map),從社區氣候調適之觀點探討如何建立氣候議題轉譯的平台,以降低科學資訊與社區認知之阻礙,進一步強化社區氣候調適的能力。台灣雖無完整之社區氣候調適案例,但是卻有類似概念的「防災社區」,而且已經累積豐厚經驗,因此方法上以台北市文山區內的社區大學與防災社區為研究對象,深度訪談六位關鍵人物; 同時根據IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)對於風險的定義選出一個社區做為故事地圖之實作案例。本研究發現,若從社會網絡之觀點分析防災社區的運作模式,社區領導者與社區大學會是兩位最重要的協調者,資訊、技術與資金是最需要的資本; 另外,目前的氣候調適六步驟對社區而言有三大問題,分別是: (一)在社區尺度部分工作項目過於粗略,須要進一步界定; (二)利害關係人之區分不夠明確; (三)步驟二與步驟三的工作內容過於專業,因此本研究提出建議與修改; 最後,本研究發現目前社區於氣候風險溝通上面臨三個問題: (一)社區居民對居住環境的災害識覺薄弱; (二)居民易遺忘社區過去的受災經驗; (三)缺乏有效的溝通平台(工具),因此本研究以故事地圖為工具嘗試提出改善之道。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Globally, it is gradually emphasized that the process of responding to climate change needs to corporate with different stakeholders. Taiwan is facing a severe pressure under climate change and especially there are more than 70% of the population live in a metropolitan area. Obviously, the climate governance of a city is going to be an important issue. Cities, however, are not homogeneous, so the climate governance should be started from communities’ scale. In the other words, the processes of climate governance need to consider how to develop a strategy adapting to local conditions. The idea of “Community-Based Adaptation to climate change” (CBA) has been put forward about two decades, whereas Taiwan is still lacks of this part. Consequently, the purpose of this study are: (1)checking the details of “Taiwan integrated research programme on Climate Change Adaptation Technology”(TaiCCAT), and providing suggestions for adapting to a urban community from the perspective of CBA after analyzing the structure of urban communities in Taiwan、(2)adopting “Story Map” as a new tool and trying to establish a platform to translate the scientific information from the perspective of CBA. Although there is few case of CBA in Taiwan, it exists many cases of community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM) which are similar to CBA and accumulates lots of experience. Therefore, the method of this study is to conduct in-depth interviews with six key figures who are familiar with CBDRM in Wenshan District, Taipei City. At the same time, this study selects a community, according to the risk definition of IPCC, as a case study of practicing story map. As a result, this study finds that community leaders and community colleges are the two most important coordinators, and information, technology and funds are the three most important capitals from a social network perspective. In addition, current TaiCCAT have three major problems for urban communities: (1) Some work items are too rough; (2) The distinction between stakeholders is not clear enough; (3) The content of steps 2 and steps 3 is too difficult, therefore, this study provides some suggestions and revises parts of it to suit urban communities. Finally, this study attempts to use Story Maps to improve the three problems founded in communities’ communication of climate risk: (1) The residents are less aware of the disasters in their living environment; (2) The residents are prone to forgotten the past disaster experiences; (3)There is a lack of effective communication platforms (tools). | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:31:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05247001-1.pdf: 4217648 bytes, checksum: 90cb668b49774607c750d1ac6c00dae3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
謝 誌 i 摘 要 ii 目 錄 iv 圖目錄 v 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 氣候變遷之衝擊面向 6 2.2 氣候變遷調適 9 2.3 以社區為本的防災與調適思維 15 2.4 公眾參與式地理資訊系統(PPGIS) 23 2.5 社區定義 28 第三章 研究方法 39 3.1 深度訪談法 39 3.2 故事地圖之實作 45 3.3 研究之效度與信度 51 第四章 研究結果 53 4.1 防災社區運作模式之分析 53 4.2 都市社區氣候調適步驟之探討 63 4.3 故事地圖扮演之角色 73 第五章 結論與建議 89 5.1 結論 89 5.2 建議 90 參考文獻 92 一、中文部分 92 二、外文部分 94 三、網頁部分 99 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建構都市社區氣候調適能力之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on Building Capacity of Urban Community for
Climate Adaptation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林子倫(Tze-Luen Lin),李欣輯(Hsin-Chi Li),李明旭(Ming-Hsu Li) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 都市社區,氣候調適六步驟,社區氣候調適,防災社區,故事地圖, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Urban community,Taiwan integrated research programme on climate change adaptation technology (TaiCCAT),Community-based adaptation to climate change(CBA),Community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM),Story Map, | en |
dc.relation.page | 99 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803820 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。