請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7222
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林麗雲(Lih-Yun Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen-Yi Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王貞懿 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:40:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-15 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:40:20Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王晴玲(2007)。《公民新聞的在地實踐-公視 PeoPo 新聞平台公眾參與及多元報導研究》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。
王贈凱(2009)。〈公視 PeoPo 公民新聞網站使用與滿足研究〉,「2009傳播管理學術研討會」,台北。 司法院大法官釋字第689號(2011年7月29日)。取自http://cons.judicial.gov.tw/jcc/zh-tw/jep03/show?expno=689 吳秀瑾(2005)。〈女性主義立場論與社會習性〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,17(3): 653-682。 林徐達(2011)。〈論地方知識的所有權與研究職權: 從詮釋人類學的觀點省思 Lahuy 的 [論文返鄉口試]〉,《台灣人類學刊》,9(1): 147-185。 林淑馨(2010)。《質性研究:理論與實務》。台北:巨流。 林開世(2016)。〈什麼是[人類學的田野工作]?知識情境與倫理立場的反省〉,《考古人類學刊》,84: 77-109。 邱千瑜(2008)。《新媒體閱聽人、公民新聞與公共媒體-新媒體使用者如何看待PeoPo公民新聞平台》。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。 洪婉臻(2009)。《公民新聞學專業意理:挑戰與建構》。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士學位論文。 胡元輝(2007)。《媒體與改造:重建台灣的關鍵工程》。台北:商周。 胡元輝(2017)。〈建制化的侷限與超越:台灣公民新聞的十年發展〉,「2017PeoPo公民新聞研討會」會議手冊,5-6。取自https://www.peopo.org/events/2017CS/2017PeoPoAA.pdf 胡幼慧(主編)(1996)。《質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北:巨流。 孫曼蘋(2009)。〈公民新聞 2.0:台灣公民新聞與「新農業文化再造」形塑之初探〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,9: 153-180。 高淑清(2008)。《質性研究的18堂課—首航初探之旅》。高雄:麗文文化。 張隆志(1997)。〈追尋失落的福爾摩莎部落──台灣平埔族群史研究的反思〉,黃富三、古偉瀛、蔡采秀(合編),《台灣史研究一百年》,頁257-272。台北:中央研究院台灣史研究所籌備處。 郭姵君(2010)。《從組織雇員到獨立記者: 三位新聞工作者的專業意理形塑與實踐》。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士學位論文。 陳向明(2000)。《質的硏究方法與社會科學研究》。北京:教育科學出版社。 陳順孝(2008年5月)。〈「公民記者」應是土著人類學家〉,阿孝札記。取自 https://axiao.tw/%E5%85%AC%E6%B0%91%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85-%E6%87%89%E6%98%AF%E5%9C%9F%E8%91%97%E4%BA%BA%E9%A1%9E%E5%AD%B8%E5%AE%B6-310da51466a7#.p5mt4k8a2 陳順孝(2012)。〈網路社會動員的繼往開來:反國光石化運動的社會科技基礎和行動策略演化〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,2(1): 19-34。 彭家發(1994)。《新聞客觀性原理》。台北:三民書局。 黃樹民(2011)。〈人類學與民族學百年學術發展〉,中華民國發展史:學術發展》,頁173-197。台北:聯經出版社。 管婺媛(2008)。《台灣 1980 年代《 自立晚報》 社會運動線記者的專業意理形成與實踐》。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士學位論文。 齊力(2005)。〈質性研究方法概論〉,齊力、林本炫(合編),《質性研究方法與資料分析》,頁1-18。嘉義:南華大學社會所。 劉建明(2003)。《當代新聞學原理》。北京市:清華大學出版社有限公司。 潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究:理論與應用》。台北:心理。 蔡士敏(2008)。《自立事件核心記者的生命故事》。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士學位論文。 鄭宇君(2014)。〈災難傳播中的群體力量: 社交媒體促成新型態的公民參與〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,27: 179-205。 蕭戎(2008年2月1日)。〈地方知識的回歸—記 Lahuy 在司馬庫斯的論文口試〉,Oikos-Taiwan部落格。取自 http://oikos-taiwan.blogspot.com/2008/02/lahuy.html 蕭博仁(2009)。《草根媒體在地扎根之探討-以公視PeoPo公民新聞平台為例》。南台科技大學資訊傳播研究所碩士論文。 Allan, S. (2013). Citizen witnessing: Revisioning journalism in times of crisis. Cambridge, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Andén-Papadopoulos, K., & Pantti, M. (2013). Re-imagining crisis reporting: Professional ideology of journalists and citizen eyewitness images. Journalism, 14(7), 960-977. Bird, S. E. (1987). Anthropological methods relevant for journalists. Journalism Educator, 41(4), 5. Bird, S. E. (2010). Anthropological engagement with news media: Why now? Anthropology News, 51(4), 5-9. Blood, R. W., Putnis, P., & Pirkis, J. (2002). Mental-illness news as violence: a news frame analysis of the reporting and portrayal of mental health and illness in Australian media. Australian Journal of Communication, 29(2), 59. Bowman, S., & Willis, C. (2003). We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news information. Retrieved from www.hypergene.net/wemedia/ Campbell, E., & Lassiter, L. E. (2014). Doing Ethnography Today, Theories, Methods, Exercises (1st ed.). Somerset, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Coward, R. (2013). Speaking personally: the rise of subjective and confessional journalism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Cramer, J., & McDevitt, M. (2004). Ethnographic journalism. Qualitative research in journalism: taking it to the streets, 127-144. DeFleur, M. L. (1991). Understanding mass communication (4th ed. ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Della Porta, D. (2014). In-Depth Interviews. In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research (pp. 496). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Detenber, B. H., Gotlieb, M. R., McLeod, D. M., & Malinkina, O. (2007). Frame intensity effects of television news stories about a high-visibility protest issue. Mass Communication & Society, 10(4), 439-460. Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464. Durham, M. G. (1998). On the relevance of standpoint epistemology to the practice of journalism: The case for “strong objectivity”. Communication Theory, 8(2), 117-140. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Fahim, H., & Helmer, K. (1980). Indigenous Anthropology in Non-Western Countries: A Further Elaboration. Current Anthropology, 21(5), 644-663. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures : selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books. Geertz, C. (1995). After the fact : two countries, four decades, one anthropologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univercity Press. Gillmor, D. (2006). We the Media: Grassroots Journalism By the People, For the People: O'Reilly Media. Grindal, B. T., & Rhodes, R. (1986). Journalism and anthropology share several similarities. The Journalism Educator, 41(4), 4-33. Gwaltney, J. L. (1976). On going home again-some reflections of a native anthropologist. Phylon, 37(3), 236-242. Hamdy, N. (2009). Arab citizen journalism in action: Challenging mainstream media, authorities and media laws. Westminster papers in communication culture, 6(1). Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory, 17(4), 367-385. Harding, S. G. (1991). Whose science? whose knowledge? : thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual review of anthropology, 5(1), 329-350. Hastrup, k. (1993). The native voice—and the anthropological vision. Social Anthropology, 1(2), 173-186. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.1993.tb00249.x Hung, C.-L. (2015). Citizen journalists as an empowering community for change. In G. D. Rawnsley & T. R. Ming-yeh (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Chinese Media (pp. 161-178). New York, NY: Routledge. Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly, 52(4), 618-626. Johnstone, J. W. C., Slawski, E. J., & Bowman, W. W. (1972). The Professional Values Of American Newsmen. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(4), 522-540. Jones, D. (1970). Towards a native anthropology. Human Organization, 29(4), 251-259. Junker, B. H. (1960). Field work: An introduction to the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Kaufhold, K., Valenzuela, S., & De Zúñiga, H. G. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3-4), 515-529. Kempny, M. (2012). Rethinking native anthropology: migration and auto-ethnography in the post-accession Europe. International Review of Social Research, 2(2), 39-52. Khamis, S., Vaughn, K., & Society. (2011). Cyberactivism in the Egyptian revolution: How civic engagement and citizen journalism tilted the balance. Arab Media, 14(3), 1-25. Knight, A., Geuze, C., & Gerlis, A. (2008). Who is a journalist. Journalism Studies, 9(1), 117-131. Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (1st paperback ed.). New York, NY: Three Rivers Press. Lowie, R. H. (1937). The history of ethnological theory. New York, NY: Rinehart & Company, Inc. Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2 ed.). London: Sage, 2002. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance : mass communication and the public interest. London, UK: Sage. Mindich, D. T. (1998). Just the facts: How' objectivity' came to define American journalism. New York, NY: New York University Press. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing : principles, techniques, analysis. (2 ed.). Melbourne, AU: Longman. Musante, K., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira. Narayan, K. (1993). How native is a “native” anthropologist? American anthropologist, 95(3), 671-686. National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders . (1988). Report of the national advisory commission on civil disorders. New York, NY: Pantheon Books. Nip, J. Y. M. (2006). Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 212-236. doi:10.1080/14616700500533528 Nishikawa, K. A., Towner, T. L., Clawson, R. A., & Waltenburg, E. N. (2009). Interviewing the interviewers: Journalistic norms and racial diversity in the newsroom. The Howard Journal of Communications, 20(3), 242-259. Örnebring, H. (2013). Anything you can do, I can do better? Professional journalists on citizen journalism in six European countries. International Communication Gazette, 75(1), 35-53. Palmer, J. (2000). Spinning into control: News values and source strategies. London, UK Leicester University Press. Papacharissi, Z. (2009). Journalism and citizenship: new agendas in communication. New York, NY: Routledge. PTS. (2015, February). Citizen journalism and trust in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.peopo.org/events/about/english/P1-6.htm. [The article was originally published in the Public Media Alliance on 20 February 2015.] Reisner, A. E. (1992). The news conference: How daily newspaper editors construct the front page. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 971-986. Richards, B., & Rees, G. (2011). The management of emotion in British journalism. Media, Culture & Society, 33(6), 851-867. Richardson, J. E. (2005). News values. In Key concepts in journalism studies (pp. 173-174). London, UK: Sage. Rosen, J. (2006). The people formerly known as the audience. http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html Schiller, D. (1981). Objectivity and the news: The public and the rise of commercial journalism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news, a social history of American newspapers. New York, NY: Basic Books. Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149-170. Smith, P. (2007, March 22). Linnebank: ‘Old media’ must re-evaluate role. Retrieved from https://pressgazette.co.uk/linnebank-old-media-must-re-evaluate-role/. Spradley, J. (2003). Asking descriptive questions. In M. R. Pogrebin (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to criminal justice: Perspectives from the field (pp. 44-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. Ståhlberg, P. (2006). On the journalist beat in India: Encounters with the near familiar. Ethnography, 7(1), 47-67. doi:10.1177/1466138106064827 Tilley, E., & Cokley, J. (2008). Deconstructing the discourse of citizen journalism: Who says what and why it matters. Pacific Journalism Review, 14(1), 94. Tunstall, J. (1971). Journalists at work: specialist correspondents: Their news organizations, news sources, and competitor-colleagues. London, UK: Constable. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field : on writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1991). The American journalist: A portrait of US news people and their work. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: US news people at the end of an era. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wien, C. (2005). Defining objectivity within journalism. Nordicom Review, 26(2), 3-15. Zelizer, B. (1992). CNN, the Gulf War, and journalistic practice. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 66-81. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7222 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文從人類學視角出發,將局內人公民記者視為是參與式觀察中的本土人類學家。透過深度訪談法,探究局內人如何當公民記者、如何形成自己的新聞意理,提供了一個以公民記者自我詮釋為主體的新聞意理研究。研究結果發現,社群認同的深淺是影響公民記者新聞意理、記者自我角色認知的關鍵因素,本文一共歸納出兩種意理類型,分別為:參與者意理與觀察者意理,在社群成員關係、採訪語言、參與頻率、報導立場、報導中的現身程度、報導責任等面向展現差異;點出除了賦權、培力之外,記者與消息來源之間關係的親疏遠近,也會影響公民記者們的報導理念、策略與實作。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Based on anthropological perspective, this study considers citizen journalists as participatory observers who have long participated in a certain community, namely, the native anthropologists in the field. Through in-depth interviews, this study offers research concerning citizen journalists' own reflection and explores how they become a citizen journalist and form their journalist ideology. The result indicates that the degree of community identification is the key factor of citizen journalists’ journalistic ideology and professional roles as citizen journalists. This study categorizes two types of ideology: participant’s ideology and observer’s ideology. Their differences are shown in interpersonal relations within the community, language, frequency of ordinary participation, narrative, standing point, and responsibility of their reports. In addition to empowerment, the intimacy of interpersonal relations between journalists and news sources also affects citizen journalists’ news philosophy, strategies, and practices. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:40:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05342006-1.pdf: 2439140 bytes, checksum: 09f4700b7fd06ea4633e408953748c9b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 圖目次 v 表目次 v 第一章 問題意識 1 第二章 文獻評述 5 第一節 公民記者的新聞意理與新聞實踐 5 第二節 局內人公民記者的角色位置 17 第三節 小結 29 第三章 研究問題與研究方法 32 第一節 研究問題 32 第二節 研究方法 33 第三節 研究對象 37 第四章 研究結果 39 第一節 觀察型「參與者」 39 第二節 參與型「觀察者」 65 第三節 小結 78 第五章 結論 82 第一節 結果與討論 82 第二節 貢獻與限制 88 第三節 未來研究建議 92 參考文獻 93 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 公民記者的新聞意理:局內人的參與式觀察與雙重處境 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Journalistic ideology of citizen journalists: Insiders’ participatory observation and double situations | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳順孝(Shun-Hsiao Chen) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 胡元輝(Yuan-Hui Hu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公民記者,新聞專業意理,參與式觀察,局內人,本土人類學家, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | citizen journalist,journalistic ideology,participant observation,insider,native anthropology, | en |
dc.relation.page | 99 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902847 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf | 2.38 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。