請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72116
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 謝吉隆(Ji-Long Xie),劉好迪(Adrian Rauchfleisch) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jun-Xiang Lian | en |
dc.contributor.author | 連俊翔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:24:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bambauer, Derek E., Ronald J. Deibert, John G. Palfrey, Rafal Rohozinski, Nart Villeneuve, and Jonathan L. Zittrain. 2005. ‘Internet Filtering in China in 2004-2005: A Country Study’. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 706681. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=706681. Barnett, A. Doak. 1951. ‘Mass Political Organizations in Communist China’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 277: 76–88. Benney, Jonathan. 2007. ‘Rights Defence and the Virtual China’. Asian Studies Review 31 (4): 435–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357820701710732. Black, Jay. 2001. ‘Semantics and Ethics of Propaganda’. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (2–3): 121–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2001.9679608. Blei, David M., and John D. Lafferty. 2005. ‘Correlated Topic Models’. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 147–154. NIPS’05. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: MIT Press. Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. ‘Latent Dirichlet Allocation’. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (Jan): 993–1022. Bolsover, Gillian. 2017. ‘Computational Propaganda in China: An Alternative Model of a Widespread Practice.’ Project on Computational Propaganda 4. Brady, Anne-Marie. 2009. Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China. Rowman Littlefield Publishers. Catlin, George E.G. 1935. ‘The Rôle of Propaganda in a Democracy’. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 179 (1): 219–26. Chan Sältzer. 2020. ‘oolong: An R package for validating automated content analysis tools’. Journal of Open Source Software, Chandelier, Marie, Agnès Steuckardt, Raphaël Mathevet, Sascha Diwersy, and Olivier Gimenez. 2018. ‘Content Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Wolf Recolonization in France Using Structural Topic Modeling’. Biological Conservation 220 (April): 254–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.029. Chang, Won Ho. 1989. Mass Media in China: The History and the Future. Iowa State University Press. Chu, Leonard L. 1986. ‘Mass Communication Theory: The Chinese Perspective’. Media Asia 13 (1): 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.1986.11726203. CNNIC. 2016. ‘Statistical Report on Internet Development in China’. https://cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/201611/P020161114573409551742.pdf. Colleoni, Elanor, Alessandro Rozza, and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. ‘Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data’. Journal of Communication 64 (2): 317–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084. Creemers, Rogier. 2015. ‘Cyber China: Updating Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the 21st Century’. Journal of Contemporary China, Forthcoming. 26 (103): 85–100. ‘Document Number Nine’.2020. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Number_Nine Doob, Leonard William. 1948. Public Opinion and Propaganda. H. Holt. Edelstein, Alex S. 2013. Total Propaganda: From Mass Culture To Popular Culture.Routledge. Effing, Robin, Jos van Hillegersberg, and Theo Huibers. 2011. ‘Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems?’ In Electronic Participation, edited by Efthimios Tambouris, Ann Macintosh, and Hans de Bruijn, 25–35. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_3. El-Khalili, Sara. 2013. ‘Social Media as a Government Propaganda Tool in Post-Revolutionary Egypt’. First Monday 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i3.4620. Ellul, Jacques. 1973. Propaganda : The Formation of Men’s Attitudes. Vintage Books. Festinger, Leon. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. Fu, King-wa, Chung-hong Chan, and Michael Chau. 2013. ‘Assessing Censorship on Microblogs in China: Discriminatory Keyword Analysis and the Real-Name Registration Policy’. IEEE Internet Computing 17 (3): 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2013.28. Gordon, George N. 1971. Persuasion: The Theory and Practice of Manipulative Communication. Hastings House. Guo, Lei, Jacob A. Rohde, and H. Denis Wu. 2020. ‘Who Is Responsible for Twitter’s Echo Chamber Problem? Evidence from 2016 U.S. Election Networks’. Information, Communication Society 23 (2): 234–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1499793. Healy, Paul Michael. 1982. ‘The Chinese Communist Youth League, 1949-1979.’ School of Modern Asian Studies. Henderson, Gae Lyn, and M. J. Braun. 2016. Propaganda and Rhetoric in Democracy: History, Theory, Analysis. SIU Press. Himelboim, Itai, Stephen McCreery, and Marc Smith. 2013. ‘Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (2): 154–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12001. Howard, Philip N., Sheetal D. Agarwal, and Muzammil M. Hussain. 2011. ‘When Do States Disconnect Their Digital Networks? Regime Responses to the Political Uses of Social Media’. The Communication Review 14 (3): 216–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597254. Israel, John. 1967. ‘The Red Guards in Historical Perspective: Continuity and Change in the Chinese Youth Movement*’. The China Quarterly 30 (April): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000029179. Jacobi, C., van Atteveldt, W.H., Welbers, K., Communication Science, Network Institute, and Communication Choices, Content and Consequences (CCCC). 2016. ‘Quantitative Analysis of Large Amounts of Journalistic Texts Using Topic Modelling’. Digital Journalism 4 (1): 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093271. Jiang, Min. 2009. ‘Authoritarian Deliberation on Chinese Internet’. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1439354. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1439354. Jin, Jiahua, Yijun Li, Xiaojia Zhong, and Li Zhai. 2015. ‘Why Users Contribute Knowledge to Online Communities: An Empirical Study of an Online Social Q A Community’. Information Management, Novel applications of social media analytics, 52 (7): 840–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.07.005. Jowett, Garth S., and Victoria O’Donnell. 2018. Propaganda Persuasion. SAGE Publications. King, Gary, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E. Roberts. 2013. ‘How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.’ American Political Science Review 107 (2): 326–43. ———. 2017. ‘How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument’. American Political Science Review 111 (3): 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144. Lasswell, Harold D. 1927. ‘The Theory of Political Propaganda’. American Political Science Review 21 (3): 627–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1945515. Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix, and Frank Stanton. 1944. Radio Research, 1942-1943. Arno Press. Liu, Alan P. L. 1984. ‘Opinions and Attitudes of Youth in the People’s Republic of China’. Asian Survey 24 (9): 975–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644079. Liu, Bo. 1997. An Overview of Chinese Press Development in 1996. Beijing: China Journalism Yearbook Press. Liu, Yinbin, and Yixia Zhou. 2011. ‘Social Media in China: Rising Weibo in Government’. In 5th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2011), 213–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2011.5936628. Liu, Yunong, and Minrong Liu. 2017. ‘社会化问答平台的社区网络形态与意见领袖特征 *——以知乎网为例’. 情报资料工作 38 (2): 106–12. Lu, Yingdan, and Jennifer Pan. 2020. ‘Capturing Clicks: How the Chinese Government Uses Clickbait to Compete for Visibility’. Political Communication, July, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1765914. Ma, Liang. 2018. ‘The Post-Adoption Behaviors of Government Social Media in China’. In Sub-National Democracy and Politics Through Social Media, edited by Mehmet Zahid Sobacı and İbrahim Hatipoğlu, 29–45. Public Administration and Information Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73386-9_2. Marina, Svensson. 2014. ‘Voice, Power and Connectivity in China’s Microblogosphere: Digital Divides on Sina Weibo.’ China Information 28 (2): 168–88. McKelvey, Karissa, Joseph DiGrazia, and Fabio Rojas. 2014. ‘Twitter Publics: How Online Political Communities Signaled Electoral Outcomes in the 2010 US House Election’. Information, Communication Society 17 (4): 436–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.892149. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. ‘Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks’. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1): 415–44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415. Medaglia, Rony, and Demi Zhu. 2017. ‘Public Deliberation on Government-Managed Social Media: A Study on Weibo Users in China’. Government Information Quarterly 34 (3): 533–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.003. Mimno, David, Hanna M. Wallach, Edmund Talley, Miriam Leenders, and Andrew McCallum. 2011. ‘Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models’. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 262–272. EMNLP ’11. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Association for Computational Linguistics. Noesselt, Nele. 2014. ‘Microblogs and the Adaptation of the Chinese Party-State’s Governance Strategy’. Governance 27 (3): 449–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12045. O’Shaughnessy, Nicholas. 1996. ‘Social Propaganda and Social Marketing: A Critical Difference?’ European Journal of Marketing 30 (10/11): 54–67.https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610149791. Pfeffer, J., T. Zorbach, and K. M. Carley. 2014. ‘Understanding Online Firestorms: Negative Word-of-Mouth Dynamics in Social Media Networks’. Journal of Marketing Communications 20 (1–2): 117–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.797778. Pratkanis, Anthony R., and Elliot Aronson. 1992. Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt Co. Pringsheim, Klaus H. 1962. ‘The Functions of the Chinese Communist Youth Leagues* (1920–1949)’. The China Quarterly 12 (December): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000020762. Qin, Bei, David Strömberg, and Yanhui Wu. 2017. ‘Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (1): 117–40. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.117. Qualter, Terence H. 1962. Propaganda and Psychological Warfare. New York: Random House. Roberts, Margaret E. 2014. ‘Fear or Friction ? How Censorship Slows the Spread of Information in the Digital Age ∗’. In . Roberts, Margaret E., Brandon M. Stewart, and Edoardo M. Airoldi. 2016. ‘A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 111 (515): 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684. Roberts, Margaret E, Brandon M Stewart, and Dustin Tingley. n.d. ‘Stm: R Package for Structural Topic Models’. Journal of Statistical Software, 41. Salmon, Charles.T. 1989. ‘Campaigns for Social “Improvement”: An Overview of Values, Rationales and Impacts’. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Vol. 18.Schlæger, Jesper, and Min Jiang. 2014. ‘Official Microblogging and Social Management by Local Governments in China’. China Information 28 (2): 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X14533901. Shambaugh, David. 2007. ‘China’s Propaganda System: Institutions, Processes and Efficacy’. China Journal, The, no. 57 (January): 25. Smith, Ted J. 1989. Propaganda: A Pluralistic Perspective. Praeger. Speier, Hans, and M Otis. 1944. ‘German Radio Propaganda in France during the Battle of France’. In Lazarsfeld and Stanton, 208-47. Starck, Kenneth, and Yu Xu. 1988. Loud Thunder, Small Raindrops: The Reform Movement and the Press in China. Teahan, W. J., Yingying Wen, Rodger McNab, and Ian H. Witten. 2000. ‘A Compression-Based Algorithm for Chinese Word Segmentation’. Computational Linguistics 26 (3): 375–93. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120100561746. Tsimonis, Konstantinos. 2018. ‘“Keep the Party Assured and the Youth [Not] Satisfied”: The Communist Youth League and Chinese University Students’. Modern China 44 (2): 170–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700417732561. Wallis, Cara. 2011. ‘New Media Practices in China: Youth Patterns, Processes, and Politics’. International Journal of Communication 5 (0): 31. Wasserman, Stanley, Stanley (University of Illinois Wasserman Urbana-Champaign), and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. Williams, Hywel T. P., James R. McMurray, Tim Kurz, and F. Hugo Lambert. 2015. ‘Network Analysis Reveals Open Forums and Echo Chambers in Social Media Discussions of Climate Change’. Global Environmental Change 32 (May): 126–38.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006. Winfield, Betty Houchin, and Zengjun Peng. 2005. ‘Market or Party Controls?: Chinese Media in Transition’. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands) 67 (3): 255–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549205052228. Woolley, S. C., and P. Howard. 2017. ‘Computational Propaganda Worldwide: Executive Summary’. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d6157461-aefd-48ff-a9a9-2d93222a9bfd. Yan, Xiaojun. 2014. ‘Engineering Stability: Authoritarian Political Control over University Students in Post-Deng China’. The China Quarterly 218 (June): 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741014000332. Yang, Guobin. 2009. The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. Columbia University Press. ———. 2014. ‘Political Contestation in Chinese Digital Spaces: Deepening the Critical Inquiry’. China Information 28 (2): 135–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X14539910. Zhang, Sir. 2019. ‘知乎用户数据分析报告’. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/79521617. Zhang, Xiaoling. 2011. The Transformation of Political Communication in China: From Propaganda to Hegemony. World Scientific. Zhao, Yuezhi. 1998. Media, Market, and Democracy in China: Between the Party Line and the Bottom Line. University of Illinois Press. 丁关根. 1993. 关于宣传思想工作的基本思路. 《十四大以来宣传思想工作的理论与实 践》. 万福义. 1991. 中国共产党建设大辞典. 四川人民出版社. ‘中国共产主义青年团中央委员会’. 2020. In 维基百科,自由的百科全书.https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%A7%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E9%9D%92%E5%B9%B4%E5%9 B%A2%E4%B8%AD%E5%A4%AE%E5%A7%94%E5%91%98%E4%BC%9A old id=60807088. 周颖. 2018. ‘政治思想传播中的新媒体应用——以共青团中央为例’. 硅谷 2018 (14): 39–40. 孟岚. 2016. ‘官方微博舆论引导方式探究——以@共青团中央为例’. 今传媒 24 (10): 46–47. 宋恩梅, 贾佳, and 苏环. 2013. ‘社会化问答平台的答案质量评估——以“知乎”、“百度知 道”为例’. 信息资源管理学报 3 (2): 19–28. 张岩松, and 张言刚. 1996. 政府公共关系教程. 中共中央党校出版社. https://book.douban.com/subject/1074954/. 张艳萍, and 何双秋. 2018. ‘政务抖音号“共青团中央”传播规律探究’. 新闻研究导刊 9 (21): 41–43. 李国太. 1996. 企业宣传思想工作实用读本. 冶金工业出版社. 王秀丽. 2014. ‘网络社区意见领袖影响机制研究——以社会化问答社区“知乎”为例’. 国 际新闻界 36 (9): 47–57. 王莉萍, and 赵飞. 2009. ‘改革开放 30 年共青团管理青少年事务的模式与经验.’ 青年探 索, no. 2009(1): 17–24. 石小月. 2017. ‘政务微博的人格化传播方式——以@共青团中央为例’. 青年记者 0 (29): 82–83. 谭玥雨. 2019. ‘传播学视角下政务抖音对政府形象的建构研究——以“共青团中央”和“青 春武汉” 为例’. 视听界, 52–58. 錢佳玥. 2018. ‘社群問答平台中科學專家的傳播效果之研究—以知乎為例’. 傳 播碩士學 位學程學位論文, 台灣: 政治大學傳播學院. 陈俊宏. 1999. 加强和改进思想政治工作学习读本. 中共中央党校出版社. https://book.douban.com/subject/1079284/. 陈娟, 刘燕平, and 邓胜利. 2018. ‘政务微博辟谣信息传播效果的影响因素研究’. 情报科 学 36 (1): 91–95. 陈娟, 高杉, and 邓胜利. 2017. ‘社会化问答用户特征识别与行为动机分析——以'知乎 '为例’. 情报科学 35 (5): 69–74. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72116 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著網路與社交媒體的發展,傳統主流媒體不再是政黨宣傳的重要場地,如何 使用新媒體有效地進行政治傳播是當下各國政黨需要思考的問題。多樣化的網路平台 也對政黨的宣傳策略提出了新的要求,照搬傳統思維無法適應新環境,且不同平台也 需要因地制宜的策略。那麼政黨該怎麼做呢?與微博不同,知乎是一個線上問答平台 ,用戶可以根據自己的興趣提問,也可以回答相關的問題。那麼,政黨會挑選哪些問 題呢?他們又會怎麼回答呢?其宣傳是否有達到相應的效果呢?本文以共青團中央在 知乎的問答內容為主,並抓取其粉絲、評論者的相關信息,以回答上述問題。 研究發現,共青團中央在知乎的行為可以分為兩個階段,“公共討論”(2016年 至2019年)與“內化影響”(2019年後),在2019年後,共青團中央回答問題與發布文 章的數量逐漸變少,取而代之的是及時性想法的發布,從積極參與公共討論,過渡到 針對性較強的粉絲影響;其回答的問題,則包含兩種類型,“社會熱點”與“日常問題”, 法律是共青團中央在回答社會熱點時的利器,在宣法、普法的同時,也對潛在的犯罪 具有一定的威懾性;黨的故事則是日常問題的重點,通過敘述特定黨員的貢獻與黨在 中國發展的領導作用,來強化黨的權威與正統地位;除此之外,在共青團中央的回答 中,軍事力量是敘事重點,其次是歷史問題、青少年保護與發展、以及社會事件與社 會文化。 共青團中央的宣傳效果有限,只有特定的內容容易引起知乎用戶的討論,其中 包括民族主義事件(例如香港反送中事件)、國家建設、宗教問題、以及娛樂明星的 毒品濫用,而法律具有一定的說服力,能夠刺激用戶為其內容點贊。此外,數據表明 ,共青團中央的粉絲並不活躍,在抽取的樣本中,14.5%的用戶是僵屍粉,僅有5.7% 的用戶是活躍的;在評論者中,特定話題不允許出現異議,包括香港反送中事件與二 戰日本侵華,共青團中央的觀點得到絕對的支持;但在其他內容中,約有14%的評論 者反對或排斥共青團中央的觀點,他們討論的話題包括言論自由、防火牆、審查制度 等。除此之外,在共青團中央的評論社區中,往往是以中心用戶為主的放射狀連結, 用戶與用戶之間的聯繫較弱,缺少深度的討論。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Social media, the online public sphere, has played an important role in political propaganda. They are different from the traditional media and different types of social media have their own characteristics, which request the party to use different propaganda strategies. This thesis explores the behaviors of Communist Youth League Committee of China (CYL) on the Zhihu platform. Zhihu is a question-and-answer platform where users can ask and answer questions based on their interests. Therefore, how does the CYL propaganda on the Zhihu? What kinds of strategies does it use and how about the propaganda effect? We answered these questions based on data from the CYL, its fans, and commenters. We found that the behavior of the CYL can be divided into two periods: “Attraction” (from 2016 to 2019 ) and “Weibo-lization” (from 2019 to 2020). After mid-2019, the number of answers and articles has decreased, while the number of ideas has increased. It represented that the CYL has changed its main task on the Zhihu, from joining public discussions and attracting strangers to affecting its fans; The CYL answered two types of questions, “Social Hotspots” and “Daily Problems”. The CYL used the law to persuade users in social hotspots and told historical stories of the CCP to legitimize the authority; then, in the contents of its answers and articles, military powers is the key point, followed by youth protection and development, and social issues and culture. The propaganda effect of the CYL on the Zhihu is limited because only certain topics have a positive relationship with the support rate, including nationalism, national constructions, religion, and drug abuse. Users are more willing to like the content when the CYL cites the law or the comments of lawyers. Besides, the fans of the CYL are inactive, because in the randomly selected sample, 14.5% of users are zombie fans and only 5.7% of users have actions like answering questions; Commenters have no objections on several topics, such as the anti-extradition movement in Hong Kong and Japanese aggression in World War II; But for topics related to the Internet firewall or the censorship, 14% of users opposed the CYL or even the CCP; Finally, we found that the community of commenters is built on the core users, and there is almost no connection between other users, representing the discussion of these users is a one-time, rather than in-depth conversation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:24:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2909202010592900.pdf: 3809005 bytes, checksum: 69131205d9bec9b71060cc3537b0323e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 2 摘要 3 Abstract 4 Contents 6 Figure Contents 8 Table Contents 10 Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Literature Review 4 2.1 Propaganda and Chinese government 4 2.1.1 The definition and history of propaganda 4 2.1.2 Traditional propaganda in China 8 2.2 Social Media, Propaganda and Censorship 13 2.2.1 Censorship in social media 13 2.2.2 Propaganda in social media 18 2.3 CYL and Zhihu platform 20 2.3.1 Existed researches about the CYL on the Zhihu 20 2.3.2 Users on the Zhihu platform 25 Chapter 3. Research design and methods 27 3.1 Data 27 3.2 Methods 28 3.2.1 Research Process 28 3.2.1 Data Collection and Cleaning 31 3.2.2 Text Mining and Chi-Square Feature Selection 32 3.2.3 Structural Topic model and Network analysis 34 3.2.4 Normal Linear Regression and Eleven hypotheses 38 Chapter 4. Research Result 44 4.1 About CYL 44 4.1.1 Distribution of answers, articles and ideas. 44 4.1.2 Questions answered by the CYL 49 4.1.3 CYL’s contents on the Zhihu 57 4.1.4 Relationships between thirteenth factors and support rates 73 4.2 About Fans 83 4.2.1 Basic characteristics of the CYL’s commenters 83 4.2.2 Subjects in comments 95 4.2.3 Sentiment analysis and three levels of criticism 102 4.2.4 Network Analysis Chapter 109 5. Conclusion 116 Appendix 126 References 152 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 中國共產黨的宣傳策略與宣傳效果: 基於共青團中央知乎內容的分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | CCP Propaganda in online forums: Analysis of the Behaviors and Effects of the CYL on the social media platform Zhihu | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周嘉辰(Jia-Chen Zhou),許詩嫻(Shi-Xian Xu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 共青團中央,政治宣傳,問答平台,傳播效果,文字探勘,主體模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Propaganda,Zhihu,the CYL,Text-mining,Propaganda effect, | en |
dc.relation.page | 162 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004234 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2909202010592900.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.72 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。