請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71894
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 簡妤儒(Yu-Ju Chien) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsueh-Ying Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂學穎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:13:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-13 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-11-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-10-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Garrety, Karin,2004。社會世界、行動者網絡與爭議:以膽固醇、飲食中脂肪與心臟病為例。科技渴望社會,台北: 群學,pp. 265-330。
丁志音,2003。〈誰使用了非西醫的補充與另類療法?社會人口特質的無區隔性與健康需求的作用〉。台灣衛誌,22(3),155-165。 江順楠,2012。〈當代台灣社會健康飲食知識初探〉。新竹:清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 李以文,2001。〈生酮飲食:以醫療團隊介入癲癇治療〉。長庚護理,12(1),52-57 。 吳嘉苓、黃于玲,2002。〈順從、偷渡、發聲與出走:「病患的行動分析。」的行動分析〉。台灣社會學,3,73-117。 林文源,2006。〈漂移之作:由血液透析病患的存在與行動談社會本體論〉。台灣社會學,12,69-140。 林文源,2017。〈把疾病帶回來?!病患實作中的多元疾病客體化〉。台灣社會學,33,1-2。 林崇熙,2001。〈沉默的技術-嘉南平原上的拼裝車〉。科技、醫療與社會,1:1-42。 林崇熙,2001。〈脈絡性技術-頡頏國家的拼裝車〉。新史學,12(4): 75-120。 蔡佳憓,2007。〈健康身體想像的論述形成與權力效果-解析保健食品的社會建構歷程〉。嘉義:南華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 賴幼雅,2009。〈想像健康,實踐身體-養生書的隱喻分析〉。新北:淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士論文。 陳美慧(Mei-Hei Chen) ; 許瀞云(Jing-Yun Xu) ; 陳寶純(Bao-Chun Chen) ; 洪碧蓮(Pi-Lien Hung) ; 侯玫玲(Mei-Lin Hou) ; 邱燕甘(Yen-Gan Chiou),2020。〈提升頑固性癲癇病童對生酮飲食之醫療遵從率〉。長庚護理,31(2),189- 201。 陳家倫,2004。〈自我宗教的興起:以新時代靈性觀為例〉。世界宗教學刊,3,137-170。 陳燕慈(Yen-Tsz Chen) 、 李旺祚(Wang-Tso Lee),2016。〈頑固型癲癇病童生酮飲食治療對主要照顧者生活品質的影響〉。台灣醫學 ,20(4) ,335-343。 鄭斐文,2012。〈肥胖科學、醫療化與身體政治〉。科技、醫療與社會,14,73-140。 鄭斐文,2013。〈社會建構論、批判實在論與行動者 網絡理論觀點下的身體與社會: 以肥胖議題為例 〉。臺灣社會學刊,53,143-182。 廖欣瑩(Hsin-Yin Liao)、楊璦瑜(Ai-Yu Yang),2019。〈生酮飲食及其他替代性飲食用於癲癇的治療〉。臺灣營養學會雜誌,43(1) ,23- 31。 Barbara Ehrenreich著、葉品岑譯,2020。《老到可以死:對生命,你是要順其自然,還是控制到死?》。台北:左岸文化。 Dallas Hartwig, Melissa Hartwig著、林麗冠譯,2017。《原始人飲食聖經:一份可以讓你終生奉行的低醣飲食計畫Whole 30》。台北:如果出版社。 Daniel E. Liberman著、郭騰傑譯,2014。《從叢林到文明,人類身體的演化和疾病的產生》。台北:商周出版 。 Dave Asprey(2017)。《防彈飲食:矽谷生物駭客抗體內發言的震撼報告》。台北:活字文化。 Foucault(1977),劉北成、楊遠嬰譯(1992)。《規訓與懲罰-監獄的誕生》。台北:桂冠。 Gary Taubes著、張家瑞譯,2019。《好卡路里,壞卡路里:醫師、營養專家、生酮高手都在研究的碳水化合物、脂肪的驚人真相!》。台北:柿子文化 。 Giddens, Anthony著、趙旭冬、方文譯,2002。《現代性與自我認同:晚期現代的自我與社會》。台北:左岸文化。 Jimmy Moore, Eric C. Westman著、游懿萱譯,2017 。《生酮治病飲食全書:酮體自救飲食者最真實的成功告白》。台北:柿子文化。 Leanne Vogel著、游懿萱譯,2018。《完全生酮一看就懂圖文指南:沒有壓力的酮體生活,成功引導超過500萬人進入生酮飲食!》。台北:柿子文化 。 Nina Teicholz著、王奕婷譯,2016。《令人大感意外的脂肪》。新北:方舟文化。 Nora Gedgaudas著、王念慈譯,2017。《燃脂生酮21天啟動計畫:以優質脂肪為主食,回歸原始生理機制,提升大腦活力,瘦得科學又健康》。台北:采實文化 。 Turner, Bryan S.著、謝明珊譯,2010,《身體與社會理論》。台北:韋伯文化。(Turner, Bryan S., 2008, The Body and Socity: Explorations in Social Theory, 3rd ed. London: Sage.) Weston A. Price著、張家瑞譯,2017。《體質大崩壞(暢銷80週年紀念版):啟發生酮、低醣、全食物和原始飲食法的最佳實證》。台北:柿子文化 。 宗田哲男著、劉滌昭譯,2017。《生酮飲食-現代人的健康救星:如何透過低醣飲食找回健康》。台北:春天出版社。 崎谷博征著、莊雅琇譯,2015。《原始人飲食法:吃基因最需要的食物》。台北:天下文化 。 陳世修(Martyn)著,2018。《生酮哪有那麼難!:最專業的生酮教練Martyn陪你一起成功生酮》。台北:柿子文化 。 陳燕慈(Yen-Tsz Chen) 、 李旺祚(Wang-Tso Lee)(2016)頑固型癲癇病童生酮飲食治療對主要照顧者生活品質的影響,台灣醫學 ,20(4) , 335 - 343 趙光榮,2006。《中國飲食文化史》。上海:上海人民出版社。 張珣,1989。《疾病與文化》。台北:稻鄉。 蔡友月,2009。《達悟族的精神失序:現代性、變遷與受苦的社會根源》。台北:聯經。 American Diabetes Association, 2018, 4. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes care, 41(Suppl 1), S38–S50. American Diabetes Association, 2019, 5. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes care, 42(Suppl 1), S46–S60. Archer, M., 2003, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Barnes B., 1974, Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge Kegan Paul, 19–21, 32–39, 66, 87. Beardsworth, A. Keil, T., 1997, Sociology on the menu: an invitation to the study of food and society. NY: Routledge. Beck, U. Beck-Gernsheim, E., 2002, Theory, Culture Society: Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Bloor D., 1991, Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago and London: the University of Chicago Press, 138–141, 173. Brinkworth et al., 2009, Long-term effects of a very-low-carbohydrate weight loss diet compared with an isocaloric low-fat diet after 12 mo. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 90(1), 23–32. Brodwin, P., 1996, Medicine and Morality in Haiti: The Contest for Healing Power (Cambridge Studies in Medical Anthropology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Budd, S., Sharma, U., Douglas, M., 1994, The Healing bond the patient-practitioner relationship and therapeutic responsibility . Routledge. Castelli W. P., 1988, Cholesterol and lipids in the risk of coronary artery disease--the Framingham Heart Study. The Canadian journal of cardiology, 4 Suppl A, 5A–10A. Coward, Rosalind, edited by Daniel Miller., 2001, The Meanings of Health Foods. In Consumption : critical concepts in the social sciences(pp.50-72.) .London: Routledge, New York. Crawford, R., 1980, Healthism and the Medicalization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388. Cuzzolin, L et al., 2003, Patterns and perceptions of complementary/alternative medicine among paediatricians and patients' mothers: a review of the literature. European journal of pediatrics, 162(12), 820–827. Deleuze, Gilles, Félix Guattari, 1980, Mille plateaux. Paris : Minuit. Daniel Duchaine., 1996, Underground Bodyopus: Militant Weight Loss Recomposition. XIPE Press. Feinman, R. D et al., 2015, Dietary carbohydrate restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: critical review and evidence base. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 31(1), 1–13. Fernandez, M. L., West, K. L., 2005, Mechanisms by which dietary fatty acids modulate plasma lipids. The Journal of nutrition, 135(9), 2075–2078. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.9.2075 Ferriero, R. et al., 2013, Phenylbutyrate therapy for pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency and lactic acidosis. Science translational medicine, 5(175), 175ra31. Foster, G. D. et al ., 2010, Weight and metabolic outcomes after 2 years on a low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diet: a randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine, 153(3), 147–157. Foucault, M., 1997, Ethics: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954e1984 Volume one. edited by Paul Rabinow, translated by Robert Hurley and others, London: Allen Lane. Jaffe, J., Gertler, M. Victual Vicissitudes, 2006, Consumer Deskilling and the (Gendered) Transformation of Food Systems. Agric Hum Values 23, 143–162. Jasanoff, Sheila., 1996, Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science. Social Studies of Science, 26(2), 393–418. Jasanoff, Sheila., 2004, States of knowledge : the co-production of science and social order. London:Routledge. Jasanoff, Sheila., 2004, Science and citizenship: a new synergy. Science and Public Policy, Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 90–94. Jordan, B., 1993 ,Birth in Four Cultures: A Crosscultural Investigation of Childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States. Waveland Press, Inc.. Jordan, B., 1997, Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley:University of California Press. Kearns CE, Schmidt LA, Glantz SA., 2016, Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents. JAMA Intern Med, 176(11):1680–1685. Kosinski, C., Jornayvaz, F. R., 2017, Effects of Ketogenic Diets on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Evidence from Animal and Human Studies. Nutrients, 9(5), 517. Latour, Bruno. 1986. Laboratory life : the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press. Latour, Bruno. 1987[1994], Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Law, John, 2007, “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” Version of 25th April 2007, (downloaded on 18th May, 2007) . Law, John, 2008, On Sociology and STS. The Sociological Review, 56(4), 623–649. Law, John, 2008, Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In: Bryan S.Turner(Ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, 3rd Edition (pp. 141-158). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Leslie C, 1980, Medical pluralism in world perspective. Social science medicine. Medical anthropology, 14B(4), 191–195. Lupton, Deborah, 1996, Food, the Body and the Self. London: Sage Publications. Melton, Gordon et al., 1990, New Age Encyclope dia. New York: Gale Research. Mol, A, 1999, Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47: 74-89. Mol, A, 2002, The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press. Mol, A, 2013, Mind your plate! The ontonorms of Dutch dieting. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 379–396. Mol, A., Law, J, 1994, Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641–671. Mol, A., Law, J, 2004, Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: the Example of Hypoglycaemia. Body Society, 10(2–3), 43–62. Montiel-Castro et al., 2013, The microbiota-gut-brain axis: neurobehavioral correlates, health and sociality. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 7, 70. Oliver, J. E, 2006, Fat politics: The real story behind America's obesity epidemic. New York: Oxford University Press. Ottinger, Gwen, 2013, Refining Expertise: How Responsible Engineers Subvert Environmental Justice Challenges. New York: New York University Press. Ottinger, Gwen, 2016, Social Movement-Based Citizen Science. In The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, edited by Darlene Cavalier and Eric B. Kennedy (pp.89-104). Tempe: Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes. Peeters, K et al., 2017, Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate couples glycolytic flux to activation of Ras. Nature communications, 8(1), 922. Pinto, A. et a., 2018, Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ketogenic Diet: New Perspectives for Neuroprotection in Alzheimer's Disease. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 7(5), 63. Prince, A. et al., 2013, Oxidative metabolism: glucose versus ketones. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 789, 323–328. Sharma, Ursula, 1992, Complementary medicine today : practitioners and patients. London ; New York : Tavistock/Routledge Shimazu, T et al., 2013, Suppression of oxidative stress by β-hydroxybutyrate, an endogenous histone deacetylase inhibitor. Science (New York, N.Y.), 339(6116), 211–214. Stephen D Phinney MD , Rd Jeff S Volek., 2011, The Art and Science of Low Carbohydrate Living.Beyond Obesity .LLC. Stoner, B, 1986, Understanding Medical Systems: Traditional, Modern, and Syncretic Health Care Alternatives in Medically Pluralistic Societies. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 17(2), 44-48. Retrieved September 1, 2020. Tenenbaum, A., Klempfner, R., Fisman, E. Z., 2014, Hypertriglyceridemia: a too long unfairly neglected major cardiovascular risk factor. Cardiovascular diabetology, 13, 159. Turner, Bryan, 1991, The discourse of diet. In The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory, edited by Mike Featherstone, Mike Hepworth and Bryan S. Turner. London Newbury Park, Calif.: SAGE Publications. Turner, J, 1982, Toward a cognitive definition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Turner, J, 1984, The Body Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford; New York, NY: B. Blackwell. Wang, Y., Sung, H., Tsai, Y., 2017, Educational differences in awareness and use of the outpatient smoking cessation services program in Taiwan. Wheless J. W, 2008, History of the ketogenic diet. Epilepsia, 49 Suppl 8, 3–5. Wise, J. M, 2005, Assemblage. In Stivale, C. J. (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts (pp. 77-87). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Witz, A, 1990, Patriarchy and professions: The gendered politics of occupational closure. Sociology, 24, 675-690. Wolpe, P. R, 1985, The Maintenance of Professional Authority: Acupuncture and the American Physician. Social Problems,32 Yudkoff, M. Et al., 2007, The ketogenic diet and brain metabolism of amino acids: relationship to the anticonvulsant effect. Annual review of nutrition, 27, 415–430. 同樂會(Aging Joyfully)- 健康生活 優雅慢老,【臉書社團平台】 。(https://www.facebook.com/groups/931997570270294) 酮健康-中華低醣生酮推廣協會,【臉書社團平台】。(https://www.facebook.com/groups/390008404761620) 酮好,【臉書社團平台】。(https://www.facebook.com/groups/ketoisgood) 酮好,【網站】。(https://www.keto.tw) 酮好,【youtube頻道】。(https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC921eA6HYHT2-CrrLWYgqqQ) 了解生酮飲食-以及你無法成功減肥的真相(新成員請先查看置頂貼文),【臉書社團平台】。(https://www.facebook.com/groups/563986003795095) 歡樂生酮趣 - 生酮/低碳/減肥/減重飲食,【臉書社團平台】。(https://www.facebook.com/groups/lmanKetoLife) Low Carb Down Under,【網站】。(https://lowcarbdownunder.com.au) Low Carb Down Under,【youtube頻道】。(https://www.youtube.com/user/lowcarbdownunder) Virta Health,【網站】。(https://www.virtahealth.com) Dr. Berg's Health Wellness Centre,【youtube頻道】。 (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3w193M5tYPJqF0Hi-7U-2g) Diet Doctor,【網站】。(https://www.dietdoctor.com) 新生兒篩檢中心,【網站】。 (https://www.ntuh.gov.tw/gene-lab-nbsc/Fpage.action?fid=5169) 罕見遺傳疾病一點通(罕見遺傳疾病中文資料庫) ,【網站】。 (http://web.tfrd.org.tw/genehelp/article.html?articleID=Porphyria submenuIndex=0) 罕見疾病基金會,【網站】。(http://www.tfrd.org.tw/tfrd/) 國外的生酮飲食分類,【網站】。 (https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/23-studies-on-low-carb-and-low-fat-diets?fbclid=IwAR1AS4Cr1zOvDJSnwvB8owRGf5asEXaPkCTIRmzjJkjIsmtfKkLg3tt-BjU#section1) 台客劇場影片【youtube頻道】。(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-i2OVfLMU4) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71894 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 生酮飲食是近年火紅的飲食法,儘管生酮飲食遭受主流醫學與營養學的批評,仍因為具有極佳的減重效果而為普羅大眾廣泛使用。主流科學認為自主執行生酮是很危險的; 生酮社群則認為它是健康的生活方式,為何主流科學與生酮社群對此具有如此兩極的評價?甚至連生酮社群內部都具有殊異?本研究以生酮飲食在台灣發展的三個進程來分析,從生酮推廣人如何把生酮飲食引入台灣,過程中會遭遇哪些挑戰,到生酮如何被做出來,落實在日常生活中,最後則試圖解答生酮飲食的多元實作來源。本研究主要運用深度訪談與文本論述分析來解答生酮社群的實作。本文的研究發現有三:首先,生酮飲食高度的爭議性,受到不少的批評與質疑。生酮推廣人要推廣生酮一來要與主流科學對話,和主流科學進行科學論辯,並試圖拆解主流科學的權威。二來要招募實作者嘗試生酮飲食,他們主要有挪用原始人飲食、結盟低碳水典範與標示特殊性這三個策略。值得注意的是,在推廣生酮的過程,生酮推廣人的策略跟群體是不斷在變動的,不斷結盟與劃分,試圖為生酮飲食社群撐出生存空間。第二,透過生酮推廣人的轉譯,生酮飲食的知識慢慢傳遞出去,也界定了生酮飲食的基本實作樣貌。然而,由於每個人的生活習慣、身體的狀態都有所差別,生酮推廣人的實作方式並不適用所有人。生酮推廣人所建立的生酮社團網路平台匯集集體實作與交流經驗,是生酮飲食得以在日常生活落實的關鍵。最後,本文借鏡ANT的實作本體論的概念,提出多重生酮的概念,生酮飲食是隨著異質行動者的多元實作而具現的多重本質。本研究從動態、實作的角度切入,關注實作中的個人,試圖理解多元與異質實作的來由。透過審視生酮飲食的案例,可以看到全新知識打造的過程,如何挑戰既有的秩序,甚至解構秩序。此外,生酮實作者的多元實作映照了當代社會的個體化現象,人具有很高的自主性可以自由選擇生活,創造自我的風格。但不可忽視高舉個人行動主體與自由的同時,也可能加強新自由主義的意識形態霸權 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The ketogenic diet is one of the most popular diets in recent years. Although the ketogenic diet is criticized by mainstream biomedicine and nutriology, many people still practice it due to its extremely efficient weight-loss effect. The mainstream scientific communities consider that it will be dangerous if people practice the ketogenic diet themselves without medical prescriptions, but people in ketogenic diet groups perceive it as a healthy lifestyle. Why do mainstream scientific communities and ketogenic diet groups evaluate the ketogenic diet so differently? And why are there differences in perceptions and practices even between different ketogenic diet groups? In this paper, I discuss three processes though which ketogenic diet established its popularity in Taiwan. Firstly, how did these advocates of ketogenic diet introduce ketogenic diet into Taiwan?What kinds of ordeal have they met? Secondly, how do people practice ketogenic diets in their daily lives. At last, why are there multiple practices of ketogenic diets ?
Based on in-depth interviews, textual, and discourse analysis, the results are divided into three parts. Firstly, ketogenic diet is controversial, still criticized by mainstream scientific communities. Advocates of the ketogenic diet hence have been engaged with two tasks to earn acceptance. One task is to debate with mainstream scientific community, trying to unravel the authority of the mainstream scientific community. The other is to recruit practicers to try the ketogenic diet. They used three main strategies to encourage people to try the new diet, including appropriating paleo diet, aligning with low-carb paradigm, labeling its distinctiveness. It is worth noting that their strategies and the boundaries of these advocate communities have been constantly changing in the process of advocating. They keep allying and demarcating with other paradigms, trying to establish a broader ketogenic diet community. Secondly, the knowledge of the ketogenic diet has been slowly diffused through advocates' translation, gradually developing common practicing methods of the ketogenic diet. However, these practicing methods might not be suitable for everybody, due to people’s diverse habits and uniqueness of human body. Discussion forums on the Internet have become the platforms that collect heterogeneous practices and experiments, which is crucial to the diffusion of ketogenic diet into practicers’daily lives. Lastly, drawing on the Actor-Network Theory(ANT), I propose that there are multiple ketogenic diets embodied through heterogeneous practices of various actors. Taking a dynamic perspective and focusing on how people practice this diet, my paper demonstrate how multiple and heterogenous practices emerged and have evolved, instead of one unified ketogenic diet. It reveals the processes through which brand-new knowledge is introduced and and strategies are employed by advocates and practicers, in order to challenge or unravel existing social orders. In addition, the multiple practices of ketogenic diets also reflect the individuation in modern society. People can create and choose their own lifestyles freely. Nevertheless, we must be aware that despite the seemly appreciation of individual freedom or that subjectivity in the movement of ketogenic diets, it may also enforce the ideology of Neoliberalism at the same time. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:13:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1410202021102000.pdf: 5294811 bytes, checksum: 2f1c5cb0be2618c48003fc77739d1c07 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、前言 1 第二節、文獻回顧 4 一、生酮飲食的歷史沿革與轉變 4 二、身體、健康治理與權力 7 三、對抗權威知識:揭露科學知識的政治性 10 四、健康知識來源與醫療多元論:靜態的框架 11 五、異質拼裝與拼裝車:動態觀點 14 六、行動者網絡理論:實作本體論 15 第三節、研究問題 16 第四節、研究方法 17 一、深度訪談法 17 二、文本論述分析 21 三、參與式觀察 22 第二章、生酮飲食的科學爭議與招募策略 23 第一節、成為生酮推廣人:台灣生酮先驅接觸生酮的始末 23 一、台灣生酮先驅與生酮的初次相遇 23 二、生酮先驅的資源與社會條件 24 三、成為生酮推廣人:生酮飲食在台灣社會的萌芽 27 第二節、生酮先驅與主流科學的知識論爭 28 一、區分酮症與酮酸中毒:酮體的去污名 28 二、訴諸科學知識的政治性:飽和脂肪的爭議 31 第三節、生酮推廣人的招募策略:彈性結盟與劃分 37 一、挪用原始人飲食:「生酮飲食」作為自然的飲食方式 37 二、結盟低碳水飲食典範:「低醣」「生酮」作為其中的一員 40 三、標示生酮飲食的特殊性 42 第四節、與台灣既存社會條件的接合:生酮的流行 45 第五節、小結 47 第三章、生酮飲食的身體控制與日常生活化 48 第一節、醫用生酮飲食的日常生活化調整 49 一、生酮飲食作為癲癇的另類療法 49 二、食療法的彈性鬆綁與衍生類型 50 第二節、生酮推廣人的轉譯:生酮飲食的日常生活化 52 一、補油派:嚴格生酮飲食比例作為基礎管控手段 53 二、不補油派:校準身體感受、信任身體回饋 55 三、兩種身體觀的理念型:補油派 v.s 不補油派 59 四、生酮網路平台作為克服日常生活化難題的解方 62 第三節、小結 66 第四章、生酮飲食的多元實作與知識拼裝 69 第一節、生酮實作者的日常實踐:個人的轉化 70 第二節、生酮飲食的多元實作:減重派與健康派 72 一、減重派的實作:體態的追求 73 二、健康派的實作:健康的追求與知識拼裝 79 第三節、生酮飲食的多重本質與動態調整 89 第四節、生酮飲食作為新的權威?還是個體的解放? 95 第五節、小結 98 第五章、結論 100 第一節、研究發現 100 第二節、研究限制與未來發展方向 103 參考文獻 106 附錄一、訪談大綱 115 附錄二、生酮飲食食譜 116 附錄三、研究倫理審查 117 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 你的生酮,不是他的生酮:科學論爭、知識轉譯與多元實作 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Your ketogenic diet is different from theirs: scientific debates, knowledge translation and multiple practices in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭斐文(Fei-Wen Cheng),陳嘉新(Jia-Shin Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 生酮飲食,異質實作,多重本質,日常生活化,科學論爭, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ketogenic diet,heterogeneous practices,multiple essences,everyday life,scientific debates, | en |
dc.relation.page | 127 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004272 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-10-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1410202021102000.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。