請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71710完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥(Ruey-Shan Guo) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Liang Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳國樑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:07:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-15 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-01-15 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abbott, W., & Monsen, R. 1979. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3): 501-515.
Aguilera, R., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of management Review, 28(3): 447-465. Alexander, G., & Buchholz, R. 1978. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3): 479-486. Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2001. Value creation in e‐business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7): 493-520. Arcelus, F., & Schaefer, N. 1982. Social demands as strategic issues: some conceptual problems. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4): 347-357. Argenti, P. 2004. How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1): 91-116. Arlow, P., & Gannon, M. 1982. Social responsiveness, corporate structure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(2): 235-241. Arya, B., & Zhang, G. 2009. Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7): 1089-1112. Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T., & Louviere, J. 2003. What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3): 281-304. Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J.1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 446-463. Banker, R., Mashruwala, R., & Tripathy, A. 2014. Does a differentiation strategy lead to more sustainable financial performance than a cost leadership strategy? Management Decision, 52(5): 872-896. Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3): 197-218. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1): 93-103. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717-736. Barnard, C. 1958. Elementary conditions of business morals. California Management Review, 1(1): 1-13. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1):71-86. Barnett, M. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 794-816. Barnett, M, & Salomon, R. 2006. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11): 1101-1122. Barnett, M., & Salomon, R. 2012. Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11): 1304-1320. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120. Baron, D. 1995. The nonmarket strategy system. Sloan Management Review, 37(1): 73-85. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. 2008. Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1): 122-136. Bhambri, A., & Sonnenfeld, J. 1988. Organization structure and corporate social performance: A field study in two contrasting industries. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 642-662. Bhattacharya, C., Smith, N., & Vogel, D. 2004. Integrating social responsibility and marketing strategy: An introduction. California Management Review, 47(1): 6-8. Boehe, D., & Cruz, L. 2010. Corporate social responsibility, product differentiation strategy and export performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2): 325-346. Bourgeois, L. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 29-39. Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. 2006. Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3): 97-116. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12): 1325-1343. Brown, B., & Perry, S. 1994. Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's “Most Admired” companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5): 1347-1359. Buehler, V., & Shetty, Y. 1974. Motivations for corporate social action. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4): 767-771. Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. 2012. Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4): 467-480. Campbell, J. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3): 946-967. Carroll, A. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4): 497-505. Carroll, A. 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3): 268-295. Carroll, A. 2008. A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In Andrew Crane, Abigail McWilliams, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon & Donald Siegel (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility:19-46. Oxford University Press. Carroll, A., & Shabana, K. 2010. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 85-105. Chakrabarty, S., & Wang, L. 2012. The long-term sustenance of sustainability practices in MNCs: a dynamic capabilities perspective of the role of R&D and internationalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2): 205-217. Chatterji, A., & Toffel, M. 2010. How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9): 917-945. Cheit, E.1964. Why managers cultivate social responsibility? California Management Review, 7(1): 3-22. Chen, C., & Hsiao, Y. 2013. The endogenous role of location choice in product innovations. Journal of World Business, 48(3): 360-372. Chen, C., & Huang, Y. 2010. Creative workforce density, organizational slack, and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 63(4): 411-417. Chen, C., & Lin, Y. 2016. Managing the foreign investment portfolio: How industry and governance diversity influence firm performance. International Business Review, 25(6): 1235-1245. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 1-23. Chi, S., Friedman, R., & Lo, H. 2015. Vicarious shame and psychological distancing following organizational misbehavior. Motivation and Emotion, 39(5): 795-812. Clark, T., & Grantham K. 2012. What CSR is not: Corporate social irresponsibility? Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, 4: 23-41 Clarkson, M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92-117. Cochran, P., & Wood, R. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1): 42-56. Cordano, M. & Frieze, I. 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of US environmental managers: Applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management journal 43(4): 627-641. David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. 2007. Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1): 91-100. David, J., Hwang, Y., Pei, B., & Reneau, J. 2012. The performance effects of congruence between product competitive strategies and purchasing management design. Management Science, 48(7): 866-885. Davidson, W., & Worrel, D. 1988. The impact of announcements of corporate illegalities on shareholder returns. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1): 195-200. Davis, K. 1960. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3): 70-76. Davis, K. 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2): 312-322. Doh, J., Howton, S., Howton, S., & Siegel, D. 2010. Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36(6): 1461-1485. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. 2010. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 8-19. Duhigg, C., & Barboza, D. 2012. In China, human costs are built into an iPad. New York Times, 25. Eells, R. 1958. Corporate Giving: Theory and Policy. California Management Review, 1(1): 37-46. Elbing, A. 1970. The value issue of business: The responsibility of the businessman. Academy of Management Journal, 13(1): 79-89. Elkins, A. 1977. Toward a positive theory of corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Review, 2(1): 128-133. Flammer, C. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3): 758-781. Flammer, C. 2015. Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 1469-1485. Fogler, H., & Nutt, F. 1975. A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1): 155-160. Frederick, W. 1960. The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4): 54-61. Frederick, W. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33(2): 150-164. Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Pitman, Marshall, MA. Friedman, M. 1970. Thesocial responsibilityof business is to increase its profits. New YorkTimes, September 13:122-126. Frooman, J. 1997. Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36(3): 221-249. Fry, L., Keim, G., & Meiners, R. 1982. Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? Academy of management Journal, 25(1): 94-106. Graves, S., & Waddock, S. 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4): 1034-1046. Grether, E. 1969. Business responsibility toward the market. California Management Review, 12(1): 33-42. Greening, D., & Gray, B. 1994. Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 467-498. Grimmer, M., & Bingham, T. 2013. Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 66(10): 1945-1953. Groening, C., & Kanuri, K. 2013. Investor reaction to positive and negative corporate social events. Journal of Business Research, 66(10): 1852-1860. Grunig, J. 1979. A new measure of public opinion on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4): 738-764. Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. 2002. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(1), 67-85. Hambrick, D. 1983. High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4): 687-707. Hamilton, B., & Nickerson, J. 2003. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1): 51–78. Hart, S. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 986-1014. Hart, S. 1997. Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard business review, 75(1): 66-76. Hay, R., & Gray, E. 1974. Social responsibilities of business managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17(1): 135-143. Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1): 153–161. Henisz, W., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. 2014. Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12): 1727-1748. Hillman, A., & Keim, G. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 125-139. Holmes, S. 1977. Corporate social performance: Past and present areas of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 20(3): 433-438. Hull, C., & Rothenberg, S. 2008. Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7): 781-789. Jayachandran, S., Kalaignanam, K., & Eilert, M. 2013. Product and environmental social performance: Varying effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(10): 1255-1264. Johnson, R., & Greening, D. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 564-576. Jones, D., Willness, C., & Madey, S. 2014. Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2): 383-404. Julian, S., & Ofori‐Dankwa, J. 2013. Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11): 1314-1330. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2): 263-291. Kang, J. 2013. The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(1): 94-109. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1): 145-159. Keim, G. 1978a. Corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the enlightened self-interest model. Academy of Management Review, 3(1): 32-39. Keim, G. 1978b. Managerial behavior and the social responsibility debate: Goals versus constraints. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1): 57-68. Ketchen, D., Boyd, B., & Bergh, D. 2008. Research methodology in strategic management: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4): 643-658. Klein, J., Smith, N., & John, A. 2004. Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3): 92-109. Klein, P., Mahoney, J., McGahan, A., & Pitelis, C. 2012. Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10(3): 304-315. Koh, P., Qian, C., & Wang, H. 2014. Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10): 1464-1482. Kolk, A., & Tulderb, R. 2002 The effectiveness of self-regulation:: corporate codes of conduct and child labour. European Management Journal, 20(3): 260-271. Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S., & Aulakh, P. 2002. Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1): 79-97. Krishnan, R. 1973. Business philosophy and executive responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 16(4): 658-669. Lange, D., & Washburn, N. 2012. Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2): 300-326. Lawless, M., & Finch, L. 1989. Choice and determinism: A test of Hrebiniak and Joyce's framework on strategy-environment fit. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 351-365.. Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. 2009. Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2):182-200. Lieberman, M. 1987. The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5): 441-452. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. 2009. The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6): 198-213. Mackey, A., Mackey, T., & Barney, J.2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 817-835. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268-305. Marquis, C., Glynn, M., & Davis, G. 2007. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 925-945. Mattingly, E., & Berman, S. 2006. Measurement of corporate social action: discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings. Business & Society, 45(1): 20-46. McGee, J. 1998. Commentary on ‘Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework' by A. Rugman and A. Verbeke. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 377-387. McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4): 854-872. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 603-610. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1):117-127. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1): 1-18. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B., Block, E., & Pollock, T. 2010. Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 701-722. Morgan, N., Vorhies, D., & Mason, C. 2009. Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8): 909-920. Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. 2011. Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management Journal, 32(9): 911-929. Murphy, P., & Schlegelmilch, B. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility: Introduction to a special topic section. Journal of Business Research, 66(10): 1807-1813. Nair, A., & Filer, L. 2003. Cointegration of firm strategies within groups: A long-run analysis of firm behavior in the Japanese steel industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2):145-159. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C., & Rangaswami, M. 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation? Harvard Business Review, 87(9): 56-64. Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. 2014. The financial effects of uniform and mixed corporate social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 51(6): 898-925. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3): 403-441. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. 2008. Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 773-775. Peloza, J., & Falkenberg, L. 2009. The role of collaboration in achieving corporate social responsibility objectives. California Management Review, 51(3): 95-113. Penna, C., & Geels, F. 2015. Climate change and the slow reorientation of the American car industry (1979–2012): An application and extension of the Dialectic Issue Life Cycle (DILC) model. Research Policy, 44(5): 1029-1048. Penrose, E. 1955. Limits to the Growth and Size of Firms. The American Economic Review, 45(2): 531-543. Penrose, E. 1959. The thoery of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Petit, T. 1966. Making socially responsible decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 9(4): 308-317. Petrenko, O., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. 2016. Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 262-279. Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New York, The Free Press. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. 2006. Strategy & Society the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harverd Business Review, 84(12): 78-94. Rosen, D, Schroeder, J., & Purinton, E. 1998. Marketing high tech products: lessons in customer focus from the marketplace. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 6: 1-17. Ruf, B., Muralidhar, K., & Paul, K. 1998. The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 24(1): 119-133. Saeidi, S., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S., & Saaeidi, S. 2015. How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2): 341-350. Schlusberg, M. 1969. Corporate legitimacy and social responsibility: The role of law. California Management Review, 12(1): 65-76. Schuler, D., & Cording, M. 2006. A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 540-558. Sharfman, M., Wolf, G., Chase, R., & Tansik, D. 1988. Antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 13(4): 601-614. Shaver, J. 1998. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect survival? Management Science, 44(4): 571–585. Sethi, S. 1975. Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3): 58-64. Sethi, S., & Votaw, D. 1969. Do we need a new corporate response to a changing social environment? Part II. California Management Review, 12(1): 17-28. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 159-180. Shiu, Y., & Yang, S. 2016. Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance‐like effects? Strategic Management Journal, 38(2): 455-470. Simanis, E., & Duke, D. 2014. Profits at the bottom of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 92(10): 86-93. Simpson, W., & Kohers, T. 2002. The link between corporate social and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2): 97-109. Singh, J. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3): 562-585. Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. 2013. When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10): 1831-1838. Skarmeas, D., Leonidou, C., & Saridakis, C. 2014. Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(9): 1796-1805. Starik, M., & Rands, G. 1995. Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 908-935. Strike, V., Gao. J., & Bansal, P. 2006. Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 850-862. Surroca, J., Tribó, J., & Waddock, S. 2010. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5): 463-490. Surroca, J., Tribó, J., & Zahra, S. 2013. Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2): 549-572. Tan, J., & Peng, M. 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1249-1263. Tang, Z., Hull, C., & Rothenberg, S. 2012. How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7): 1274-1303. Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. 2015. How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9): 1338-1357. Terlaak, A. 2007. Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 968-985. Turban, D., & Greening, D. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 658-672. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4): 297-323. Ullmann, A.1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 540-557. Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. 2008. The worth of values–a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2): 407-424. Votaw, D., & Sethi, S. 1969. Do we need a new corporate response to a changing social environment? Part I. California Management Review, 12(1): 3-16. Waddock, S., & Graves, S. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4):303-319. Wagner, M. 2010. Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4): 581-594. Wagner, T., Lutz, R., & Weitz, B. 2009. Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6): 77-91. Walls. J. , Berrone, P., & Phan. P. 2012. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8): 885-913. Wang, D., Chen, P., Yu, T., & Hsiao, C. 2015. The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand equity and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 68(11): 2232-2236. Wang, H., & Choi, J. 2013. A new look at the corporate social-financial performance relationship: The moderating roles of temporal and interdomain consistency in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 39(2): 416-441. Wang, H., & Qian, C. 2011. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6): 1159-1181. Wang, T., & Bansal, P. 2012. Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long‐term orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10): 1135-1153. Wartick, S., & Cochran, P. 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 758-769. Weaver, G., Trevino, L., & Cochran, P. 1999. Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 539-552. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180. Wilson, l. 1975. What one company is doing about today's demands on business? In George A. Steiner (Ed.), Changing business society interreiationships. Los Angeles: Graduate School of Management, UCLA. Wiseman, R. 2009. On the use and misuse ofratio variables in strategic management research. In Berg D, Ketchen D Jr, (eds). Research Methodology in Strategy in Management, Vol. 5: 75-110. Bingley, UK: Emerald Ltd. Wong, E., Ormiston, M., & Tetlock, P. 2011. The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6): 1207-1228. Wood, D. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718. Wu, H., Lin, B., & Chen, C. 2007. Contingency view on technological differentiation and firm performance: evidence in an economic downturn. R&D Management, 37(1): 75-88. Yamakawaa, Y., Yang, H., & Lin, Z. 2011. Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit. Research Policy, 40(2): 287-296 Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. 2010. Building social business models: lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 308-325. Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9): 809-825. Zenisek, T. 1979. Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review, 4(3): 359-368. Zhao, X., & Murrell, A. 2016. Revisiting the corporate social performance‐financial performance link: A replication of Waddock and Graves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11): 2378-2388. Zhou, Y. 2011. Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6): 624-639. Zyglidopoulos, C., Georgiadis, P., Carroll, C., & Siegel, D. 2012. Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Research, 65(11): 1622-1627. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71710 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近代企業社會責任(CSR)相關議題的學術研究，起源自1950年代末期，在經過多年的發展，已經逐漸成為管理學界一個相當受到重視的研究領域。在諸多關於企業社會責任的研究流派當中，關於策略性CSR的研究著重於競爭策略與社會策略的結合與探討，在近幾年已成為一個新興的CSR研究流派。因此，本論文的研究架構即依附在策略型CSR的研究流派之下，探討公司策略如何與社會策略進行有效整合，以強化公司的財務績效表現。本研究以美國公開發行的上市公司作為取樣對象，實證結果支持了公司的競爭策略，如: 成本領導與差異化策略等，對於CSR與財務績效表現(CFP)間的非線性關係具有正向調和的效果；而這些競爭策略則對於企業不道德或黑心事業(CSiR)與CFP間的非線性關係產生了負向調和的作用。因此，經理人應考量本身的競爭優勢來源，藉此與社會策略進行結合，以進一步強化公司的財務績效表現。此外，本研究也探討了公司內生性因素對於企業追求社會責任的策略選擇之影響。實證研究結果顯示，部分企業可能因為所面臨的內、外部環境等內生性因素所影響，而無法有效透過企業社會責任的執行以提高公司績效表現，以致於這類的公司將策略性選擇較不積極參與執行企業社會責任相關活動。本博士論文為未來的策略性CSR相關研究，建構初期的理論架構與探討諸多可能的研究方向；同時，也對企業經理人提出具有管理意涵的策略建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged and accumulated considerable amount of research since late 1950s. One of the current research directions focuses on the interactions among a company’s business and social strategies, which crafts a research stream for strategic CSR. As a result, the research framework of this dissertation aims to explore the potentials for integrating a company’s business and social strategies, which allows a company to pursue social value without the compensation of its economic value, and even possibly improves its financial performance. Drawing observations from the U.S. publicly traded companies, this study suggests that business strategies such as cost leadership and differentiation positively moderate the curvilinear relationship between CSR and corporate financial performance (CFP); however, negatively moderates the curvilinear relationship between corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR) and CFP. Besides, this research also proposes that there are endogenous factors that affect a company’s strategic choices on whether or not being socially responsible. Some companies may be unable to well manage their social strategies to improve firm performance under the encountering enteral and external environment, which hold them back from being more socially responsible. This dissertation paves an early stage for conducting strategic CSR research, and construct some theoretical foundation for future studies. Besides, more strategic insights may be generated from this study for managers’ considerations. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:07:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-D01741007-1.pdf: 2167129 bytes, checksum: 388357d558a50827c424e587e86d449f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌 謝 iii Abstract v 摘 要 vii List of Figures xi List of Tables xiii 1. Chapter One: Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Questions 4 1.3 Research Procedure 5 2. Chapter Two: Literature Review and Hypotheses 9 2.1 The relationship between CSR and CFP 14 2.2 The relationship between CSiR and CFP 17 2.3 Moderating effect of cost leadership and differentiation. 20 2.4 The trend of strategic corporate social responsibility 25 2.5 Organizational capability and CSR engagement strategy choice 27 2.6 Organizational slack and CSR engagement strategy choice 31 2.7 Organizational capability, slack, CSR engagement strategy choice, and firm performance 35 3. Chapter Three: Research Framework and Methodology 39 3.1 Research framework 39 3.2 Hypotheses to be tested 41 3.3 Data collection and sample 43 3.4 Measures 45 3.5 Empirical analysis 50 4. Chapter Four: Research Analysis and Results 55 4.1 The empirical results of study 1 55 4.2 The empirical results of study 2 64 5. Chapter Five: Discussion and Conclusion 73 5.1 Theoretical implications 77 5.2 Managerial implications 80 5.3 Limitation and future research 82 References 85 Appendix 101 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 黑心事業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業社會責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 事業策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 差異化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 內生性因素 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 競爭策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成本領導 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Organizational Slack | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR) | en |
| dc.subject | Business strategy | en |
| dc.subject | Cost leadership | en |
| dc.subject | Differentiation | en |
| dc.subject | Endogenous effect | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate social responsibility(CSR) | en |
| dc.title | 策略性企業社會責任:
競爭策略、組織能力、寬裕資源與公司績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility:
Business Strategies, Organizational Capabilities, Slack and Firm Performance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳忠仁(Chung-Jen Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林博文(Bou-Wen Lin),李伯謙(Po-Chien Li),林俊裕(Jun-You Lin),林雅惠 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業社會責任,黑心事業,事業策略,競爭策略,成本領導,差異化,內生性因素, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Corporate social responsibility(CSR),Corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR),Business strategy,Cost leadership,Differentiation,Endogenous effect,Organizational Slack, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 121 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201804285 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-07 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。