請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71693完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姚開屏(Kai-Ping Yao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Han Leng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 冷承翰 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:06:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-01-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Böckenholt, U. (2014). Modeling motivated misreports to sensitive survey questions. Psychometrika, 79, 515–537.
Bolt, D. M., & Lall, V. F. (2003). Estimation of compensatory and noncompensatory multidimensional item response models using markov chain monte carlo. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 395–414. Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459. Chan, J. C.-C., & Jeliazkov, I. (2009). MCMC estimation of restricted covariance matrices. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 18, 457–480. Cronbach, L. J. (1950). Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 3–31. Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291–300. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private selfconsciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527. Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 321–331. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. Harris, J. A. (1997). A further evaluation of the aggression questionnaire: Issues of validity and reliability. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1047–1053. Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 161–172. Krueger, J. (1998). Enhancement bias in descriptions of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 505–516. Leary, M., & Kowalski, R. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47. Mesmer-Magnus, J., Viswesvaran, C., Deshpande, S., & Jacob, J. (2006). Social desirability: The role of over-claiming, self-esteem, and emotional intelligence. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 48, 336–356. Mick, D. G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable responding? the case of materialism. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 106–119. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378. Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131–149. Nadler, A., Goldberg, M., & Jaffe, Y. (1982). Effect of self-differentiation and anonymity in group on deindividuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1127–1136. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires (pp. 143–165). New York: Springer. Williams, K. M., Paulhus, D. L., & Nathanson, C. (2002). The nature of over-claiming: Personality and cognitive factors. In Poster presented at the 110th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Chicago, IL, August, 2002. Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237–307. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71693 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在建立一個新的試題反應理論模型(item response theory model)以考量個體在填答自陳量表(self-report assessment)時過度呈現(overreport)或低度呈現(underreport)真實自我的行為。此行為是根據欲測量特質之方向所產生,是一種在表達初始想法時會無意識欺騙自我,並下意識將選擇轉移至更符合讚許之選項的行為機制。此行為機制在本模型中以在多向度評等量尺模型(multidimensional rating scale model)內加入欺騙因子(deception term),再另外乘上轉移因子(transfer term)的方式處理,其中轉移結因子以指標函數(indicator function)與轉移機率矩陣(transition probability matrix)所組成。本模型建立在貝式架構上(Bayesian framework)並以馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅法(Markov chain Monte Carlo)估計參數。本模型之參數估計結果良好反映在一系列的模擬研究當中。此外,在實徵研究中,本模型被應用於分析由本研究所設計之網路實驗的資料,其中發現參與者傾向在記名時欺騙自我,亦在有記分板的狀況下轉移選擇。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this study, a new item response theory model is developed to account for the situation where respondents overreport or underreport their actual opinion corresponding to the positive or negative direction of an issue measured in a self-report assessment. Such behavior is conceptualized as a mechanism that not only deceives but transfers selections. In the proposed model, such mechanism is performed by incorporating a deception term into a multidimensional rating scale (MRS) model and then multiplying by a transfer term, which is performed by an indicator function and a transition matrix separately. The proposed model is presented in a Bayesian framework approximated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. Through a series of simulations, the parameters under the proposed model are recovered well. The methodology is also implemented within an online experimental study to demonstrate its application. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:06:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04227116-1.pdf: 2810421 bytes, checksum: 0066795d4296b192a52121a646408db1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Retrieve-Deceive-Transfer Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 Estimation Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.1 Bayesian Hierarchical Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2 Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4 A Simulation Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.1 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5 An Empirical Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5.1 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 5.3 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 6 Discussion and Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 7 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 A Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 A.1 R Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 A.2 Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 A.3 Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 多向度評等量尺模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會期許 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 試題反應理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | item response theory model | en |
| dc.subject | multidimensional rating scale model | en |
| dc.subject | socially desirable behavior | en |
| dc.title | 社會期許行為之試題反應模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Item Response Theory Model for Socially Desirable Behavior | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃宏宇(Hung-Yu Huang),游琇婷(Hsiu-Ting Yu),張育瑋(Yu-Wei Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社會期許,試題反應理論,多向度評等量尺模式, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | socially desirable behavior,item response theory model,multidimensional rating scale model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 62 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900056 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.74 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
