Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 公共衛生碩士學位學程
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71648
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor方啟泰(Chi-Tai Fang)
dc.contributor.authorKai-Ping Lanen
dc.contributor.author藍凱平zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T06:05:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-05
dc.date.copyright2019-03-05
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-01-18
dc.identifier.citation1. WHO. Poisoning Prevention and Management. Available at: https://www.who.int/ipcs/poisons/en/.
2. Jesslin J, Adepu R, Churi S. Assessment of Prevalence and Mortality Incidences Due to Poisoning in a South Indian Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2010;72:587-91. doi: 10.4103/0250-474x.78525.
3. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Zimmerman A, Schauben JL. 2015 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 33rd Annual Report. Clinical Toxicology 2016;54:924-1109. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1245421.
4. 楊振昌, 洪憲忠, 薩支興, 陳淑炫, 鄧昭芳. 台灣地區自民國74年至民國82年中毒個案之統計資料分析. 疫情報導 1995;11:139-58.
5. 衛生福利部. 106年度死因統計. Available at: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-3960-113.html.
6. Tang YM, Zhang L, Pan JJ, et al. Unintentional Poisoning in China, 1990 to 2015: The Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. American Journal of Public Health 2017;107:1311-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2017.303841.
7. Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Fraser MO, Banner W. Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 34th Annual Report (vol 55, pg 1072, 2017). Clinical Toxicology 2017;55. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1415423.
8. 卢筱洪, 谭玮, 吕锡锋, 罗和生. 160例急性中毒患者流行病学调查. 數理醫藥學雜誌 2010;23:677-9.
9. Gross SA, Paustenbach DJ. Shanghai Health Study (2001-2009): What was learned about benzene health effects? Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2018;48:217-51. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2017.1401581.
10. Wang LJ, Wu Y, Yin P, et al. Poisoning deaths in China, 2006-2016. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2018;96:314-+. doi: 10.2471/blt.17.203943.
11. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: Annual Report 2015. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 2016;23:358-70.
12. Shin SD, Suh GJ, Rhee JE, Sung J, Kim J. Epidemiologic characteristics of death by poisoning in 1991-2001 in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science 2004;19:186-94. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.2.186.
13. Cha ES, Khang YH, Lee WJ. Mortality from and Incidence of Pesticide Poisoning in South Korea: Findings from National Death and Health Utilization Data between 2006 and 2010. Plos One 2014;9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095299.
14. Shadnia S, Esmaily H, Sasanian G, Pajoumand A, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Abdollahi M. Pattern of acute poisoning in Tehran-Iran in 2003. Human & Experimental Toxicology 2007;26:753-6. doi: 10.1177/0960327107083017.
15. Islambulchilar M, Islambulchilar Z, Kargar-Maher MH. Acute adult poisoning cases admitted to a university hospital in Tabriz, Iran. Human & Experimental Toxicology 2009;28:185-90. doi: 10.1177/0960327108099679.
16. Guloglu C, Kara IH. Acute poisoning cases admitted to a university hospital emergency department in Diyarbakir, Turkey. Human & Experimental Toxicology 2005;24:49-54. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht499oa.
17. Krakowiak A, Piekarska-Wijatkowska A, Kobza-Sindlewska K, et al. POISONING DEATHS IN POLAND: TYPES AND FREQUENCIES REPORTED IN LODZ, KRAKOW, SOSNOWIEC, GDANSK, WROCLAW AND POZNAN DURING 2009-2013. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 2017;30:897-908. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01063.
18. Hovda KE, Bjornaas MA, Skog K, et al. Acute poisonings treated in hospitals in Oslo: A one-year prospective study (I): Pattern of poisoning. Clinical Toxicology 2008;46:35-41. doi: 10.1080/15563650601185969.
19. Lee HL, Lin HJ, Yeh STY, Chi CH, Guo HR. Etiology and outcome of patients presenting for poisoning to the emergency department in Taiwan: a prospective study. Human & Experimental Toxicology 2008;27:373-9. doi: 10.1177/0960327108094609.
20. 林稜傑, 林增記, 施曜綸, 蔡錦蓮, 蔡米山. The Patients Presented in Emergency Department with Poisoning Exposure, 1995-2002. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Taiwan 2003;5:181-9.
21. 洪宇箴, 白璐, 高森永, 簡戊鑑. 臺灣藥物意外中毒死亡及住院趨勢,1999-2008. 北市醫學雜誌 2010;7:221-34. doi: 10.6200/TCMJ.2010.7.3.03.
22. Chien WC, Chung CH, Lin CH, Lai CH. A nationwide evidence-based study of factors associated with hospitalisations due to unintentional poisoning and poisoning mortality in Taiwan. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 2013;20:295-301. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2012.724689.
23. Persson HE, Sjöberg GK, Haines JA, De Garbino JP. Poisoning severity score. Grading of acute poisoning. Journal of Toxicology - Clinical Toxicology 1998;36:205-13.
24. Churi S, Ramesh M, Bhakta K, Chris J. Prospective assessment of patterns, severity and clinical outcome of Indian poisoning incidents. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2012;60:859-64.
25. 刘毅, 陈兵, 杨丽敏, 刘健, 赵华杰, 天津医科大学第二医院急诊科. 中毒严重度评分在急性中毒患者中的应用. 中国急救医学 2009:836-8.
26. 施小燕, 洪玉才, 江观玉, 何小军. 中毒严重度评分和APACHE-Ⅱ在中毒评估应用中的对比研究. 中華急診醫學雜誌 2007;16:65-7.
27. Yuan SX, Gao YS, Ji WQ, Song JS, Mei X. The evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, poisoning severity score, sequential organ failure assessment score combine with lactate to assess the prognosis of the patients with acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning. Medicine 2018;97. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000010862.
28. Sam KG, Kondabolu K, Pati D, Kamath A, Kumar GP, Rao PGM. Poisoning severity score, APACHE II and GCS: Effective clinical indices for estimating severity and predicting outcome of acute organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2009;16:239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.12.004.
29. Konradsen F, van der Hoek W, Cole DC, et al. Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries - options for restricting the availability of pesticides. Toxicology 2003;192:249-61. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00339-1.
30. 陳楚杰, 葉瑞垣, 李中一, 陳靖宜, 洪湘雯. 台灣地區自殺身亡率及其相關因素之研究:1997-2003. 台灣公共衛生雜誌 2010;29:201-15. doi: 10.6288/tjph2010-29-03-02.
31. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet 2009;373:1372-81. doi: Doi 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60372-X
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71648-
dc.description.abstract目的:在臺灣,過去資料顯示中毒的發生率每千人約在 0.16 - 0.22 人之間,經常造成中毒者需要至急診就醫,甚至住院或死亡,因此想藉由科學研究方式,了解影響急診中毒病患嚴重程度的相關因子,進而做為臨床人員照護策略上的參考及相關公共衛生當局訂定中毒預防策略之用。
方法:本研究為前瞻性之觀察性研究,透過病歷資料回顧,收錄民國104年1月1日至105年12月31日因中毒至某醫學中心急診就醫之病患共1136例,並將病患之中毒嚴重度分為嚴重及輕微兩組,以邏輯回歸加以分析並計算勝算比,進而得知影響中毒嚴重度的因子。
結果:在病患來源方面,透過轉診就醫之病患中毒較嚴重的機會為自行就醫病患的2.33倍(95% C.I.:1.338-3.813);中毒原因方面,蓄意中毒病患族群中毒較嚴重的機會為非蓄意中毒族群的2.9倍(95% C.I.:1.844-6.320);中毒物質方面,農藥中毒的病患族群產生嚴重後果的機會為西藥中毒族群的2.09倍(95% C.I.:1.419-4.135),生物毒素中毒族群產生嚴重後果的機會為西藥中毒族群的0.12倍(95% C.I.:-0.935-0.392)。
結論:透過轉診就醫、蓄意中毒、農藥中毒之病患族群產生嚴重後果的機會較高,臨床人員需要對這些中毒病患族群多加留意,可能需要住院甚至是住加護病房觀察;在公共衛生的觀點,因為農藥中毒產生嚴重後果的機會較高以及蓄意中毒病患族群大多數原因是自殺、自傷,因此透過政策對農藥取得管道的管制及對自殺、自傷之高危險族群進行自殺防治才能促進人民的健康,減少醫療上的支出。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In Taiwan, the incidence of poisoned are 0.16-0.22 per 1000 people, and that usually caused emergency department visited and even hospitalization or death. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the factors that affected the poisoning severity score(PSS) in poisoned people who visited emergency department by scientific research method, in order to help clinical employee developing their care strategy, and to help public health authorities making the policies for poisoning prevention.
Methods: This is a prospective observational study, by using the medical chart review, and enrolled the poisoned people who visited the northern medical center in 1 January, 2015 to 31 December, 2016, total 1136 cases. And divided this 1136 cases into two groups (mild or severe) by poisoning severity score, then using the Logistic regression model to analyze and calculate odds ratios, finally, to determine the factors that affecting the severity of poisoning.
Results: In the aspect of where patient came from, compared to the patients who came to emergency department directly, the patients who transferred from other hospital had 2.33 times chance to be the severe group (95% C.I.:1.338-3.813); In the reason of poisoning, compared to unintentional group, the intentional group had 2.9 times chance to be the severe group (95% C.I.:1.844-6.320); In the substances of poisoning, compared to medical medications group, the pesticide group had 2.09 times chance to be the severe group (95% C.I.:1.419-4.135), and the biotoxin group had 0.12 times chance to be the severe group (95% C.I.:-0.935-0.392).
Conclusion: The patient who visited emergent department via other hospital referral, intentional poisoned, or pesticide intoxication had more chance to be the poisoned severe group, clinical care staffs should pay more attentions to those groups, they might need hospital admission or even intensive care unit for further care and management. In the aspect of public health, pesticide intoxication patients had more chance to be the severe group and almost all the reasons of intentional poisoned were suicide or self-harmed behaviors, thus, restricting the assess and availability of pesticide and early prevention strategies to high risk groups of self-harmed or suicide by policies making could improve people’s health and reduce the expenditure of medical care system.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:05:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-R04847037-1.pdf: 1276788 bytes, checksum: b8f89a6efd93627fd437af4284de6e71 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 .................................................................................................. i
謝辭 .......................................................................................................................... ii
摘要 .......................................................................................................................... iii
ABSTRACT ….......................................................................................................... iv
目錄 ........................................................................................................................... v
圖表目錄 ................................................................................................................... vi
第一章 導論 .............................................................................................................. 1
第一節 實習單位特色與簡介 .................................................................................. 1
第二節 文獻回顧 ….................................................................................................. 2
壹、國外中毒個案概況 ............................................................................................ 2
貳、國內中毒個案概況 ............................................................................................ 4
參、中毒嚴重度(Poisoning Severity Score, PSS) ...................................................... 5
第三節 研究缺口及研究動機 ................................................................................... 6
第四節 研究目的與研究問題 ................................................................................... 6
第二章 方法 ............................................................................................................... 7
第三章 結果 ............................................................................................................... 8
第一節 描述性統計 …............................................................................................... 8
第二節 推論性統計 .................................................................................................. 10
壹、單一變項Logistic regression ............................................................................. 10
貳、多變項Logistic regression ................................................................................. 12
第四章 討論 .............................................................................................................. 14
第一節 研究結果探討及限制 .................................................................................. 14
第二節 對實習單位之回饋 ...................................................................................... 15
第三節 相關政策上之建議 ...................................................................................... 16
參考文獻 .................................................................................................................... 17
附錄一 中毒嚴重度POISONING SEVERITY SCORE (PSS) ................................ 20
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title急診中毒病患之中毒嚴重度與相關因素分析-以北部某醫學中心為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Analysis of Poisoning Severity Score and Their Associated Factors in Poisoned Patients Visited Emergency Department – A Study of One Medical Center in Northern Taiwan.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear107-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor陳燕嘉(Yen-Chia Chen)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee侯重光(Chorng-Kuang How)
dc.subject.keyword中毒病患,急診,中毒嚴重度,邏輯迴歸,前瞻性研究,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordpoisoned patients,emergency department,poisoning severity score,Logistic regression,prospective study,en
dc.relation.page23
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201900121
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2019-01-18
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept公共衛生碩士學位學程zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:公共衛生碩士學位學程

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.25 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved