請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71612完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meng-xue Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王夢雪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:04:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-01-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 方裕民（2011），幽默設計的認知歷程與失諧實驗。未出版博士論文。國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所，台北。
2. 台北市文化局（2014），臺北市都市品味行動綱領。 3. 吳明隆（2006）。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。知城數位科技股份有限公司。 4. 李素馨（1999），都市視覺景觀偏好之研究。都市與計劃，26（1），19-40。 5. 杜政修（2008），幽默商品設計之研究。未出版碩士論文。成功大學工業設計研究所，台南。 6. 林晏州（2005），景觀之大眾偏好評估方法，景觀遊憩研究室。 7. 周孟慈（2005），自然旅遊環境之遊憩體驗與生心理效益之研究，內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處研究報告。 8. 岳曉東（2012），幽默心理學：思考與研究（初版）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。 9. 邱發忠（1999），幽默創造訓練之課程設計及效果評估研究。未出版之碩士論文，私立輔仁大學應用心理學研究所，新北。 10. 胡品清（1986），法國文學中的幽默，聯合文學，12-17。 11. 高源令（1991），談兒童[幽默]。創造思考教育，（3），44-45。 12. 張文哲、洪光遠、邱發忠、蘇文賢（譯）（2012）。Zimbardo’s普通心理學：核心概念。學富文化：台灣。(Philip G. Zimbardo、Robert L. Johnson、Vivian McCann, Psychology : core concepts, 6th ed) 13. 張如鈞（1990），幼兒圖畫書在幼稚園教學上的運用，中華民國兒童文學學會會訊，6-11。 14. 張春興（1991）。現代心理學。東華書局：台北。 15. 張春興、楊國樞（1989）。心理學。東華書局：台北。 16. 許雁婷（2012），場所中公共藝術的自然度、情緒反應與景觀偏好之關係。未出版碩士論文。東海大學景觀學系，台中。 17. 陳皎眉、林宜旻、徐富珍、孫旻暐、張滿玲（2015）。心理學（二版）。雙葉書廊：台灣。 18. 喬建中（2003）。情緒研究: 理論與方法。南京師範大學出版社：南京。 19. 游恆山（譯）（2014）。心理學（6版）。五南出版社：台北。(Richard J. Gerrig, Psychology and Life) 20. 游莞瑋、林晏州（1999），植栽量體及色彩對降低焦慮情緒效果之研究，45（4），387-394。 21. 黃孝璋（2007），景觀偏好、注意力恢復力及心理生理反應之相關性研究。碩士論文。臺灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。 22. 萬年、世茂（1992），中西方幽默之源流及差異。揚州大學學報，人文社會科學版，(4)，55-59。 23. 廖軍豪（2004），產品設計的幽默屬性與認知歷程。碩士論文。台灣科技大學設計研究所，台北。 24. 劉佩雲（1990），性別、創造力、自我檢校與幽默感的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，全國博碩士論文，台北。 25. 蔡鋒樺、吳汶蘭（2017），情境特質焦慮與潛水測試動作表現之相關性探討。通識學刊：理念與實務，5(2)，75-93。 26. 鄭昭明（1993）。認知心理學：理論與實踐。桂冠圖書公司：台北 27. Abdulkarim, D., & Nasar, J. L. (2014). Are livable elements also restorative? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 29-38. 28. Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4). doi:10.1515/humr.15.4.365 29. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. 30. Attardo, S. (1997). The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 10(4), 395-420. 31. Bell, N. J., McGhee, P. E., & Duffey, N. S. (1986). Interpersonal competence, social assertiveness and the development of humour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 51-55. 32. Berk, L. S., Tan, S. A., Fry, W. F., Napier, B. J., Lee, J. W., Hubbard, R. W., ... & Eby, W. C. (1989). Neuroendocrine and stress hormone changes during mirthful laughter. The American journal of the medical sciences, 298(6), 390-396. 33. Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249-259. 34. Berto, R., Massaccesi, S., & Pasini, M. (2008). Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan's fascination hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 185-191. 35. Braden, R., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., & Jamin, S. (1997). Resource reservation protocol (RSVP)--Version 1 functional specification (No. RFC 2205). 36. Bruehl, S., Carlson, C. R., & McCubbin, J. A. (1993). Two brief interventions for acute pain. Pain, 54(1), 29-36. 37. Cackowski, J. M., & Nasar, J. L. (2003). The restorative effects of roadside vegetation: Implications for automobile driver anger and frustration. Environment and Behavior, 35(6), 736-751. 38. Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health psychology, 7(3), 269. 39. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310. 40. Cole, D. N., & Hall, T. E. (2010). Experiencing the restorative components of wilderness environments: Does congestion interfere and does length of exposure matter?. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 806-823. 41. Dantzer, R., & Mormede, P. (1995). Psychoneuroimmunology of stress. 42. Danzer, A., Dale, J. A., & Klions, H. L. (1990). Effect of exposure to humorous stimuli on induced depression. Psychol Rep, 66(3 Pt 1), 1027-1036. doi:10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.1027 43. Davitz, L. J., & Pendleton, S. H. (1969). Nurses' inferences of suffering. Nursing Research. 44. Dienstbier, R. A. (1995). The Impact of Humor on Energy, Tension, Task Choices, and Attributions: Exploring Hypotheses from Toughness Theory. Motivation and emotion, 19(4), 255. 45. Dixon, N. F. (1980). Humor: A cognitive alternative to stress? In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 7, pp. 281-289). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. 46. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). Cultivated emotions: Parental socialization of positive emotions and self-conscious emotions. Psychological Inquiry, 9(4), 279-281. 47. Fry, W. F. (1994). The biology of humor. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 7(2), 111-126. 48. Fry, W. F., & Rader, C. (1977). The respiratory components of mirthful laughter. Journal of Biological Psychology. 49. Fry, W. F., & Savin, W. M. (1988). Mirthful laughter and blood pressure. 50. Hampes, W. P. (1992). Relation between intimacy and humor. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 127-130. 51. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(2), 109-123. 52. Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Institutet för bostads-och urbanforskning. 53. Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian housing and planning research, 14(4), 175-194. 54. Hempelmann, C. F., & Samson, A. C. (2008). Cartoons: drawn jokes. The primer of humor research, 609-640. 55. Herzog, T. R., & Strevey, S. J. (2008). Contact With Nature, Sense of Humor, and Psychological Well-Being. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 747-776. doi:10.1177/0013916507308524 56. Herzog, T. R., Kropscott, L. A. (2004). Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of preference and perceived danger in forest settings without pathway. Environment and Behavior, 36(5), 659-677 57. Herzog, T. R., Maguire, P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 159-170. 58. Hubert, W., & de Jong-Meyer, R. (1991). Autonomic, neuroendocrine, and subjective responses to emotion-inducing film stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 11(2), 131-140. 59. Hubert, W., Möller, M., & de Jong-Meyer, R. (1993). Film-induced amusement changes in saliva cortisol levels. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 18(4), 265-272. 60. Jones, J. M. (1970). Cognitive factors in the appreciation of humor: A theoretical and experimental analysis (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning). 61. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. 62. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. CUP Archive. 63. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Island Press. 64. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 65. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and EnvironmentǻFunctioning in an Uncertain World. New York: Praeger. 66. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and EnvironmentǻFunctioning in an Uncertain World. New York: Praeger. 67. Karmanov, D., & Hamel, R. (2008). Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2), 115-125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.004 68. Klein, R. (2016). Humor in Architecture: Jewish Wit on Béla Lajta's Buildings. Ars Judaica The Bar Ilan Journal of Jewish Art, 12, 93-110. 69. Korotkov, D., & Hannah, T. E. (1994). Extraversion and emotionality as proposed superordinate stress moderators: A prospective analysi.pdf. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 787-792. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90220-8 70. Kuiper, N. A., & Martin, R. A. (1998). Laughter and stress in daily life: Relation to positive and negative affect. Motivation and emotion, 22(2), 133-153. 71. Kuiper, N. A., Martin, R. A., & Olinger, L. J. (1993). Coping humor, stress, and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 25, 81-96. 72. L. Fredrickson, B., & Levenson, R. W. (1998). Positive emotions speed recovery from the cardiovascular sequelae of negative emotions. Cognition & emotion, 12(2), 191-220. 73. Labott, S. M., & Martin, R. B. (1987). The Stress-moderating Effects of Weeping and Humor. Journal of Human Stress, 13(4), 159-164. doi:10.1080/0097840x.1987.9936809 74. Lefcourt, H. M. (2001). Humor: The psychology of living buoyantly. Springer Science & Business Media. 75. Lefcourt, H. M., & Thomas, S. (1998). Humor and stress revisited. The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic, 179-202. 76. Levi, L. (1965). The urinary output of adrenalin and noradrenalin during pleasant and unpleasant emotional states: A preliminary report. Psychosomatic Medicine, 27(1), 80-85. 77. Martin, R. A. (2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: methodological issues and research findings. Psychol Bull, 127(4), 504-519. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.504 78. Martin, R. A., & Dobbin, J. P. (1989). Sense of humor, hassles, and immunoglobulin A: evidence for a stress-moderating effect of humor. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 18(2), 93-105. 79. Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Academic press. 80. Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods.pdf. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(6), 1313-1324. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1313 81. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. 82. Masten, A. S. (1986). Humor and competence in school-aged children. Child development, 461-473. 83. McGhee, P. E., & Pistolesi, E. (1979). Humor: Its origin and development (p. 208). San Francisco: WH Freeman. 84. Moran, C. C. (1996). Short-Term Mood Change, Perceived Funniness, and the Effect of Humor Stimuli. Behavioral Medicine, 22(1), 32-38. doi:10.1080/08964289.1996.9933763 85. Nerhardt, G. (1970). Humor and inclination to laugh: Emotional reactions to stimuli of different divergence from a range of expectancy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 185-195. 86. Nijholt, A. (2015). Designing Humor for Playable Cities. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2175-2182. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.358 87. Nijholt, A. (2015). The humor continuum: from text to smart environments (keynote paper). Paper presented at the Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), 2015 International Conference on. 88. Nijholt, A. (2017). Mischief Humor in Smart and Playable Cities. In A. Nijholt (Ed.), Playable Cities: The City as a Digital Playground (pp. 235-253). Singapore: Springer Singapore. 89. O'Connell, W. E. (1976). Freudian humour: The eupsychia of everyday life. 90. O'leary, A. (1990). Stress, emotion, and human immune function. Psychological bulletin, 108(3), 363. 91. Orth-Gomér, K., Eriksson, I., Moser, V., Theorell, T., & Fredlund, P. (1994). Lipid lowering through work stress reduction. International journal of behavioral medicine, 1(3), 204-214. 92. Porterfield, A. L. (1987). Does sense of humor moderate the impact of life stress on psychological and physical well-being? Journal of Research in Personality, 21(3), 306-317. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(87)90013-4 93. Rothbart, M. K. (1973). Laughter in young children. Psychological bulletin, 80(3), 247. 94. Rothbart, M. K. (1976). Incongruity, problem-solving and laughter. Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, 37-54. 95. Ruch, W. (1997). State and trait cheerfulness and the induction of exhilaration: A FACS study.pdf. European Psychologist, 2(4), 328-341. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.2.4.328 96. Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38(2), 311. 97. Russell, J. A., & Snodgrass, J. (1987). Emotion and the environment. Handbook of environmental psychology, 1(1), 245-81. 98. Safranek, R., & Schill, T. (1982). Coping with Stress: Does Humor Help. Psychological Reports, 51(1), 222-222. doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.1.222 99. San Juan, C., Subiza-Pérez, M., & Vozmediano, L. (2017). Restoration and the City: The Role of Public Urban Squares. 8(2093). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02093 100. Shultz, T. R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children's appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13(3), 456-477. 101. Shultz, T. R. (1976). A cognitive-developmental analysis of humour. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 11-36). Piscataway, NJ, US: Transaction Publishers. 102. Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L. Vagg, P.R. & Jacobs, G.A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. CA: Consulting Psychologists. 103. Stone, A. A., Cox, D. S., Valdimarsdottir, H., Jandorf, L., & Neale, J. M. (1987). Evidence that secretory IgA antibody is associated with daily mood. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(5), 988. 104. Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues, 1, 81-100. 105. Svebak, S., Götestam, K. G., & Jensen, E. N. (2004). The significance of sense of humor, life regard, and stressors for bodily complaints among high school students. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 67-83. 106. Szabo, A. (2003). The Acute Effects of Humor and Exercise on Mood and Anxiety. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(2), 152-162. doi:10.1080/00222216.2003.11949988 107. Szabo, A., Ainsworth, S. E., & Danks, P. K. (2005). Experimental comparison of the psychological benefits of aerobic exercise, humor, and music. Humor, 18(3). doi:10.1515/humr.2005.18.3.235 108. Trice, A. D., & Price-Greathouse, J. (1986). Joking under the drill: A validity study of the CHS. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 265-266. 109. Valdimarsdottir, H. B., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (1997). Positive and negative mood: Association with natural killer cell activity. Psychology and Health, 12(3), 319-327. 110. Vilaythong, A. P., Arnau, R. C., Rosen, D. H., & Mascaro, N. (2003). Humor and hope: Can humor increase hope? Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 16(1). doi:10.1515/humr.2003.006 111. Wicker, F. W., Thorelli, I. M., Barron III, W. L., & Ponder, M. R. (1981). Relationships among affective and cognitive factors in humor. Journal of Research in Personality, 15(3), 359-370. 112. Yang, T. H., & Chen, Y. (2013). Preliminary Discussion on Methods of Sculpture Design in Urban Landscape Environment. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 409-410, 738-741. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.409-410.738 113. Zigler, E., Levine, J., & Gould, L. (1967). Cognitive challenge as a factor in children's humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(3), 332. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71612 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 生活在都市環境的人們，其生心理健康狀態與環境緊密相關，景觀環境如何使人們在枯燥的都市環境中也能緩解緊張、得到放鬆是一個重要的議題。將幽默感帶入景觀環境中，可以調節人們的情緒、舒緩壓力，同時提升其生活品質。
本研究有兩個目的，一是探索並分析景觀中的幽默，從而對含有幽默意涵的景觀進行定義；二是瞭解幽默景觀如何影響人的心理效益，重點考察人觀看幽默景觀後的情緒體驗、狀態焦慮之變化以及觀賞偏好。研究分為三步驟：1.以幽默的景觀案例作為蒐集對象，包括都市環境、自然環境中的公共藝術、建築等一切讓人可以感到好笑的景觀案例，挑選出35張照片為第二階段之樣本；2.情緒形容詞蒐集，其結果用作發展正式問卷之情緒體驗之問項，以第一階段篩選之案例照片作為受測樣本，對情緒形容詞進行蒐集與分析，獲得20個情緒形容詞，並篩選出正式問卷之案例照片15張；3.正式問卷調查，測量幽默景觀對受試者的心理效益。 研究結果：1.幽默景觀會影響人的情緒體驗，並且以「創意的」和「有趣的」等幽默景觀之特徵感受最為強烈；2.幽默景觀可以影響狀態焦慮，有緩解壓力的效果；幽默景觀之情緒體驗對觀賞偏好的影響顯著。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The psychophysical health of the people, living in urban areas, is closely associated with the environment. Accordingly the issue that how the landscape environment helps people to relieve stress and relax is of significance. Bringing the human sense into the landscape environment can neutralize emotions and simultaneously improve life quality.
There are two aims of this study: the one is to explore the human sense embedded in the landscape, in order to identify the humorous landscape; the other is to understand how the humorous landscape makes impact on people’s psychological benefits, focusing on their emotional experiences, changes in state anxiety, and preferences for landscape after watching the humorous landscapes. Three steps are taken in my research: first, I collect the photographs of the humorous landscapes, selecting 35 pictures as the sample of the second stage; then, based on the 35 photos earlier mentioned, I gather adjective vocabulary, obtain 20 adjective words for the options for the emotional experience, and select 15 pictures as the case photographs for the formal questionnaire; following that I do the questionnaire research, measuring the participants’ psychological benefits to the humorous landscapes. My research result consists of two parts: on the one side, the humorous landscapes, particularly those innovative and funny, exert influence on people’s emotional experiences, on the other side, the humorous landscapes can effectively affect people’s state anxiety and help them relieve stress. The emotional experience of watching the humorous landscapes makes great impact on the landscape preference. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:04:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R02628318-1.pdf: 9697237 bytes, checksum: aa6e9cf70ac466518d556f34972126f4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景與動機 1 1.2研究目的 2 1.3研究內容 2 1.4研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 2.1研究名詞定義 4 2.1.1幽默的定義 4 2.1.2幽默景觀的定義 7 2.2幽默理論的探討 8 2.2.1幽默的理解歷程 8 2.2.2失諧-解困理論 11 2.2.3幽默的健康效益 15 2.2.4幽默景觀失諧之特性 19 2.2.5小結 22 2.3景觀的心理效益相關理論與研究 23 2.3.1情緒體驗理論與相關研究 23 2.3.2壓力相關理論 27 2.3.3景觀偏好相關理論 29 2.3.4小結 31 第三章 研究設計 32 3.1研究架構及假設 32 3.2研究步驟 33 3.2.1前測結果 34 3.2.2正式問卷之情緒形容詞及受測樣本篩選規則 38 3.3幽默景觀樣本篩選 39 3.4研究變項 40 3.4.1情緒體驗 40 3.4.2狀態焦慮 42 3.4.3觀賞偏好 44 3.5研究工具 45 3.6研究對象與分析方法 47 3.6.1研究對象 47 3.6.2分析方法 47 第四章 結果分析 49 4.1樣本敘述 49 4.1.1樣本特性分析 49 4.1.2受測者基本資料敘述 50 4.2情緒體驗之結果 54 4.2.1情緒體驗信度分析 54 4.2.2情緒體驗之敘述性統計 55 4.2.3情緒體驗之因素分析 56 4.3狀態焦慮之結果 58 4.3.1狀態焦慮之敘述性分析 58 4.3.2情緒體驗影響狀態焦慮之分析 58 4.4觀賞偏好之結果 60 4.4.1偏好程度之敘述性分析 60 4.4.2情緒體驗影響觀賞偏好之分析 61 第五章 結論 64 5.1幽默景觀影響人的情緒體驗 64 5.2幽默景觀可以緩解狀態焦慮 66 5.3幽默景觀之情緒體驗會影響人的觀賞偏好 66 第六章 後續建議與討論 68 參考文獻 70 附錄一 78 附錄二 89 附錄三 102 附錄四 106 附錄五 112 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 幽默景觀的情緒、壓力效益與觀賞偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Emotional, Stress Benefits, and Preference of Humor Landscapes | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州,林寶秀,張伯茹,歐聖榮 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 幽默,景觀,失諧-解困理論,心理效益, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Humor,Landscape,Incongruity-resolution theory,Psychological benefits, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 141 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900166 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 9.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。