請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71591
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊啟伸(Chi-Shen Yang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張煜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:04:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Department, F.a.A., Fishery Statistical Database - Collections Global Aquaculture Production. 2018, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
2. Integrated Taxonomic Information System on-line database. 2018. 3. 邵廣昭. 台灣魚類資料庫. 2018 12-06; Available from: http://fishdb.sinica.edu.tw. 4. Nations, F.a.A.O.o.t.U., The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals. 2018. 5. 胡興華, 臺灣漁業的歷史與文化, in 海洋文化學刊. 2006. p. 25-48. 6. 林全洲, 台灣鯛的奇蹟與危機, in 聯合報. 2006. 7. 曾達輝, 吳郭魚 跳龍門.身價百倍 郭啟彰 話當年.晚境清苦, in 民生報. 1986. 8. 陳明成, 吳郭魚之父 郭啟彰明天公祭 冒險帶回魚苗養殖 身後未留下代表事蹟紀念 子孫感到遺憾, in 聯合報. 2000. 9. 胡興華, 吳郭魚傳奇. 1997, 行政院農委會漁業署。漁業推廣. p. 36-42. 10. 李健全, 吳郭魚單性養殖之理論與實際. 1979, 中國水產. p. 11-13. 11. Pechsiri, J. and A. Yakupitiyage, A comparative study of growth and feed utilization efficiency of sex-reversed diploid and triploid Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. 2005. 36(1): p. 45-51. 12. Swingle, H.S., Comparative Evaluation of Two Tilapias as Pondfishes in Alabama. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1960. 89(2): p. 142-148. 13. Yamamoto, T.O.J.J.o.E.Z., Artificially induced sex‐reversal in genotypic males of the medaka (Oryzias latipes). 1953. 123(3): p. 571-594. 14. Wohlfarth, G.W. and H. Wedekind, The heredity of sex determination in tilapias. Aquaculture, 1991. 92: p. 143-156. 15. Cnaani, A., et al., Genetics of sex determination in tilapiine species. Sex Dev, 2008. 2(1): p. 43-54. 16. Wohlfarth, G.W., The unexploited potential of tilapia hybrids in aquaculture. Aquaculture Research, 1994. 25(8): p. 781-788. 17. Hutchings, J.A. and D.J. Fraser, The nature of fisheries- and farming-induced evolution. Molecular Ecology, 2007. 17(1): p. 294-313. 18. Graves, J.A.M., The rise and fall of SRY. Trends in Genetics, 2002. 18(5): p. 259-264. 19. Smith, C.A., et al., The avian Z-linked gene DMRT1 is required for male sex determination in the chicken. Nature, 2009. 461(7261): p. 267. 20. Mawaribuchi, S., et al., Sex chromosome differentiation and the W-and Z-specific loci in Xenopus laevis. 2017. 426(2): p. 393-400. 21. Yoshimoto, S., et al., A W-linked DM-domain gene, DM-W, participates in primary ovary development in Xenopus laevis. 2008. 105(7): p. 2469-2474. 22. Ottolenghi, C., et al., Loss of Wnt4 and Foxl2 leads to female-to-male sex reversal extending to germ cells. 2007. 16(23): p. 2795-2804. 23. Lavery, R., et al., Testicular differentiation occurs in absence of R-spondin1 and Sox9 in mouse sex reversals. 2012. 8(12): p. e1003170. 24. Nanda, I., et al., A duplicated copy of DMRT1 in the sex-determining region of the Y chromosome of the medaka, Oryzias latipes. 2002. 99(18): p. 11778-11783. 25. Matsuda, M., et al., DMY is a Y-specific DM-domain gene required for male development in the medaka fish. 2002. 417(6888): p. 559. 26. Myosho, T., et al., Tracing the emergence of a novel sex-determining gene in medaka, Oryzias luzonensis. 2012: p. genetics. 111.137497. 27. Takehana, Y., et al., Co-option of Sox3 as the male-determining factor on the Y chromosome in the fish Oryzias dancena. 2014. 5: p. 4157. 28. Hattori, R.S., et al., A Y-linked anti-Müllerian hormone duplication takes over a critical role in sex determination. 2012. 109(8): p. 2955-2959. 29. Li, M., et al., A tandem duplicate of anti-müllerian hormone with a missense SNP on the Y chromosome is essential for male sex determination in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. 2015. 11(11): p. e1005678. 30. Capel, B., Vertebrate sex determination: evolutionary plasticity of a fundamental switch. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2017. 18: p. 675. 31. Pan, Q., et al., Vertebrate sex-determining genes play musical chairs. 2016. 339(7-8): p. 258-262. 32. Barske, L.A., B.J.C.o.i.g. Capel, and development, Blurring the edges in vertebrate sex determination. 2008. 18(6): p. 499-505. 33. Devlin, R.H. and Y.J.A. Nagahama, Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. 2002. 208(3-4): p. 191-364. 34. Eisen, M.B., et al., Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. 1998. 95(25): p. 14863-14868. 35. Sun, Y.-L., et al., Screening and characterization of sex-linked DNA markers and marker-assisted selection in the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). 2014. 433: p. 19-27. 36. Gammerdinger, W.J., et al., Structure and decay of a proto-Y region in Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. 2014. 15(1): p. 975. 37. Venter, J.C., et al., The Sequence of the Human Genome. Science, 2001. 291(5507): p. 1304. 38. Mardis, E.R., The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends in Genetics, 2008. 24(3): p. 133-141. 39. Luo, C., et al., Direct Comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 Sequencing Technologies on the Same Microbial Community DNA Sample. PLOS ONE, 2012. 7(2): p. e30087. 40. Schuster, S.C.J.N.m., Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. 2007. 5(1): p. 16. 41. Rothberg, J.M., et al., An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature, 2011. 475: p. 348. 42. Metzker, M.L.J.N.r.g., Sequencing technologies—the next generation. 2010. 11(1): p. 31. 43. Rhoads, A., K.F.J.G. Au, proteomics, and bioinformatics, PacBio sequencing and its applications. 2015. 13(5): p. 278-289. 44. Eid, J., et al., Real-Time DNA Sequencing from Single Polymerase Molecules. Science, 2009. 323(5910): p. 133. 45. Branton, D., et al., The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nature Biotechnology, 2008. 26: p. 1146. 46. Mikheyev, A.S. and M.M.J.M.e.r. Tin, A first look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer. 2014. 14(6): p. 1097-1102. 47. Zhang, X., et al., Improving genome assemblies by sequencing PCR products with PacBio. 2012. 53(1): p. 61-62. 48. Ferrarini, M., et al., An evaluation of the PacBio RS platform for sequencing and de novo assembly of a chloroplast genome. 2013. 14(1): p. 670. 49. Goodwin, S., et al., Oxford Nanopore sequencing, hybrid error correction, and de novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome. 2015. 50. Latest Assembly of NCBI. 2018-12-17. 51. Assembly version information of Nile Tilipia. 06-29. 52. Brawand, D., et al., The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in African cichlid fish. Nature, 2014. 513(7518): p. 375-381. 53. Kocher, T.D., Oreochromis niloticus isolate F11D_XX, whole genome shotgun sequencing project. 54. Kofler, R., R.V. Pandey, and C. Schlotterer, PoPoolation2: identifying differentiation between populations using sequencing of pooled DNA samples (Pool-Seq). Bioinformatics, 2011. 27(24): p. 3435-6. 55. Sahraeian, S.M.E., et al., Gaining comprehensive biological insight into the transcriptome by performing a broad-spectrum RNA-seq analysis. Nature Communications, 2017. 8(1): p. 59. 56. Kim, D., B. Langmead, and S.L. Salzberg, HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods, 2015. 12(4): p. 357-60. 57. Pertea, M., et al., Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nature protocols, 2016. 11(9): p. 1650-1667. 58. Frazee, A.C., et al., Ballgown bridges the gap between transcriptome assembly and expression analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 2015. 33: p. 243. 59. Bolger, A.M., M. Lohse, and B. Usadel, Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2014. 30(15): p. 2114-2120. 60. Martin, M., Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. 2011, 2011. 17(1): p. 3 %J EMBnet.journal. 61. Joshi, N. and J. Fass, Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33)[Software]. 2011. 62. Aronesty, E.J.T.O.B.J., Comparison of sequencing utility programs. 2013. 7(1). 63. Lindgreen, S.J.B.r.n., AdapterRemoval: easy cleaning of next-generation sequencing reads. 2012. 5(1): p. 337. 64. Li, H., et al., The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 2009. 25(16): p. 2078-9. 65. Danecek, P., et al., The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. 27(15): p. 2156-2158. 66. Tarasov, A., et al., Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics, 2015. 31(12): p. 2032-4. 67. McKenna, A., et al., The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res, 2010. 20(9): p. 1297-303. 68. Love, M.I., W. Huber, and S.J.G.B. Anders, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. 2014. 15(12): p. 550. 69. Ritchie, M.E., et al., limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research, 2015. 43(7): p. e47-e47. 70. Robinson, M.D., D.J. McCarthy, and G.K. Smyth, edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. 26(1): p. 139-140. 71. Pimentel, H., et al., Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty. Nature Methods, 2017. 14: p. 687. 72. Purcell, S., et al., PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. American journal of human genetics, 2007. 81(3): p. 559-575. 73. Steiß, V., et al., PERMORY-MPI: a program for high-speed parallel permutation testing in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics, 2012. 28(8): p. 1168-1169. 74. Cingolani, P., et al., A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly, 2012. 6(2): p. 80-92. 75. Zerbino, D.R., et al., Ensembl 2018. Nucleic Acids Research, 2018. 46(D1): p. D754-D761. 76. Hunter, J.D., Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 2007. 9(3): p. 90-95. 77. Caswell, T.A., et al. matplotlib/matplotlib v3.0.2. 2018. 78. Ewels, P., et al., MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics, 2016. 32(19): p. 3047-3048. 79. Kolde, R.J.R.p.v., Pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. 2012. 61. 80. Robinson, J.T., et al., Integrative genomics viewer. Nature biotechnology, 2011. 29(1): p. 24-26. 81. Rossum, G., Python tutorial. 1995, CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science). 82. MOLAS Tilapia 2018. 2018. 83. Merkel, D., Docker: lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment %J Linux J. 2014. 2014(239): p. 2. 84. Auwera, G.V.d., What is a GVCF and how is it different from a 'regular' VCF? 2014. 85. Conte, M.A., et al., A high quality assembly of the Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) genome reveals the structure of two sex determination regions. BMC genomics, 2017. 18(1): p. 341-341. 86. Yu, C., RNA-Seq Analysis Docker. 2018. 87. Lee, B.-Y., et al., Genetic and Physical Mapping of Sex-Linked AFLP Markers in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). 2011. 13(3): p. 557-562. 88. Eshel, O., et al., Linkage and Physical Mapping of Sex Region on LG23 of Nile Tilapia (<em>Oreochromis niloticus</em>). 2012. 2(1): p. 35-42. 89. Cnaani, A., et al., Genetics of Sex Determination in Tilapiine Species. Sexual Development, 2008. 2(1): p. 43-54. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71591 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究以台灣重要具高經濟價值的養殖魚種吳郭魚(Oreochromis niloticus)為對象,以高效準確的生物資訊分析工具組成單點變異分析和表現量差異分析平台,尋找與吳郭魚性別決定有關的遺傳因子,作為後續吳郭魚性別分化研究的基礎。本研究分析發育第四天與第五天的吳郭魚苗雌雄胚胎的RNASeq。原始讀序經過清理、定址於吳郭魚基因體組裝序列(ASM185804v2)。選定雙端皆能被定址的讀序進行變異點分析,得到八組樣本共1,184,624個變異位點。觀察這些變異位點的組別與密度分布,並進行交叉比對以及關聯分析,篩選出獨屬雄性、雌性,以及在雌雄之間有差異的變異位點。我們觀察到LG 2在2.14~2.2Mbp區域的性別差異變異位點有明顯的集中現象,註解後得知所屬基因以及其造成的影響,配合使用GO分析、KEGG分析,發現這些基因可能參與了訊息傳導、細胞間交互作用、有絲分裂等反應。由雌雄基因表現量分析,得到5,129個性別差異表現基因。將性別相關變異位點分析中所得到2,136個基因與性別差異表現的基因名單交叉比對,找到277個基因在雌雄之間使用不同剪切位的轉錄序列,這些基因或許在性別分化歷程中扮有角色。本研究期望能對吳郭魚性別分化系統帶來更深入的了解,也希望在此研究中建立的高效分析平台,能協助其他物種進行類似的序列分析工作。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is one of the most economically valuable aquaculture species in Taiwan, but the mechanism of sex differentiation hasn’t been fully studied. In this study, we combine gene expression and single nucleotide variation analysis as main strategy to find variants that may be associated to tilapia’s sex differentiation process. A two replicates RNA-Seq experiment were done in four experimental conditions, male and female tilapia embryos in day 4 and day 5 respectively. Raw reads of 8 samples was cleaned and mapped with ASM185804v2 assembly. 1,184,624 single base variation sites were detected in 8 samples. We found a significant sex-biased SNV density increase in 2.14~2.20Mbp region of Linkage Group 2. Functional enrichment analysis of genes reside this sex-biased SNV region highlighted some GO categories and KEGG pathways, such as signal transduction, cell adherent, mitotic process, and etc. Gene expression analysis between 4 sets of samples revealed 5,129 differentially expressed genes between male and female. Comparing with the result of 2,136 genes with sex-biased SNV, 277 genes were identified to be translated in gender specific transcript preference. Some of these genes are also supported by the high expression level in gonads tissue like testis or ovary. These genes may probably be the candidate genes which involved in sex differentiation process. The NGS tools with high efficiency and accuracy were allocated to form a high-performance data analysis docker platform. We hope to contribute to other species’s NGS analysis studies through this established high-efficiency docker analysis platform. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:04:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04b22031-1.pdf: 6106684 bytes, checksum: bb42e21c681c16c1fe65151afdf1088e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖目錄 6
表目錄 8 前言 9 魚種基本介紹 9 養殖歷史 10 吳郭魚習性 12 單性吳郭魚 12 性別分化的遺傳因子研究 13 NGS和生物資訊學背景介紹 15 研究目的 18 研究方法 19 定序資料簡述 19 分析工具 20 分析流程簡圖 25 資料前處理 26 SAM檔案壓縮 27 將部分起始與末端序列分類的不同基因剪切區域 27 標記重複序列 28 CIGAR與多N序列片段的處理 29 基因表現量分析 31 表現量分析流程簡圖 32 使用StringTie分析基因表現量 33 變異分析 34 變異分析流程簡圖 34 使用GVCF模式進行變異提取 36 合併相同分組之GVCF樣本,提取變異點 37 變異樣本篩選 37 變異點初步分析 41 使用Vcftools進行分析 42 將表現量分析與變異分析結果合併 45 將合併的結果繪製成火山圖 45 進行KEGG、GO分析 45 結果 46 實驗樣本序列簡述 46 Trimming結果 46 Mapping結果 49 資料前處理數據結果 50 基因變異分析 52 變異樣本結果 54 變異點於染色體中分佈的情形 57 使用VCFtools進行分析 62 使用Plink關聯分析 66 LG2高變異區域分析 71 基因表現量分析 75 將DESeq2表現量分析結果以ggplot2繪製成火山圖 78 將DESeq2表現量分析結果以pheatmap繪製成熱圖 79 使用Expression Level篩選變異點 80 繪製同一基因之不同轉錄產物在不同性別的表現情形 82 使用KEGG與GO Term分析 85 總覽流程圖 89 討論 91 附錄 94 程式碼附錄 113 參考文獻 134 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 使用RNA-Seq資料分析策略解析尼羅吳郭魚(Oreochromis niloticus)之性別決定遺傳因子 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring Genetic Causes Related to Sex Determination Process of Nile Tilapia through RNA-Seq Analysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林仲彥(Chung-Yen Lin) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 龔紘毅(Hong-Yi Gong),黃章文(Chang-Wen Huang),陳淑華(Shu-Hua Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 吳郭魚,台灣鯛,次世代定序,RNA定序,單核?酸多態性,變異, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Nile Tilapia,Next-Generation Sequencing,RNA-Seq,SNP,Variation,Docker, | en |
dc.relation.page | 137 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900207 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生化科技學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生化科技學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.96 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。