Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 醫學工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71581
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林啟萬(Chii Wan Lin)
dc.contributor.authorChia Hsieh Changen
dc.contributor.author張嘉獻zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T06:03:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-29
dc.date.copyright2019-01-29
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-01-28
dc.identifier.citation1.Harris EJ, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, Kravitz SR, Mendelson SA, et al. (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg 43: 341-373.
2.Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR (1999) The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 27: 585-593.
3.Levinger P, Murley GS, Barton CJ, Cotchett MP, McSweeney SR, et al. (2010) Comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture 32: 519-523.
4.Tweed JL, Campbell JA, Avil SJ (2008) Biomechanical risk factors in the development of medial tibial stress syndrome in distance runners. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98: 436-444.
5.Kohls-Gatzoulis J, Angel JC, Singh D, Haddad F, Livingstone J, et al. (2004) Tibialis posterior dysfunction: a common and treatable cause of adult acquired flatfoot. BMJ 329: 1328-1333.
6.Dyal CM, Feder J, Deland JT, Thompson FM (1997) Pes planus in patients with posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: asymptomatic versus symptomatic foot. Foot ankle Int 18: 85-88.
7.Forriol F, Pascual J (1990) Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle 11: 101-104.
8.Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM (1987) The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 20: 547-551.
9.Mathieson I, Upton D, Birchenough A (1999) Comparison of footprint parameters calculated from static and dynamic footprints. The Foot 9: 145-149.
10.Silvino N, Evanski PM, Waugh TR (1980) The Harris and Beath footprinting mat: diagnostic validity and clinical use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151: 265-269.
11.Welton EA (1992) The Harris and Beath footprint: interpretation and clinical value. Foot Ankle 13: 462-468.
12.Onodera AN, Sacco IC, Morioka EH, Souza PS, de Sa MR, et al. (2008) What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur? Foot 18: 142-149.
13.Nikolaidou ME, Boudolos KD (2006) A footprint-based approach for the rational classification of foot types in young school children. Foot 16: 82-90.
14.Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M (1987) The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69: 426-428.
15.El O, Akcali O, Kosay C, Kaner B, Arslan Y, et al. (2006) Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study. Rheumatol Int 26: 1050-1053.
16.Benaglia T, Chauveau D, Hunter DR, Young DS (2009) Mixtools: An R Package for Analyzing Finite Mixture Models.
17.Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, et al. (2010) Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr 169: 447-452.
18.Chen KC, Yeh CJ, Tung LC, Yang JF, Yang SF, et al. (2011) Relevant factors influencing flatfoot in preschool-aged children. Eur J Pediatr 170: 931-936.
19.Mauch M, Grau S, Krauss I, Maiwald C, Horstmann T (2008) Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. Int J Obes 32: 1068-1075.
20.Mickle KJ, Steele JR, Munro BJ (2006) The feet of overweight and obese young children: are they flat or fat? Obesity 14: 1949-1953.
21.Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M (2006) Prevalence of Flat Foot in Preschool-Aged Children. Pediatrics 118: 634-639.
22.Tudor A, Ruzic L, Sestan B, Sirola L, Prpic T (2009) Flat-footedness is not a disadvantage for athletic performance in children aged 11 to 15 years. Pediatrics 123: 386-392.
23.Adoracion Villarroya M, Manuel Esquivel J, Tomas C, Buenafe A, Moreno L (2008) Foot structure in overweight and obese children. Int J Pediatr Obes 3: 39-45.
24.Rao UB, Joseph B (1992) The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74: 525-527.
25.Rose GK, Welton EA, Marshall T (1985) The diagnosis of flat foot in the child. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67: 71-78.
26.Lin CJ, Lai KA, Kuan TS, Chou YL (2001) Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 21: 378-382.
27.Lin CH, Lee HY, Chen JJ, Lee HM, Kuo MD (2006) Development of a quantitative assessment system for correlation analysis of footprint parameters to postural control in children. Physiol Meas 27: 119-130.
28.Berger VW, Zhou Y (2005) Kolmogorov–Smirnov Tests. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
29.Bosch K, Gerb J, Rosenbaum D. Development of healthy children’s feet – Nine-year results of a longitudinal investigation of plantar loading patterns. Gait Posture 2010; 32: 564-571.
30.Chen KC, Tung LC, Yeh CJ, Yang JF, Kuo JF, Wang CH. Change in Flatfoot of Preschool-aged Children: A 1-year Follow-up Study. Eur J Pediat. 2013;172:255-260.
31.Hashimoto T, Sakuraba K. Strength training for the intrinsic flexor muscles of the foot: Effects on muscle strength, the foot arch, and dynamic parameters before and after the training. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:373–376.
32.Milligan EP, Cook PG. Effect of plantar intrinsic muscle training on medial longitudinal arch morphology and dynamic function. Manual Ther. 2013;18:425-430.
33.Mayer NH. Clinicophysiologic concepts of spasticity and motor dysfunction in adults with an upper motoneuron lesion. Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1997;6:S1-13.
34.Olsson MC, Kruger M, Meyer LH, et al. Fiber type-specific increase in passive muscle tension in spinal-cord injured subjects with spasticity. J Physiol. 2006;577:339-352.
35.Sheean G, McGuire JR. Spastic hypertonia and movement disorders; pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and quantification. PM R. 2009;1:827-833.
36.Schwartz L, Engel JM, Jensen MP. Pain in persons with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1243-1246.
37.Zorowitz RD, Gillard PJ, Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers. Neurology. 2013;80:S45-52.
38.Saulino M, Guillemete S, Leier J, Hinnenthal J. Medical cost impact of intrathecal baclofen therapy for severe spasticity. Neuromodulation 2015;18:141-149.
39.Edgar TS. Oral pharmacotherapy of childhood movement disorders. J Child Neurol. 2003;18:S40-49.
40.Delgado MR, Hirtz D, Aisen M, et al. Practice Parameter: pharmacologic treatment of spasticity in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Neurology. 2010;74:336-343.
41.Chang YJ, Fang CY, Hsu MJ, Lien HY, Wong MK. Decrease of hypertonia after continuous passive motion treatment in individuals with spinal cord injury. Clin Rehab. 2007;21:712-718.
42.Cosgrove AP, Corry IS, Graham HK. Botulinum toxin in the management of the lower limb in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:386-396.
43.Graham HK, Aoki KR, Autti-Ramo I, et al. Recommendations for the use of Botulinum toxin type A in the management of cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2000;11:67-79.
44.Van Rhijn J, Molenaers G, Ceulemans B. Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of children and adolescents with an acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19:331-335.
45.Farmer JP, Sabbagh AJ. Selective dorsal rhizotomies in the treatment of spasticity related to cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:991-1002.
46.Langerak NG, Lamberts RP, Fieggen AG. A prospective gait analysis study in patients with diplegic cerebral palsy 20 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;1:180-186.
47.Peacock WJ, Arens LJ, Berman B. Cerebral palsy spasticity, selective posterior rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosci. 1987;13:61-66.
48.Albright AL. Intrathecal baclofen for childhood hypertonia. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:971-979.
49.Campbell WM, Ferrel A, McLaughlin JF. Long-term safety and efficacy of continuous intrathecal baclofen. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:660-665.
50.Cahana A, Van Zundert J, Macrea L, van Kleef M, Sluijter ME. Pulsed radiofrequency: current clinical and biological literature available. Pain Med. 2006;7:411-423.
51.Van Zundert J, de Louw AJ, Joosten EA, et al. Pulsed and continuous radiofrequency current adjacent to the cervical dorsal root ganglion of the rat induces late cellular activity in the dorsal horn. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:125-131.
52.Tun K, Cemil B, Gurcay AG, et al. Ultrastructural evaluation of pulsed radiofrequency and conventional radiofrequency lesions in rat sciatic nerve. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:496-500.
53.Podhajsky RJ, Sekiguchi Y, Kikuchi S, Myers RR. The histological effects of pulsed and continuous radiofrequency lesions at 42 degrees C to rat dorsal root ganglion and sciatic nerve. Spine. 2005;30:1008-1013.
54.Herz DA, Parsons KC, Pearl L. Percutaneous radiofrequency foramenal rhizotomies. Spine. 1983;8:729-732.
55.Uematsu S, Udvarhelyi GB, Benson DW, Siebens AA. Percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy. Surg Neurol. 1974;2:319-325.
56.van Kleef M, Barendse GA, Dingemans WA, et al. Effects of producing a radiofrequency lesion adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion in patients with thoracic segmental pain. Clin J Pain. 1995;11:325-332.
57.Kasdon DL, Lathi ES. A prospective study of radiofrequency rhizotomy in the treatment of posttraumatic spasticity. Neurosurgery. 1984;15:526-529.
58.Vles J, van Kleef M, Sleypen F, et al. Radiofrequency lesions of the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of hip flexor spasm: a report of two cases. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1997;1:123-126.
59.Vles GF, Vles JS, van Kleef M, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency lesions adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion alleviate spasticity and pain in children with cerebral palsy: pilot study in 17 patients. BMC Neurol. 2010;10:52-60.
60.Chua NH, Vissers KC, Sluijter ME. Pulsed radiofrequency treatment in interventional pain management: mechanisms and potential indications. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153:763-771.
61.Huang RY, Liao CC, Tsai SY, et al. Radiofrequency on neuropathic pain: electrophysiological, molecular, and behavioral evidence supporting long-term depression. Pain Physician. 2017;20:E269-283.
62.Hsieh TH, Tsai JY, Wu YN, Hwang IS, Chen TI, Chen JJ. Time course quantification of spastic hypertonia following spinal hemisection in rats. Neuroscience. 2010;167,185-198.
63.Basso DM, Beattie M, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12,1-21.
64.Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transaction. Exp Neurol. 1996;139,244-256.
65.Bose P, Parmer R, Thompson FJ. Velocity-dependent ankle torque in rats after contusion injury of the midthoracic spinal cord: Time course. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:1231-1249.
66.Kitzman PH, Uhl TL, Dwyer MK. Gabapentin suppresses spasticity in the spinal cord-injured rat. Neuroscience. 2007;149,813-821.
67.Garrison MK, Yates CC, Reese NB, Skinner RD, Garcia-Rill E. Wind-up of stretch reflexes as a measure of spasticity in chronic spinalized rats: The effects of passive exercise and modafinil. Exp Neuro. 2011;227,104-109.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71581-
dc.description.abstract背景:目前已有1000多篇科學論文探討扁平足議題,然而人類如何在兒童時期發展出足弓沒有完整的縱向研究;痙攣是一種神經病理現象,影響中風和脊髓損傷患者運動功能表現,並導致關節攣縮,如何有效抑制痙攣是臨床上的大議題。本研究的目的是建立一個新的扁平足分類,據此研究兒童足弓狀態的轉變,並確定與之發展相關的預後因子;並嘗試使用脈衝射頻(PRF)於背根神經節,檢測對痙攣抑制和運動表現的改變。
方法:1)前瞻性收錄小學一年級兒童的身體結構、體適能及足弓指數,進行了兩次評估;使用Chippaux-Smirak指數(CSI)的雙峰頻率分佈來定義扁平足和非扁平足。探討兒童身體結構和體適能測試,包括20米短跑,站立式跳遠和單腳平衡在扁平足及非扁平足兒童的差異、發生足弓改變及維持扁平足的差異。2) 24隻經脊髓損傷後並存活28天之大鼠,以右後肢痙攣為實驗模型,隨機分為PRF組或假手術組。PRF以2赫茲雙頻25ms持續300秒(500k赫茲,5V電壓強度)施加在右側L5背根神經節上。在PRF或假手術後的前一天、第3天、第7天和第14天,以450deg / s的被動踝背屈運動,測量右肱三頭肌的肌肉張力;並通過Basso,Beattie和Bresnahan(BBB)評分來評估運動功能。
結果:1) CSI 0.6為雙峰分布,其交叉值可區分扁平足及非扁平足,此交叉值不隨年齡、性別和體重而變化。以此足弓分類發現a)扁平足女童在單腳平衡中的表現明顯劣於非扁平足女童(前者單腳平衡測驗中位數為4.0秒,後者為4.3秒,p = 0.04,95%信賴區間0.404-0.484)。b)混合足型兒童在性別、體重、BMI及單腳平衡表現之百分比,介於雙側扁平兒童和雙側非扁平足兒童之間。c)第二年轉為非扁平足者的兒童在單腳平衡項目表現明顯改善(進步增加2.5秒,而維持扁平足者則進步1.7秒,p = 0.03)。
2) PRF後第3天肌張力明顯下降,於第14天後逐漸恢復到治療前狀態,而在假手術組中,肌肉張力在術後為持續顯著增加;PRF後BBB評分從10降至8,並在第14天後恢復到PRF前水平,而假手術後BBB評分則維持不變。
結論:兒童足弓指數的雙峰分佈,及其特殊的轉變模式,與身體自然生長不同。足弓發展與單腳平衡之間的密切關係,顯示結構與功能之間的潛在聯繫。PRF對痙攣下的肌肉張力產生顯著且可逆的抑制,但可能伴隨運動功能的惡化。這個發現警示PRF降痙治療,應考量患者的痙攣狀態及運動功能,在療效及併發症之間求取平衡,顯示可微調劑量的PRF植入裝置,而非體外一次性刺激,是未來所需。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground: More than 1,000 scientific papers have been devoted to flatfoot issue. However, how human build foot arches has not been studied thoroughly before. Spasticity affects motion and leads to joint contracture in patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. The purposes of flatfoot study were to establish a new classification of flatfoot and to study the transition of foot arch status in children and to identify the associated factors. The spasticity study tested spasticity suppression and locomotion change after pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) at the dorsal root ganglion of rats.
Methods: 1) In a prospective longitudinal study, two surveys of body structure, physical fitness and foot arch index were conducted in 1228 school aged children from 2012 to 2014. The bimodal frequency distribution of the Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI) of footprints was used to define flatfeet and non-flatfeet. The body structures and physical fitness tests, including 20-meter dash, standing long jump and one leg balance, were compared between flatfooted children and non-flatfooted children, children who transited from flatfooted to non-flatfooted and children remained in flatfooted. 2) Twenty-four rats that survived for 28 days after thoracic spinal cord injury and showed spasticity in the right hind limb were separated randomly to a PRF group or Sham operation group. PRF consisted of 2 Hz biphasic 25 ms trains of PRF (500 kHz, 5 V intensity) applied on the right L5 dorsal root ganglion for 300 seconds. Muscle tension of the right triceps surae was measured at 450deg/s of passive ankle dorsiflexion on the day before and 3, 7, and 14 days after PRF or sham operation. Locomotive function was evaluated by obtaining Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scores.
Results: 1) A constant intersection value of 0.6 in the CSI could distinguish the two modes of children, and values were constant by age, sex, and weight. a) Flatfoot girls had significantly inferior performance in the one leg balance than non-flatfoot girls (median, 4.0 seconds in flatfoot girls vs. 4.3 seconds in non-flatfoot girls, p=0.04, 95% CI 0.404-0.484). b) Children with mixed feet were just between the children with bilateral flatfeet and children with bilateral non-flatfeet in percentage of sex, body weight, BMI and performance of one leg balance. c) Flatfooted children who were transiting to non-flatfooted showed significantly improved performance in one leg balance (+2.5 seconds vs. +1.7 seconds in children remaining in flatfooted, p=0.03), while sex and weight were not associated with the transition.
2) Muscle tension of the triceps surae decreased significantly 3 days after PRF, and gradually returned to baseline 14 days later. In the sham operation group, muscle tension increased significantly over 14 days. The BBB scores declined from 10 to 8 after PRF and returned to pre-PRF levels 14 days later, while scores remained constant after sham operation.
Conclusion: Development of children’s foot arches is a transition process that is characterized by bimodal distribution and all-or-none changes and is not attributable to body growth. The close relationship between foot arch development and one leg balance suggests underlying structure-function connection. PRF produced significant and reversible suppression in spasticity, but this was accompanied by deterioration in locomotive function. Thus, caution should be exercised in considering the benefits and costs in suppressing spasticity in ambulatory patients, and implanted devices that apply titratable doses of PRF may be best to optimize patients’ needs.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:03:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-D98548008-1.pdf: 1235156 bytes, checksum: 26d0b9ed85a8af44312853771d3f51ad (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 II
Abstract IV
Chapter 1.Definition of flatfoot 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2.1 Ethics Statement 2
1.2.2 Participants 2
1.2.3 Footprint recording 2
1.2.4 Footprint measurements 3
1.2.5 Reliability of SAI and CSI measurement 4
1.2.6 Statistical analysis 5
1.3 Results 6
1.3.1 Frequency distribution of data 6
1.3.2 Deconvolution of a bimodal distribution to two
normal distributions 7
1.3.3 Effects of age on the bimodal distribution 8
1.3.4 Effects of sex on the bimodal distributions 9
1.3.5 Effects of obesity on the bimodal distributions 11
1.3.6 Summary of results 11
1.4 Discussion 12
Chapter 2. Physiological significance of the new flatfoot diagnosis 14
2.1 Introduction 14
2.2 Materials and Methods 15
2.2.1 Participants 15
2.2.2 Physical fitness 15
2.2.3 Statistics 16
2.3 Results 16
2.4 Discussion 18
Chapter 3. Transitional state between flatfoot and non-flatfoot 20
3.1 Introduction 20
3.2 Materials and Methods 21
3.2.1 Participants 21
3.2.2 Footprint recording and measurement 21
3.2.3 Statistics 22
3.3 Results 22
3.3.1 Distribution of both feet CSI 22
3.3.2 Physiological difference among 3 groups children
with different both feet CSI 23
3.3.3 Comparison of the flatfeet side and non-flatfeet
side in the children with mixed feet 25
3.4 Discussion 25
Chapter 4. The transition of foot arch development by a
longitudinal study 28
4.1 Introduction 28
4.2 Materials and Methods 29
4.2.1 Ethics Statement 29
4.2.2 Participants 29
4.2.3 Measurements 30
4.2.4 Definition of flatfoot and non-flatfoot 31
4.2.5 Data analysis 32
4.3 Results 33
4.3.1 Global footprint index distribution 33
4.3.2 Transition of foot arches status in 1.5 years 35
4.3.3 All-or-none change in footprint index 37
4.3.4 Pattern of body growth 39
4.3.5 Pattern of foot arch development 40
4.3.6 Association factors for flatfoot and non-flatfoot
children 41
4.3.7 Factors associated with foot arch development 43
4.4 Discussion 46
Conclusion 50
References 50
Chapter 5. Spasticity suppression by pulsed radiofrequency on the dorsal root ganglionn 56
5.1 Introduction 56
5.2 Materials and Methods 58
5.2.1 Ethic statement 58
5.2.2 Study protocol 59
5.2.3 Rat model for hind limb spasticity 60
5.2.4 Assessment of muscle tension by passive stretching
of the triceps surae 61
5.2.5 Sampling from continuous measurement of muscle
tension 63
5.2.6 Muscle tension and electromyography 64
5.2.7 Locomotive function assessment 66
5.2.8 Pulsed radiofrequency on dorsal root ganglion 66
5.2.9 Statistical analysis 68
5.3 Results 69
5.3.1 Baseline data of rats in PRF group and sham group
69
5.3.2 Decrease in muscle tension by PRF 70
5.3.3 Comparison between the PRF group and the sham
group 72
5.3.4 Motor function change after PRF treatment 73
5.3.5 Summary of findings 75
5.4 Discussion 76
Conclusion 80
References 80
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject痙攣zh_TW
dc.subject運動功能表現zh_TW
dc.subject脈衝射頻zh_TW
dc.subject扁平足zh_TW
dc.subject足弓發展zh_TW
dc.subjectflatfooten
dc.subjectlocomotive functionen
dc.subjectpulsed radiofrequency(PRF)en
dc.subjectspasticityen
dc.subjectarch developmenten
dc.title足弓發育及抑制痙攣的生物力學研究zh_TW
dc.titleA biomechanical study of foot arch development and spasticity suppressionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear107-1
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.coadvisor章良渭(Liang Wey Chang)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee呂東武(Tung Wu Lu),陳適卿(Shih Ching Chen),張家豪(Jia Hao Chang)
dc.subject.keyword扁平足,足弓發展,痙攣,脈衝射頻,運動功能表現,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordflatfoot,arch development,spasticity,pulsed radiofrequency(PRF),locomotive function,en
dc.relation.page85
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201900211
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2019-01-28
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept醫學工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:醫學工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.21 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved