請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71578
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊明仁(Ming-Jen Yang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Iat-Hin Tam | en |
dc.contributor.author | 譚日軒 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:03:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-02-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adams-Selin, R.D., S.C. van den Heever, and R.H. Johnson, 2013: Impact of Graupel Parameterization Schemes on Idealized Bow Echo Simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 1241–1262.
Adams-Selin, R.D., S.C. van den Heever, and R.H. Johnson, 2013: Sensitivity of Bow-Echo Simulation to Microphysical Parameterizations. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 1188–1209. Augustine, J. A., and F. Caracena, 1994: Lower tropospheric precursors to nocturnal MCS development over the central United States. Wea. Forecasting, 9, 116–135. Bailey, M.P. and J. Hallett, 2009: A Comprehensive Habit Diagram for Atmospheric Ice Crystals: Confirmation from the Laboratory, AIRS II, and Other Field Studies. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2888–2899. Bellamy, J. C., 1949: Objective calculations of divergence, vertical velocity and vorticity. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 30, 45–49. Bryan, G. H., J.C. Wyngaard, and J.M. Fritsch, 2003: Resolution Requirements for the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2394–2416. Bryan, G. H., D. Ahijevych, C. A. Davis, and M. L. Weisman, 2005: Observations of cold pool properties in mesoscale convective systems during BAMEX. Preprints, 32nd Conf. on Mesoscale Meteorology, Albuquerque, NM, Amer. Meteor. Soc. Braun, S. A. and R.A. Houze, 1994: The Transition Zone and Secondary Maximum of Radar Reflectivity behind a Midlatitude Squall Line: Results Retrieved from Doppler Radar Data. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2733–2755. Dawson, D. T., M. Xue, J.A. Milbrandt, and M.K. Yau, 2010: Comparison of Evaporation and Cold Pool Development between Single-Moment and Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Schemes in Idealized Simulations of Tornadic Thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1152–1171. Dawson, D. T., E.R. Mansell, Y. Jung, L.J. Wicker, M.R. Kumjian, and M. Xue, 2014: Low-Level ZDR Signatures in Supercell Forward Flanks: The Role of Size Sorting and Melting of Hail. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 276–299. Didlake, A. C. and M.R. Kumjian, 2017: Examining Polarimetric Radar Observations of Bulk Microphysical Structures and Their Relation to Vortex Kinematics in Hurricane Arthur (2014). Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 4521–4541. Ferrier, B. S., 1994: A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: Description. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 249–280. French, A.J. and M.D. Parker, 2010: The Response of Simulated Nocturnal Convective Systems to a Developing Low-Level Jet. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3384–3408 Geerts, B., D. Parsons, and Coauthors, 2017: The 2015 Plains Elevated Convection at Night Field Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 767–786. Grasmick, C., B. Geerts, D. D. Turner, Z. Wang, and T. M. Weckwerth, 2018: The Relation between Nocturnal MCS Evolution and Its Outflow Boundaries in the Stable Boundary Layer: An Observational Study of the 15 July 2015 MCS in PECAN. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 3203-3226. Grim, J.A., R.M. Rauber, G.M. McFarquhar, B.F. Jewett, and D.P. Jorgensen, 2009: Development and Forcing of the Rear Inflow Jet in a Rapidly Developing and Decaying Squall Line during BAMEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1206–1229. Hallett, J., and S. C. Mossop, 1974: Production of secondary ice particles during the riming process. Nature, 249, 26–28. Homeyer, C., and M. Kumjian, 2015: Microphysical characteristics of overshooting convection from polarimetric radar observations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 72, 870-891. Jensen, A.A., J.Y. Harrington, and H. Morrison, 2018: Microphysical Characteristics of Squall-Line Stratiform Precipitation and Transition Zones Simulated Using an Ice Particle Property-Evolving Model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 723–743. Kumjian, M. R., 2013: Principles and applications of dual-polarization weather radar. Part 2: Warm and cold season applications. Journal of Operational Meteorology, 1(20), 243-264. Kumjian, M. R. and O.P. Prat, 2014: The Impact of Raindrop Collisional Processes on the Polarimetric Radar Variables. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3052–3067. Lebo, Z., 2018: A Numerical Investigation of the Potential Effects of Aerosol-Induced Warming and Updraft Width and Slope on Updraft Intensity in Deep Convective Clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 535–554. Mansell, E. R., 2010: On Sedimentation and Advection in Multimoment Bulk Microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3084–3094. Mansell, E. R., C. L. Ziegler, and E. C. Bruning, 2010: Simulated electrification of a small thunderstorm with two-moment bulk microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 171–194. Parker, M. D., 2008: Response of Simulated Squall Lines to Low-Level Cooling. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1323–1341. Parker, M. D., 2010: Relationship between System Slope and Updraft Intensity in Squall Lines. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 3572–3578. Peters, J. M.,, E.R. Nielsen, M.D. Parker, S.M. Hitchcock, and R.S. Schumacher, 2017: The Impact of Low-Level Moisture Errors on Model Forecasts of an MCS Observed during PECAN. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 3599–3624. Shapiro, A., E. Fedorovich, and J.G. Gebauer, 2018: Mesoscale Ascent in Nocturnal Low-Level Jets. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1403–1427 Sinclair, V. A., D. Moisseev, and A. von Lerber, 2016: How dual-polarization radar observations can be used to verify model representation of secondary ice. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 10954–10970. Shin, H. H., and S. Y. Hong, 2011: Intercomparison of planetary boundary-layer parametrizations in the WRF model for a single day from CASES-99, Bound-Lay Meteorol., 139(2), 261–281. Szeto, K. K., and H. R. Cho, 1994: A numerical investigation of squall lines. Part II: The mechanics of evolution. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 425–433. Trier, S. B., J. W. Wilson, D. A. Ahijevych, and R. A. Sobash, 2017: Mesoscale vertical motions near nocturnal convection initiation in PECAN. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 2919–2941. van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596–1609. van Weverberg, K., A. M. Vogelmann, H. Morrison, and J. Milbrandt, 2012: Sensitivity of idealized squall-line simulations to the level of complexity used in two-moment bulk microphysics schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1883–1907. Weisman, M.L., 1992: The Role of Convectively Generated Rear-Inflow Jets in the Evolution of Long-Lived Mesoconvective Systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 1826–1847. Xue, L., J. Fan, Z.J. Lebo, and Coauthors, 2017: Idealized Simulations of a Squall Line from the MC3E Field Campaign Applying Three Bin Microphysics Schemes: Dynamic and Thermodynamic Structure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 4789–4812. Yang, M. J., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995: Sensitivity of squall-line rear inflow to ice microphysics and environmental humidity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 3175–3193. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71578 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究利用於2015年7月15日於美國堪薩斯州進行之PECAN (Plains Elevated Convection at Night) 觀測實驗相關資料及WRF敏感度實驗研究美國中西部中尺度對流系統在晚間強度維持的原因。觀測資料顯示於晚上減弱的系統有較多對流於系統後方形成(System rear CIs),而於晚上增強的系統則有更多對流於系統邊緣形成(System edge CIs)。利用觀測資料,我們提出兩個不同的假設來解釋這種差異:(一)System edge CIs附近大氣邊界層上方水氣含量較多和(二)兩種對流系統的運動場結構與微物理過程有一定差異,而這些差異有利於有System edge CIs 的系統增強。
雙偏極雷達觀測結果顯示有較多System edge CIs系統有較強並水平延伸之後方入流(RIJ)及較明顯的軟雹/冰雹淞化成長過程(Riming growth),顯示(二)可能扮演較重要的角色。我們可以利用WRF微物理敏感度實驗對假設 (二) 作進一步的探討。實驗結果顯示,當實驗容許軟雹或冰雹可沿大小不同以不一終端速度下降的時候,後方入流會有增強並於水平方向能有所延伸。同時,RIJ的水平延伸容許更多對流於系統邊緣產生。 上述結果出現的原因與對流系統內熱力場的變化有關:密度較大(較重)的軟雹粒子較大的終端落速使這些粒子能於較靠近對流上升區(Updraft region)的位置降到0oC線以下。軟雹溶解過程中的潛熱消耗可增大對流上升區溶解層上下的浮力差並產生較明顯的負浮力氣壓擾動(negative buoyancy pressure perturbation),此相對低壓對RIJ增強有主導影響。實驗結果同時顯示較強的RIJ可將部分下降至0oC線附近的軟雹重新帶到上升氣流中並可以增強淞化成長,而令更多軟雹能在上升區中形成。這過程中所產生額外的潛熱釋放可使對流系統強度增加並有更大維持能力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, the sustenance of the nocturnal CIs within mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) developed on 15 July 2015 during the Plains Elevated Convection at Night (PECAN) field campaign were investigated with a combination of in-situ observations and a set of Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) experiments.
Observational analyses revealed that systems with a greater percentage of CIs near the system edge had greater maintainability than system where CIs tended to cluster in system rear. Two hypotheses were proposed to explain this phenomenon: (a) environmental instability near the system edge CIs were greater due to enhanced moisture above the boundary layer and (b) the kinematic-microphysical structures of systems with system edge CIs evolved in a manner that was favorable for system maintenance. Specifically, dual-polarimetric observations indicate stronger, more extended rear-inflow jet (RIJ) and increased riming growth within the convective updrafts for these systems. A set of microphysical sensitivity experiments were performed to evaluate the two hypotheses. Since the ambient environmental instabilities were similar between the experiments, internal processes would play a dominate role if significant inter-model differences in updraft strength were found. Statistical analyses suggest that simulated systems were stronger when rimed particles can sediment at different terminal velocities with regard to their sizes. RIJs in these systems tended to the stronger and more horizontally expanded, allowing more system edge CIs. In these experiments, preferential sedimentation of melting graupel increased the buoyancy gradient near system edge and created stronger negative buoyancy pressure perturbation, which enhanced the system RIJs. Stronger and more horizontally extended RIJs could subsequently strengthen the system by extra riming and deposition when the RIJs transported the graupel back to the updrafts. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:03:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05229023-1.pdf: 27670068 bytes, checksum: e5e7ceae01a560950145ccb78d9c9598 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Signatures of committee members #
Abstract i Chinese Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii List of Figures v List of Tables xiv 1. Introduction and Motivation 1.1 Nocturnal convective systems over the Great Plains 1 1.2 Current understandings on nocturnal convective systems 1 1.3 Motivation for this study 2 2. Event Overview 2.1 Synoptic Overview 4 2.2 Radar morphology and evolution of observed nocturnal systems 4 2.3 Two hypotheses on the different system evolutions at night 5 3. Instrumentation and Experimental Design 3.1 Instrumentation platforms and observational data quality control 1. Summary of utilized platforms 6 3.2 Basic WRF settings 1. WRF specifications 7 2. Domain design and boundary conditions 8 3. Physical parameterization options 9 4. Observational Analysis 4.1 High-frequency radiosonde analysis 1. Pre-MCS environmental comparison 10 2. Quasi-two-dimensional analysis ] 11 3. Comparison of pre-MCS environmental instability parameter profiles 11 4.2 Pre-convective environmental characteristics – Potential contributors for environmental heterogeneity 1. Inference of mesoscale vertical motions 12 2. Generation of environmental heterogeneity: Observational Analysis 15 4.3 Internal microphysical and kinematic characteristics 1. Reflectivity and kinematic characteristics of the analyzed systems 17 2. Microphysical characteristics of the analyzed systems 18 3. Summary 22 5. Evolution of simulated MCS and moisture variability 5.1 Description of simulated storm evolution 23 5.2 Simulated environmental heterogeneity and moisture transport 23 6. Sensitivity of simulated systems to microphysical processes 6.1 Overview of microphysical sensitivity experiment designs 1. MCS strength and microphysical processes: An overview 26 2. Sensitivity experiment designs 28 6.2 Sensitivity experiments: Overview of simulated systems 1. Reflectivity structures 29 2. Microphysical characteristics: Hydrometeor distributions 33 3. Accumulated Precipitation 35 4. Near-surface temperature 35 6.3 Impact of size sorting on simulated systems – Results from Group I 1. Evolution of updraft statistics 36 2. Evolution of updraft vertical structure 37 3. Potential link between MCS strength and rear-inflow jets (RIJs) 39 4. Microphysical-dynamical contribution of stronger rear inflows in FULL/RNSS 40 5. Thermodynamical response to RIJs during mature phase 42 6. Microphysical response to RIJs during MCSS mature phase 42 7. Brief summary on the results from Group I 44 6.4 Impact of rimed particle sedimentation characteristics on simulated systems – Results from Group II & III 1. Sensitivity to terminal velocity-diameter relationship 45 2. Sensitivity to dominant rimed particle type 48 6.5 Dynamical inferences on simulated MCSs 1. Diagnostical analysis on pressure perturbation 50 2. Diagnostical analysis on vorticity evolution 52 7. Conclusion and future research routes 7.1 Summary of observational and simulation results 55 7.2 Implications of our findings 57 7.3 Future research paths 58 Figures 59-117 Appendix I: Data processing and quality control 118-119 Bibliography 120-123 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 冰相微物理過程與環境不穩定度對晚間對流系統維持的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The impact of Ice Microphysics and Ambient Instabilities on Nocturnal Convective System Maintenance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 李文兆(Wen-Chau Lee) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周仲島(Ben Jong-Dao Jou),陳正平(Jen-Ping Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 降水過程,雲微物理,中尺度動力機制,後方入流,終端落速, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Precipitation Process,Cloud Microphysics,Mesoscale Dynamics,Rear-inflow jets,Terminal velocity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 123 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900175 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 大氣科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 大氣科學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 27.02 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。