請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71505
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 趙遠宏(Yuan-Hung Chao) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Sheng Ke | en |
dc.contributor.author | 柯育生 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:02:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-23 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-11-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Lee MS, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adult flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. Mar-Apr 2005;44(2):78-113. 2. Aenumulapalli A, Kulkarni MM, Gandotra AR. Prevalence of Flexible Flat Foot in Adults: A Cross-sectional Study. J Clin Diagn Res. Jun 2017;11(6):Ac17-ac20. 3. Ledoux WR, Hillstrom HJ. The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet. Gait Posture. Feb 2002;15(1):1-9. 4. Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA, Mall NA, Queen RM. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running. Gait Posture. Oct 2008;28(3):405-411. 5. Buldt AK, Forghany S, Landorf KB, Levinger P, Murley GS, Menz HB. Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture. May 2018;62:235-240. 6. Song J, Hillstrom HJ, Secord D, Levitt J. Foot type biomechanics. comparison of planus and rectus foot types. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Jan 1996;86(1):16-23. 7. Hillstrom HJ, Song J, Kraszewski AP, et al. Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait Posture. Mar 2013;37(3):445-451. 8. Atik A, Ozyurek S. Flexible flatfoot. North Clin Istanb. 2014;1(1):57-64. 9. Abousayed MM, Alley MC, Shakked R, Rosenbaum AJ. Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. JBJS Rev. Aug 2017;5(8):e7. 10. Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med. Sep-Oct 1999;27(5):585-593. 11. Kosashvili Y, Fridman T, Backstein D, Safir O, Bar Ziv Y. The correlation between pes planus and anterior knee or intermittent low back pain. Foot Ankle Int. Sep 2008;29(9):910-913. 12. Lakstein D, Fridman T, Ziv YB, Kosashvili Y. Prevalence of anterior knee pain and pes planus in Israel defense force recruits. Mil Med. Nov 2010;175(11):855-857. 13. Bluman EM, Title CI, Myerson MS. Posterior tibial tendon rupture: a refined classification system. Foot Ankle Clin. Jun 2007;12(2):233-249. 14. Deland JT, de Asla RJ, Sung IH, Ernberg LA, Potter HG. Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: which ligaments are involved? Foot Ankle Int. Jun 2005;26(6):427-435. 15. Redmond AC, Landorf KB, Keenan AM. Contoured, prefabricated foot orthoses demonstrate comparable mechanical properties to contoured, customised foot orthoses: a plantar pressure study. J Foot Ankle Res. Jun 16 2009;2:20. 16. Khodaei B, Saeedi H, Jalali M, Farzadi M, Norouzi E. Comparison of plantar pressure distribution in CAD-CAM and prefabricated foot orthoses in patients with flexible flatfeet. Foot (Edinb). Dec 2017;33:76-80. 17. Yurt Y, Sener G, Yakut Y. The effect of different foot orthoses on pain and health related quality of life in painful flexible flat foot: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. Feb 2019;55(1):95-102. 18. Kim EK, Kim JS. The effects of short foot exercises and arch support insoles on improvement in the medial longitudinal arch and dynamic balance of flexible flatfoot patients. J Phys Ther Sci. Nov 2016;28(11):3136-3139. 19. Menz HB, Allan JJ, Bonanno DR, Landorf KB, Murley GS. Custom-made foot orthoses: an analysis of prescription characteristics from an Australian commercial orthotic laboratory. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. Jun 2017;10(1):23. 20. Davia-Aracil M, Hinojo-Pérez JJ, Jimeno-Morenilla A, Mora H. 3D printing of functional anatomical insoles. Comput Ind. Feb 2018;95:38-53. 21. Lee J-Y, An J, Chua CK. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today. Jun 2017;7:120-133. 22. Joo J-Y, Kim Y-K. Effects of Customized 3D-printed Insoles on the Kinematics of Flat-footed Walking and Running. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. Jan 2019;28(4):237-244. 23. Xu R, Wang Z, Ren Z, et al. Comparative Study of the Effects of Customized 3D printed insole and Prefabricated Insole on Plantar Pressure and Comfort in Patients with Symptomatic Flatfoot. Med Sci Monit. May 12 2019;25:3510-3519. 24. Su S, Mo Z, Guo J, Fan Y. The Effect of Arch Height and Material Hardness of Personalized Insole on Correction and Tissues of Flatfoot. J Healthc Eng. Jun 2017;2017:1-9. 25. Hertling D, Kessler, R.M. Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders: Physical Therapy Principles and Methods. 4th ed. 2006. 26. Gray, H. Anatomy of the human body. 1918. 27. Toullec E. Adult flatfoot. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. Feb 2015;101(1 Suppl):S11-17. 28. Dunn JE, Link CL, Felson DT, Crincoli MG, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am J Epidemiol. Mar 1 2004;159(5):491-498. 29. Johnson KA, Strom DE. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 1989;239:196-206. 30. Myerson MS. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393-405. 31. Deland JT, Page A, Sung IH, O'Malley MJ, Inda D, Choung S. Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency results at different stages. Hss j. Sep 2006;2(2):157-160. 32. Raikin SM, Winters BS, Daniel JN. The RAM classification: a novel, systematic approach to the adult-acquired flatfoot. Foot Ankle Clin. Jun 2012;17(2):169-181. 33. Harris RI, Beath T. Hypermobile flat-foot with short tendo achillis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1948;30a(1):116-140. 34. Van Boerum DH, Sangeorzan BJ. Biomechanics and pathophysiology of flat foot. Foot Ankle Clin. Sep 2003;8(3):419-430. 35. Holmes GB, Jr., Mann RA. Possible epidemiological factors associated with rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. Foot Ankle. Feb 1992;13(2):70-79. 36. Hoellwarth JS, Mahan ST, Spencer SA. Painful pes planovalgus: an uncommon pediatric orthopedic presentation of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Pediatr Orthop B. Sep 2012;21(5):428-433. 37. Jack EA. Naviculo-cuneiform fusion in the treatment of flat foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Feb 1953;35-b(1):75-82. 38. Mengiardi B, Pinto C, Zanetti M. Spring Ligament Complex and Posterior Tibial Tendon: MR Anatomy and Findings in Acquired Adult Flatfoot Deformity. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. Feb 2016;20(1):104-115. 39. Buldt AK, Forghany S, Landorf KB, Murley GS, Levinger P, Menz HB. Centre of pressure characteristics in normal, planus and cavus feet. J Foot Ankle Res. Feb 2018;11:3. 40. Hertel J, Gay MR, Denegar CR. Differences in Postural Control During Single-Leg Stance Among Healthy Individuals With Different Foot Types. J Athl Train. Jun 2002;37(2):129-132. 41. Cobb SC, Tis LL, Johnson BF, Higbie EJ. The effect of forefoot varus on postural stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. Feb 2004;34(2):79-85. 42. Chao T-C, Jiang B. A comparison of postural stability during upright standing between normal and flatfooted individuals, based on COP-based measures. Entropy. Feb 2017;19:76. 43. Kim JA, Lim OB, Yi CH. Difference in static and dynamic stability between flexible flatfeet and neutral feet. Gait Posture. Feb 2015;41(2):546-550. 44. Harrison P, Littlewood C. Relationship between pes planus foot type and postural stability. 2010. 45. Zhang X, Schütte KH, Vanwanseele B. Foot muscle morphology is related to center of pressure sway and control mechanisms during single-leg standing. Gait Posture. Sep 2017;57:52-56. 46. Global foot orthotic insole market report by product (leather, polypropylene and others), application (sports, medical and others) and by regions - industry trends, size, share, growth, estimation and forecast, 2019-2026. Jan 2020. https://www.valuemarketresearch.com/report/foot-orthotic-insole-market. 47. Rothschild VR, Fox JR, Rothschild RJ, Rothschild KA. Natural foot orthosis and method of manufacturing the same. 2000. 48. Mumith A, Thomas M, Shah Z, Coathup M, Blunn G. Additive manufacturing: current concepts, future trends. Bone Joint J. Apr 2018;100-b(4):455-460. 49. O’Connor HJ, Dickson AN, Dowling DP. Evaluation of the mechanical performance of polymer parts fabricated using a production scale multi jet fusion printing process. Addit Manuf. Aug 2018;22:381-387. 50. Chatham CA, Long TE, Williams CB. A review of the process physics and material screening methods for polymer powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Prog Polym Sci. Jun 2019;93:68-95. 51. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). Jan 2006;21(1):89-98. 52. Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the Foot Posture Index. J Foot Ankle Res. Jul 2008;1(1):6. 53. Redmond AC. Foot Posture Index – User guide and manual. 2005. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/medicine/FASTER/z/pdf/FPI-manual-formatted-August-2005v2.pdf 54. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG, Lebec M, Vicenzino B, Wilson J. Reliability of the modified Foot Posture Index. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Jan-Feb 2008;98(1):7-13. 55. Morrison SC, Ferrari J. Inter-rater reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) in the assessment of the paediatric foot. J Foot Ankle Res. Oct 2009;2:26. 56. McLaughlin P, Vaughan B, Shanahan J, Martin J, Linger G. Inexperienced examiners and the Foot Posture Index: A reliability study. Man Ther. Dec 2016;26:238-240. 57. Patrick K, Donovan L. Test-retest reliability of the Tekscan(R) F-Scan(R) 7 in-shoe plantar pressure system during treadmill walking in healthy recreationally active individuals. Sports Biomech. Mar 2018;17(1):83-97. 58. Giacomozzi C. Appropriateness of plantar pressure measurement devices: a comparative technical assessment. Gait Posture. May 2010;32(1):141-144. 59. Brenton-Rule A, Mattock J, Carroll M, et al. Reliability of the TekScan MatScan® system for the measurement of postural stability in older people with rheumatoid arthritis. J Foot Ankle Res. Aug 2012;5:21. 60. EOS GmbH. EOS system data sheet EOS P 396. 2013. https://www.eos.info/systems_solutions/plastic/systems_equipment/eos_p_396. 61. Wu SH, Liang HW, Hou WH. Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index. J Formos Med Assoc. Feb 2008;107(2):111-118. 62. Gijon-Nogueron G, Palomo-Toucedo I, Gil-Tinoco A, Ortega-Avila AB, Munuera-Martínez PV. Effect produced on ground reaction forces by a prefabricated, weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing foot orthosis in the treatment of pronated foot: Pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). Jun 2018;97(22):e10960. 63. Gijon-Nogueron G, Cortes-Jeronimo E, Cervera-Marin JA, García-de-la-Peña R, Benhamu-Benhamu S, Luque-Suarez A. Foot orthoses custom-made by vacuum forming on the non-load-bearing foot: preliminary results in male children with calcaneal apophysitis (Sever's disease). Prosthet Orthot Int. Dec 2013;37(6):495-498. 64. Healy A, Dunning DN, Chockalingam N. Materials used for footwear orthoses: a review. Footwear Science. Jun 2010;2(2):93-110. 65. Hähni M, Hirschmüller A, Baur H. The effect of foot orthoses with forefoot cushioning or metatarsal pad on forefoot peak plantar pressure in running. J Foot Ankle Res. Nov 2016;9:44. 66. Ohuchi H, Chavez JS, Alvarez CAD. Changes in calcaneal pitch and heel fat pad thickness in static weight bearing radiographs while wearing shoes with arch support and heel cup orthotics. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. Jul 2019;17:21-24. 67. Moghadam M, Ashayeri H, Salavati M, et al. Reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability in healthy older adults: effects of postural task difficulty and cognitive load. Gait Posture. Apr 2011;33(4):651-655. 68. Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK. A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol. Mar 1994;49(2):M72-84. 69. Feuerbach JW, Grabiner MD, Koh TJ, Weiker GG. Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 1994;22(2):223-229. 70. Chen TH, Chou LW, Tsai MW, Lo MJ, Kao MJ. Effectiveness of a heel cup with an arch support insole on the standing balance of the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. Mar 2014;9:351-356. 71. Guskiewicz KM, Perrin DH. Effect of orthotics on postural sway following inversion ankle sprain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. May 1996;23(5):326-331. 72. Tahmasebi R, Karimi MT, Satvati B, Fatoye F. Evaluation of standing stability in individuals with flatfeet. Foot Ankle Spec. Jun 2015;8(3):168-174. 73. Dingenen B, Staes FF, Janssens L. A new method to analyze postural stability during a transition task from double-leg stance to single-leg stance. J Biomech. Sep 2013;46(13):2213-2219. 74. Levin O, Van Nevel A, Malone C, Van Deun S, Duysens J, Staes F. Sway activity and muscle recruitment order during transition from double to single-leg stance in subjects with chronic ankle instability. Gait Posture. Jul 2012;36(3):546-551. 75. Hsieh RL, Peng HL, Lee WC. Short-term effects of customized arch support insoles on symptomatic flexible flatfoot in children: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). May 2018;97(20):e10655. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71505 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:客製化鞋墊能針對功能性扁平足進行介入與矯正,過去已有使用三維列印技術製作鞋墊的文獻,然而使用的技術類型、材料與結構設計不一,使其在療效方面相比傳統製程或是減法製程尚無法定論。 實驗目的:使用電腦輔助設計配合三維列印製程製作客製化鞋墊,建立臨床驗證流程,比較不同熱塑性聚合物的鞋墊於功能性扁平足受試者穿戴後的足部功能與生物力學參數變化。 方法:本計畫收入10位功能性扁平足患者(足部姿勢指數大於六分)進行三種鞋墊的穿戴,分別採用三維列印(尼龍與熱塑性聚氨酯材質)與電腦銑床製作(乙烯醋酸乙烯酯共聚物材質)。實驗利用足底壓力感測器與量表紀錄介入後的生物力學參數、疼痛與個別一週穿戴後的足部療效。統計則採用弗理曼二因子等級變異數分析與事後分析來比較組間差異。 結果:尼龍材質的三維列印鞋墊能降低第一蹠骨的最大足底壓力與力量,行走時能將身體重心帶往外側偏移,也擁有最好的舒適度並降低其疼痛程度。熱塑性聚氨酯材質的三維列印鞋墊能增加內側中足的最大足底壓力、力量與接觸面積,重新分配重量以降低足部疼痛。此外,三維列印鞋墊都能降低單腳時的重心偏移速度,然而彼此之間卻沒有顯著差異。個別穿戴一週後,所有鞋墊的足部功能量表分數都會顯著下降,然而熱塑性聚氨酯材質的鞋墊相較乙烯醋酸乙烯酯共聚物材質的鞋墊其分數會相對上升。 結論:三維列印提供精準的客製化鞋墊製程,尼龍與熱塑性聚氨酯三維列印鞋墊能有效改善功能性扁平足患者的足部生物力學表現、疼痛與功能,可作為客製化鞋墊的新選擇。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Functional flatfoot can be treated with customized insoles. There have been few studies using 3D printing for customized insoles for functional flatfoot. Besides, compared to the traditional methods and subtractive manufacturing, the effect of 3D printing insoles is still controversial and depends on technology, materials and design. Purpose: This study aims to compare the effects of 3D printing customized insoles using different thermoplastic materials on functional flatfoot patients’ foot function and biomechanics. Method: Ten patients with functional flatfoot (foot function index > 6) were recruited in this study and wore three kinds of customized insoles fabricated by 3D printing with Nylon (3D-Nylon) and TPU (3D-TPU) or computer numerical control machine with EVA (CNC-EVA). F-Scan system and questionnaires were used to record foot biomechanics and pain after wearing insoles immediately, and foot conditions each week. Statistical analysis was adopted for the Friedman test and post-hoc test for all outcome measures to test the difference between groups. Result: 3D-Nylon insole significantly decreased peak pressure and peak force in 1st metatarsal, shifted the center of pressure (COP) laterally, and alleviated pain during walking. 3D-TPU insole increased peak pressure, peak force and contact area in the medial midfoot, which reduced pain during walking. During single leg stance, COP excursion velocity was decreased with all insoles when compared with shoe alone condition. However, there was no significant difference between groups. Foot function index (FFI) was decreased with all insoles when compared with shoe alone condition. Besides, FFI was significantly higher with 3D-TPU insole than CNC-EVA insole. Conclusion: 3D printing provides a precise fabrication process of customized insoles. 3D-Nylon and 3D-TPU insoles can effectively improve the biomechanical performance, pain and function of the foot of patients with functional flatfoot, and can be used as a new choice for customized insoles. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:02:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2011202010451300.pdf: 2789729 bytes, checksum: 7fc1699c1d1972a80f27ddadced20ee3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 致謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 表目錄 ix 圖目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 問題陳述 3 1.3 研究目的 3 1.4 研究假說 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 足部構造與足型分類 5 2.2 功能性扁平足 5 2.2.1 成人功能性扁平足的病因 6 2.2.2 成人功能性扁平足的評估 8 2.2.3 功能性扁平足的處理 9 2.3 功能性扁平足與疾病的關聯 10 2.3.1 足底壓力與接觸面積改變 11 2.3.2 壓力中心變化 12 2.4 鞋墊 13 2.4.1 鞋墊製作產業現況 13 2.4.2 製程方式與優勢 14 2.4.3 客製化鞋墊對於功能性扁平足的療效 16 2.5 積層製造 17 2.5.1 積層製造於鞋墊產業應用 17 2.5.2 材料擠製成型 17 2.5.3 粉末床熔融技術 19 2.5.4 新型熱塑性材料的特性與優勢 20 第三章 實驗方法 23 3.1 實驗設計 23 3.2 樣本數估計 23 3.3 納入條件 23 3.4 排除條件 24 3.5 儀器 24 3.5.1 足底壓力感測器系統 24 3.5.2 三維列印機台 26 3.6 實驗流程 28 3.7 結果測量 31 3.7.1 主要量測項目 – 生物力學參數 31 3.7.2 次要量測項目 – 疼痛、量表 31 3.8 統計分析 32 第四章 結果 34 4.1基本資料 34 4.2生物力學參數 35 4.3壓力中心 37 4.3.1 壓力中心偏移指數 37 4.3.2 前後、內外方向與整體之偏移速度 38 4.3.3 壓力中心偏移橢圓面積 39 4.4 疼痛與舒適度 40 4.5 足部功能量表 41 第五章 討論 42 5.1 三維列印鞋墊的優勢 42 5.2 三維列印鞋墊對於行走時的生物力學療效 43 5.3 三維列印鞋墊對於平衡能力的影響 46 5.4 鞋墊穿戴之反饋與後續量表追蹤 47 5.5 實驗限制 48 第六章 結論 50 參考文獻 51 附表 59 附圖 60 附錄 80 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 客製化鞋墊對於功能性扁平足患者的生物力學與疼痛之療效 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Customized Insoles on Biomechanics and Pain in Patients with Functional Flatfoot | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 王興國(Hsing-Kuo Wang) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡永裕(Yung-Yu Tsai),葉坤達(Kun-Da Yeh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 扁平足,三維列印,鞋墊,生物力學, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Flatfoot,3D printing,Insole,Biomechanics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004345 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-11-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2011202010451300.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.72 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。