請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71503
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王湉妮 | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Lun Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃國倫 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:02:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2029-12-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-03-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E., & Stein, R. E. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res, 11(3), 193-205.
Arnould, C., Penta, M., & Thonnard, J. L. (2007). Hand impairments and their relationship with manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(9), 708-714. Auld, M. L., Boyd, R. N., Moseley, G. L., & Johnston, L. M. (2011). Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: a clinimetric review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 31(4), 413-439. Auld, M. L., Boyd, R. N., Moseley, G. L., Ware, R. S., & Johnston, L. M. (2012a). Tactile function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy compared to typically developing children. Disabil Rehabil, 34(17), 1488-1494. Auld, M. L., Boyd, R. N., Moseley, G. L., Ware, R. S., & Johnston, L. M. (2012b). Impact of tactile dysfunction on upper-limb motor performance in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93(4), 696-702. Auld, M. L., & Johnston, L. M. (2018). A touchy topic: tactile assessment among pediatric therapists. Disabil Rehabil, 40(3), 267-276. Auld, M. L., Russo, R., Moseley, G. L., & Johnston, L. M. (2014). Determination of interventions for upper extremity tactile impairment in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol, 56(9), 815-832. Auld, M. L., Ware, R. S., Boyd, R. N., Moseley, G. L., & Johnston, L. M. (2012). Reproducibility of tactile assessments for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 32(2), 151-166. Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. (2006). Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. Acta Psychol (Amst), 121(1), 1-20. Bruton, A., Conway, J. H., & Holgate, S. T. (2000). Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy, 86(2), 94-99. Bumin, G., & Kavak, S. T. (2010). An investigation of the factors affecting handwriting skill in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil, 32(8), 692-703. Dannenbaum, R. M., Michaelsen, S. M., Desrosiers, J., & Levin, M. F. (2002). Development and validation of two new sensory tests of the hand for patients with stroke. Clin Rehabil, 16(6), 630-639. Ekstrand, E., Lexell, J., & Brogardh, C. (2016). Test-retest reliability of the Shape/Texture Identification test(TM) in people with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil, 30(11), 1120-1127. Gaubert, C. S., & Mockett, S. P. (2000). Inter-rater reliability of the Nottingham method of stereognosis assessment. Clin Rehabil, 14(2), 153-159. Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med, 30(1), 1-15. Hsu, H. Y., Kuo, L. C., Jou, I. M., Chen, S. M., Chiu, H. Y., & Su, F. C. (2013). Establishment of a proper manual tactile test for hands with sensory deficits. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 94(3), 451-458. Huang, S. L., Hsieh, C. L., Wu, R. M., & Lu, W. S. (2017). Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Taiwan Geriatric Depression Scale in patients with Parkinson's disease. PLoS One, 12(9), e0184823. Huang, Y. J., Wang, Y. L., Wu, T. Y., Chen, C. T., Kuo, K. N., Chen, S. S., Hou, W. H., Hsieh, C. L. (2015). Validation of the short-form Health Literacy Scale in patients with stroke. Patient Educ Couns, 98(6), 762-770. Kalron, A., Greenberg-Avrahami, M., & Achiron, A. (2015). Validity and test-retest reliability of a measure of hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis: the ReSense test. Disabil Rehabil, 37(10), 914-920. Kawai, S. (2002). Heaviness perception. I. Constant involvement of haptically perceived size in weight discrimination. Exp Brain Res, 147(1), 16-22. Klingels, K., De Cock, P., Molenaers, G., Desloovere, K., Huenaerts, C., Jaspers, E., & Feys, H. (2010). Upper limb motor and sensory impairments in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Can they be measured reliably? Disabil Rehabil, 32(5), 409-416. Klingels, K., Demeyere, I., Jaspers, E., De Cock, P., Molenaers, G., Boyd, R., & Feys, H. (2012). Upper limb impairments and their impact on activity measures in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 16(5), 475-484. Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med, 15(2), 155-163. Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160. Kuo, H. C., Gordon, A. M., Henrionnet, A., Hautfenne, S., Friel, K. M., & Bleyenheuft, Y. (2016). The effects of intensive bimanual training with and without tactile training on tactile function in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: A pilot study. Res Dev Disabil, 49-50, 129-139. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol, 19(3), 342-368. Lima, D. H., Queiroz, A. P., De Salvo, G., Yoneyama, S. M., Oberg, T. D., & Lima, N. M. (2010). Brazilian version of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment: validity, agreement and reliability. Rev Bras Fisioter, 14(2), 166-174. Lincoln, N. B., Jackson, J. M., & Adams, S. A. (1998). Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients. Physiotherapy, 84(8), 358-365. Mawase, F., Bar-Haim, S., & Karniel, A. (2011). Lack of predictive control in lifting series of virtual objects by individuals with diplegic cerebral palsy. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 19(6), 686-695. Miller, K. J., Phillips, B. A., Martin, C. L., Wheat, H. E., Goodwin, A. W., & Galea, M. P. (2009). The AsTex: clinimetric properties of a new tool for evaluating hand sensation following stroke. Clin Rehabil, 23(12), 1104-1115. Nascimento, L. P., Martini, J., Voos, M. C., Chien, H. F., & Caromano, F. A. (2016). Development of a new haptic perception instrument: a pilot study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 74(1), 75-80. Oskoui, M., Coutinho, F., Dykeman, J., Jette, N., & Pringsheim, T. (2013). An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol, 55(6), 509-519. Pavao, S. L., Silva, F. P., Savelsbergh, G. J., & Rocha, N. A. (2015). Use of sensory information during postural control in children with cerebral palsy: systematic review. J Mot Behav, 47(4), 291-301. Petersen, E., Tomhave, W., Agel, J., Bagley, A., James, M., & Van Heest, A. (2016). The Effect of Treatment on Stereognosis in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy. J Hand Surg Am, 41(1), 91-96. Sakzewski, L., Ziviani, J., & Boyd, R. (2010). The relationship between unimanual capacity and bimanual performance in children with congenital hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol, 52(9), 811-816. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ, 2, 53-55. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol, 60(1), 34-42. Wang, T. N., Liang, K. J., Liu, Y. C., Shieh, J. Y., & Chen, H. L. (2017). Psychometric and Clinimetric Properties of the Melbourne Assessment 2 in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 98(9), 1836-1841. Williams, P. S., Basso, D. M., Case-Smith, J., & Nichols-Larsen, D. S. (2006). Development of the Hand Active Sensation Test: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(11), 1471-1477. Wingert, J. R., Burton, H., Sinclair, R. J., Brunstrom, J. E., & Damiano, D. L. (2008). Tactile sensory abilities in cerebral palsy: deficits in roughness and object discrimination. Dev Med Child Neurol, 50(11), 832-838. Wolny, T., Linek, P., & Michalski, P. (2017). Inter-rater reliability of two-point discrimination in acute stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation, 41(1), 127-134. Wu, C. Y., Chuang, I. C., Ma, H. I., Lin, K. C., & Chen, C. L. (2016). Validity and Responsiveness of the Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment for Outcome Evaluation in Stroke Rehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther, 70(2), 7002290040p1-7002290040p8. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71503 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 前言:腦性麻痺孩童常伴隨上肢功能缺損,上肢功能缺損又以感覺及動作功能缺損最為常見。過去文獻顯示,約20~90%的腦性麻痺孩童有觸覺功能缺損之情形,過去文獻亦顯示觸覺知覺功能為預測腦性麻痺孩童上肢動作功能的重要因子,然而,目前應用於腦性麻痺孩童的觸覺知覺評估工具有些許限制,此外,亦無任何評估工具全面性地評估腦性麻痺孩童觸覺知覺功能,因此,本研究目的為發展一個標準化功能性觸覺知覺評估工具,並初步驗證本工具應用於腦性麻痺孩童之心理計量特性(包含內部一致性信度、再測信度、收斂效度、已知族群效度以及天花板/地板效應)。
方法:藉由文獻回顧與團隊會議討論,本團隊設計出一套包含物品、形狀、粗細、軟硬、重量等五個面向的觸覺知覺測驗。另外,為了驗證本工具於腦性麻痺孩童之心理計量特性,本研究招募4至13歲的腦性麻痺孩童與典型發展孩童。治療師於兩周內重複施測本測驗於同一名腦性麻痺孩童,此外,治療師亦施測外在校標(西門-韋恩斯坦單絲測驗、靜態/動態兩點區辨、修訂版諾丁漢感覺評估量表、墨爾本評估第二版),以檢測本測驗於腦性麻痺孩童之心理計量特性,典型發展孩童則僅需接受一次施測。 結果:物品與形狀分測驗擁有良好至可接受的內部一致性信度,且本工具的五項分測驗於腦性麻痺孩童非慣用手(患側手)的測驗分數擁有良好的再測信度。本工具亦於腦性麻痺孩童非慣用手(患側手)呈現良好的收斂效度與已知族群效度,而物品、形狀、粗細、軟硬等四項分測驗呈現顯著的天花板效應。 討論:本工具於腦性麻痺孩童非慣用手(患側手)上具有良好的信效度,期待後續研究改良本工具並驗證其反應性,並推廣至臨床實務應用。 關鍵字:腦性麻痺孩童、觸覺功能、評估工具、信效度 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often have problems in upper-limb motor and sensory functions. According to previous studies, about 20–90% of children with CP have tactile deficits. In addition, tactile perception functions have been reported to be potential predictors of upper limb motor function in children with CP. Despite their importance, the existing tactile perception assessment tools have some critical limitations. Also, no comprehensive standardized tactile perception test is currently available for children with CP. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop a new standardized functional tactile perception test, the Observatory Test of Tactile Perception (OTTP). Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the OTTP, including internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent validity, known-group validity and ceiling/floor effects, were also examined in children with CP.
Method: The OTTP, including five subtests (i.e., object, shape, roughness, hardness and heaviness perception), was developed with standardized procedures. Children with CP and typically developing children aged 4 to 13 years were recruited to examine the psychometric properties of the OTTP. Each child with CP completed two assessment sessions within intervals of about 2 weeks. The typically developing children were tested only once. The OTTP, Semmes–Weinstein Monofilaments, Two-Point Discrimination, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, Melbourne Assessment 2, and Manual Ability Classification System were administrated. Result: The object and shape perception subtests had acceptable internal consistency reliability with alpha or KR-20 values greater than 0.8. The OTTD had good test–retest reliability in the non-dominant (more-affected) hand (ICC > 0.8), but moderate test–retest reliability in the dominant (less-affected) hand among three out of the five subtests. The OTTD presented good convergent reliability and known-group validity in the non-dominant (more-affected) hand of children with CP. Four subtests of the OTTD showed notable ceiling effects in both hands. Discussion: The OTTP is a reliable and valid measure of tactile perception in children with CP. The OTTP comprehensively measures five domains of tactile perception functions to help therapists capture the scope of children’s tactile perception performances. The OTTP is recommended for use in the non-dominant (more-affected) hand of children with CP in clinical practice. Further refinement and examination of other psychometric properties are needed in the future. Keywords: Cerebral Palsy, Tactile Perception, Assessment, Reliability, Validity | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:02:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05429003-1.pdf: 1162632 bytes, checksum: 4a70868b8907434a1deb9fd57869b71e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv Tables of Contents vi List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Tactile Perception Assessment Tools 2 1.2.1 Spatial perception 3 1.2.2 Object perception 4 1.2.3 Shape perception 5 1.2.4 Roughness perception 6 1.2.5 Hardness perception 8 1.2.6 Heaviness perception 9 1.3 Purposes 11 Chapter 2 Method 12 2.1 Development of the OTTP 12 2.1.1 Object perception 13 2.1.2 Shape perception 13 2.1.3 Roughness perception 14 2.1.4 Hardness perception 15 2.1.5 Heaviness perception 15 2.2 Psychometric Properties of the OTTP 16 2.2.1 Participants 16 2.2.2 Procedure 16 2.2.3 Data Analysis 17 2.2.3.1 Reliability 17 2.2.3.1.1 Internal consistency 17 2.2.3.1.2 Test–retest Reliability 18 2.2.3.2 Validity 19 2.2.3.2.1 Convergent Validity 19 2.2.3.2.2 Known-Group Validity 19 2.2.3.2.3 Ceiling/Floor Effects 19 Chapter 3 Results 21 3.1 Demographic Characteristics of the Participants 21 3.2 Descriptive Statistics 21 3.3 Reliability 22 3.3.1 Internal consistency 22 3.3.2 Test–retest reliability 22 3.4 Validity 23 3.4.1 Convergent validity 23 3.4.2 Known-group validity 23 3.4.3 Ceiling effect 23 Chapter 4 Discussion 24 4.1 Reliability 24 4.1.1 Internal consistency 24 4.1.2 Test–retest reliability 24 4.2 Validity 26 4.2.1 Convergent validity 26 4.2.2 Known-group validity 27 4.2.3 Ceiling effect 27 4.3 Limitation 28 4.3.1 Sample size 28 4.3.2 Sampling 29 4.3.3 Cognitive function 29 4.4 Future work 29 4.4.1 Revision 29 4.4.2 Further examination 30 4.5 Conclusion 30 Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the participants 32 Table 2. Scores of the OTTP in the CP and TDC groups 33 Table 3. Scores of the OTTP of both sessions in the CP group 34 Table 4. Scores of the external criteria in the CP group 35 Table 5. Internal consistency of object and shape perception subtests 36 Table 6. Cronbach’s α coefficient of the object perception subtest 37 Table 7. Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 of shape perception subtest 38 Table 8. Intraclass correlation coefficient of the OTTP and the rNSA 39 Table 9. Standard error of measurement of the OTTP and the rNSA 40 Table 10. Minimal detectable change with 95% confidence of the OTTP and the rNSA 41 Table 11. Correlation between the OTTP and the external criteria 42 Table 12. Percentage of participants with the highest and the lowest possible scores 43 Figure 1. Bland-Altman plot of the object perception subtest 44 Figure 2. Bland-Altman plot of the shape perception subtest 45 Figure 3. Bland-Altman plot of the roughness perception subtest 46 Figure 4. Bland-Altman plot of the hardness perception subtest 47 Figure 5. Bland-Altman plot of the heaviness perception subtest 48 References 49 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 腦性麻痺孩童觸覺知覺測驗之發展 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Development of the Observation Test of Tactile Perception for Children with Cerebral Palsy | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝清麟,郭立杰,陳顥齡,謝正宜 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 腦性麻痺孩童,觸覺功能,評估工具,信效度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Cerebral Palsy,Tactile Perception,Assessment,Reliability,Validity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 53 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900340 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。