請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71410
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王俊能(Chun-Neng Wang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chieh Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王郁傑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:00:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-02-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-02-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New german critique(65), 125-133.
Azfar, O. (2002). The New Institutional Economics Approach to Economic Development-An Analytic Primer. The Pakistan Development Review, 45, 965-980. Becker, M., McRobb, R., Watson, F., Droge, E., Kanyembo, B., Murdoch, J., & Kakumbi, C. (2013). Evaluating wire-snare poaching trends and the impacts of by-catch on elephants and large carnivores. Biological Conservation, 158, 26-36. Bennett, E. L., & Robinson, J. G. (2000). Hunting of wildlife in tropical forests: implications for biodiversity and forest peoples. Environment Department working papers, 76. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251-1262. E. Bodmer, R., & Robinson, J. (2004). Evaluating the sustainability of hunting in the nootropics. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and society, 15(4). Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441-473. Jones, J. P. G., Andriamarovololona, M. M., & Hockley, N. (2008). The Importance of Taboos and Social Norms to Conservation in Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 22(4), 976-986. Keuling, O., Stier, N., & Roth, M. (2008). How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.? European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54(4), 729. Kim, M., L. M. Baskin, K. J.-C. Pei, R. Taber, A. Müller and K. Kaji. 2018. Chapter 34: Wildlife policy and laws in East Asia. Page 445-479 In “North American Wildlife Policy and Law” (Eds. Leopold, B.D., W. B. Kessler and J. L. Cummins), Boone and Crockett Club, 624p, Missoula. McCullough, D. R. (1996). Spatially structured populations and harvest theory. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1-9. North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of theoretical politics, 2(4), 355-367. Noss, A. J. (1998). The impacts of cable snare hunting on wildlife populations in the forests of the Central African Republic. Conservation Biology, 12(2), 390-398. Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C., & Walker, R. S. (2005). An empirical test of source–sink dynamics induced by hunting. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(5), 910-920. Novaro, A. J., Redford, K. H., & Bodmer, R. E. (2000). Effect of hunting in source‐sink systems in the neotropics. Conservation Biology, 14(3), 713-721. Ostrom, E. (1994). Constituting Social Capital and Collective Action. Journal of theoretical politics, 6(4), 527-562. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World development, 29(2), 209-227. Reyes-García, V., Aceituno-Mata, L., Calvet-Mir, L., Garnatje, T., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Lastra, J. J., . . . Vallès, J. (2014). Resilience of traditional knowledge systems: the case of agricultural knowledge in home gardens of the Iberian Peninsula. Global Environmental Change, 24, 223-231. Scillitani, L., Monaco, A., & Toso, S. (2010). Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56(3), 307-318. SIRÉN, A., HAMBÄCK, P., & MACHOA, J. (2004). Including Spatial Heterogeneity and Animal Dispersal When Evaluating Hunting: a Model Analysis and an Empirical Assessment in an Amazonian Community. Conservation Biology, 18(5), 1315-1329. Skoog, G. E. (2005). Supporting the development of institutions–formal and informal rules. UTV Working Paper, 3. Sodeikat, G., & Pohlmeyer, K. (2002). Temporary home range modifications of wild boar family groups (Sus scrofa L.) caused by drive hunts in Lower Saxony (Germany). Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft, 48(1), 161-166. von Halle, B. O., & Director, T. S. A. (2002). Preliminary assessment of the environmental and socio-economic impacts of wild meat harvesting in South America. Links between Biodiversity, Conservation, Livelihoods and Food Security: the sustainable use of wild species for meat. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, 24, 61-69. Willcox, A. S., & Nambu, D. M. (2007). Wildlife hunting practices and bushmeat dynamics of the Banyangi and Mbo people of Southwestern Cameroon. Biological Conservation, 134(2), 251-261. 巴唐志強(2010)。臺灣原住民東魯凱族的狩獵文化與認同探究。國立體育大學體育推廣學系碩士班碩士論文。 交通部公路總局蘇花公路改善工程處(2017)。台9 線蘇花公路山區路段改善計畫(蘇澳~東澳、南澳~和平、和中~大清水)指標生物研究計畫研究調查報告-106年期末報告書。 吳幸如(2009)。狩獵與危害防治對臺灣野豬(Susscrofataivanus)族群影響之探討。臺灣師範大學生命科學系博士論文。 吳雯菁(2005)。再見/再現獵人: 一個魯凱族部落的獵人意涵探索。臺灣大學森林學研究所學位論文。 李亦園(1963)。 南澳的泰雅人: 民族學田野調查與硏究。中央硏究院民族學硏究所。 拉互依(2008)。是誰在講什麼樣的知識-Smangus 部落主體性建構與地方知識實踐。靜宜大學生態學系研究所碩士論文 林玉珮(2006)。丹大地區布農族狩獵現況之調查研究。臺灣師範大學生命科學研究所碩士論文。 崔万田、周晔馨(2006)。正式制度与非正式制度的关系探析。教学与研究, 8,頁 42-48。 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究:五南。 黃國超(2001)。神聖的瓦解與重建-鎮西堡泰雅人的宗教變遷。國立清華大學人類學研究所碩士論文 裴家騏(2010)。魯凱族的狩獵知識與文化-傳統生態知識的價值。台灣原住民研究論叢, 8,頁 67-84。 戴興盛、莊武龍、林祥偉(2011)。原住民於何處狩獵?東臺灣太魯閣族某村落之實證研究。地理學報(62),頁 49-72。 戴興盛、呂翊齊(2018)。花蓮太魯閣族漁獵場的空間分布研究。科技部106年專題研究計畫成果報告。 戴蕾(2005)。泰雅人的家: 共食與餵養。臺灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。 藍姆路卡造(2013)。吉拉米代部落獵人的身體經驗與地方知識。國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所碩士論文。 顏愛靜、孫稚堤(2008)。原住民地區共用資源自主治理之研究-以馬里克彎河域的護魚行動為例。地理學報(52),頁 53-91。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71410 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自2017年10月到2018年4月,共參與並記錄三位南澳泰雅族獵人的陷阱獵的陷阱位置、獵徑、獵物種類、數量、捕獲狀態、利用方式。另外還訪談了7位中老年獵人。結果發現獵場面積小、鄰近部落道路為當代獵場的主要特徵,而數個不同獵區輪替使用、定期巡視、監督人為干擾、精準擺設、主要冬季狩獵等,則為南澳獵人經營獵區的模式。從狩獵成果發現,陷阱地點的選擇、定期的巡視、獵具的改進和選擇性的放生,是達到獵物選擇、降低腐爛率,和以較低努力量即可獲得穩定收獲量的關鍵,也是在地生態知識(LEK)於陷阱獵過程中的展現。此外,生態知識養成、山野技術實踐、信仰連結的實際經驗、gaga的遵守和獵人形象的展現,也是陷阱獵過程中,南澳獵人認同的文化內涵。至今許多中老年獵人,仍堅持每年放陷阱,雖然已非經濟需求,但卻充滿文化認同的實踐與肩負傳承的使命感。從歷史脈絡來看,影響狩獵努力量的主因為銷售管道、族群數量、環境改變和政府法令。多數獵人認為只要禁止商業買賣,以及在道路可及性的限制之下,便不會有過度狩獵的疑慮。最後,本研究發現LEK是將世代傳承的歷史記憶、獵人實踐的身體經驗,以及來自教育、媒體的外部知識,透過個人的整合與詮釋,所建立的在地知識,而此LEK經過集體再現的過程,形成一套集體認同與共享的資訊。這些元素,再透過文化內化的方式,影響個人的實踐。其包含了集體的認同,與個人差異化的詮釋。在當代,陷阱獵的LEK面臨世代傳承斷層、集體生產、共享成果的社會關係減弱,以及外部正式制度打壓的挑戰,使得在地知識的生產、創新、非正式規則的運作遭受阻礙,增加資源治理的成本。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | From October 2017 to April 2018, I participated in the trap hunting of three Atayal hunters in Nanao, Ilan, and recorded the trap position, hunting path, and the species, quantity, capture status and utilization of the game. In addition, seven middle-aged hunters were also interviewed. The results show that small area and adjacent to roads are the main features of the hunting grounds. Nanao hunters manage the hunting grounds by rotation of several small hunting grounds, regular inspections of human disturbance, effective set, and seasonal hunting. The harvest result shows that choice of trap locations, regular inspections, improved hunting tools and selective release are key to achieving prey selection, reducing wastage, and achieving stable harvests with lower effort. Trap hunting is the demonstration of local ecological knowledge, LEK. Also, the development of ecological knowledge, practice of wild survival skills, connection with faith, practice of gaga and the role model of the hunter represent Nanao hunters’ cultural connotations in the trap hunting practice. Nowadays, many middle-aged and old hunters persist in putting traps every year, which is not for domestic demand, but for their cultural identity and inheritance. From a historical perspective, hunting effort is affected by the lack of sale channels, decrease of wildlife population, environmental changes, and the government decree. Most hunters believe that as long as commercial trade are prohibited and the access to roads is limited, there will be no concern about overharvesting. Finally, this study found that LEK consists of knowledge passed down from generation to generation, experience of hunting practice, as well as the external knowledge from education and media. Through collective representation, these elements form a set of collective identity and shared information, which affect individual behavior. LEK contains both collective identity and individual interpretation. At the present time, LEK of trap hunting faces the challenges of inheritance, weakened relationship of reciprocity, and prohibited by the external institution, all of which may hinder the production, innovation, and operation of LEK. As the result, the nature resource management may be high-cost and inefficient. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:00:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R03b44014-1.pdf: 3332513 bytes, checksum: 054caa125369d841a6bed5e3cf1d8f71 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 iv 表目錄 vi 圖目錄 viii 壹、 研究動機及相關研究之探討 1 一、 研究動機 1 二、 文獻回顧 2 貳、 研究目的與問題 9 參、 研究過程與方法 10 一、 先前理解 10 二、 與研究對象的關係 10 三、 參與式觀察 11 四、 半結構式訪談 11 五、 以獵人為主體的書寫 13 六、 研究限制 13 肆、 名詞定義 14 伍、 研究結果與討論 15 一、 三位獵人狩獵模式記錄 15 二、 三位獵人狩獵成果統計分析 26 三、 陷阱獵在地生態知識的內涵 36 四、 獵場經營模式 48 五、 影響陷阱獵成果的因子 57 六、 陷阱獵LEK的運作模式與挑戰 71 七、 獵人對狩獵管理的看法 75 陸、 結論 79 一、 陷阱獵的LEK內涵 79 二、 LEK的運作機制 80 三、 未來研究建議 80 參考文獻 82 附錄-訪談大綱 85 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 南澳泰雅獵人陷阱獵的個案研究:一個在地生態知識的觀點 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Cases study on the trap hunting practice in Atayal, Nanao, Ilan: a local ecological knowledge perspective. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 裴家騏(Jai-Chyi Pei) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 戴興盛(Hsing-Sheng Tai) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 傳統生態知識,套索陷阱,永續狩獵,野生動物經營管理,社會規範, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | traditional ecological knowledge,snare trap,sustainable hunting,wildlife management,social norms, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900496 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-02-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.25 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。