Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71241
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳鴻基
dc.contributor.authorZheng-Tang Guoen
dc.contributor.author郭政堂zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T05:00:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-01
dc.date.copyright2018-07-31
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-07-25
dc.identifier.citation一、中文文獻
1.王熙哲(2007)。銀髮族創新採納理論之建構:以新科技產品為例。元智大學管理研究所博士論文。未出版。
2.王儷玲。(2018)。金融科技時代下的資安風險。遠見雜誌。取自:
https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=44066
3.吳東憲、林信惠。(2015)。以風險管理與知識整合確保大型資訊專案之績效—以新建製造工廠為例。商略學報。頁 251-266。
4.林佩璇。(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。國立中正大學主編,質的教育研究方法,頁 239-262。
5.林信惠、黃明祥、王文良(2010)。軟體專案管理。臺北市:智勝文化。
6.哈佛商業評論(譯)。(2016)。變身敏捷企業(原作者:Darrell K. R., Jeff S. and Hirotaka T.)。取自https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0003465.html
7.國際商業機器公司(2015)。敏捷.大膽.無疆界擁抱新數位時代的贏家策略。2015 IBM CAMS關鍵報告。取自:https://www-07.ibm.com/tw/blueview/2015apr/pdf/p6.pdf
8.陳向明。(1999)。質的研究方法與社會科學研究。中國大陸出版。
9.陳向明。(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南圖書。
10.陳錦輝(譯)。(2015)。敏捷與Scrum軟體開發速成(原作者:Chris S. and Hillary L. J.)。新北市:博碩文化。
11.程文郁(2002)。以質性研究方法探討消費者選擇行動電話服務業者之行為。國立中山大學管理學院企業管理研究所碩士論文。未出版。
12.黃明祥(2011)。系統分析與設計。臺中市:滄海書局。
13.黃振星(譯)。(2017)。SCRUM大型專案開發進化-用LeSS框架完成更多事(原作者:Craig L. and Bas V.)。台北市:松崗。
 
14.鄭炳強(2007)。軟體工程從實務出發。臺北市:智勝文化。
15.錢一一(譯)。(2004)。與熊共舞—軟體專案的風險管理(原作者:Tom D. and Timothy L.)。臺北市:經濟新潮社。
二、英文文獻
1. Agarwal, R., and Sambamurthy, V. 2002. 'Principles and Models for Organizing the IT Function,' MIS Quarterly Executive, p.p. 1-16.
2.Amab D., Guo C. A. Peng and Alok C., 2013,”Risks in enterprise cloud computing:the perspective of IT experts”, Journal of Computer Information Systems,pp.39-48
3.AIRMIC, ALARM, and IRM, 2010, “A Structured Approach to Enterprise Risk Management(ERM) and the requirements of ISO 31000.”
4.Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A. van, Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R. C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., and Thomas, D., 2001, “Manifesto for Agile Software Development,” Retrieved from http://agilemanifesto.org/
5.Boehm, B. W.,1991,“Software Risk Management: Principles and Practices,” IEEE Software,vol.8, pp.32-41.
6.Boehm, B., 2000, “Spiral Developments Experience and Implementation Challenges,” USC-SEI Workshop, pp.1-31.
7.Boehm, B., 1989, “Software Risk Management Tutorial,” IEEE Computer Society Press.
8.Boehm, B. and Turner R., 2003,“Using Risk to Balance Agile and Plan-Driven Methods,” IEEE Software,Vol.36, pp.57-66.
9.Bryman, A. ,1988,” Quantity and Quality in Social Research”, London: Unwin Hyman.
10.Carlo S. and Roberto V., 2017, “The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities”,Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, pp. 1728- 1752.
11.Cerveny, R. P., Garrify, E. J., and Sanders, G. L., 1995, “The Application of Prototyping to Systems Development: A Rationale and Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 42, No.1 , pp.50-61.
12.Chen, J. Wang, D. Pan, S. L., 2011, “Understanding Organizational Agility Development for Government – A Process Model of Resource Configuration.” PACIS.
13.Clancy, T., 2014, “The Standish Group Chaos-Project Smart,” The Standish Group.
14. CMMI Product Team, (2010), “CMMI for Development, Version 1.3.,” Retrieved from https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/asset_files/TechnicalReport/2010_005_001_15287.pdf
15.Cohen, M. D., 2007, “Reading Dewey: reflections on the study of routine,” Organizations Studies, Vol.28, pp.773-786.
16.Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A.,1990, “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128-152.
17.Conboy, K., 2009, “Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development,”Information Systems Research, Vol. 20, pp.329-354.
18.Daghfous, A., 2004,”Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices,” S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 69, pp.21-27.
19.Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. ,2000,” Handbook of Qualitative Research, “ Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
20.Duncan, R., 1976,”The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation,” The Management of Organization, Vol. 1,pp. 167-188.
21.Erande, A. S. Verma, A. K,2008, “Measuring Agility of Organizations – A Comprehensive Agility Measurement Tool (CAMT)”,Old Dominion University, Proceedings of The 2008 IAJC-IJME International Conference.
22.Fairley, R.E. and Willshire, M. J., 2003, ”Why the Vasa sank: 10 problems and some antidotes for software projects”, IEEE Software, pp.18-25
23.Feiler, P.H. and Humphrey, W.S., 1992, “Software Process Development and Enactment: Concepts and Defitions”, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
24.Fiol, C. M. and Lyles, M. A., 1985,”Organizational learning,” Acad. Management, pp.803-813.
25.Gebauer, H. and Worch, H.T., 2012, “Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation”, European Management Journal, Vol. 30, pp. 57-73.
26.Gibson, C. B. and Birkinshaw, J.,2004,” The antecedents,consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, pp.209-226.
27.Heckler, J. and Powell, A., 2016,” IT and Organizational Agility: A Review of Major Findings”, Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)
28.Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., and Winter, S. G., 2007, “Dynamic capabilities, Understanding strategic change in organizations,”Oxford, England: Blackwell.
29.Hareton L., 2001, “Organizational Factors for Successful Management of Software Development,”The Journal of Computer Information System,Vol.42, pp.26-37.
30.Herzog, P., 2011, “Open and Closed Innovation: Different Cultures for Different Strategies,” Gabler Verlag/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, New York.
31.Henk, W. V., Nicolai, J. F., Marjorie, A. L., 2010,”Perspective-Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize its Potential in the Organization Field,” Organization Science, Vol. 21, pp.931-951
32. James, S. D. and Allan, F., 2018,” Absorption, combination and desorption:
knowledge-oriented boundary spanning capacities,” Journal of Knowledge Management, Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0325
33.Jan M., Kai F. and Jon F. K., 2016,” The role of absorptive and desorptive capacity (ACDC) in sustainable supply management,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,Vol. 46, pp.177-210.
34.Janssen, L.M.A.W., 2010, “Organizational agility in an institutional context”, Supervisors: drs. M.C.P. Nijssen & prof. dr. J. Paauwe.
35. Jeff S. and Ken S., 2017, “The Scrum Guide-The Definitive Guide to Scrum:
The Rules of the Game,” Retrieved from https://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf
36.Kent B., 1999, “Embracing Change with Extreme Programming,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 32, pp.70-77.
37.Kirk, J. and Miller, M., 1988,”Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research,”London:Sage.
38.Koza, M. P. and Lewin, A. Y, 1998, “The co-evolution of strategic alliances,” Organization Science,Vol. 9,pp. 255-264.
39.Lane, P., Salk, J.E. and Lyles, M.A.,2001, “Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 1139-1161.
40.Lane, P. J., Lubatkin, M., 1998, “Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19, pp.461-477.
41.Lichtenthaler, U. ,Lichtenthaler, E. and Ernst, H., 2004, “Desorptive capacity: a new perspective on the external commercialization of knowledge,”Scientific Working Paper Series of Otto Beisheim Gradeuate School of Management, Vol. 99, pp.1-42.
42.Lichtenthaler, U.,2011, “Open innovation: past research, current debates and future directions,”Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 25, pp. 75-93.
43.Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G., 1985, “Naturalistic Inquiry,” England: Beverly Hills, Mowen.
44.March, J. G.,1991,” Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,” Organization Science, Vol 2., pp. 71-87.
45.Mathiassen, L., and Pries-Heje. J., 2006, “Business Agility and Diffusion of Information Technology,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 15, pp. 116-119.
46.Merriam, S. B.,1998,”Qualitative research and case study applications in education”,San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47. Mladenka, P., Matej, C. and Ines. M., 2015,” Organizational Ambidexterity,
Exploration, Exploitation and Firms Innovation Performance,” Organizacija,Vol.48,pp.112-118.
48.Netrix, 2017, “2017 IT Risks Report,” Retrieved from https://www.netwrix.com/2017itrisksreport.html
49.Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., and Sambamurthy, V., 2006, “Enterprise Agility and the Enabling Role of Information Technology,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 15, pp. 120-131.
50.Oz, E. and Sosik, J., 2000, “Why information systems projects are abandoned: a leadership and communication theory and exploratory study,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, pp. 66-78.
51.Persson, J. S., Nørbjerg, J., and Nielsen, P. A.,2016, “Improving ISD Agility in Fast-Moving Software Organizations,” Association for Information Systems,Vol. 96.
52.Richard E. K., David J. P. and Anne L. D., 2008, “ Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Y: Toward a Construct-valid Measure,” Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 20, pp.255-271.
53.Rivette, K. and Kline, D.,2000, “Discovering new value in intellectual property,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78 pp. 54-66.
54.Roger, L. Van Scoy, 1992,” Software Development Risk:Opportunity, Not Problem”,
Software Engineering Institute(SEI).
55.Ronald P. Higuera and Yacov Y. Haimes, 1996,” Software Risk Management”, Software Engineering Institute(SEI).
56.Rothaermel, F. T.,2001,” Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation,”Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp.687-699.
57.Rothaermel, F. T. and Alexandre, M. T.,2009,” Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity,” Organization Science, Vol. 20, pp. 759-780.
58.Royce, W.W., 1970, ”Managing the Development of Large Software Systems”, IEEE WESCON.
59.Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., and Grover, V., 2003, “Shaping Agility through Digital Options:Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 237-263.
60.Schmidt, R, Lyytinen, K., Keil, M. and Cule, P., 2001, “Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study,” Journal of Management Information Systems, pp.5-36.
61.Stake, R. E.,1995,” The art of case study research,” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.Szulanski, G.,1996, “Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practices within a firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 . , pp. 27-43. 
63.Schreyogg, G. and Kliesch-Eberl. M., 2007, “How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp.913-933.
64.Tellis, W., 1997,” Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report,” Vol. 3. Retrieved from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/tellis1.html .
65.Timothy K., 2007, ”IT project risk factors:The project management professionals perspective”, Journal of Computer Information Systems ,pp.61-69
66.Torgeir D. and Casper L., 2016, “Emerging themes in agile software development: Introduction to the special section on continuous value delivery,” Information and Software Technology,pp.56-60.
67.Tsoukas, H., 2009, “A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations,” Organization Science, Vol.20, pp.941-957.
68.Tushman, M. L. and O’Reilly, C. A. ,1996, “Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change,” California management review, Vol. 38,pp.8-30.
69. Yin, R., 1994,”Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.)”,Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
70.Zahra S. A. and George G., 2002, “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.27.
71.Zaidah Z., 2007, “Case study as a research method,” Journal Kemanusiaan bil, Vol. 9, pp.1-6.
72.Ziegler, N., Ruether, F., Bader, M.A. and Gassmann, O.,2013, “Creating value through external intellectual property commercialization: a desorptive capacity view”, The Journal of Technology Transfer,Vol. 38, pp. 930-949.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71241-
dc.description.abstract隨著新興資訊科技的興起,企業需隨時因應各式風險,而企業如何透過敏捷開發模式因應風險,即是一項極為重要的議題。然而考量現今敏捷開發模式著重於開發專案本身,無法協助企業迅速回應系統開發過程中的各式風險。基於文獻回顧,本研究目的在於不僅從資訊系統開發流程,亦從組織內外部環境及組織學習能力等層面,探討影響資訊系統開發的敏捷度因子,建構出一套協助企業快速應變風險的資訊系統開發敏捷度架構。
在結合台灣五間採用新興資訊科技的企業並以個案研究法分析後,本研究證實企業在資訊系統開發上,需從資訊系統開發(包含資訊系統敏捷開發模式、實踐工具、專案及風險管理方法、開發團隊溝通方式)、組織內部(包含開發團隊與組織互動方式、個人與各部門溝通方式、管理者思維、組織文化、目標及願景)、組織外部(包含產品服務屬性、與供應商及消費者互動方式、市場定位策略、市場競爭力)及組織學習能力(包含知識管理制度、組織文化、吸收能力、解吸能力、雙元性)等層面思考影響資訊系統開發敏捷度的因子並採取相對應之策略。分析結果顯示,具備開放、團結與樂於溝通的組織文化可幫助資訊系統開發敏捷度的建立,而個人動態能力的培養可成為組織順利建立敏捷度架構的關鍵依據,成為本研究之重要發現。期許資訊系統開發團隊邁向敏捷開發模式之餘,在面對組織溝通風氣建立、組織外部環境影響及個人動態能力培養上,搭配資訊系統開發敏捷度成熟度模型,評估資訊系統開發敏捷度的導入程度,進而達到快速因應風險的效果,將威脅及損失轉化為創造市場競爭優勢的機會。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the rapid development of new information technology, it is important for members in information technology departments to quickly respond to risks with agile mentality. While the current agile development methods focus more on information development processes, the main purpose of this research is to establish an information system development agile framework, including affected factors not only from information system development processes but also from internal environment, external environment and organizational learning capabilities.
Therefore, researcher interviewed with five enterprises adopting new technologies in Taiwan about their strategies of agile thinking, learning capabilities, corporate culture and goals. Regarding the case study method as the main research method, after analyzing, the following are the findings in the research. First, information technology departments have to consider factors affecting agile development processes from the perspective of information system development (including agile development model, agile development tools, project and risk management methods and interacion with others in information technology department), internal envireonment(including interaction with other departments, communication in information technology department, managerial thinking, organizational culture, organizational aims and organizational vision),external environment(including products, interaction with suppliers and customers, market positioning and market competitiveness) and learning capabilities(including knowledge management policy, absorptive capabilities, desorptive capabilities and Ambidexterity).Second, under an open-minded, unite and communicative culture, it is beneficial for enterprises to build up an infromation system development agile framework. Lastly, individual dynamic capabilities is the key factor which causes information system development agile framework become more successful. The researcher hopes this framework will not only help information technology departments respond to risks from internal and external environment quickly but transfer threats and losses into competitive advantages from the perspecitve of building an communicative culure and emphasizing more on individual dynamic capabilities.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T05:00:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05725017-1.pdf: 6871316 bytes, checksum: 12d1a9c0c7adee2221bb8dece2a5983d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 i
論文摘要 ii
THESIS ABSTRACT iii
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 風險管理分類及方法回顧 5
第二節 資訊系統開發模式回顧 8
第三節 資訊系統開發敏捷度回顧 13
第四節 吸收能力、解吸能力及雙元性回顧 20
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究架構 27
第二節 研究方法 28
第三節 個案背景介紹 33
第四節 個案資訊系統專案管理流程簡介 36
第五節 個案統整過程 41
第六節 個案統整結果 43
第四章 研究分析與結果 48
第一節 個案資訊系統開發風險分析 48
第二節 個案資訊系統開發風險管理分析 55
第三節 個案資訊系統開發敏捷度分析 65
第四節 個案企業學習能力分析 71
第五節 個案資訊系統開發敏捷度影響因子 85
第五章 研究結論與建議 94
第一節 研究結論 94
第二節 研究限制與未來建議 98
參考文獻 100
一、中文文獻 100
二、英文文獻 101
附錄 108
附錄一 訪談問卷大綱 108
附錄二 個案統整表格 110
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject資訊系統開發風險zh_TW
dc.subject敏捷開發模式zh_TW
dc.subject資訊系統開發敏捷開發架構zh_TW
dc.subject溝通互動的組織文化zh_TW
dc.subject個人動態能力zh_TW
dc.subjectindividual dynamic capabilitiesen
dc.subjectagility development modelen
dc.subjectrisken
dc.subjectinformation system development agile frameworken
dc.subjectinteractive organizational cultureen
dc.title資訊系統開發敏捷度架構之探討與建立zh_TW
dc.titleThe Discussion and the Establishment of Information System Development Agile Frameworken
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee朱宇倩,邱議德
dc.subject.keyword資訊系統開發風險,敏捷開發模式,資訊系統開發敏捷開發架構,溝通互動的組織文化,個人動態能力,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordrisk,agility development model,information system development agile framework,interactive organizational culture,individual dynamic capabilities,en
dc.relation.page112
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201801936
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-07-26
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
6.71 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved