Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71146
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王全三(Chuan-San Wang)
dc.contributor.authorTing-Ju Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳亭如zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T04:55:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-03
dc.date.copyright2018-08-03
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-07-29
dc.identifier.citation中華人民共和國財政部,2006,中國註冊會計師審計準則第 1324號——持續經營。
中華人民共和國財政部,2007,中國註冊會計師審計準則第 1211 號——瞭解被審計單位及其環境和評估重大錯報風險。
中華人民共和國財政部,2006,中國註冊會計師審計準則第 1501號 ——審計報告。
中華人民共和國財政部,2016,中國註冊會計師審計準則第 1502 號——非標準審計報告。
中華人民共和國財政部,2016,中國註冊會計師審計準則第1504號——在審計報告中溝通關鍵審計事項。
李建然、許書偉及陳政芳,2003,非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究。會計評論,37:,1-30。
李建然,2016,財務報表使用者如何解讀上市(櫃)公司新式無保留意見查核報告。證券暨期貨月刊,第三十四卷(九月),第九期,16-29。
邱茗囷,2015,國際審計監理議題重要趨勢。證券暨期貨月刊,第三十三卷(七月),第七期,15-27。
周建宏、陳耀宗、徐永堅,2017,會計師查核報告重大變革——新式查核報告解析與例示,台北:財團法人資誠教育基金會。
徐永堅,2016,審計準則公報第五十八號「查核報告中關鍵查核事項之溝通」之內容、影響與建議。證券暨期貨月刊,第三十四卷(九月),第九期,30-41。
財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2010,審計準則公報第四十八號。
財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2011,審計準則公報第五十一號。
財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2011,審計準則公報第五十二號。
財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2015,審計準則公報第五十七號。
財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2016,審計準則公報第五十八號。
財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2016,審計準則公報第五十九號。
黃仲豪,2016,推動我國採用新式會計師查核報告——由英國實施經驗論起。證券暨期貨月刊,第三十四卷(九月),第九期,5-15。
證券交易法,民國 107 年 04 月 25 日(修正日期)。
MBAlib智庫百科,取自2018年7月,【電子百科】,取自http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E5%AE%A1%E8%AE%A1%E5%BB%B6%E8%BF%9F。
Backof, A., Bowlin, K., & Goodson, B. (2017). The impact of proposed changes to the content of the audit report on jurors’ assessments of auditor negligence.
Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary accounting research, 15(1), 1-24.
Beneish, M. (1997). How do managers benefit from earnings overstatement? Working paper, Indiana University.
Beneish, M. D. (1997). Detecting GAAP violation: Implications for assessing earnings management among firms with extreme financial performance. Journal of accounting and public policy, 16(3), 271-309.
Bédard, J., Gonthier-Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2014, January). Costs and benefits of reporting Key Audit Matters in the audit report: The French experience.In International Symposium on Audit Research. Available at: http://documents.escdijon.eu/pdf/cig2014/ACTESDUCOLLOQUE/BEDARD_GONTHIER_BESACIER_SCHATT. pdf.
Bowlin, K. (2011). Risk-based auditing, strategic prompts, and auditor sensitivity to the strategic risk of fraud. The Accounting Review, 86(4), 1231-1253.
Brasel, K., Doxey, M. M., Grenier, J. H., & Reffett, A. (2016). Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review, 91(5), 1345-1362.
CFA Institute. (2010). Independent Auditor’s Report Survey Results. Charlottesville: CFA Institute. Available at:https://www.cfainstitute.org/Survey/independent_auditors_report_survey_results.pdf .
Chalmers, J. (2013). PwC Comment Letter on FRC Revision to ISA (UK and Ireland)700:Requiring the auditor's report to address risks of material misstatement, materiality and a summary of audit scope.
Church, B. K., Davis, S. M., & McCracken, S. A. (2008). The auditor's reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons, 22(1), 69-90.
Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., & Wolfe, C. J. (2014). Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors' decision to invest?. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 71-93.
Chaney, P. K., & Philipich, K. L. (2002). Shredded reputation: The cost of audit failure. Journal of accounting research, 40(4), 1221-1245.
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Difference-in-Difference Estimation. Population Health Methods.Available at: https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/difference-difference-estimation .
Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities, & Cohen, M. F. (1978). Report, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities. Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities.
Czapiński, J., & Lewicka, M. (1979). Dynamics of interpersonal attitudes: Positive–negative asymmetry. Polish Psychological Bulletin.
Deloitte & Touche LLP. (2013). “Comments to the PCAOB Re: Proposed Auditing Standards on the Auditor’s Responsibilities Regarding Other Information and Related Amendments, PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034.”. (December 11, 2013).Available at:http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Pages/Docket034Comments.aspx.
DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of accounting and economics, 17(1-2), 145-176.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting review, 193-225.
Dietrich, J. R., Kachelmeier, S. J., Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Linsmeier, T. J. (2001).Market efficiency, bounded rationality, and supplemental business reporting disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(2), 243-268.
Ernst & Young LLP. (2013). “Comments to the PCAOB Re: Proposed Auditing Standards on The Auditor’s Responsibilities Regarding Other Information and Related Amendments, PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034.” .(December 18, 2013).Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Pages/Docket034Comments.aspx.
Financial Reporting Counci.(2013b). International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700: The independent auditor's report on financial statements. Revised June 2013.
Financial Reporting Counci.(2015).Extended auditor’s reports A review of experience in the first year. Financial Reporting Council, 4-48.
Financial Reporting Council.(2016).Extended auditor’s reports—a further review of experience .2016. FRC report,1-61.
Fuller, S. (2015). The Effect of Auditor Reporting Choice and Audit Committee Oversight Strength on Management Financial Disclosure Decisions.
Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2015). Early evidence on the effects of critical audit matters on auditor liability. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(1), A24-A33.
Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2016). The effects of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1629-1646.
Gray, G. L., Turner, J. L., Coram, P. J., & Mock, T. J. (2011). Perceptions and misperceptions regarding the unqualified auditor's report by financial statement preparers, users, and auditors. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 659-684.
Harper, R. M., Mister, W. G., & Strawser, J. R. (1987). The impact of new pension disclosure rules on perceptions of debt. Journal of Accounting Research, 327-330.
Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. W. (1996). Auditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. Accounting Review, 43-59.
Hirshleifer, D., & Teoh, S. H. (2003). Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of accounting and economics, 36(1-3), 337-386.
Hodge, F. D., Kennedy, J. J., & Maines, L. A. (2004). Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting?. The Accounting Review, 79(3), 687-703.
Kachelmeier, S. J., Schmidt, J. J., & Valentine, K. (2014). The effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor's report on perceived auditor responsibility for misstatements. Working paper, The University of Texas at Austin.
Kachelmeier, S. J., Schmidt, J. J., & Valentine, K. (2017). The disclaimer effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report.
Koch, C., & Salterio, S. E. (2017). The effects of auditor affinity for client and perceived client pressure on auditor proposed adjustments. The Accounting Review, 92(5), 117-142.
Köhler, A. G., Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V., & Theis, J. C. (2016). The Effects of Key Audit Matters on the Auditor's Report's Communicative Value: Experimental Evidence from Investment Professionals and Non-Professional Investors.
KPMG LLP. (2013). “Comments to the PCAOB Re: Proposed Auditing Standards on the Auditor’s Responsibilities Regarding Other Information and Related Amendments, PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034.”. (December 11, 2013). Available at:http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Pages/Docket034Comments.aspx.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2013b). Reporting on Audited Financial Statements: Proposed New and Revised International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Revised July 2013.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2016). Communicating key audit matters in the independent Auditor's report.International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants.
Mock, T. J., Bédard, J., Coram, P. J., Davis, S. M., Espahbodi, R., & Warne, R. C. (2012). The audit reporting model: Current research synthesis and implications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(sp1), 323-351.
Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of accounting research,18(1), 109-131.
Overend, R. (2013). EY Comment Letter on FRC Revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700: Requiring the auditor's report to address risks of material misstatement, materiality and a summary of audit scope.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
Pelzer, J. R. E. (2016). Understanding barriers to Critical Audit Matter effectiveness: A qualitative and experimental approach(Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University).
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2011). Concept Release on auditor independence and audit firm rotation. PCAOB Concept Release No. 2011-006 (August).Washington: PCAOB.
PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034.” (December 11, 2013). Available at:http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Pages/Docket034Comments.aspx.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) .(2013).Proposed Auditing Standard: The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion. August 13, 2013.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) .(2016). Proposed Auditing Standard: The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards. May 11, 2016.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.(PCAOB).(2017). The Auditor's report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion and related amendments to PCAOB standards.PCAOB Release No. 2017-001 June 1, 2017. PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034. Washington, D. C.: PCAOB.Available at:https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/2017-001-auditors-report-final-rule.pdf .
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). (2013). “Comments to the PCAOB Re: Proposed Auditing Standards on the Auditor’s Responsibilities Regarding Other Information and Related Amendments, PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034.” . (December 11, 2013)Available at:http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Pages/Docket034Comments.aspx.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). (July, 2017). “Enhanced auditor’s report Review of the first year experience in Hong Kong.”.PwC review report,1-21.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). (2017).“Enhanced auditor’s report Survey of first year experience in Singapore.”. PwC review report,1-23.
Reid, L. C., Carcello, J. V., Li, C., & Neal, T. L. (2016). Impact of auditor and audit committee report changes on audit quality and costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom.
Schneider, A., & Church, B. K. (2008). The effect of auditors’ internal control opinions on loan decisions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(1), 1-18.
Sirois, L. P., Bédard, J., & Bera, P. (2018). The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor's report: evidence from an Eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizon.
Teoh, S., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. (1998). Earnings management and the post-issue underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50 (October): 63-99.
Watt, R., and J. Zimmerman. (1980). The markets for independence and independent auditors. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.
Wells Fargo. (2016). Comment letter on PCAOB Release No. 2016-003; Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 34.
Wilson, T. E., & Grimlund, R. A. (1990). An examination of the importance of an auditors reputation. Auditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(2), 43-59.
Windsor, C., & Kavanagh, M. (2012). Auditor independence and client economic power: Qualitative evidence and propositions involving auditors’ emotions and moral reasoning.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71146-
dc.description.abstract審計準則公報第五十八號自2016年起,要求查核報告揭露查核過程發現的最重要事項,此關鍵查核事項應使查核人員投入較多資源,用以提昇審計強度、降低審計風險。本研究以公司自行申報收入數與審計核定年度收入間之差異,作為衡量審計強度的代理變數及迴歸的應變數,進行雙重差分模型(difference-in-difference model)分析,2016年及/或2017年關鍵查核事項含有收入的公司年度作為實驗組,其他公司年度為控制組,2010年至2015年為控制期間,2016年及2017年為實驗期間,若關鍵查核事項確實「關鍵」而有審計風險,則自行申報收入數與審計核定年度收入間應有顯著差異。研究結果顯示實驗組與控制組間之自行申報收入數與審計核定數無顯著差異。額外測試不區分實驗組與控制組於關鍵查核事項實施前、後的原有差異,若僅使用2016年及2017年度資料,二組間仍無顯著差異。若將樣本期間擴大為2010年至2017年,實驗組與控制組則有差異,仍源自期間因素而非關鍵查核事項。整體研究結果顯示關鍵查核事項內含的收入事項未能反映審計風險。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAuditing Standards Bulletin No. 58 has required Audit Reports to reveal the most important issue discovered during the audit process since 2016. This Key Audit Matter regulation should attract more resources from auditors in order to decrease audit risks by increasing auditing strength. This study uses the difference between self-reported and audited annual revenue as a proxy for auditing strength and the dependent variable of regressions in a difference-in-difference model. The treatment group includes firm-years with 2016 and/or 2017 KAM of “revenues” and other firm-years are included as control group. Years 2010 to 2015 are used as control period, and years 2016 to 2017 as treatment period. If KAM is indeed a key audit matter that reveals audit risks, the self-reported revenue should significantly differ from the audited revenue. The result shows no significant difference in the two numbers between the treatment group and the control group. The additional test that does not control for treatment and control periods, also shows no difference between the two groups when sample period ranges from 2016 to 2017. There is significant difference between the treatment group and the control group when sample period ranges from 2010 to 2017. The difference causes from the term effect, not from KAM. The overall results reveal the inclusion of revenue as a KAM item does not reflex audit risks.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:55:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05722024-1.pdf: 1471818 bytes, checksum: 5f13053023cbff3311060d05d5ffb099 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 關鍵查核事項相關規範與現象 4
第一節 國外關鍵查核事項相關規範與現象 4
2.1.1英國對於關鍵查核事項相關規範與現象 4
2.1.2美國對於關鍵查核事項相關規範與現象 5
2.1.3新加坡對於關鍵查核事項相關規範與現象 9
第二節 中國與香港關鍵查核事項相關規範與現象 11
2.2.1 中國審計報告意見類型及形式內容概要說明 11
2.2.2 中國關鍵查核事項相關規範 13
2.2.3 香港關鍵查核事項實施概況 15
第三節 臺灣關鍵查核事項相關規範與現象 17
2.3.1 審計準則公報第五十七號:新式查核報告之適用制度概要說明 17
2.3.2 審計準則公報第五十八號:查核報告中關鍵查核事項之公報介紹 19
第三章 文獻回顧 23
第一節 涉及會計師(事務所)與關鍵查核事項之研究 23
3.1.1審計責任、成本 24
第二節 涉及財務報告編製者與關鍵查核事項之研究 26
第三節 涉及投資人、債權人、證券分析師等財務報告使用者與關鍵查核事項之研究 27
第四節 關鍵查核事項之其他研究 30
第四章 關鍵查核事項是否確為重大事項之假說建立 32
第一節  研究推論 32
第二節  假說建立 34
第五章 研究方法 35
第一節 收入認列 36
第二節 迴歸模型設立 37
5.2.1 模型建立與應變數解釋 37
5.2.2 自變數解釋 41
5.2.3 控制變數解釋 43
第三節 資料樣本分析 46
5.3.1 關鍵查核事項資料 46
5.3.2 會計師及其事務所資料 46
5.3.3 公司會計及證券市場資料 47
5.3.4 各應變數資料分群分析 58
第四節 敘述性統計及相關係數分析 67
5.4.1敘述性統計 67
5.4.2相關係數分析 68
第六章 實證結果 73
第一節 主要模型實證結果 73
6.1.1 以dmy_over_revenue作為應變數之模型1 73
6.1.2 以dif_TA_turnover_abs作為應變數之模型2 74
6.1.3 以dif_TA_turnover作為應變數之模型3 75
6.1.4 整體模型三種變數與假說之推論關聯分析 76
第二節 額外測試 80
6.2.1 額外測試說明 80
6.2.2 額外測試模型及變數解釋 81
6.2.3 額外測試結果 82
第三節 主要實證測試之各模型迴歸結果 89
第七章 結論 96
參考文獻 99
 
圖目錄
圖2-1 如何決定和溝通CAM 7
圖5-1 模型使用之自變數與雙重差分模型 42
 
表目錄
表2-1 IAASB、英國及美國之制度比較 8
表5-1 變數定義表 40
表5-2 複迴歸各變數與應變數之預期方向 45
表5-3 樣本篩選 47
表5-4 兩年皆將收入列入關鍵查核事項分配情形 48
表5-5 任一年度將收入列入關鍵查核事項分配情形 49
表5-6 總觀察值的產業分配比例 50
表5-7 兩年皆將收入列入關鍵查核事項 產業情形 52
表5-8 任一年度將收入列入關鍵查核事項 產業情形 55
表5-9 自行公告營收大於審計核定營收公司百分比數 58
表5-10 自行公告營收是否大於審計核定營收-兩年皆列入之百分比 59
表5-11 自行公告營收是否大於審計核定營收-任一年度列入之百分比 60
表5-12 自行公告營收與審計核定營收之差異取絕對值,以前期總資產(TA)作為分母-平均值 61
表5-13 自行公告營收與審計核定營收之差異取絕對值,以前期總資產(TA)作為分母-兩年皆列入公司平均值 62
表5-14 自行公告營收與審計核定營收之差異取絕對值,以前期總資產(TA)作為分母-任一年列入公司平均值 63
表5-15 自行公告營收與審計核定營收之差異,以前期總資產(TA)作為分母之平均值 64
表5-16 自行公告營收與審計核定營收之差異,以前期總資產(TA)為分母-兩年列入 65
表5-17 自行公告營收與審計核定營收之差異,以前期總資產為分母-任一年度 66
表5-18 總觀察值敘述性統計 69
表5-19 變數相關係數表 70
表6-1 主實證複迴歸結果 78
表6-2 額外性分析複迴歸結果-KAM實施年度 85
表6-3 額外性分析複迴歸結果-全樣本期間 87
表6-4 應變數:DMY_OVER_REVENUE各MODEL複迴歸結果 90
表6-5 應變數:DIF_TA_TURNOVER_ABS 各MODEL複迴歸結果 92
表6-6 應變數:DIF_TA_TURNOVER 各MODEL複迴歸結果 94
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject關鍵查核事項zh_TW
dc.subject查核風險zh_TW
dc.subject審計強度zh_TW
dc.subjectKey audit matter(KAM)en
dc.subjectAudit risksen
dc.subjectAuditing strengthen
dc.title關鍵查核事項是否顯示查核風險zh_TW
dc.titleDoes Key Audit Matter Reveal Audit Risks?en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳坤志(Kun-Chih Chen),吳瑞萱(Ruei-Shian Wu),許耀文(Yaowen Hsu)
dc.subject.keyword關鍵查核事項,查核風險,審計強度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordKey audit matter(KAM),Audit risks,Auditing strength,en
dc.relation.page108
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201802074
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-07-30
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.44 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved