請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7105
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張文貞(Wen-Chen Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chang-Ting Guh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 顧昌庭 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-17T15:59:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-17 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-17T15:59:37Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-03-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Alexandrov, S. A. (2006). The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: How Compulsory Is It? Chinese Journal of International Law, 5(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jml008
2. Allee, T. L. and Huth, P. K. (2006). Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Legal Rulings as Domestic Political Cover. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 219—234. 3. Association for Employment Injuries in Taiwan (2012). Nuclear Waste Storage Facility in Orchid Island, Taitung, Taiwan Threatens the Health of Workers and Tao People. Retrieved from: https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/67091 (中華民國工作傷害受害人協會(2012)。蘭嶼核廢料儲存廠迫害作業工人、達悟族人生命健康。檢自: https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/67091) 4. Atomic Energy Council (2015). Q and A for the Transformation of Cask Loading Pool into Spent Fuel Pool in the Kuosheng Nuclear Station. Retrieved from: https://www.aec.gov.tw/webpage/control/nuclear/files/index_20_5-01.pdf (行政院原子能委員會(2015)。「核二廠燃料廠房三樓裝載池設備修改及安裝工作」申請案常見問答集。檢自: https://www.aec.gov.tw/webpage/control/nuclear/files/index_20_5-01.pdf) 5. Atomic Energy Council (2018). License Renewal of the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant. Retrieved from: https://www.aec.gov.tw/核能管制/運轉中電廠管制/核能電廠運轉執照換發[台電公司於105年7月7日撤回核一廠延役申請案,原能會已終止審查作業] (行政院原子能委員會(2018)。核能一廠運轉執照換發。檢自: https://www.aec.gov.tw/核能管制/運轉中電廠管制/核能電廠運轉執照換發[台電公司於105年7月7日撤回核一廠延役申請案,原能會已終止審查作業]) 6. Atomic Energy Council (2019). Final Disposal of High-level Radioactive Wastes. Retrieved from: https://www.aec.gov.tw/便民專區/民眾常見問答集/放射性物料管理/放射性廢棄物最終處置--220_237_2275_362.html (行政院原子能委員會(2019)。高放射性廢棄物最終處置。檢自: https://www.aec.gov.tw/便民專區/民眾常見問答集/放射性物料管理/放射性廢棄物最終處置--220_237_2275_362.html) 7. Atomic Energy Law (1971). (原子能法(1971)。) 8. Burns, G. S. (2018). The impact of the major nuclear power plant accidents on the international legal framework for nuclear power. In Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 101 (Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Ed., pp. 7-30). (Nuclear Law Bulletin, No. 101). Boulogne-Billancourt, France: OECD/NEA. 9. Canfa, W. (2007). Chinese Environmental Law Enforcement: Current Deficiencies and Suggested Reforms. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 8, 159-193. 10. Chang, M.-C. and Hu, J.-L. (2011). Inconsistent preferences in environmental protection investment and the central government’s optimal policy. Applied Economics, 43 (6), 767-772. 11. Chen, W.-Z. (2017). Procedural Defect—Environmental Groups would File a Petition against the Transformation of Cask Loading Pool into Spent Fuel Pool in the Kuosheng Nuclear Station. Retrieved from: https://e-info.org.tw/node/205327 (陳文姿(2017)。未審先發包-核二廠「裝載池」改裝放用過核燃料,環團將提訴願。檢自: https://e-info.org.tw/node/205327) 12. Chen, W.-Z. (2017). Unit 1 of Kuosheng Nuclear Station would Restart in Early June. Retrieved from: https://e-info.org.tw/node/205325 (陳文姿(2017)。核二廠一號機預計六月上旬重啟。檢自: https://e-info.org.tw/node/205325) 13. CHEN, Y., WANG, C., & LIN, S. (2008). A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport☆. Omega, 36(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.04.018 14. Cheng, M.-S. and Jhang, H.-D. (2011). An Examination on Taiwanese Nuclear Liability Laws (plans_04_e-100_03). Taipei, Taiwan: Library of Soochow University. (程明修主持(2011)。我國核子損害賠償法制度之研修(行政院原子能委員會研究計畫期末報告,plans_04_e-100_03)。臺北,東吳大學圖書館。) 15. Chinese Television Service (2015). The Broken Fuel Handlebar in the Jinshan Nuclear Station already cost 1.5 Billion NT Dollars. Retrieved from: http://news.cts.com.tw/cts/politics/201503/201503081590429.html (華視新聞(2015)。核一廠燃料把手鬆脫,已花15億。檢自: http://news.cts.com.tw/cts/politics/201503/201503081590429.html) 16. Deutch, J. M. (1992). The New Nuclear Threat. Foreign Affairs, 71 (4), 120-134. 17. Di Nucci, M. R., & Isidoro Losada, A. M. (2015). An Open Door for Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Export? In Nuclear Waste Governance (pp. 79–97). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08962-7_3 18. Du, Y. and Parsons, J. E. (2009). Update on the Cost of Nuclear Power (09-004). Massachusetts, MA: A Joint Center of the Department of Economics, MIT Energy Initiative, and Sloan School of Management. 19. Fan, B.-N. and Ban, P. (2008). Government Waste in China and Countermeasures. Journal of Zhejiang University, 38 (6), 49-56. (范柏乃、班鵬(2008)。政府浪費與治理對策研究。浙江大學學報, 38 (6), 49-56.) 20. Gawande, K., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001). Nuclear Waste Transport and Residential Property Values: Estimating the Effects of Perceived Risks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1155 21. Hamilton, A., Waterson, B., Cherrett, T., Robinson, A., and Snell, I. (2013). The evolution of urban traffic control: changing policy and technology, Transportation, Planning and Technology, 36 (1), 24-43. 22. Harrar, J. E., Carley, J. F., Isherwood, W. F., and Raber, E. (1990). Report of the Committee to Review the Use of J-13 Well Water in Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations. Virginia, VA: National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce. 23. Hawthorne, M. and Tribune Reporter. (2011). Millions of Great Lakes fish killed in power plant intakes. Retrieved from: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-met-great-lakes-fish-kills-20110614-story.html?outputType=amp 24. Henckaerts, J. M., Doswald-Beck, L., and Alvermann, C. (Eds.). (2005). Customary international humanitarian law. Cambridge University Press. 25. Hunter, D., Salzman, J., and Zaelke, D. (2015). International Environmental Law and Policy. Minnesota, MN: Foundation Press. 26. International Atomic Energy Agency (1972). Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 27. International Atomic Energy Agency (1979). Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 28. International Atomic Energy Agency (1986). Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 29. International Atomic Energy Agency (1986). Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 30. International Atomic Energy Agency (1994). Convention on Nuclear Safety. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 31. International Atomic Energy Agency (1997). Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 32. International Atomic Energy Agency (1997). Status lists of Early Notification Convention. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 33. International Atomic Energy Agency (1999). Survey of wet and dry spent fuel storage. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 34. International Atomic Energy Agency (2002). Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-R-2). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 35. International Atomic Energy Agency (2003). IAEA Annual Report 2002. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 36. International Atomic Energy Agency (2003). The Long Term Storage of Radioactive Waste: Safety and Sustainable. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 37. International Atomic Energy Agency (2004). IAEA Annual Report 2003. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 38. International Atomic Energy Agency (2009). Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 39. International Atomic Energy Agency (2010). IAEA Annual Report 2009. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 40. International Atomic Energy Agency (2011). IAEA Annual Report 2010. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 41. International Atomic Energy Agency (2012). IAEA Annual Report 2011. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 42. International Atomic Energy Agency (2015). Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency (IAEA Safety Standards Series GSR Part 7). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 43. International Atomic Energy Agency (2018). IAEA Response and Assistance Network (EPR-RANET 2018). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 44. International Atomic Energy Agency (2018). Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (2018 Edition). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 45. International Atomic Energy Agency (2019). IAEA Annual Report 2018. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. 46. International Atomic Energy Agency (2019). Incident and Emergency Center. Retrieved from: https://www.iaea.org/about/organizational-structure/department-of-nuclear-safety-and-security/incident-and-emergency-centre 47. Jankowitsch-Prevor, O. (2006). The convention on nuclear safety. In The Convention on Nuclear Safety, In: International Nuclear Law in the Post-Chernobyl Period, A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency (pp. 155-168). 48. Jhang, D.-P. (2014). Nuclear Stations on Fault Lines. Retrieved from: https://ourisland.pts.org.tw/content/地震帶上的核電廠 (張岱屏(2014)。地震帶上的核電廠。檢自: https://ourisland.pts.org.tw/content/地震帶上的核電廠) 49. Jiang, R.-T. (2013). Three Antidotes for Nuclear Waste Management. Retrieved from: https://nuke.wikia.org/zh/wiki/核廢料處理的三⼤大法寶 (江仁台(2013)。核廢料處理的三大法寶。檢自: https://nuke.wikia.org/zh/wiki/核廢料處理的三⼤大法寶) 50. Jiang, Y.-M. (2018). Opinions of the Local Residents who live near the Jinshan Nuclear Station. Retrieved from: https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-living-near-nuclear-power-plants (江櫻梅(2018)。家離核電廠那麼近:一位金山人的無奈。檢自: https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-living-near-nuclear-power-plants) 51. Kuramochi, T. (2015). Review of energy and climate policy developments in Japan before and after Fukushima. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 1320–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.001 52. Nick, S. K. (2018). Today is yesterday’s pupil: Reactor license renewal in the United States. In Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 101 (Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Ed., pp. 31-61). (Nuclear Law Bulletin, No. 101). Boulogne-Billancourt, France: OECD/NEA. 53. Nuclear Emergency Response Act (2003). (核子事故緊急應變法(2003)。) 54. Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (2003). (核子反應器設施管制法(2003)。) 55. Peng, W.-H. (2015). An Investigation on the Risk Management Regulations of Taiwanese Nuclear Power Plants—from the Viewpoint of Regulatory Framework and Procedures. Chiayi, Taiwan: Department of Law, National Chung-Cheng University. (彭惟欣(2015)。我國核能電廠風險管制規範之研究—以組織與程序保障功能出發。國立中正大學法律學系,嘉義縣。) 56. Posner, E. A. and de Figueiredo, M. F. P. (2005). Is the International Court of Justice Biased? Journal of Legal Studies, 34, 599-630. 57. Quinn, E. (2011). The Refugee Convention Sixty Years On: Relevant or Redundant. Working Notes, 68, 19-25. 58. Ramseyer, J. (2012). Why power companies build nuclear reactors on fault lines: The case of Japan. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(2), 457-486. 59. Regulations on Final Disposal of Low Level Radioactive Waste and Safety Management of the Facilities (2012). (低放射性廢棄物最終處置及其設施安全管理規則(2012)。) 60. Reisser, J., Shaw, J., Wilcox, C., Hardesty, B. D., Proietti, M., Thums, M., & Pattiaratchi, C. (2013). Marine Plastic Pollution in Waters around Australia: Characteristics, Concentrations, and Pathways. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080466 61. Schwelb, E. (1968). Civil and Political Rights: The International Measures of Implementation. The American Journal of International Law, 62(4), 827. https://doi.org/10.2307/2197013 62. Sims, R. E. H., Rogner, H.-H., and Gregory, K. (2003). Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation. Energy Policy, 31, 1315-1326. 63. Sjöberg, L. (2004). Local Acceptance of a High-Level Waste Repository. Risk Analysis, 24 (3), 1-30. 64. Slovic, P., Flynn, J. H., and Layman, M. (1991). Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste. Science, 254 (5038), 1603-1607. 65. The Freedom of Government Information Law (2005). (政府資訊公開法(2005)。) 66. The Nuclear Materials and Radioactive Waste Management Act (2002). (放射性物料管理法(2002)。) 67. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (2006). Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants (Supplement 24-Regarding Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2). District of Columbia, DC: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 68. United Nations (1945). Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice. San Francisco, SF: United Nations. 69. United Nations (1980). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. In MULTILATERAL (United Nations Ed., pp. 331-512). (United Nations-Treaty Series, No. 18232). New York, NY: United Nations. 70. United Nations (1983). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. New York, NY: United Nations. 71. World Nuclear Association (2019). Nuclear Power in France. Retrieved from: https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/ckuntries-a-f/france.aspx 72. Wu, R.-J. (2004). Environmental costs Analysis of thermal discharge from power plant. Taipei, Taiwan: Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University. (吳任潔(2004)。發電廠溫排水之環境成本分析。國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所:臺北市。) 73. Yeh, J.-R. (1999). Global Environmental Issues—from the Viewpoint of Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: CHULIU PUBLISHER. (葉俊榮(1999)。全球環境議題:臺灣觀點。臺北市:巨流。) 74. Yeh, J.-R. (2015). Climate Change Management and Laws. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press. (葉俊榮(2015)。氣候變遷治理與法律。臺北市:臺大出版中心。) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7105 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2011 年 3 月 11 號發生了日本歷史上有紀錄以來規模最大(9.0)的地震,並且造成福島核災,而這場災難讓我們必須重新審慎檢視既有的核能安全國際法架構。於此同時,臺灣的核電廠正面臨運轉執照已經或即將到期的問題,然而,許多關於執照換發或除役所衍生的問題卻尚未解決。因此,本研究將相對應的核安國際 公約與臺灣的內國法進行比較,藉此萃取出好的立法例提供臺灣參考,以期能進而解決核電廠執照換發或除役期間所面對的問題。本研究藉由管制目的、管制工具、輔助措施和衡平措施這四個面向的分析,有系統地整理鮮少為人所知的 1970 到 90 年代正式通過的各部核能安全相關的國際公約。本研究發現當今既有的核能安全國際公約已能完整囊括全球核能和平使用的每個面向,包含反應爐的運轉、核廢料的處理、核事故的及早通報與國際互助。然而,這些公約對於核能安全的衡平措施和實質上國際技術支援的要求卻略顯不足。此外,本研究也發現儘管臺灣的核能安全法規大多已經符合各部國際公約授權各締約國所建立的行政與立法機制,但是對於代際正義和及早向國際社會通報核事故這兩件事情上,臺灣的核能安全法規尚有需要改進之處。因此,本論文建議臺灣的核能安全法規應儘快納入代際正義和國際通報機制,而國際公約也應加強衡平措施和跨國援助的量能。本論文亦透過國際公約和臺灣法規各面向之比較,希望這些公約和法規能同步汲取對方好的措施,進而提升臺灣與全球的核能發電安全制度。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | On March 11th, 2011, a magnitude-9.0 earthquake, the largest earthquake ever recorded in Japanese history, caused the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster. It unveils the necessity to reexamine the existing international legal framework on the nuclear safety regime. Meanwhile, Taiwanese nuclear power plants are urgently facing the license expiration dates, but several important issues in terms of license renewal or decommissioning have yet to be addressed. As a result, it is worthwhile to compare between the international legal framework and the case study in Taiwan in order to provide some good legislative examples for Taiwan to take into account. As a matter of fact, all the international nuclear safety conventions were adopted in the 1970s to 1990s, and they were rarely noticed by the researchers nowadays. Through the analysis on the attributes of objectives, implementing measures, assisting measures, and equitable measures, this thesis introduces those international nuclear safety conventions in a systematic manner. This study found out that the existing conventions have already covered a comprehensive range of nuclear activities, including the operation of reactor facilities, the treatment of radioactive wastes, the early notification of nuclear accidents, and the assistance from the international society; however, the equitable measures and assistant missions of the conventions remained insufficient. On the other hand, this research also found out that the nuclear safety laws in Taiwan mostly comply with the guidelines of the conventions, but the intergenerational justice and the early report system to the neighboring countries of a nuclear incident shall be established as soon as practicable. As a result, this thesis suggests that the nuclear safety conventions need to be enhanced in terms of the equity and international assisting missions whereas the laws in Taiwan must promptly incorporate the intergenerational justice and a thorough reporting mechanism. At last but not least, this study compares in between the relevant conventions and laws, hoping that both sides can learn from the good practices from the counterparts so as to improve the nuclear safety regime worldwide. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-17T15:59:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R07247002-1.pdf: 8355234 bytes, checksum: c8b20ed5c9175dab293dbc2c4cd1b98a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements 1
摘要 2 Abstract 3 List of Figures 10 List of Tables 11 Chapter 1. Introduction 13 Chapter 2. International Legal Framework on Nuclear Safety 16 2.1. Development of Nuclear Safety Conventions 16 2.2. Analytical Method for Nuclear Safety Conventions and Taiwanese Laws 21 2.3. Convention on Nuclear Safety 22 2.3.1. Objectives 24 2.3.2. Implementing Measures 24 2.3.3. Assisting Measures 26 2.3.4. Equitable Measures 26 2.4. Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management 26 2.4.1. Objectives 27 2.4.2. Implementing Measures 28 2.4.3. Assisting Measures 30 2.4.4. Equitable Measures 32 2.5. Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident 33 2.5.1. Objectives 34 2.5.2. Implementing Measures 35 2.5.3. Assisting Measures 37 2.5.4. Equitable Measures 38 2.6. Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency 38 2.6.1. Objectives 39 2.6.2. Implementing Measures 40 2.6.3. Assisting Measures 44 2.6.4. Equitable Measures 45 2.7. Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities 47 2.7.1. Objectives 48 2.7.2. Implementing Measures 49 2.7.3. Assisting Measures 50 2.7.4. Equitable Measures 50 2.8. Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter 51 2.8.1. Objectives 53 2.8.2. Implementing Measures 54 2.8.3. Assisting Measures 55 2.8.4. Equitable Measures 55 2.9. Merits and Flaws of the International Nuclear Safety Conventions 55 Chapter 3. Taiwan’s Nuclear Safety Laws 57 3.1. Domestic Legislation on Nuclear Safety 57 3.1.1. Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act 57 3.1.1.1. Objectives 58 3.1.1.2. Implementing Measures 59 3.1.1.3. Assisting Measures 59 3.1.1.4. Equitable Measures 60 3.1.2. Atomic Energy Law 60 3.1.2.1. Objectives 61 3.1.2.2. Implementing Measures 62 3.1.2.3. Assisting Measures 62 3.1.2.4. Equitable Measures 63 3.1.3. The Nuclear Materials and Radioactive Waste Management Act 63 3.1.3.1. Objectives 64 3.1.3.2. Implementing Measures 65 3.1.3.3. Assisting Measures 66 3.1.3.4. Equitable Measures 66 3.1.4. Nuclear Emergency Response Act 67 3.1.4.1. Objectives 68 3.1.4.2. Implementing Measures 68 3.1.4.3. Assisting Measures 71 3.1.4.4. Equitable Measures 72 3.2. Domestic Legislation in view of International Conventions 72 3.2.1. Domestic Legislation in view of Nuclear Safety Convention 74 3.2.1.1. Objectives 76 3.2.1.2. Implementing Measures 76 3.2.1.3. Assisting Measures 77 3.2.1.4. Equitable Measures 77 3.2.2. Domestic Legislation in view of Physical Protection Convention 78 3.2.2.1. Objectives 80 3.2.2.2. Implementing Measures 80 3.2.2.3. Assisting Measures 81 3.2.2.4. Equitable Measures 81 3.2.3. Domestic Legislation in view of Joint Convention and Marine Dumping Convention 82 3.2.3.1. Objectives 84 3.2.3.2. Implementing Measures 84 3.2.3.3. Assisting Measures 86 3.2.3.4. Equitable Measures 87 3.2.4. Domestic Legislation in view of Early Notification Convention and Assistance Convention 87 3.2.4.1. Objectives 89 3.2.4.2. Implementing Measures 89 3.2.4.3. Assisting Measures 91 3.2.4.4. Equitable Measures 92 3.3. Merits and Flaws of Taiwan’s Nuclear Safety Laws 92 Chapter 4. Taiwan’s Case Studies 94 4.1. License Renewal Application 94 4.1.1. Confidentiality shall be abolished 94 4.1.2. International technical cooperation in the Regulation Act 96 4.2. Decommissioning Procedures 100 4.2.1. International Technical Cooperation 101 4.2.2. Intergenerational Justice 104 4.3. Reflection on the Case Studies 105 Chapter 5. Conclusion 107 Reference 110 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 福島核災後的核能發電安全制度檢討—從國際法架構到臺灣的個案分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Overhaul on the Nuclear Safety Regime after the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster—from the International Legal Framework to the Case Study in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林子倫(Tze-Luen Lin),林春元(Chun-Yuan Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 核能安全,核電廠除役,核電廠執照換發,世代正義,福島核災, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Atomic Energy Security,Decommissioning Procedures of Nuclear Reactor Facilities,License Renewal Application of Nuclear Reactor Facilities,Intergenerational Justice,Fukushima Nuclear Accident, | en |
dc.relation.page | 115 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000431 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-109-1.pdf | 8.16 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。