請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70863
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳羿貞 | |
dc.contributor.author | Kai-Jing Yeh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 葉凱菁 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:41:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-30 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Reference
1. Adams, G. L., S. A. Gansky, A. J. Miller, W. E. Harrell and D. C. Hatcher (2004). 'Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126(4): 397-409. 2. Ahn, J., S. J. Kim, J. Y. Lee, C. J. Chung and K. H. Kim (2017). 'Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151(1): 148-156. 3. Baek, C., J. Y. Paeng, J. S. Lee and J. Hong (2012). 'Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.' J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(5): 1161-1169. 4. Baek, S. H., I. S. Cho, Y. I. Chang and M. J. Kim (2007). 'Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography.' Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104(5): 628-639. 5. Bell, W. H. (1992). Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery, WB Saunders Company. 6. Bishara, S. E., P. S. Burkey and J. G. Kharouf (1994). 'Dental and facial asymmetries: a review.' The Angle Orthodontist 64(2): 89-98. 7. Bruce, R. A. (1968). 'Condylar hyperplasia and mandibular asymmetry: a review.' J. Oral Surg. 26: 281-290. 8. Burstone, C. J. (1998). Diagnosis and treatment planning ofpatients with asymmetries. Seminars in orthodontics, Elsevier. 9. Chebib, F. and A. Chamma (1981). 'Indices of craniofacial asymmetry.' The Angle Orthodontist 51(3): 214-226. 10. Chen, Y. J., C. C. Yao, Z. C. Chang, H. H. Lai, S. C. Lu and S. H. Kok (2016). 'A new classification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion.' J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44(6): 676-683. 11. Cheong, Y.-W. and L.-J. Lo (2011). 'Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management.' Chang Gung Med J 34(4): 341-351. 12. Cho, J.-H., E.-J. Kim, B.-C. Kim, K.-H. Cho, K.-H. Lee and H.-S. Hwang (2007). 'Correlations of frontal lip-line canting with craniofacial morphology and muscular activity.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 132(3): 278. e277-278. e214. 13. Edler, R., D. Wertheim and D. Greenhill (2003). 'Comparison of radiographic and photographic measurement of mandibular asymmetry.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123(2): 167-174. 14. El-Mangoury, N. H. and Y. A. Mostafa (1990). 'Epidemiologic panorama of dental occlusion.' The Angle Orthodontist 60(3): 207-214. 15. Ferrario, V. F., C. Sforza, A. Miani and G. Tartaglia (1993). 'Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 103(4): 327-337. 16. Ferrario, V. F., C. Sforza, C. E. Poggio and G. Tartaglia (1994). 'Distance from symmetry: A three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry.' Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52(11): 1126-1132. 17. Galvão, M. C. d. S., J. R. Sato and E. C. Coelho (2012). 'Dahlberg formula: a novel approach for its evaluation.' Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 17(1): 115-124. 18. Good, S., R. Edler, D. Wertheim and D. Greenhill (2006). 'A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry.' The European Journal of Orthodontics 28(2): 97-102. 19. Graber, L. W., R. L. Vanarsdall, K. W. Vig and G. J. Huang (2016). Orthodontics-E-Book: Current Principles and Techniques, Elsevier Health Sciences. 20. Haraguchi, S., Y. Iguchi and K. Takada (2008). 'Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients.' The Angle orthodontist 78(3): 421-426. 21. Haraguchi, S., K. Takada and Y. Yasuda (2002). 'Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity.' The Angle Orthodontist 72(1): 28-35. 22. Hwang, H.-S., I.-S. Youn, K.-H. Lee and H.-J. Lim (2007). 'Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 132(3): 279. e271-279. e276. 23. Hwang, H. S., C. H. Hwang, K. H. Lee and B. C. Kang (2006). 'Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130(6): 779-785. 24. Hwang, H. S., Y. S. Min, S. C. Lee, M. K. Sun and H. S. Lim (2009). 'Change of lip-line cant after 1-jaw orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular asymmetry.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(4): 564-569. 25. Jacobs, J. D., W. H. Bell, C. E. Williams and J. W. Kennedy (1980). 'Control of the transverse dimension with surgery and orthodontics.' American Journal of Orthodontics 77(3): 284-306. 26. Joondeph, D. R. (2000). 'Mysteries of asymmetries.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 117(5): 577-579. 27. Kim, J. Y., H. D. Jung, Y. S. Jung, C. J. Hwang and H. S. Park (2014). 'A simple classification of facial asymmetry by TML system.' J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42(4): 313-320. 28. Lee, S. (2001). 'The evaluation of mandibular asymmetry using the radiography and facial photography.' J Korean Acad Dent Radiol 31: 199-204. 29. Lew, K. K., W. C. Foong and E. Loh (1993). 'Malocclusion prevalence in an ethnic Chinese population.' Australian Dental Journal 38(6): 442-449. 30. Maeda, M., A. Katsumata, Y. Ariji, A. Muramatsu, K. Yoshida, S. Goto, K. Kurita and E. Ariji (2006). '3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities.' Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(3): 382-390. 31. Masuoka, N., Y. Momoi, Y. Ariji, H. Nawa, A. Muramatsu, S. Goto and E. Ariji (2005). 'Can cephalometric indices and subjective evaluation be consistent for facial asymmetry?' The Angle orthodontist 75(4): 651-655. 32. Masuoka, N., A. Muramatsu, Y. Ariji, H. Nawa, S. Goto and E. Ariji (2007). 'Discriminative thresholds of cephalometric indexes in the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 131(5): 609-613. 33. Nur, R. B., D. G. Cakan and T. Arun (2016). 'Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149(2): 225-237. 34. Obwegeser, H. L. and M. S. Makek (1986). 'Hemimandibular hyperplasia — Hemimandibular elongation.' Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery 14: 183-208. 35. Onyeaso, C. O. (2004). 'Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in Ibadan, Nigeria.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126(5): 604-607. 36. Padwa, B. L., M. O. Kaiser and L. B. Kaban (1997). 'Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry.' Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 55(8): 811-816. 37. Peck, S., L. Peck and M. Kataja (1991). 'Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces.' The Angle Orthodontist 61(1): 43-48. 38. Proffit, W., C. Phillips and C. Dann (1990). 'Who seeks surgical-orthodontic treatment?' The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery 5(3): 153-160. 39. Proffit, W. R., H. W. Fields Jr and D. M. Sarver (2006). Contemporary orthodontics, Elsevier Health Sciences. 40. ROBINSON, S. W., T. M. SPEIDEL, R. J. ISAACSON and F. W. WORMS (1972). 'Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism.' The Angle Orthodontist 42(3): 227-235. 41. Ryu, H. S., K. Y. An and K. H. Kang (2015). 'Cone-beam computed tomography based evaluation of rotational patterns of dentofacial structures in skeletal Class III deformity with mandibular asymmetry.' Korean J Orthod 45(4): 153-163. 42. Schmid, W., F. Mongini and A. Felisio (1991). 'A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible.' American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 100(1): 19-34. 43. Severt, T. and W. Proffit (1997). 'The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina.' The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery 12(3): 171-176. 44. SHAH, S. M. and M. Joshi (1978). 'An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex.' The Angle Orthodontist 48(2): 141-148. 45. Šidlauskas, A. and K. Lopatienė (2009). 'The prevalence of malocclusion among 7–15-year-old Lithuanian schoolchildren.' Medicina 45(2): 147-152. 46. Takano-Yamamoto, T. and S. Kuroda (2007). 'Titanium screw anchorage for correction of canted occlusal plane in patients with facial asymmetry.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132(2): 237-242. 47. Tang, E. L. (1994). 'Occlusal features of Chinese adults in Hong Kong.' Australian orthodontic journal 13(3): 159. 48. Tyan, S., H. S. Park, M. Janchivdorj, S. H. Han, S. J. Kim and H. W. Ahn (2016). 'Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.' Angle Orthod 86(3): 421-430. 49. Van Keulen, C., G. Martens and L. Dermaut (2004). 'Unilateral posterior crossbite and chin deviation: is there a correlation?' The European Journal of Orthodontics 26(3): 283-288. 50. Woon, K.-C., Y.-L. Thong and R. A. Kadir (1989). 'Permanent dentition occlusion in Chinese, Indian and Malay groups m Malaysia.' Australian orthodontic journal 11(1): 45. 51. Yogosawa, F. (1990). 'Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment.' The Angle Orthodontist 60(3): 199-206. 52. You, K.-H., K.-J. Lee, S.-H. Lee and H.-S. Baik (2010). 'Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.' American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 138(5): 540. e541-540. e548. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70863 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:
安格氏第三類異常咬合的盛行率在亞洲人大幅高出其他族群,並且常伴有臉部不對稱。本研究的目標為利用錐束射束斷層掃描(CBCT),分析骨性三級異常之正顎手術患者的中臉部與下臉部不對稱特徵,並探討硬軟組織之間表現的關聯性。本研究先分析下頦點偏斜與下顎枝寬度關係,再根據下顎骨不對稱形態差異,將患者分為三個組別,進一步分析比較 各組內偏斜側與非偏斜側不對稱特徵,以及三個組別間不對稱特徵之差異。 研究程序及方法: 本研究蒐集採行正顎手術治療的安格氏三級骨性咬合患者共計70位。患者於治療前拍攝錐狀射束斷層掃描並進行3D影像重組。在患者3D影像的臉部硬軟組織選取21個界標點,以評估顏面形態不對稱。根據左右下顎枝寬度差異(Ramus width difference)與下頷點偏斜(Menton deviation)的量及方向將患者分成三組,Group1與Group2的偏斜側下顎枝寬度比非偏斜側較寬,Group 1的下頦點偏斜量大於下顎枝寬度差異,而group 2的下頦點偏斜量小於下顎枝寬度差異,Group 3則是偏斜側的下顎枝寬度反而比非偏斜側較小。 結果: Group 1 (n=33)患者有最大的下頦點歪斜,不對稱特徵包含:上下顎骨皆為偏斜側較寬,上顎非偏斜側會往下傾斜(downward canting),上顎非偏斜側位於較前方,偏斜側下顎枝往頰側傾斜。齒性部分上顎後牙適應下顎偏斜,發生代償現象,咬合平面非偏斜側較往下傾斜,偏斜側後牙較往頰側傾斜(buccal tipping)。軟組織的表現則與骨骼表現同向,皆為偏斜側較寬。Group 1的不對稱形態為:(1)從正面觀為下顎roll rotation的不對稱形態,(2)從axial view看,上顎及下顎往偏斜側做yaw rotation。 Group 2 (n=18)患者的下頦點歪斜量為三組之中最小,不對稱特徵包括:上下顎骨偏斜側比較寬,上顎齒性代償現象只有在左右橫向上有所表現,垂直向度上則否。軟組織與骨骼表現同向,皆為偏斜側較寬,Group 2的不對稱形態為類似下顎平移(sideshift)所造成的不對稱。 Group 3 (n=19)患者的不對稱特徵包括:上顎骨非偏斜側較為前方,下顎骨非偏移側比較寬,齒性部分沒有明顯橫向及垂直向代償現象,至於軟組織則與骨骼表現反向,偏斜側軟組織較厚。Group 3的不對稱形態從axial view看,上下顎骨皆往偏斜側做yaw rotation,旋轉中心可視為位於下頦點與兩側下顎枝連線之間的下顎骨體中央區域。 三組間不對稱分析,上顎部分Jugular point與冠狀平面之距離 (Jugular-C) 的測量值有顯著差異,從axial view看,group 1及group 3上顎往偏斜側做yaw rotation,非偏移側mandibular foramen以及mental foramen 較偏移側前方。下顎骨骼的測量值大部份都有顯著差異。Group 3下顎骨兩側橫向差異 (discrepancy)較小。從frontal view看,Group 1的偏斜側下顎枝較往頰側傾斜。三組間達到顯著差異的齒性測量項目有:Maxilla U6 canting,Maxilla U6 dimension difference。其中group 1有最大的咬合平面傾斜,且為非偏移側較往下傾斜。Group 1的上顎arch form discrepancy為3組中最大,偏斜側後牙寬度較寬。軟組織測量項目,包括嘴唇傾斜、左右軟組織寬度差異、左右軟組織厚度差異等項目,在3組間皆達到顯著差異。Group 1的lip canting的程度顯著大於其他兩組,且與上顎骨傾斜,上顎後牙咬合平面傾斜的方向皆相同。 結論 本篇研究根據下頦點偏斜及左右下顎枝寬度差異之相對量及方向,將患者分成三組,結果顯示下顎偏斜型態不同的顏面不對稱,在上顎及齒槽區亦存在相異的不對稱特徵。顏面不對稱程度最嚴重的Group 1患者,上顎臼齒的頰舌角度及垂直高度伴隨下顎不對稱而有橫向及垂直向齒性代償現象,Group 3軟組織與骨骼不對稱為反向表現,偏斜側的軟組織較厚。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objective:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate facial asymmetry 3 dimensionally using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in skeletal Class III patients. Material and methods: The patients were classified into 3 groups based on the relationship of direction and amount of menton deviation relative to the transverse ramus width asymmetry. In groups 1 and 2, menton deviation was accompanied by a larger transverse ramus distance on the deviated side. While in group 1 the amount of menton deviation was greater than that of ramus asymmetry, group 2 patients showed a smaller menton deviation in comparison to ramus asymmetry. Patients in group 3 exhibited an atypical asymmetry of larger ramus distance contralateral to the side of menton deviation. Statistical analysis was run to compare hard/ soft tissue characteristics between the deviation side and non-deviation side in each group. Difference of the structural characteristics among 3 groups were also delineated by using one-way ANOVA and posy-hoc tests. Results: Group 1 showed the greatest amount of menton deviation. Significant greater transverse dimension of maxilla and mandible were noted for the deviation side. In addition, maxilla exhibited downward canting in the non-deviation side, and the ramus of the deviation side was more buccal inclined than that of the non-deviation side. The bucco-lingual axes of maxillary first molars were compensated to transverse skeletal asymmetry, which resulted in canting in the maxillary occlusal plane. In contrast, no significant difference in soft tissue thickness between the deviation side and the non-deviation side was observed. Group 2 showed the lowest amount of menton deviation. Significant greater transverse dimension of maxilla and mandible were observed at the deviation side. No significant difference was noted in the bucco-lingual tooth axis of bilateral maxillary first molars nor dentoalveolar heights was observed between the deviated and non-deviated sides. There was no significant difference in soft tissue thickness between the deviation and non-deviation sides. In group 3, the Jugular point was more anterior positioned in the non-deviation side than the deviation side. The transverse dimension of mandible was significant greater at the non-deviation side. The asymmetry in bucco-lingual inclination of bilateral maxillary first molars was not statistically significant, suggesting that no obvious dental compensation existed. However, the soft tissue thickness was significant greater at the deviation side. The Jugular-C measurement was significant different between the 3 groups. In group 1 and 3, the Jugular point was more anteriorly positioned at the non-deviated side than the deviation side. Most of the measurements representing mandibular structures were significant different among 3 groups. Similarly, in group 1 and 3, the mandibular foramen and mental foramen were more anteriorly positioned at the non-deviation side. Group 1 exhibited more buccally inclined ramus at the deviation side than the other 2 groups. Group 3 showed the smallest amount of transverse width discrepancy between bilateral ramus. There were significant differences in the measurements of maxilla U6 canting and maxilla U6 dimension difference between 3 groups. Group 1 showed greatest maxilla U6 canting and transverse width discrepancy. All the soft tissue measurements were significant different among the 3 groups. The lip canting was of greatest amount in group 1. Group 3 exhibited the greatest difference in the bilateral soft tissue thickness of the lower face. Conclusion Different structural characteristics were found among 3 groups. In Group 1 patients, the maxillomandibular complex exhibited displacement including a roll rotation in frontal view and a yaw rotation in axial view to the deviation side. As to group 2 patients, facial asymmetry was characterized by mandible sideshift to the deviation side. Abruptly, the maxillomandibular complex of group 3 patients exhibited a yaw rotation to the deviation side. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:41:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04422023-1.pdf: 14868818 bytes, checksum: d6cd4772ca3110967f27ed1ba77f9a7e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………….… 1 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………. 4 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………….. 7 1.1研究背景……………………………………………………………………. 7 1.2 安格氏三級咬合……………………………………………………….… 7 1.3 顏面不對稱之病因…………………………………………………….… 8 1.4 下顎不對稱…………………………………………………………….… 9 1.5 下顎不對稱分類及分析……………………………………………...… 10 1.6 上顎骨不對稱……………………………………………...................… 13 1.7 橫向及垂直向齒性代償……………………………………………...… 13 1.8 軟組織不對稱及其分類……………………………………………...… 16 1.9 嘴唇傾斜……………………………………………………………...… 18 1.10 錐束電腦斷層掃描……………………………………………...…….. 19 1.11研究目的……………………………………………...………………... 20 第二章 研究程序及方法………...……………………………………………..…22 2.1 研究對象…………………..…………………………………………… 22 2.2 錐束電腦斷層掃描資料蒐集……..…………………………………… 22 2.3 錐束電腦斷層掃描影像定位……………………………………...…… 23 2.4 錐束電腦斷層掃描影像測量………………………………………..… 25 2.5 建立顱顏不對稱之分類…..…………………………………………… 27 2.6 數據統計方法…..……………………………………………………… 28 2.7 觀察者內誤差…..……………………………………………………… 29 第三章 結果………...……………………………………………………. 30 3.1 患者組成…………………..…………………………………………… 30 3.2 各組內偏斜側與非偏斜側不對稱分析…………..…………………… 30 3.3 各組間不對稱分析………..…………………………………………… 35 第四章 討論………...……………………………………………………. 37 4.1 各組內偏斜側與非偏斜側不對稱分析..……………………………… 37 4.2 各組間不對稱之比較..………………………………………………… 46 4.3 下顎不對稱形態的探討..……………………………………………… 50 4.4 矯正治療及手術術式考量..………………………………………… 52 第五章 結論………...……………………………………………………. 54 第六章 未來展望………...……………………………………………………. 56 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………….…… 57 附錄………………………………………………………………………………. 63 圖 目 錄 圖一:Dolphin 軟體三維影像重組…………………………………... 63 圖二:三維影像定位….…………………………………………........... 63 圖三:三維影像(3D planar view)定位…………................. 64 圖四:界標點3D座標輸出至Excel軟體……………...………....... 64 圖五:界標點之示意圖……………………….…………………........... 65 圖六:各測量項目之示意圖……………….……………………......... 66 圖七:界標點三維向度之測量項目的示意圖……………………......67 圖八:各測量項目之示意圖………………………………………....... 68 圖九:界標點三維向度之測量項目的示意圖…..........…......... 69 圖十:顱顏不對稱之分類………………………....…..................... 70 圖十一:下頦點偏移量與下顎枝橫向差異量之分布圖…............71 圖十二:Group 1不對稱形態………………………………............... 72 圖十三:Group 2不對稱形態………………………....................... 73 圖十四:Group 3不對稱形態………………………....................... 74 圖十五:三組間差異達顯著性的骨骼測量項目及測量值……..... 75 圖十六:三組間差異達顯著性的骨骼測量項目及測量值…...... 76 圖十七:三組間差異達顯著性的骨骼測量項目及測量值……..... 77 圖十八:三組間差異達顯著性的齒性測量項目及測量值……....... 77 圖十九:三組間差異達顯著性的軟組織測量項目及測量值…........ 78 表 目 錄 表一:界標點定義.................................................................. 79 表二:測量項目及其定義........................................................ 80 表三:各測量項目的觀察者內誤差........................................... 81 表四:各組患者的組成........................................................... 82 表五:各組內偏移側與非偏移側骨骼測量項目之比較................ 83 表六:各組內偏移側與非偏移側齒性測量目之比較.................... 84 表七:各組內偏移側與非偏移側軟組織測量目之比較................. 85 表八:三組間骨性測量項目之比較............................................ 86 表九:三組間齒性測量項目之比較............................................ 87 表十:三組間軟組織測量值之比較............................................ 88 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 顏面不對稱之軟組織及硬組織評估:
應用錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描之三維分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Hard and soft tissue evaluation of facial asymmetry:
3D analysis using CBCT. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 郭生興 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳政憲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 顏面不對稱, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | facial asymmetry, | en |
dc.relation.page | 85 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801784 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 14.52 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。