請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7079完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yo-Yu Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉又瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-17T10:18:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-12-01 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-17T10:18:14Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-03-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-02-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 丁興祥、張慈宜、曾寶瑩（譯）（2006）。《質性心理學：研究方法的實務指南》（原作者：Jonathan A. Smith）。臺北市：遠流。（原著出版年﹕2003年）。
林姿葶、鄭伯壎（2007）。〈性別與領導角色孰先孰後？ 主管—部屬性別配對、共事時間及家長式領導〉。《中華心理學刊》，49，433-450。 胡幼慧（1996）。〈多元方法：三角交叉檢視法〉。見胡幼慧（主編）：《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁271-285。臺北市：巨流圖書公司。 胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）。〈一些質性方法上的思考〉。見胡幼慧（主編）：《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁141-158。臺北市：巨流圖書公司。 陳皎眉、陳彰儀（2005）。當性別遇上權力：女性領導者之壓力研究。國科會專題計畫成果報告。 陳銘薰、吳文傑、呂秋霞（2005），玻璃天花板效應：企業女性員工升遷發展之實證研究。第九屆科際整合管理研討會，頁294-305。 徐瑋伶、黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、樊景立（2006）。〈德行領導〉。見鄭伯壎、姜定宇（編）：《華人組織行為：議題、作法及出版》，頁122-144。臺北市：華泰。 鄭伯壎、黃敏萍（2008）。〈實地研究中的案例研究〉。見陳曉萍、徐淑英、樊景立、鄭伯壎（編）：《組織與管理研究的實證方法》，頁225-258。臺北市：華泰。 Adler, N. J. (1996). Global women political leaders: An invisible history, an increasingly important future. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 133-161. Andersson, B. E., & Nilsson, S. G. (1964). Studies in the reliability and validity of the critical incident technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(6), 398-403. Anderson, N., Lievens, F., Dam, K. v., & Born, M. (2006). A construct-driven investigation of gender differences in a leadership-role assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 555-566. Axelrod, A. (2003). Profiles in leadership. New York: Prentice Hall Press. Bhatnagar, D. & Swamy, R. (1995). Attitudes towards women as managers: Does interaction make a difference? Human Relations, 48(11), 1285–1307. Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr, L. A. (1994). Critical service encounters: The employee's viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 95-106. Blanchard, K. H., & Sargent, A. G. (1984). The one minute manager is an androgynous manager. Training and Development Journal, 38, 82-85. Bowen, C. C., Swim, J. K., & Jacobs, R. R. (2000). Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2194-2215. Bowman, G. W., Worthy, N. B., & Greyser, S. A. (1965). Are women executives people? Harvard Business Review, 43(4), 14-28, 164-178. Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz , J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662-669. Cann, A., & Siegfried, W. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leadership behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 413-419. Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81-99. Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2001). Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 629-636. Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Publishers. Chrisler, J. & Clapp, S.K. (2008). When the boss is a women. In M.A. Paludi (Eds.), The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce.(pp.34-65). Praeger Publishers. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25-38. Cook, L., & Rothwell, B. (2000). The X & Y of leadership: How men and women make a difference at work. London: Business Books Network. Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review , 11(3), 618 - 634. Druskat, V. U. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 99-119. Duehr, E. E., & Bono, J. E. (2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing? Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 815–846. Duff-McCall, K. and Schweinle, W. (2008). Leadership and Women. In M.A. Paludi (Eds.), The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce.(pp.87-99). Praeger Publishers. Eagly, A. H. (2003). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In D. Van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg(Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations. (pp79-93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1-12. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834. Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781-797. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306-315. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender.(pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fiedler, F.E., & Garcia, J.E. (1987) New approaches to effective leadership： cognitive resources and organizational performance, New York: John Wiley and Sons. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358. Geier, J. G. (1967). A trait approach to the study of leadership in small groups. Journal of Communication, 17(4), 316-323. Grogan, M. & Smith, F. (1998). A feminist perspective of women superintendents'approaches to moral dilemmas. Journal for a Just and Caring Education , 4(2), 176-192. Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. R, & Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935-942. Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81-92. Heilman, M. E., Rivero, J. C., & Brett, J. F. (1991). Skirting the competence issue: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on task choices of women and men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 99-105. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427. Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women's ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday. Helgesen, S. (1995). The web of inclusion: A new architecture for building great organizations. New York: Doubleday. Hollander, E. P., & Offermann, L. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179-189. Holmstrom, A., Burleson, B., & Jones, S. (2005). Some consequences for helpers who deliver “cold comfort”: Why it's worse for women than men to be inept when providing emotional support. Sex Roles, 53(3), 153-172. House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-339. Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people? Organization Science, 15, 232-240. Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39-60. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational behavior and human performance, 22, 375-403. Kent, R. L., & Moss, S. E. (1994). Effects of sex and gender role on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1335-1346. Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: do traits matter? Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 48-60. Korabik, K. (1990). Androgyny and leadership style. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 283-292. Latham, G. P., & Wexley, K. N. (1994). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. NY: Addison-Wesley. Lefkowitz, J. (1994). Sex-Related Differences in Job Attitudes and Dispositional Variables: Now You See Them,... The Academy of Management Journal. 37(2), 323-349. Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370-390. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777-785. Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (1997). Above the glass ceiling? A comparison of matched samples of female and male executives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 359 -375. Lynch, M & Post, K. (1996). What’s glass ceiling? Public Interest, 124, 27-36. McClelland, D. C., & Dailey, C. (1972). Improving officer selection for the foreign service. Boston: McBer & Company. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Nelson, D. L., & Burke, R. J. (2002). A framework for examining gender, work stress, and health. In D. L. Nelson & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Gender, work stress, and health. (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492- 499. Parks-Stamm, E. J., Heilman, M. E., & Hearns, K. A. (2008). Motivated to panelize: Women’s strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 237-247. Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603- 609. Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125. Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1979). The “good manager”: Masculine or androgynous? Academy of Management Journal, 22, 395– 403. Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1989). The “good manager”: Did androgyny fare better in the 1980s? Group and Organization Studies, 14, 216 –233. Powell G.N., Graves L.M. (2003). Women and men in management. Sage Publications. Ragins, B. (1991). Gender effects in subordinate evaluations of leaders: Real or artifact? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 259-268. Ritter, B. A., & Yoder, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 187-193. Robbins, S.P. (2007). Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743-762. Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1315-1328. Sargent, A. G. (1979). The androgynous manager. Strategy and Leadership, 7, 37-42. Sargent, A. G., & Stupak, R. J. (1989). Managing in the '90s: The androgynous manager. Training and Development Journal, 43, 29-35. Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100. Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied psychology, 60, 340 –344. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675– 688. Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T, & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33-41. Sczesny, S. (2003). A closer look beneath the surface: Various facets of the think-manager-think male stereotype. Sex Roles, 49, 353-363. Spencer, L. M.,& Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Stanford, J. H., Oates, B. R., & Flores, D. (1995). Women's leadership styles: A heuristic analysis. Women in Management Review, 10, 9-16. Sutton, C. D. and Moore, K. K. (1985). Executive women: 20 years later. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 42-66. Thornton, A., & Freedman, D. (1979). Changes in the sex role attitudes of women: 1962-1977. American Sociological Review, 44, 831-842. Trinidad, C., & Normore, A. H. (2005). Leadership and gender: A dangerous liaison? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26, 574-590. Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leader and decision making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Walumba, F. O., Wu, C., & Ojode, L. A. (2004). Gender and instructional outcomes: The mediating role of leadership style. Journal of Management Development, 23(2), 124-140. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Industrial Relations Center. Willemsem, T.M. (2002). Gender typing of the successful manager: A stereotype reconsidered. Sex Roles, 46, 385-391. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of management, 15(2), 251-289. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations.(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall. Zaccaro, S. J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 308-315. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7079 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 由於過去研究僅指出女性領導者較傾向展現民主、參與式領導與轉型式領導風格（Eagly, Johannesen-Schmidt, & Engen, 2003；Trinidad & Normore, 2005），但並未指出女性領導者展現這些領導行為時將具有高度效能。因此本研究旨在探究領導效能展現的性別差異，以深入瞭解以下三項研究重點：一、使男性與女性領導者各自成為具有高度效能之領導者的關鍵何在？二、具有高度效能的男性與女性領導者，其領導風格的展現是否有顯著的差異？三、女性領導者展現與男性領導者相同的特定領導風格或策略時，其效果是否與男性領導者相當？本研究藉由量化研究取向輔以質化資料，針對實務界的現狀進行探究。研究首先對男性領導者與女性領導者的效能展現做出詳盡的測量以篩選出領導效能（高、低）乘上領導者性別（男、女）共四種組合之研究對象，再利用關鍵事例法蒐集研究對象領導風格與策略豐富的描述，從中對前述三項研究重點進行深入分析。研究結果發現，高效能男性領導者與女性領導者之間的領導行為展現，確實存有差異，其中「上行下效」、「堅持目標絕不輕易妥協」、「保有權力距離感」以及「鼓勵部屬自學」為高效能男性領導者獨有的領導行為；而「妥善運用多元溝通技巧」、「強化自我同舟共濟的使命感」、「隨時保有高度敏感力」、「善用網絡資源」則是高效能女性領導者獨有的領導行為。歸納所有研究資料推論得知，富有高領導效能的男性領導者善用前引指揮型的領導模式帶領團隊前進，而高領導效能的女性領導者則採與團隊成員並肩向前的中心凝聚型領導模式。最後將根據研究結果，進一步討論理論貢獻與實務應用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous studies show that female leaders are inclined to deliver democratic, participative and transformational leadership（Eagly, Johannesen-Schmidt, & Engen, 2003； Trinidad & Normore, 2005）； however, none of these conclusions highlight that such leadership would lead to higher effectiveness. Therefore, this study was to explore gender differences in leadership effectiveness and following is three research points for a deeper understanding: 1. Key essentials of becoming high effectiveness leaders for male and female leaders respectively. 2. Significant differences of leadership behavior between male and female leaders. 3. Is leadership effectiveness consistent between a female and male leader when female carries out same leadership strategies as male does? The study supplemented quantitative research with qualitative data and explored several practical scenarios. First of all, through a conduct of exhaustive list of criteria of measurements on male and female leaders, a matrix with leader effectiveness（high, low）and gender（male, female）was formed. Afterwards, through critical incident technique we collected leadership styles and strategy descriptions from the three research points in-depth analysis. The results showed that there are differences in high leadership effectiveness male leaders and female leaders once they display leadership behaviors. The unique leadership behaviors on high leadership effectiveness of male leader are “Superiors are imitated by their inferiors”, “Insisting the goal”, “Maintaining a power distance”, and “Encouraging subordinates to study by themselves”. On the other hand, the unique leadership behaviors on high leadership effectiveness of female leader are “Using multiple communication skills”, “Reinforcing team spirit idea: we are on the same boat”, “Keeping high sensitivity”, and “Leveraging networking resources such as senior subordinates”. To summarize, male leaders with high leadership effectiveness usually give direct instructions to lead a team, while female leaders with high leadership effectiveness apply cohesion leadership style to propel a team going forward. The last part further discusses theoretical contributions and practical applications. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-17T10:18:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97227124-1.pdf: 1471445 bytes, checksum: 3e4ccd308a5da8a4643e428d259ac18e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 領導相關研究 5 第二節 性別與領導研究 9 第三節 兩性領導研究與領導效能 12 第四節 領導效能的性別差異 14 第三章 研究方法 17 第一節 研究設計 18 第二節 研究對象 19 第三節 研究工具 24 第四節 資料蒐集 25 第五節 資料分析程序 26 第四章 研究結果 31 第一節 成為領導者的基本要件 33 第二節 高效能領導者的領導行為 37 第三節 高效能男性領導者的領導行為 43 第四節 高效能女性領導者的領導行為 45 第五節 低效能領導行為的領導行為 48 第六節 低效能男性領導者的領導行為 51 第七節 低效能女性領導者的領導行為 54 第五章 討論與建議 59 第一節 研究結果總結 60 第二節 領導角色與性別角色 64 第三節 兩性領導者間的差異 68 第四節 領導效能展現的性別差異 72 第五節 研究限制與未來方向 76 第六節 管理實務上的意涵 77 參考文獻 81 附錄一 領導效能主觀評判指標量表 89 附錄二 關鍵領導行為事例與向度分類 91 第一節 高度領導效能之男性領導者 91 第二節 高度領導效能之女性領導者 128 第三節 低度領導效能之男性領導者 157 第四節 低度領導效能之女性領導者 186 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 領導行為與領導效能之兩性異同 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Gender Differences in Leadership Behavior and Leadership Effectiveness | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳彰儀,吳宗祐,姜定宇 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 領導者性別,領導行為,領導風格,領導效能,質化資料, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Gender,Leader,Leadership style,Leadership behavior,Leadership effectiveness,Qualitative data, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 197 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-02-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.44 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。