Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70600Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張仁和(Jen-Ho Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Yi Chuang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 莊政一 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:32:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-16 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 內政部戶政司（2016）：《全國姓名統計分析》。台北市：內政部。
李放、鄭雪、鄧琳雙、鄔俊芳（2012）：〈大學生同性戀偏見程度及其與社會支配傾向的關係〉。《中國性科學》，21，79-82。 卓耕宇、達努巴克（2007）：〈多元性別與同志教育〉。見黃淑玲與游美惠（主編）：《性別向度與臺灣社會》，頁114-136。臺北市：巨流。 張德勝、游家盛、王采薇（2013）：〈大學生對男同志和女同志人際關係態度之調查研究〉。《教育心理學報》，44，411-431。 傅仰止（2016）：《台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2015第七期第一次：綜合問卷組》。107年6月28日，摘自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫網站，https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_ detail.php?id=1057。 喀飛（2012）：〈老年同志的三重污名：老年、同志、性〉。《文化研究》，13，308-312。 Ahmed, A. M., & Hammarstedt, M. (2009). Detecting discrimination against homosexuals: Evidence from a field experiment on the Internet. Economica, 76, 588-597. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Bahns, A. J., & Crandall, C. S. (2013). The opposite of backlash: High‐SDO people show enhanced tolerance when gay people pose little threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 286-291. Cheng, Y. H. A., Wu, F. C. F., & Adamczyk, A. (2016). Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995–2012. Chinese Sociological Review, 48, 317-345. Clausell, E., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). When do subgroup parts add up to the stereotypic whole? Mixed stereotype content for gay male subgroups explains overall ratings. Social Cognition, 23, 161-181. David, E. J. R., & Derthick, A. O. (2017). The psychology of oppression. New York: Springer Publishing Company. Engstrom, C. M., & Sedlacek, W. (1997). Attitudes of heterosexual students toward their gay male and lesbian peers. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 565-576. Fasoli, F., Paladino, M. P., Carnaghi, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., & Bain, P. G. (2016). Not “just words”: Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 237-248. Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope Eds., Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 97–116). New York: Guilford. Gabriel, U., & Banse, R. (2006). Helping behavior as a subtle measure of discrimination against lesbians and gay men: German data and a comparison across countries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 690-707. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264. Haslam, N., & Bain, P. (2007). Humanizing the self: Moderators of the attribution of lesser humanness to others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 57-68. Hendren, A., & Blank, H. (2009). Prejudiced behavior toward lesbians and gay men: A field experiment on everyday helping. Social Psychology, 40, 234-238. Herek, G. M. (1984). Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A factor-analytic study. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 39-51. Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19-22. Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 40-66. Herek, G. M., Cogan, J. C., & Gillis, J. R. (2002). Victim experiences in hate crimes based on sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 319-339. Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691-698. Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 901. Lauster, N., & Easterbrook, A. (2011). No room for new families? A field experiment measuring rental discrimination against same-sex couples and single parents. Social Problems, 58, 389-409. Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197. MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation. Psychology & Sexuality, 6, 275-294. Mata, J., Ghavami, N., & Wittig, M. A. (2010). Understanding gender differences in early adolescents’ sexual prejudice. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 50-75. Michinov, N., Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., & Méot, A. (2005). Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: A new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 91-98. Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2011). Sexual orientation bias toward gay men and lesbian women: Modern homonegative attitudes and their association with discriminatory behavioral intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2573-2599. Novelli, D., Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2010). Come together: Two studies concerning the impact of group relations on personal space. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 223-236. Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741. Raja, S., & Stokes, J. P. (1998). Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: The modern homophobia scale. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 3, 113-134. Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336-353. Schope, R. D., & Eliason, M. J. (2000). Thinking versus acting: Assessing the relationship between heterosexual attitudes and behaviors toward homosexuals. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 11, 69-92. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Slater, L. Z., Moneyham, L., Vance, D. E., Raper, J. L., Mugavero, M. J., & Childs, G. (2015). The multiple stigma experience and quality of life in older gay men with HIV. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 26, 24-35. Talley, A. E., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2008). Evaluations and aggression directed at a gay male target: The role of threat and antigay prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 647-683. Viki, G. T., Winchester, L., Titshall, L., Chisango, T., Pina, A., & Russell, R. (2006). Beyond secondary emotions: The infrahumanization of outgroups using human–related and animal–related words. Social Cognition, 24, 753-775. Weichselbaumer, D. (2003). Sexual orientation discrimination in hiring. Labour Economics, 10, 629-642. Whitley, B. E., & Ægisdóttir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42, 947-967. Whitley, B. E., & Lee, S. E. (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144-170. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70600 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 以往研究多從人口變項來探討對同性戀態度的差異，並將同性戀視為同質群體，且聚焦於態度測量而較少探討具體歧視行為。本研究以分組活動的組員選擇，探討個人的社會支配傾向與對不同背景同性戀排斥之間的關係，並區分直接排斥與間接排斥。本研究共招募到201位異性戀參與者，當刪除同婚議題討論的活動後，雖然直接排斥同性戀與異性戀沒有差異，但普遍對同性戀的間接排斥較強。同時，結果顯示社會支配傾向與對年長男同、年長女同、年輕男同的直接與間接排斥呈正相關，與對年輕女同的排斥則無相關。後續分析發現對同性戀態度可以中介社會支配傾向對同性戀排斥的預測效果，去人性化則無法。中介調節分析顯示同性戀對象的性別會影響中介效果，同性戀對象年齡的影響則未達顯著。本研究顯示社會支配傾向能夠預測對同性戀的排斥，並會受到同性戀對象的年齡與性別影響，且根據對象的不同，不同社會支配傾向者對同性戀排斥的歷程也會不同。本研究從不同層面了解對同性戀的歧視，期許能為相關研究提出新的方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous studies have mainly focused on the relationship between participants’ demographic information and attitudes toward homosexuals, in which treat the homosexuals as a homogeneity group and less focus on the concrete exclusive behavior on homosexuals. Using the group member selection paradigm, the current study investigated the relationship between social dominance orientation (SDO) and exclusion of different homosexual subgroups, and distinguish the direct and indirect exclusions. 201 heterosexual participants were recruited. After deleting discussion of same-sex marriage scenario, there were no difference between direct exclusion of homosexuals and heterosexuals, but indirect exclusion of homosexuals were stronger. The results showed that SDO was positive correlated with direct and indirect exclusion of old gay, old lesbian and young gay; however, there was no correlation between SDO and exclusion of young lesbian. Attitude toward homosexuals mediated the relationship between SDO and exclusion when the target were gay men; on the other hand, dehumanization mediated the relationship when the target were old homosexuals except direct exclusion of old lesbian. The findings showed that the SDO can predict exclusion of homosexuals, and the mediators of the relationship between SDO and exclusion of homosexuals were influenced by the homosexuals’ gender and age. Implications and limitations are discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:32:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05227121-1.pdf: 4810925 bytes, checksum: 330c9bdd40965669f39841e9690302d4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………………1 第二節 文獻回顧…………………………………………………………2 第三節 小結…………………………………………………………8 第二章 研究方法…………………………………………………………10 第一節 研究參與者…………………………………………………………10 第二節 研究材料…………………………………………………………10 第三節 研究程序…………………………………………………………13 第三章 研究結果…………………………………………………………14 第一節 情境對象特徵在直接、間接排斥與去人性化的影響…………………14 第二節 社會支配傾向對排斥同性戀與態度之影響……………………………………19 第三節 對同性戀態度與去人性化之中介分析……………………………………………25 第四節 對象背景資訊之調節中介效果…………………………………………………………27 第五節 小結…………………………………………………………29 第四章 討論與結論…………………………………………………………31 第一節 綜合討論…………………………………………………………31 第二節 研究貢獻…………………………………………………………32 第三節 研究限制…………………………………………………………33 第四節 結論…………………………………………………………34 參考文獻…………………………………………………………35 附錄…………………………………………………………40 附錄一…………………………………………………………40 附錄二…………………………………………………………41 附錄三…………………………………………………………42 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 對同性戀態度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 同性戀次群體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會支配傾向 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 間接排斥 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 直接排斥 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 去人性化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | social dominance orientation | en |
| dc.subject | homosexual subgroups | en |
| dc.subject | attitude toward homosexuals | en |
| dc.subject | dehumanization | en |
| dc.subject | direct exclusion | en |
| dc.subject | indirect exclusion | en |
| dc.title | 社會支配傾向對同性戀排斥之影響－性別、年齡與去人性化的中介調節分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Social Dominance Orientation and Exclusion of Homosexual: A Moderated Mediation Analysis of Homosexuals’ Gender, Age, and Dehumanization | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 李怡青(I-Ching Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃金蘭(Chin-Lan Huang),郭郡羽(Chun-Yu Guo) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社會支配傾向,同性戀次群體,對同性戀態度,去人性化,直接排斥,間接排斥, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | social dominance orientation,homosexual subgroups,attitude toward homosexuals,dehumanization,direct exclusion,indirect exclusion, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803106 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 心理學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf Restricted Access | 4.7 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.