請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70560完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃從仁(Tsung-Ren Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yao-Ming Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝曜名 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:31:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-15 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-15 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 許功餘、張玉鈴（2015）：〈費力控制與 HEXACO 性格向度對青少年內化與 外化問題行為之預測效果〉。《中華心理學刊》57，1–25。 doi:10.6129/CJP.20141105
高泉豐（1994）：〈認知需求的概念與測量〉。《中華心理學刊》36，1–20。 Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907 Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152. doi: 10.1177/1088868314523838 Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612–625. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612 Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26, 1531–1542. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594620 Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1406.5823. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984). The Efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805–818. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805 Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present ... and future? Memory, 10, 305–318. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000135 Eagly, A. H., Chen, S., Chaiken, S., & Shaw-Barnes, K. (1999). The impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 64–89. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.64 Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Brannon, L. A., Shaw, K., & Hutson-Comeaux, S. (2000). Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1392–1408. doi: 10.1177/0146167200263007 Fox, J. R., Park, B., & Lang, A. (2007). When available resources become negative resources: The effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research, 34, 277–296. doi: 10.1177/0093650207300429 Frost, P., Casey, B., Griffin, K., Raymundo, L., Carrigan, R., Frost, P., … Raymundo, L. (2016). The influence of confirmation bias on memory and source monitoring. The Journal of General Psychology, 1309, 238–252. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2015.1084987 Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877–902. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321 Graham, L. M. (2007). Need for cognition and false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 409–418. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.012 Hilbig, B. E., Heydasch, T., & Zettler, I. (2014). To boast or not to boast: Testing the humility aspect of the Honesty-Humility factor. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 12–16. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.033 Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516–519. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003 Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Multilevel Analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315650982 Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: information seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799–825. Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557–71. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R Package Version 2.0-32, Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=lmerTest Lassiter, G. D., Briggs, M. A., & Slaw, R. D. (1991). Need for cognition, causal processing, and memory for behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 694–700. doi: 10.1177/0146167291176013 Levin, I. P., Huneke, M. E., & Jasper, J. D. (2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion–exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 171–193. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2881 Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & Landfield, K. (2009). Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 390–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01144.x Lundgren, S. R., & Prislin, R. (1998). Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 715-726. doi: 10.1177/0146167298247004 Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide, 2nd ed. Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. doi.org: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 Noguchi, K., Gel, Y. R., Brunner, E., & Konietschke, F. (2012). nparLD: An R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Journal of Statistical Software, 50, 1–23. doi: 10.18637/jss.v050.i12 Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587–595. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.587 Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655–669. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.655 Shapiro, M. A. (1994). Signal detection measures of recognition memory. In A. Lang (Ed.) Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp. 133–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70560 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在現代公民社會，許多社會議題透過網路傳播、發酵。當人們在網路上參與討論時，以人有限的認知資源，會如何處理眼前多元且分歧的資訊？我們試圖從訊息的選擇以及訊息的記憶兩個方向來探索這個問題。在過去研究指出，人們傾向選擇支持自身態度，或是符合自己原初假設的資訊，這現象被稱為驗證性偏誤。然而，人們記得的內容，會是支持自身態度的資訊，還是那些與自身態度相左的？在記憶研究文獻中，此問題尚未有定論。本研究架設實驗網頁模擬線上討論中接收訊息的場景。在這個大規模施測（N = 5395）的線上實驗中，使用連續訊息搜尋作業以及再認記憶作業探索人對於他人意見的訊息處理，並測量與訊息處理相關的個體差異。我們從實驗中發現人們具有驗證性偏誤，也就是傾向選擇支持自己態度的他人意見，但此偏誤在高認知涉入程度的討論情境即有所減緩。我們使用線性混和效果模型預測記憶表現，發現參與者在相左意見的記憶較支持意見為佳。進一步使用不同的記憶測度預測模型對這現象進行更細緻的探討後，發現支持意見表現較差來自於誤警較多。此外，我們發現部分個人特質，例如誠實謙遜、開放性以及認知需求，能正向預測記憶表現。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the modern civilized society, more and more social issues are raised and communicated through the internet. On the internet, how do people process diverse and diverged information with limited cognitive resources? Previous studies have shown a confirmation bias during information selection—people tend to select information in line with their attitudes or hypotheses. However, it is still an open question whether an individual also shows such a confirmation bias in remembering information and the present study was set out to answer this question. In this large-scale web-based study (N = 5395), each participant was presented with a sequence of opinions that aligned either with or against their positions on a specific issue. The participants’ recognition memories of these opinions were then tested after a short delay during which they were required to fill out a personality questionnaire. In the results from mixed-effects regression models that controlled for individual differences, a confirmation bias was indeed observed during information selection although the bias could be attenuated when the participants were engaged for further discussion. On the contrary, the participants actually showed an overall worse memory performance for opinions that were in line with rather than against their attitudes because of more false alarms. In addition to personal attitudes, we also found some personality variables, Honesty-Humility and Need for Cognition in particular, to positively predict the performance of recognition memory. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:31:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04227105-1.pdf: 3935493 bytes, checksum: 2427a7616e46da4cdb2682220574b6cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | ㄧ 緒論 1
第一節 偏誤的訊息處理歷程 1 第二節 訊息處理階段：搜尋資訊 3 第三節 訊息處理階段：記憶資訊 4 第四節 個人特質與訊息處理的關係 5 第五節 研究假設 6 二 方法 8 第一節 測量 8 第二節 實驗情境設計 13 第三節 參與者以及實驗環境設置 15 第四節 實驗步驟 16 第五節 資料前處理以及分析 19 三 結果 27 四 討論 47 五 結論 52 參考文獻 54 附錄 58 附錄一 認知需求量表（中文版） 58 附錄二 HEXACO-PI-R（中文版） 60 附錄三 意見庫 63 附錄四 實驗內問項詳細內容 69 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 驗證性偏誤 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 再認記憶 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性格特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 混和效果模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 線上研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | confirmation bias | en |
| dc.subject | recognition memory | en |
| dc.subject | personality traits | en |
| dc.subject | mixed-effects model | en |
| dc.subject | online study | en |
| dc.title | 我們是否記得與自己相左的意見？以大型網路研究探索個體對他人意見的訊息處理 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Do We Remember Opinions Opposite to Ours? Investigating Individuals’ Information Processing of Opinions From Other People Through a Large-Scale Online Study | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉怡玉(Yei-Yu Yeh),鄭仕坤(Shih-Kuen Cheng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 驗證性偏誤,再認記憶,性格特質,混和效果模型,線上研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | confirmation bias,recognition memory,personality traits,mixed-effects model,online study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 70 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803080 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.84 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。