請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70444完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝寶煖 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jing-Rou Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林靚柔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:28:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
王文漢（2017）。得軟體者得天下【網路新聞】。檢索日期：2017.07.23。取自 http://www.digitimes.com.tw/col/article.asp?id=125 王梅玲、謝寶煖（2014）。圖書資訊學導論。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 牛涵錚、楊勝欽 （2012）。研發人員科學素養量表之建構—以臺灣電子資訊業為例。商略學報，4(1)，59-74。 沈珮琴（2011）。資訊素養教育融入學科課程之實施成效。中興大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺中市。 李平（2018）。信息时代大学生信息素养教育创新研究。农业图书情报学刊。30(4)，143-147。 李育杰（2013）。資訊專業證照研析報告。「教育部資訊軟體人才培育中程計畫」發表之報告。國立臺灣科技大學。 李德竹（2000）。資訊素養的意義，內涵與演變。圖書與資訊學刊，35，1-25。 李蔡彥、鄭宇君（2011）。資訊科技與新媒體研究之發展。傳播研究與 踐，1(1)， 75-80。 吳美美（1996）。在新時空座標中的圖書館功能─談資訊素養教育。圖書館學與資訊科學，22(2)。 吳碧如（2005）。高屏地區大學校院行政人員資訊素養之研究。高雄師範大學成人教育所文教行政人員碩士學位在職進修專班，未出版碩士論文，高雄市。 岳振豪（2011）。國軍人員資訊素養與工作績效相關性之研究─以國防部某單位為例。世新大學資訊傳播學研究所，未出版碩士論文，台北市。 科技產業資訊室（2016）。2016年全球IT支出3.41兆美元 英脫歐加速IT人才流動【網路新聞】。檢索日期：2017.07.23。取自http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=12589 洪秀熒（2004）。高雄縣國民小學行政人員資訊素養與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系學校行政研究所，未出版碩士論文，高雄市。 莊道明（1998）。以資訊素養為基礎的圖書館利用教育課程-世新大學圖書管實施方式。書苑季刊，35，27-36。 陳怡君（1990）。資訊零時差 戰鬥力HOT到家【網路新聞】。檢索日期：2017.07.23。取自http://www.story.pu.edu.tw/halloffame/detail/f57a16c7-df7f-e611-80bb-005056bb512a 陳萍（2016）。《高等教育信息素養框架》 之國內研究與思考。數字圖書館論壇，9，68-72。 陳肇亨（2010）。立法機關行政人員資訊素養與電子化政府數位行政作業能力關係之研究。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 張如瑩（2010）。我國大學校院資訊素養通識課程之規劃。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，未出版之碩士論文，臺北市。 張茵婷（2007）。 幼稚園教師資訊素養與教學現況之研究。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士班，台中縣。 程秋萍（2008）。在職學生資訊素養與職業技能相關性之研究: 以國立臺北商業 技術學院為例。圖書與資訊學刊，66，89-106。 張黎慧（2004）。探討臨床護理人員資訊素養之研究。國立中正大學資訊管理研究所，嘉義縣。 張黎慧（2008）。探討臨床護理人員資訊素養之研究-以某區域醫院為例。醫院雜誌，41(4)，11-22。 楊富全（2004）。 國民小學教師兼行政人員資訊素養與行政效能之研究。國立臺中教育大學國民教育研究所，臺中市。 楊境恩（2004）。國內警察人員資訊安全素養對資訊犯罪偵查能力影響之研究。樹德科技大學資訊管理研究所，高雄市。 鄔寧芬、何青芳（2018）。上海地區高校「信息素養教育」課程的現狀、問題和對策。圖書館雜志，322(2)，39-46。 管康彥（1996）。21世紀之企業新挑戰。戰略生產力，490，67-69。 廖淑真（2007）。碩士生對資訊素養之熟練度與態度之調查研究-以亞洲大學為例。中興大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺中市。 賴靜姿（2006）。資訊軟體工程師知識與技能之研究－以C公司為例。「第十二屆企業人力資源管理實務專題研究成果發表會」發表之論文。國立中央大學。 鄭宇凱（2009）。空軍人員資訊安全素養之評量與分析。國立臺東大學環境經濟資管研究所，台東縣。 劉佩芝（2018）。面向用戶需求的高校圖書館信息素養教育研究。黑河學刊，238(4)，177-178。 劉璇、王峰（2015）。基于學科的高校大學生專業信息素養教育實踐研究—以杭州市高校爲例。圖書館學刊，37(6)，69-72。 盧勝煜（2008）中華電信台灣北區分公司員工資訊素養與在職教育訓練相關性之研究。世新大學資訊傳播研究所，未出版碩士論文，台北市。 儲鳴（2008）。我國高新技術產業IT知識員工能力素質的開發研究。未出版之碩士論文。天津大學，天津市。 羅之盈（2015）。科技之島找不到軟體工程師【網路新聞】。檢索日期：2017.07.23。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5071525 魏令芳（2002）。大學資訊素養教育之研究。未出版之碩士論文。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 蘇秀慧（2017）。2017全球市值百大企業 這家成長幅度最大【網路新聞】。檢索日期：2017.07.29。取自https://udn.com/news/story/7238/2550769 西文部分 ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee (2012). 2012 top ten trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College & Research Libraries News., 73(6), 311-320. ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee (2017). Environmental Scan 2017. Retrieved July 25, 2017, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/EnvironmentalScan2017.pdf American Association of School Libraries (1998). Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://ischool.sjsu.edu/courses/250.loertscher/modelaasl.html American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. (1989) Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential American Library Association. (2001). Library Advocacy Now!Action Pack 2001.Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://www.ala.org/ala/advocacybucket/informationliteracy.pdf Armstrong, C. (2005). Defining Information Literacy for the UK. Library & Information Update, 4 (1-2), 22-25. Beal, V. (2015). Software Engineer. Retrieved July 15,2017, from http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/software_engineer.html Bird, N. J., & Bird, N. (2016). Information literacy for the workplace: a review of the literature and research proposal. National Conference on Information Literacy. Zhenjiang, China. Boynton, A. C., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Information technology planning in the 1990's: Directions for practice and research, MIS quarterly, 59-71. Breivik, P. S., & Ford, B. J. (1993). Promoting learning in libraries through information literacy. American Libraries, 24(1), 98-102. Bruce, C. S. (1999). Workplace experiences of information literacy. International journal of information management, 19(1), 33-47. Bundy, A. (2004). Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework: Principles, standards and practice (2nd ed.). Adelaide, Australia: ANZIIL. Retrieved from http://www.caul.edu.au/content/upload/files/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf Campbell, S. (2004). Defining information literacy in the 21st century. World Library and Information Congress:70th IFLA General Conference and Council. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla70/prog04.htm Cheuk, B. (2002). Information literacy in the workplace context: issues, best practices and challenges. White paper prepared for UNESCO, The US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic. Connaway, L. S., Proffitt, M., Lewis, J. S., Alexander, S., Du, Y., Eden, B., ... & Salisbury, L. (2012). 2012 top ten trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College and Research Libraries News, 73(6), 311-320. De Saulles, M. (2007). Information literacy among UK SMEs: an information policy gap. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 59(1), 68–97. Doyle, C. (1992). Final report to the national forum on information literacy. Syracuse, N.Y.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources. (ED 351 033). Feldman, S,. & Sherman, C. (2001). The High Cost of Not Finding Information An IDC White Paper. Retrived May 28 , 2018, from http://www.ejitime.com/materials/IDC%20on%20The%20High%20Cost%20Of%20Not%20Finding%20Information.pdf Forster, M. (Ed.). (2017). Information literacy in the workplace. Facet Publishing. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (2016). In Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf Garner, S. D. (2006). High-Level Colloquium on Information Literacy and Lifelong Learning Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Alexandria, Egypt. UNESCO. Gashurov I,. & Matsuuchi A. (2013). CUNY’s Critical Thinking Skills Initiative Redesigning workforce education through information literacy learning, Coll. Res. Libr. News. 74,70-73. Hatch. M. J. (1997). Organization theory. Oxford university press. Head, A. J. (2013). What information competencies matter in today’s workplace?. Library and information research, 37(114), 74-104. Inskip, C. (2014). Information literacy is for life, not just for a good degree: a literature review. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1448073/1/IL%20in%20the%20workplace%20literature%20review%20Dr%20C%20Inskip%20June%202014.%20doc.pdf Jones, G. R. (1998). Organizational theory, 2nd ed., Addison. Wesley Longman Publishing Company. Kielstra, P. (2007). A change in the climate is business going green?. In A change in the climate is business going green?. Economist Intelligence Unit. Lauby, S. (2013). The difference between knowledge, skills and abilities. HR Bartender, 29. Lloyd, A. (2010). Information literacy landscapes: Information literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Oxford, England : Chandos Pub. O’Brien, J. A. (1999) Management Information System, Managing Information Technology in the Internetworked Enterprise, 4th ed. NY: McGraw-Hill Education. Patricia, S. B., & Gordon G. E. (1989). Information Literacy: Revolution in the Library. NY:Macmillan. ProQuest Releases Results of its 2016 Information Literacy Survey (2017).Retrieved June 26, 2018, from https://www.proquest.com/about/news/2017/ProQuest-Releases-Results-of-its-2016-Information-Literacy-Survey.html Resnick, M. (2002). Rethinking learning in the digital age. In G. Kirkman (Ed.),The global information technology report: Readiness for the net-worked word.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Rosenberg, V. (2002), Information Literacy and Small Business, Paper Presented at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague. Spencer, L.M., Spencer, S.M., (1993) Competence at Work: Model for Superior Performance, New York: John Wiley & Sons,Inc. Stoof, A., (2005) Tools for the Identification and Description of Competencies. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Open University of the Nederland,Heerlen. The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy – Core Model For Higher Education (2011). In SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf Whisler, T. L., & Leavitt, H. J. (1958). Management in the 1980's. Harvard Business Review, 36(6), 41-48. Williams, D., Cooper, K., & Wavell, C. (2014). Information literacy in the workplace: An annotated bibliography. Robert Gordon University Online Article (accessed October 2014). Wu, Y. D. H. (2012). Information Literacy in the Workplace: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Journal of Library and Information Science, 38(1) 84-104. Zuppo, C. M. (2012). Defining ICT in a boundaryless world: The development of a working hierarchy. International journal of managing information technology, 4(3), 13. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70444 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討軟體資訊專業人員對於職場資訊素養、軟體知識技能的自我認知，並比較兩者之間的關係；問卷發放部分橫跨海峽雙邊，並依據所得資料進行比較，對於提升職場資訊素養與軟體知識技能給出建議，以供兩岸資訊科技產業參考借鑒。
本研究以兩岸軟體工程師為研究對象，採用問卷調查法作為資料蒐集之方法，共回收578 份有效樣本。研究結果發現：（1）兩岸軟體工程師在職場資訊素養及軟體知識技能所有構面皆有顯著差異；（2）圖資領域與非圖資領域的軟體工程師在職場資訊素養及軟體知識技能所有構面皆有顯著差異；（3）個人條件中，年齡偏低、大學學歷及資訊工程背景者擁有較高的職場資訊素養與軟體知識技能；（4）職場環境條件中，年資較低、公司規模較小及未擔任主管者擁有較高的職場資訊素養與軟體知識技能；（5）資訊行為在職場資訊素養及軟體知識技能大部分構面無顯著差異；（6）職場資訊素養與軟體知識技能之間有高度正相關且有54.2%的預測力。 最後，根據結果提出五項建議：（1）加強「社群知識傳播」構面能力，提升整體職場資訊素養；（2）加強「專業知識能力」構面能力，提升整體軟體知識技能；（3）軟體資訊科技產業主管職人員應加強職場資訊素養提升；（4）加強在校學生資訊素養與專業課程的連結，提升職場資訊素養；（5）加強兩岸軟體工程師相互交流機會，提升職場資訊素養。 關於進一步研究，提供三項建議供研究者參考：（1）擴大研究調查範圍；（2）研究方法可採多樣方式進行；（3）制定職場資訊素養能力標準 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to identify the relationship between software information professionals' workplace information literacy and software knowledge & skill, and further explore the relationship between the two. The questionnaires were distributed across the Taiwan strait and compared with the data obtained, and designed to give suggestions for improving workplace information literacy, software knowledge & skill. All can be cited as information for cross-strait information technology industry.
The participants in this study were cross-strait information technology professionals. 578 valid questionnaires have been collected. Results showed that, (1)Cross-strait software engineers have significant differences in all aspects of workplaceinformation literacy and software knowledge & skill; (2) Software engineers in the field of library and information and non-library and information have significant differences in all aspects of workplace information literacy and software knowledge & skill; (3) Among the personal conditions, participants with lower age, college degrees and information engineering backgrounds have higher workplace information literacy and software knowledge & skill; (4) In the workplace environment conditions, participants with lower seniority, working for small companies and acting as non-supervisor have higher workplace information literacy and software knowledge & skill; (5) Information behavior has no significant difference in most aspects of workplace information literacy and software knowledge & skills; (6) There is a high positive correlation between workplace information literacy and software knowledge & skill along with the predicted value 54.2% of both. Based on the results, five suggestions were raised as follows, (1) Improve the capability of 'community knowledge dissemination' to enhance the overall workplace information literacy; (2) Improve the capability of “professional knowledge ability” to enhance the overall software knowledge & skill; (3) The supervisors in the software information industry should enhance the workplace information literacy; (4) Strengthen the links between information literacy and professional courses to enhance workplace information literacy; (5) Strengthen communication opportunities between cross-strait software engineers to enhance workplace information literacy. For further research, three suggestions were raised as follows, (1) Expand the scope of research; (2) Research methods can be used in various ways; (3) Develop workplace information literacy standards. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:28:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R03126026-1.pdf: 4274192 bytes, checksum: 57bda9763be256021926aee316cd3f09 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝 辭 ....................................................................................................................... i
中文摘要 .................................................................................................................. ii 英文摘要 ................................................................................................................. iii 目 次 .......................................................................................................................v 圖 次 .................................................................................................................... vii 表 次 ................................................................................................................... viii 第一章 緒論..............................................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景 ..................................................................................................1 第二節 研究目的 ..................................................................................................5 第三節 研究問題 ..................................................................................................5 第四節 研究範圍與限制 ......................................................................................6 第五節 名詞解釋 ..................................................................................................6 第二章 文獻探討 ......................................................................................................9 第一節 資訊素養介紹 ..........................................................................................9 第二節 職場資訊素養 ........................................................................................ 18 第三節 軟體資訊科技產業 ................................................................................. 30 第四節 軟體知識技能 ........................................................................................ 37 第三章 研究方法與步驟 ........................................................................................ 45 第一節 研究方法 ................................................................................................ 45 第二節 研究步驟 ................................................................................................ 58 第四章 研究結果與討論 ........................................................................................ 59 第一節 人口變項與資訊行為分析 ..................................................................... 59 第二節 職場資訊素養分析 ................................................................................. 69 第三節 軟體知識技能分析 ................................................................................. 89 第四節 職場資訊素養與軟體知識技能關係分析 ............................................ 108 第五節 綜合討論 .............................................................................................. 106 第五章 結論與建議 .............................................................................................. 117 第一節 結論 ...................................................................................................... 117 第二節 建議 ...................................................................................................... 122 第二節 進一步研究之建議 ............................................................................... 125 參考文獻 ............................................................................................................... 127 附錄1 軟體資訊產業人員職場資訊素養認知與評估調查問卷(繁體版) ............. 135 附錄2 軟體資訊產業人員職場資訊素養認知與評估調查問卷(簡體版) ............. 140 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 軟體知識技能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊素養 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 職場資訊素養 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 軟體資訊專業人員 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊科技 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 問卷調查法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | software knowledge & skill | en |
| dc.subject | information technology professionals | en |
| dc.subject | information technology | en |
| dc.subject | information behavior | en |
| dc.subject | questionnaire survey | en |
| dc.subject | information literacy | en |
| dc.subject | workplace information literacy | en |
| dc.title | 兩岸軟體資訊專業人員職場資訊素養與軟體知識技能關係之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study of the Relationship Between Information Literacy in the Workplace and Software Knowledge & Skill:
A Cross-strait Perspective on Information Technology professionals | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林呈潢,莊道明 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊素養,職場資訊素養,軟體知識技能,軟體資訊專業人員,資訊科技,資訊行為,問卷調查法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | information literacy,workplace information literacy,software knowledge & skill,information technology professionals,information technology,information behavior,questionnaire survey, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 144 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201802922 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。