Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生命科學院
  3. 生態學與演化生物學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70425
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李培芬
dc.contributor.authorJin-Ying Leeen
dc.contributor.author李金穎zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T04:27:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-15
dc.date.copyright2018-08-15
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-08-13
dc.identifier.citationAdams, L. W. (1994). Urban wildlife habitats: a landscape perspective (Vol. 3): U of Minnesota Press.
Blair, R. (2004). The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecology and Society, 9.
Blair, R. B. (1996). Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications, 6, 506-519.
Blair, R. B., & Johnson, E. M. (2008). Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban–rural habitat network: points of local invasion and extinction? Landscape Ecology, 23, 1157-1169.
Brown, C. R., & Brown, M. B. (2013). Where has all the road kill gone? Current Biology, 23, R233-R234.
Carbó-Ramírez, P., & Zuria, I. (2011). The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 213-222.
Carignan, V., & Villard, M.-A. (2002). Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 78, 45-61.
Chace, J. F., & Walsh, J. J. (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 46-69.
Chamberlain, D. E., Gough, S., Vaughan, H., Vickery, J., & Appleton, G. (2007). Determinants of bird species richness in public green spaces. Bird Study, 54, 87-97.
Chang, C.-R., Chien, H.-F., Shiu, H.-J., Ko, C.-J., & Lee, P.-F. (2017). Multiscale heterogeneity within and beyond Taipei city greenspaces and their relationship with avian biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 138-150.
Chao, A., Chazdon, R. L., Colwell, R. K., & Shen, T.-J. (2004). A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecology Letters, 8, 148-159.
Cheng, Y.-L. (2003). The Relationship of Urban Park Connectivity and Avian Assemblages. (master thesis), National Taiwan University. (In Chinese)
Chien, H.-F. (2007). The Relationship between Landscape Structure and Avian Communities in Urban Parks of Taipei City. Master thesis, Chinese Culture University. (In Chinese)
Clergeau, P., Croci, S., Jokimäki, J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L., & Dinetti, M. (2006). Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes. Biological Conservation, 127, 336-344.
Clergeau, P., Savard, J.-P. L., Mennechez, G., & Falardeau, G. (1998). Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor, 413-425.
Conole, L., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2011). Functional and spatial differentiation of urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 11-23.
Croci, S., Butet, A., & Clergeau, P. (2008). Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? The Condor, 110, 223-240.
Crooks, K. R., Suarez, A. V., & Bolger, D. T. (2004). Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biological Conservation, 115, 451-462.
Department of Budget. (2016). Taipei Statistical Yearbook 2016. Taipei City Government, Taipei. (In Chinese)
Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Couvet, D., Lee, A., & Jiguet, F. (2007). Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conservation Biology, 21, 741-751.
Ding, C.-S. (2017). 淺談二十年來臺北都會區的鳥況變化. Forest Research Newsletter, 24, 22-27.
Ding, T.-S., Juan, C.-S., Lin, R.-S., Pan, C.-Y., Tsai, Y.-J., Wu, J. W., & Yang, Y.-H. (2017). The Checklist of the Birds of Taiwan. Chinese Wild Bird Federation. (In Chinese)
Domínguez-López, M. E., & Ortega-Álvarez, R. (2014). The importance of riparian habitats for avian communities in a highly human-modified Neotropical landscape. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85, 1217-1227.
Elmqvist, T., Setälä, H., Handel, S. N., van der Ploeg, S., Aronson, J., Blignaut, J. N., . . . de Groot, R. (2015). Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 101-108.
Guillera‐Arroita, G. (2017). Modelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities. Ecography, 40, 281-295.
Hsui, H.-J. (2015). Factors Affecting Urban Green Space preference by Crested Goshawk (Accipiter trivirgatus) and Collared Scops Owl (Otus lettia) – A Study in Taipei Area. (master thesis), Chinese Culture University. (In Chinese)
Jokimäki, J., & Huhta, E. (2000). Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban gradient. The Condor, 102, 838-847.
Jokimäki, J., Suhonen, J., Jokimäki-Kaisanlahti, M.-L., & Carbó-Ramírez, P. (2016). Effects of urbanization on breeding birds in European towns: Impacts of species traits. Urban Ecosystems, 19, 1565-1577.
Kark, S., Iwaniuk, A., Schalimtzek, A., & Banker, E. (2007). Living in the city: can anyone become an ?urban exploiter'? Journal of Biogeography, 34, 638-651.
Karydis, M., & Tsirtsis, G. (1996). Ecological indices: a biometric approach for assessing eutrophication levels in the marine environment. Science of the Total Environment, 186, 209-219.
Keddy, P. A. (1992). Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3, 157-164.
Koh, C.-N., Lee, P.-F., & Chiou, C.-R. C. (2008). Influences of fragment size, isolation and habitat heterogeneity on bird assemblage composition in urban landscapes-A case study of Taipei parks and green areas. City and Planning, 35, 141-154.
Lancaster, R. K., & Rees, W. E. (1979). Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57, 2358-2368.
Leveau, L. M. (2013). Bird traits in urban–rural gradients: how many functional groups are there? Journal of Ornithology, 154, 655-662.
Lin, W.-L. (2017). The effects of urbanization on breeding performance and nest defense of urban birds. (master thesis), National Taiwan Normal University. (In Chinese)
Luck, G. W., & Smallbone, L. T. (2011). The impact of urbanization on taxonomic and functional similarity among bird communities. Journal of Biogeography, 38, 894-906.
Magurran, A. E., Baillie, S. R., Buckland, S. T., Dick, J. M., Elston, D. A., Scott, E. M., . . . Watt, A. D. (2010). Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 574-582.
Magurran, A. E., Dornelas, M., Moyes, F., Gotelli, N. J., & McGill, B. (2015). Rapid biotic homogenization of marine fish assemblages. Nature Communications, 6, 8405.
Mainwaring, M. C. (2015). The use of man-made structures as nesting sites by birds: A review of the costs and benefits. Journal for Nature Conservation, 25, 17-22.
Martin, T. E. (1995). Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs, 65, 101-127.
Marvier, M., Kareiva, P., & Neubert, M. G. (2004). Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation. Risk Analysis, 24, 869-878.
Marzluff, J. M. (2001). Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World (pp. 19-47): Springer.
McDonald, R. I., Kareiva, P., & Forman, R. T. (2008). The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 141, 1695-1703.
McGill, B. J., Dornelas, M., Gotelli, N. J., & Magurran, A. E. (2015). Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 104-113.
McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: the impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience, 52, 883-890.
McKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127, 247-260.
McKinney, M. L., & Lockwood, J. L. (1999). Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 450-453.
Meffert, P. J., & Dziock, F. (2013). The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landscape Ecology, 28, 943-957.
Melles, S., Glenn, S. M., & Martin, K. (2003). Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: Species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conservation Ecology, 7.
Morneau, F., Décarie, R., Pelletier, R., Lambert, D., DesGranges, J.-L., & Savard, J.-P. (1999). Changes in breeding bird richness and abundance in Montreal parks over a period of 15 years. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 111-121.
National Taiwan University. (2008). Digital Museum of Zoology. Rerieved from: http://archive.zo.ntu.edu.tw/index.asp
Norton, B. A., Evans, K. L., & Warren, P. H. (2016). Urban biodiversity and landscape ecology: Patterns, processes and planning. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 1, 178-192.
O'Connell, T. J., Jackson, L. E., & Brooks, R. P. (2000). Bird guilds as indicators of ecological condition in the central Appalachians. Ecological Applications, 10, 1706-1721.
Olden, J. D. (2006). Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 2027-2039.
Orchan, Y., Chiron, F., Shwartz, A., & Kark, S. (2013). The complex interaction network among multiple invasive bird species in a cavity-nesting community. Biological Invasions, 15, 429-445.
Ortega-Álvarez, R., & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2009). Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 189-195.
Owens, I. P. F., & Bennett, P. M. (2000). Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: Habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 12144-12148.
Pearson, D. L. (1994). Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 345, 75-79.
Public Works Department. (2018). Research System of Taipei Public Works. Retrieved 2018/07, from Taipei City Government. http://pwbstat.taipei.gov.tw/pxweb2007p/dialog/statfile9.asp
Ralph, C. J., Droege, S., & Sauer, J. R. (1995). Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. In: Ralph, C. John; Sauer, John R.; Droege, Sam, technical editors. 1995. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: p. 161-168, 149.
Ramalho, C. E., & Hobbs, R. J. (2012). Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 179-188.
Severinghaus, L. L., Ding, T.-S., Fang, W.-H., Lin, W.-H., Tsai, M.-C., & Yen, C.-W. (2012). The Avifauna of Taiwan. 2nd edition. Forest Bureau, Council of Argiculture. Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih, P.-Y. (2013). A Study on the Relationship between Avian Community Changes and Landscape Changes in Northern Taiwan. (master thesis), Chinese Culture University. (In Chinese)
Shih, W.-Y. (2017). Bird diversity of greenspaces in the densely developed city centre of Taipei. Urban Ecosystems, 21, 379-373.
Shiu, H.-J., & Lee, P.-F. (2003). Assessing avian point-count duration and sample size using species accumulation functions. Zoological Studies, 42, 357-367.
Shochat, E. (2004). Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city‐slicker birds. Oikos, 106, 622-626.
Simberloff, D., & Dayan, T. (1991). The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22, 115-143.
Stem, C., Margoluis, R., Salafsky, N., & Brown, M. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: a review of trends and approaches. Conservation Biology, 19, 295-309.
van Rensburg, B. J., Peacock, D. S., & Robertson, M. P. (2009). Biotic homogenization and alien bird species along an urban gradient in South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 233-241.
Verner, J. (1984). The guild concept applied to management of bird populations. Environmental Management, 8, 1-13.
Wang, Y.-W. (2014). Study on terrestrial breeding bird community of urban parks. (master thesis), National Taiwan University. (In Chinese)
Watson, J. E., Whittaker, R. J., & Dawson, T. P. (2004). Avifaunal responses to habitat fragmentation in the threatened littoral forests of south‐eastern Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 1791-1807.
Yang, M.-H. (2018). Traffic facilities affecting the distribution of three exotic starling species in Taipei City. (master thesis), National Taiwan University. (In Chinese)
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70425-
dc.description.abstract隨著都市擴張,自然棲地流失且破碎化,當地物種由少數偏好都市環境的外來種佔優勢而逐漸取代,造成群聚間的生物均質化(biotic homogenization),引起對都市生物多樣性的關注。過去都市鳥類研究著重探討空間尺度上的群聚變化,在時間尺度上群聚如何變動的研究則相對缺乏,因此本研究利用2003至2017年台北市16座公園的鳥類調查資料,首先以相似度指標檢視外來物種是否造成群聚間的均質化,接著將鳥類分別以遷徙屬性、食性、覓食棲地、築巢棲地及棲地廣適度進行同功群分析,並計算各同功群在16個樣區中物種數、豐度及相對豐度的平均變化趨勢,藉以探討十五年間台北都市公園鳥類的群聚變遷。
結果顯示整體鳥類物種數、豐度均呈上升趨勢。若排除外來物種,群聚間的相似度逐年下降;若納入外來種則無顯著變化,顯示外來種造成某程度上的生物均質化。大部分同功群的物種數及豐度均上升,然而各同功群的變化速度不一。外來種、雜食者、水域穀食者、蟲果穀食者、水域覓食者及森林棲地廣適者在三種指標均呈上升趨勢。其中,雜食者的增加速度高於其他食性同功群,推測能夠使用多樣人類產生的食物來源使雜食者在都市區域有足夠資源增加族群量。與水環境相關的同功群,如水域穀食及水域覓食者,顯示台北市公園提供合適的水域環境;而雖然森林廣適者在三種指標均上升,森林棲地專一者在物種數及豐度同樣上升且增加速度較快,雖過去認為都市化不利於棲地專一型物種,此研究推測適當的棲地營造可支持該類物種在都市區域生存;地面築巢者同樣被認為較無法適應都市環境,其物種數及豐度在十五年間也呈上升趨勢。此外,外來種及洞穴建物築巢者具有相似的變化趨勢,推測能使用建物孔洞進行築巢為外來種適應都市環境的重要原因之一。本研究藉由長期監測的資料,得知鳥類群聚的時空變遷,有助於評估台北市生物多樣性的狀況並做出合適的保育行動。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUrbanization results in loss of natural habitats and biodiversity. Bird assemblages are dominant by few species and share more similarity in highly urbanized regions, so called “biotic homogenization”, which raises concern of urban biodiversity. However, most of studies focused on spatial patterns. How assemblages changed over time is relatively unexplored. Hence, this study used monitoring data of 16 Taipei parks from 2003 to 2017 to investigate temporal changes of bird assemblages. We used similarity indices to examine the effects of exotic species on biotic homogenization. Then, we used five traits (residence status, diet, foraging site, nesting site and habitat) and three indices (richness, abundance, relative abundance) to determine if there were different temporal trends in guilds.
The results demonstrated an upward trend in both overall species richness and total abundance. After excluding exotic species, similarity indices decreased through time, which implied that they to some degree drove the homogenization of assemblages. Guilds exhibited different trends. Exotic species, omnivores, insecti/frugi/granivores, aquatic/granivores, aquatic foragers and forest generalists significantly increased in all indices. Most of guilds had positive trends in richness and abundance, but rates of increase were divergent. Omnivores increased faster than other diet guilds, which may result from their ability to utilize a variety of food types, including human-provided food. Increase of water-associated species, such as aquatic/granivores and aquatic foragers, reflected a good aquatic environment in Taipei city. Forest generalists indicated positive trends in all indices; however, forest specialists showed a faster increase in richness and abundance. Though forest specialists used to be viewed as urban avoiders, this study deduced that supplements of suitable habitats can support their population in urban areas. The same situation was also found in ground nesters; however, there is still a lack of directly environmental evidence. In addition, exotic species and cavity/building nesters shared similar change patterns; thus, the ability to nest in man-made structures may be important for them to adapt well in urban environments. With the long-term monitoring data, the study provided the temporal perspective of bird assemblages, which can help to reach a more comprehensive and efficient actions of diversity conservation.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:27:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05b44018-1.pdf: 2844395 bytes, checksum: 6ab7b02da59c378dd4f5b39cc788d936 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
Contents vi
List of figures vii
List of tables viii
1. Introduction 1
2. Materials and Methods 4
2-1. Study area 4
2-2. Bird survey 5
2-3. Community similarity 5
2-4. Species traits 6
2-5. Ecological indices 7
2-6. Statistical analyses 7
3. Results 10
3-1. Overall changes of avian assemblages 10
3-2. Temporal trends of community similarity 11
3-3. Average changes of avian assemblages 11
3-3-1. Richness 11
3-3-2. Abundance 12
3-3-3. Relative abundance 13
4. Discussion 14
5. References 19
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject時間趨勢zh_TW
dc.subject都市生物多樣性zh_TW
dc.subject長期監測zh_TW
dc.subject相似度zh_TW
dc.subject同功群zh_TW
dc.subjectguilden
dc.subjecturban biodiversityen
dc.subjectlong-term monitoringen
dc.subjectsimilarityen
dc.subjecttemporal trenden
dc.title台北市公園鳥類群聚變遷:2003-2017年zh_TW
dc.titleTemporal Changes of Bird Assemblages in Taipei Urban Parks, 2003-2017en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee柯佳吟,張琪如
dc.subject.keyword都市生物多樣性,長期監測,相似度,時間趨勢,同功群,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordurban biodiversity,long-term monitoring,similarity,temporal trend,guild,en
dc.relation.page51
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201803171
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-08-14
dc.contributor.author-college生命科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept生態學與演化生物學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:生態學與演化生物學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.78 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved