請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70251
標題: | 東南亞新住民子女之平等受教育權--雙語教育作為積極平權措施 The Equal Right to Education of Children of New Immigrants from Southeast Asia: Bilingual Education as Affirmative Action |
作者: | Jo-Shin Lin 林若馨 |
指導教授: | 許宗力 |
關鍵字: | 東南亞新住民子女,間接歧視,平等受教育權,教育機會均等,積極平權措施,雙語教育,社會國原則,國際公約, children of new immigrant from Southeast Asia,indirect discrimination,the equal right to education,equality of educational opportunity,affirmative action,bilingual education,Principle of Welfare State,ICESCR,CRC, |
出版年 : | 2018 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 本文觀察到東南亞新住民子女在受教育的過程中面臨事實上不平等之困境,以其為發想加以探究此困境究竟單純為社會國原則之作用,抑或是有其他導致不平等之因素。本文以為,在國家以台灣華語作為授課語言之政策之下,是導致該事實上不平等之重要原因,並且對於整個東南亞新住民群體而言構成間接歧視,對其受教育權之保障不足。
本文透過探究教育學界對於受教育之目的與作用,提出以「教育機會均等」作為受教育權之保障核心,並且所有國家之教育政策都必須以得滿足教育機會均等之要求,始能認為對受教育權之保障已足。本文以為雙語教育是得滿足東南亞新住民子女受教育權之措施,並且其作用更得外溢至有助於該群體於我國社會地位之提升,為一透過教育手段所實施之積極平權措施。 而間接歧視之概念,除作為將東南亞新住民子女在受教育中面臨之事實上平等的問題引入憲法平等權保障之中以外,在後階段雙語教育作為一種積極平權措施,而須透過社會國原則之作用配置國家資源時,間接歧視之作用更提供了正當性基礎。最後,本文以「受教育權」、「社會國原則」以及「合於國際公約精神之憲法解釋」三者之間的交互作用,作為東南亞新住民子女實現其受教育權完整保障之憲法上依據。 This thesis is based on the observation of the dilemma of de facto inequality which children of new immigrant from Southeast Asia are facing during their education, and try to find out the reason behind this dilemma could be merely interpreted as the function of the Principle of Welfare State or could there be other factors. This thesis believes that the policy of setting Taiwanese Mandarin as the language used in school teaching not only cause de facto inequality, but also constitute indirect discrimination and demonstrate the insufficiency of their right to education. This thesis claims “equality of educational opportunity” as the core value of the right to education according to the studies about the purposes and functions of education made by the educational academics. Thus, all the education policies made by government should meet the requirements of equality of educational opportunity to fulfill the demand of the right to education. Furthermore, this thesis believes that bilingual education could be an affirmative action which can not only fulfill their right to education, but also promote their social status. Besides, the fact of constituting indirect discrimination can not only provide the de facto inequality, which children of new immigrant from Southeast Asia are facing, a foundation under the protection of right of equality, but also justify bilingual education as an affirmative action when government is distributing resource due to the function of the Principle of Welfare State. Last, this thesis claims that the interaction between “the right to education”, “Principle of Welfare State” and “constitutional interpretation which corresponds to international convention” could provide children of new immigrant from Southeast Asia a constitutional foundation for full protection of their right to education. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70251 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU201803485 |
全文授權: | 有償授權 |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.44 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。