Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70061
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳玲玲
dc.contributor.authorHao Luen
dc.contributor.author陸皞zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T03:41:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-02
dc.date.copyright2018-03-02
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-02-07
dc.identifier.citationAgrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2005). The effects of self-construal and commitment on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 841-849.
Ahluwalia, R. (2002). How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments? Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 270-279.
Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 394-400.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, pp. 1173-1182.
Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31-40.
Carmines, E. Z. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage Publications.
Chen, P.-Y., Dhanasobhon, S., & Smith, M. D. (2008). All Reviews are Not Created Equal: The Disaggregate Impact of Reviews and Reviewers at Amazon.Com. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.918083
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354.
Clemons, E., Gao, G., & Hitt, L. (2006). When Online Reviews Meet Hyperdifferentiation: A Study of the Craft Beer Industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149-171.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5-37.
Dellarocas, C. (2003). The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), pp. 1407-1424.
Duclos, R., & Barasch, A. (2014). Prosocial Behavior in Intergroup Relations: How Donor Self-Construal and Recipient Group-Membership Shape Generosity. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, pp. 93-108.
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889-906.
Fombrun, C., & Rindova, V. (2000). The Road to Transparency: Reputation Management at Royal Dutch/Shell. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, & M. H. Larsen, The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand (pp. 7-96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1989). Effect of Memory Perspective on Retrospective Causal Attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), pp. 399-403.
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). 'I' Value Freedom, but 'We' Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321-326.
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 83-115.
Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., S., D., Dellarocas, C., Pfeiffer, B., . . . Verlegh, P. (2005). The Firm's Management of Social Interactions. Marketing Letters, 16(3), pp. 415-428.
He, S. X., & Bond, S. D. (2015). Why Is the Crowd Divided? Attribution for Dispersion in Online Word of Mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1509-1527.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
Herbig, P., & Milewicz, J. (1993). The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(3), pp. 18-24.
Herbig, P., & Milewicz, J. (1993). The Relationship of Reputation and Credibility to Brand Success. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(3), 18-24.
Hirsch, F. (1978). Social Limits to Growth. Routledge.
Hung, K. H., & Li, S. Y. (2007). The influence of eWOM on virtual consumer communities: Social capital, consumer learning, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of advertising research, 47(4), pp. 485-495.
Jeong, E., & Jang, S. (. (2011). Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) motivations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 356-366.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(4), p. 557.
Kanagawa, C., Cross, S., & Markus, H. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 90-103.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution Theory in Social Psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 192-238). University of Nebraska Press.
Lalwani, A., & S., S. (2009). The 'me' I claim to be: cultural self-construal elicits self-presentational goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 88-10.
Laura E. Buffardi and W. Keith Campbell. (2008). Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), pp. 1303-1314.
Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous Consumption vs. Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation. 39(3), 530-544.
Lin, C.-Y., Fang, K., & Tu, C.-C. (2010). Predicting consumer repurchase intentions to shop online. Journal of Computers, 5(10), pp. 1527-1533.
Lynn, M. (1992). Lynn, M. (1992). The psychology of unavailability: Explaining scarcity and cost effects on value. 13(1), pp. 3-7.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
Mende-Siedlecki, P., Baron, S. G., & Todorov, A. (2013). Diagnostic Value Underlies Asymmetric Updating of Impressions in the Morality and Ability Domains. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(50), 19406-19415.
MIC. (2016). Online user demographics. Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute.
Mittal, V., William T. Ross, J., & Baldasare, P. M. (1998). The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-Level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 33-47.
Mittone, L., & Savadori, L. (2009). The scarcity bias. Applied Psychology, 58(3), pp. 453-468.
Mizerski, R. W. (1982). An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 301-310.
Moore, S. (2015). Attitude Predictability and Helpfulness in Online Reviews: The Role of Explained Actions and Reactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), pp. 30-44.
Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185-200.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), p. 175.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
O'Cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1, pp. 25-39.
Park, D. H., & Lee, J. (2009). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), pp. 386-398.
Payne, J., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1991). Consumer decision making. pp. 50-84.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1).
Schneider, M. (2007). The Nature, History and Significance of the Concept of Positional Goods. History of Economics Review, 45(1), 60-81.
Selnes, F. (1993). An Examination of the Effect of Product Performance on Brand Reputation, Satisfaction and Loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 27(9), pp. 19-35.
Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 4, pp. 76-94.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and Extremity Biases in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), pp. 131-142.
Sun, M. (2011). How Does the Variance of Product Ratings Matter. Management Science, 58(4), 696-707.
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(5), p. 649.
Wojciszke, B., Brycz, H., & Borkenau, P. (1993). Effects of Information Content and Evaluative Extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 327-335.
Zhang, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2009). The influence of self-construal on impulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 838-850.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70061-
dc.description.abstract兩派對立文獻分別證實:比起負面口碑,消費者對正面口碑有更強烈的知覺助益程度,即為「正面效應(positivity effect)」;而相較於正面口碑,消費者對負面口碑的知覺助益程度更為強烈,即為「負面效應(negativity effect)」。過往學者們對於該二效應各執一詞,因而本研究欲排解雙方之分歧,探討何種因素干擾口碑正負性對知覺助益程度的影響,並提出相關推論:首先,以「確認偏誤(confirmation bias)」作為理論基礎,提出正面效應與負面效應的存在取決於消費者對產品品牌之印象。換言之,可靠的品牌可增加正面口碑的知覺助益程度,並抑制負面口碑之影響,亦即正面效應;而不可靠的品牌卻加強了負面口碑的知覺助益程度,同時削弱正面口碑之作用,亦即負面效應。其次,依消費者不時對網路口碑探本溯源,本研究假設消費者會先將口碑的正負性歸因於產品品質或評論者偏好,進而決定口碑的助益程度。然而,因消費者對於產品種類之預期亦會影響歸因,故本研究同樣以確認偏誤為推理基礎,預測炫耀性商品將促使消費者傾向對正面口碑做出產品歸因、對負面口碑歸做出評論者歸因,產生正面效應;而因對非炫耀性商品無所預期故不會影響歸因過程。再者,因消費者的歸因與知覺助益程度受「自我構念(self-construal)」影響,本研究認為:相較於互依我(interdependent)的消費者,產品歸因程度與知覺助益程度的正相關在獨立我(independent)的消費者中更加明顯。最後,以上所有假說皆由實驗順利驗證;本研究調和正面效應與負面效應的爭議,也重述建立品牌形象之重要性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTwo conflicting theories document the effects of eWOM valence (positive or negative) on consumer perceived helpfulness: Positivity effect shows that positive reviews are considered as more helpful over negative reviews, while negativity effect shows the contrary. Adopting the theory of confirmation bias, this research proposes that both effects coexist contingent upon consumers’ existing beliefs of the brand reputation. Specifically, dependable brands bolster the perceived helpfulness of positive reviews and dampen that of negative reviews (positivity effect). In contrast, undependable brands strengthen the perceived helpfulness of negative reviews and weaken that of positive reviews (negativity effect). While this may be true, consumers do not always take the eWOM valence at face value. We posit that consumers attribute the eWOM valence to either product quality, or reviewer preferences, as an antecedent to determine review helpfulness. Nevertheless, prior beliefs of a product type’s superiority can affect attribution. We infer that positional products facilitate consumers to attribute the cause of positive reviews to the product, and negative reviews to the reviewer (positivity effect). On the contrary, consumers lack prior beliefs on non-positional products; hence, confirmation bias does not sway the attribution process. Meanwhile, consumers’ self-construal affects their judgments of attribution. We propose that there is a stronger positive correlation between product-related attribution and perceived helpfulness for independent individuals than interdependent individuals. The empirical results of this research support all hypotheses. This research reconciles the dispute between positivity and negativity effects and reinforces the importance of brand image.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:41:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R04725016-1.pdf: 2419504 bytes, checksum: 84245ee6ea2bc33a99a2c646a9dccb8c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
序言 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
Table of Contents v
List of Figures viii
List of Tables ix
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 The Effect of Valence on Perceived Helpfulness 4
2.2 Direct Effect of Valence on Perceived Helpfulness 6
2.2.1 The Moderating Effect of Brand Reputation 7
2.3 Indirect Effect of Valence on Perceived Helpfulness: An Attributional Explanation 8
2.3.1 The Moderating Effect of Product Type 9
2.3.2 The Moderating Effect of Self-Construal 10
2.4 Research Model 11
Chapter 3 Study 1 12
3.1 Research Methodology 12
3.1.1 Experimental Design 12
3.1.2 Test Material of the Independent Variables 12
3.1.3 Measurements of the Dependent Variable 13
3.1.4 Participants 14
3.1.5 Procedure 15
3.2 Empirical Results 16
3.2.1 Reliability of Measurement and Manipulation Check 16
3.2.2 Test of Hypotheses 17
Chapter 4 Study 2 19
4.1 Research Methodology 19
4.1.1 Experimental Design 19
4.1.2 Test Material of the Independent Variables 19
4.1.3 Measurements of the Dependent Variable 21
4.1.4 Participants 22
4.1.5 Procedure 23
4.2 Empirical Results 24
4.2.1 Reliability of Measurement and Manipulation Check 24
4.2.2 Test of Hypotheses 25
Chapter 5 Conclusion 29
5.1 Conclusion and Implications 29
5.2 Limitations and Future Work 30
References 32
Appendix A 38
Appendix B 39
Appendix C 40
Appendix D 41
Appendix E 42
Appendix F 43
Appendix G 44
Appendix H 46
Appendix I 49
Appendix J 50
Appendix K 51
Appendix L 53
Appendix M 54
Appendix N 56
Appendix O 58
Appendix P 59
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject網路口碑zh_TW
dc.subject正面效應zh_TW
dc.subject負面效應zh_TW
dc.subject歸因理論zh_TW
dc.subject確認偏誤zh_TW
dc.subject自我構念zh_TW
dc.subjecteWOMen
dc.subjectpositivity effecten
dc.subjectnegativity effecten
dc.subjectconfirmation biasen
dc.subjectattributionen
dc.subjectself-construalen
dc.title名聞遐邇抑或惡名昭彰
探討網路口碑正負性影響知覺助益程度
zh_TW
dc.titleHelpfulness is in the Eyes of the Beholder
The Effect of eWOM Valence on Perceived Helpfulness
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee欒斌,翁崇雄,盧希鵬
dc.subject.keyword網路口碑,正面效應,負面效應,確認偏誤,歸因理論,自我構念,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordeWOM,positivity effect,negativity effect,confirmation bias,attribution,self-construal,en
dc.relation.page60
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201701552
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-02-08
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.36 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved