請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70054完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江炯聰 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shih-Chung Shang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 向士中 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:41:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-03-02 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-03-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-02-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
吳政德. (2015). 陸軍新訓士官領導型態與領導效能關係之研究. 嶺東科技大學高階主管企管碩士在職專班碩士論文. 呂勝瑛. (1997). 兩岸員工價值觀, 工作倫理及組織向心力的比較. 兩岸三地人力資源管理較與整合學術研討會論文集. 李玉環. (2007). 研析國軍陸, 海, 空三軍領導型態, 組織文化與領導效能之差異. 淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文. 李書年. (2006).人格特質, 領導型態, 組織溝通與領導效能之關聯性研究. 大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係學系碩士論文. 周正儀. (1997). 企業領導者情緒商數對領導型態與效能之研究. 中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文. 周清菁. (2005). 兩岸企業領導型態與領導效能之研究--以電子資訊產業為例. 中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文. 林佳怡. (2012). 家族企業主管仁慈領導對員工行為之影響: 主管認同之中介效果. 國立中正大學勞工關係學系暨研究所碩士論文. 林盈州. (2008). 海巡署南部地區基層安檢所主管領導型態, 心理契約與領導效能相關性之研究. 樹德科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文. 林琨堂. (1996). 企業主管領導型態與員工溝通滿足及領導效能之關係研究-以台糖公司為例. 國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文. 林開元. (2005). 個人政治知覺與組織公平對員工工作行為影響之研究：以某軍事單位為例. 淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文. 邱垂勇. (2007). 組織文化, 主管領導型態, 領導效能對工作滿意度之影響--以 TFT-LCD玻璃基板供應商為例. 成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文. 紀淑靜. (2004). 探討護理主管領導型態與領導效能之關係. 成功大學護理學系學位論文. 張康玲. (2000). 女性業務主管的人格特質, 領導型態及領導效能關係之研究--以台灣南區保險業為例. 長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文. 黃同圳. (1993). 青年勞工工作價值觀與組織向心力之研究. 行政院青年輔導委員會. 黃國隆. (1995). 臺灣與大陸企業員工工作價值觀之比較. 本土心理學研究, (4), 92-147. 楊佳琪. (2008). 國家文化與領導型態對領導效能影響之研究. 義守大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文. 蔡副彬. (2005). 消防局領導型態與領導效能關係之研究--以情境因素為干擾變項.國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文. 蔡涵如. (2013). 中階主管的領導型態對於領導效能之研究. 中山大學國際經營管理碩士班碩士論文. 鄭國良. (2010). 領導型態, 組織文化, 員工效能與領導效能模型發展之研究. 龍華科技大學商學與管理研究所碩士論文. 鄭勝文. (2003). 空軍飛機修護基層主管領導型態與領導效能關係之研究. 國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文. 賴延融. (2008). 領導型態對虛擬團隊人際互動暨效能之影響程度. 清雲科技大學國際企業管理研究所學位論文. 賴鳳儀, 林鉦棽, & 錢書華. (2010). 轉化領導對服務品質影響效果之實徵分析: 調節式路徑分析的運用. 管理學報, 27(2), 169-184. 謝廷豪. (2001). 領導型態與領導效能關係之研究-以中部某連鎖零售業為例. 國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文. 韓詠蘭. (1998). 企業主管領導型態組織生命週期部屬人格特質與領導效能關係之研究-以台灣食品業為例. 成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文. 鐘淑珍. (1999). 台灣與大陸新人類工作價值觀比較--以一電腦公司為例. 國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文. 英文部分 Alanazi, F. M., & Rodrigues, A. (2003). Power bases and attribution in three cultures. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(3), 375-395. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39. Ashkanasy, N. M., & O'connor, C. (1997). Value congruence in leader-member exchange. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(5), 647-662. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1989). Potential biases in leadership measures: How prototypes, leniency, and general satisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs. Educational and psychological measurement, 49(3), 509-527. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European industrial training, 14(5). Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. Sage Pubns. Bryman, A. (1993). Charismatic leadership in business organizations: Some neglected issues. The leadership quarterly, 4(3-4), 289-304. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row. Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 75(3), 339-356. Cohen, F., Solomon, S., Maxfield, M., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2004). Fatal attraction: The effects of mortality salience on evaluations of charismatic, task-oriented, and relationship-oriented leaders. Psychological science, 15(12), 846-851. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of management review, 12(4), 637-647. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications. de Hoogh, A., den Hartog, D., Koopman, P., Thierry, H., van den Berg, P., van der Weide, J., & Wilderom, C. (2004). Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 447-471. Deluga, R. J. (1992). The relationship of leader-member exchanges with laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership in naval environments. Impact of leadership, 237-247. Dono-Koulouris, M. J. (2003). Leadership style, teacher empowerment, and job satisfaction in selected Catholic elementary schools. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative science quarterly, 239-263. Erber, R., & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 47(4), 709. Erez, M., & Earley, C. (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press. Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative science quarterly, 421-444. Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American psychologist, 48(6), 621. Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. European review of social psychology, 7(1), 31-61. Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple identity organizations. Organizational Science, 13: 618-635. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362. George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. John Wiley & Sons. George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2005). One foot in each camp: The dual identification of contract workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 68-99. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77-88. Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270. Guieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, 4th (Ed), NY McGraw Hill. Day, RL (1977). Toward a Process. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(5), 509-530. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K.H. (1977). Management of organization behavior: utilizing human resources (3rd . ed.). Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1974). So you want to know your leadership style? Training & Development Journal. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Harvester Wheatsheaf. Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European review of social psychology, 4(1), 85-111. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and social psychology review, 5(3), 184-200. Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity: 462-479. New York: Guilford. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of management review, 25(1), 121-140. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social psychology quarterly, 255-269. House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 321-339. House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189–207). Carbondale, IL: South Illinois University Press. House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis?. Journal of management, 23(3), 409-473. House, R. J., & Howell, J. M. (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(2), 81-108. House, R. J., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories. House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the US presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 364-396. House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the US presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 364-396. Hui, C., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (1999). A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader-member exchange, and perceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance: A Chinese case. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 77(1), 3-21. Hunt, J. G. (1999). Transformational/charismatic leadership's tranformation of the field: An historical essay. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 129-144. Janssen, O., & Huang, X. (2008). Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members’ citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management, 34: 69-88. Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., De Luque, M. S., & House, R. J. (2006). In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. The academy of management perspectives, 20(1), 67-90. Jensen, S. M., & Luthans, F. (2006). Entrepreneurs as authentic leaders: Impact on employees' attitudes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(8), 646-666. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of applied psychology, 89(5), 755. Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of applied psychology, 92(5), 1286. Kark, R., & Shamir, B. (2002). The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collectiveselves and further effects on followers. In B. J. Avolio & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (Vol. 2): 67-91. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 246. Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 246. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-146. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of conflict resolution, 2(1), 51-60. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25: 57-78. Kernis, M.H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26. Kets deVries, M. F. (1988). Prisoners of leadership. Human Relations, 41(3), 261-280. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 656-669. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1031-1057. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1031-1057. Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2001). Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 133-152. Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2001). Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 133-152. Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic Leadership: A Positive Development Approach (in:) KS Cameron, JE Dutton, RE Quinn (eds), Positive Organizational Scholarship. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 115-134. Mahoney, T. A., & Weitzel, W. (1969). Managerial models of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 357-365. McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 545-559. Medley, F., & Larochelle, D. R. (1995). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Nursing management, 26(9), 64JJ. Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative science quarterly, 78-102. Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com. Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management journal, 49(2), 327-340. Pillai, R., & Meindl, J. R. (1991). The impact of a performance crisis on attributions of charismatic leadership: A preliminary study. In Best paper proceedings of the 1991 Eastern Academy of Management Meetings. Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of applied psychology, 82(2), 262-269. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citize. Journal of management, 22(2), 259-298. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Hui, C. (1993). Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Research in personnel and human resources management. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations: 171-207. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 16(3), 289-298. Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1, 419-489. Schnake, M., Cochran, D., & Dumler, M. (1995). Encouraging organizational citizenship: The effects of job satisfaction, perceived equity and leadership. Journal of managerial issues, 209-221. Schnake, M., Dumler, M. P., & Cochran, D. S. (1993). The relationship between' traditional' leadership,' super' leadership, and organizational citizenship behavior. Group & Organization Management, 18(3), 352-365. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization science, 4(4), 577-594. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization science, 4(4), 577-594. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2008). How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science, 19(6), 807-823. Spangler, W. D., & Braiotta Jr, L. (1990). Leadership and corporate audit committee effectiveness. Group & Organization Studies, 15(2), 134-157. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. CUP Archive. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. CUP Archive. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 439. Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289. Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., & Griffith, J. A. (2012). Leadership and emotion management for complex tasks: Different emotions, different strategies. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 517-533. Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., & Griffith, J. A. (2012). Leadership and emotion management for complex tasks: Different emotions, different strategies. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 517-533. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to group-oriented effort. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice: 29-42. New York: Psychology. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 1008. Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., Witte, H., & Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self‐determination theory approach. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 80(2), 251-277. Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., Witte, H., & Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self‐determination theory approach. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 80(2), 251-277. Waldman, D. A., Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. (1990). Adding to contingent-reward behavior: The augmenting effect of charismatic leadership. Group & Organization Studies, 15(4), 381-394. Waldman, D., Ramirez, G., House, R. J., & Puranam, P. (1996). The effects of US CEO leader behavior on firm profits under conditions of environmental certainty and uncertainty: A longitudinal investigation. Working paper, Reginal Jones Center for Strategic Management, Wharton School of Management. Walumbwa, F. O., & Lawler, J. J. (2003). Building effective organizations: transformational leadership, collectivist orientation, work-related attitudes and withdrawal behaviours in three emerging economies. International journal of human resource management, 14(7), 1083-1101. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of management, 34(1), 89-126. Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Lawler, J. J., & Shi, K. (2004). The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 515-530. Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Lawler, J. J., & Shi, K. (2004). The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 515-530. Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Retracted: Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 901-914. Wang, P., & Rode, J. C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human relations, 63(8), 1105-1128. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. Translated by T. Parsons. New York: The Free Press. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617. Yammarino, F. J., & Dubinsky, A. J. (1994). Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. Personnel psychology, 47(4), 787-811. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of management, 15(2), 251-289. Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), 285-305. Yukl, G. A., & Becker, W. S. (2006). Effective empowerment in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 3(3), 210-231. Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. InM. D. Dunnette & LM Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychol-ogy, vol 3: 147-197. Palo Alto. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70054 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究採用社會認同的觀點，探討轉換型領導對領導效能表現之影響，並且以主管認同為中介變項，探討其中介效果。再者，本研究蒐集台灣和大陸兩個地區的樣本，並且比較不同地區員工在轉換型領導、主管認同、主管領導效能和員工組織公民行為等構面的差異。
本研究以問卷調查法來收集資料，以台灣及大陸的製造業員工為研究對象，透過配對取樣的方式，同時收集主管與部屬的資料。本研究總共發出282套問卷，回收的有效配對問卷共有264套，有效配對問卷回收率為93.62%。問卷調查結果經敘述統計分析、信度分析、皮爾森相關分析、階層迴歸分析、獨立樣本T檢定，探討轉換型領導、主管認同、主管領導效能和員工組織公民行為之關聯性。 本研究之主要發現與總結如下：(1) 轉換型領導對知覺領導效能及員工組織公民行為皆有顯著正向影響。(2) 轉換型領導對主管認同有顯著正向影響。(3) 主管認同對知覺領導效能及員工組織公民行為皆有顯著正向影響。(4) 轉換型領導會透過主管認同的部份中介效果，對知覺領導效能產生影響。(5) 轉換型領導會透過主管認同的完全中介效果，對組織公民行為產生影響。(6) 大陸員工之轉換型領導、主管認同、知覺領導效能顯著高於台灣員工。(7) 台灣和大陸員工之組織公民行為無顯著差異。 本研究主要貢獻在於以社會認同的觀點，檢驗轉換型領導對領導效能的直接效果，並且進一步檢驗主管認同在自變項與依變項之間的中介效果，提供更完整的角度來檢視領導型態與領導效能之間的關係，補充國內領導的相關研究之不足。由於同時以兩岸員工為受測者，本研究結果亦可提供研究者從事兩岸相關研究的參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research, based on the view of social identification, aimed to explore the influence of transformational leadership on leadership effectiveness, and took supervisor identification as a mediating factor to examine the mediating effects. In this study, we collected samples from Taiwan and Mainland China, and compared the differences of employees in transformational leadership, supervisor identification, leadership effectiveness and organizational citizenship behavior in different regions.
A total of 282 questionnaires were distributed to the manufacturing employees in Taiwan and Mainland China and the samples were included supervisors and subordinates. The response rate was 93.62% and 264 valid questionnaires were employed into following analysis to investigate the influence of transformational leadership on leadership effectiveness. Several statistic methods were used to analyze the collected data sets, including descriptive statistics analysis, reliability analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, hierarchical regression analysis, and independent-sample T-test. Moreover, the main findings and conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) Transformational leadership has significant positive effects on perceived leadership effectiveness and organizational citizenship behavior. (2) Transformational leadership has a significant positive impact for supervisor identification. (3) Supervisor identification has significant positive effects on perceived leadership effectiveness and organizational citizenship behavior. (4) Supervisor identification is partial mediate the relationship between transformational leadership and perceived leadership effectiveness. (5) Supervisor identification is completed mediate the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. (6) The dimensions of transformational leadership, supervisor identification, and perceived leadership effectiveness for Mainland Chinese employees are significantly higher than Taiwanese employees. (7) There is no significant difference in the organizational citizenship behavior of employees in Taiwan and Mainland China. The main contribution of this study was to test the direct effect of transformational leadership for leadership effectiveness from the point of view of social identification, and to further test the mediating effect of supervisor identification. This study tried to provide a more complete perspective to examine the relationship between leadership style and leadership effectiveness, and also to supplement the lack of leadership research in this field. Lastly, the results of this study also provided a reference for researchers engaged the studies in Taiwan and Mainland China filed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:41:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-P99750013-1.pdf: 862413 bytes, checksum: f2b4ca62c9f3a2c063cb4f73af25c7ed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝辭I 中文摘要II Abstract III 目錄V 表目錄VII 圖目錄VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與重要性 3 第三節 研究流程 6 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 社會認同理論 7 第二節 主管認同與領導 9 第三節 領導型態 11 第四節 領導效能 18 第五節 組織公民行為 19 第六節 兩岸領導者與員工之差異 21 第七節 領導型態、主管認同與領導效能之關聯性 22 第八節 研究架構 26 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 研究變項與衡量工具 27 第二節 研究對象與抽樣方法 28 第三節 資料分析 29 第四章 研究結果 31 第一節 信度分析 31 第二節 描述性統計分析 32 第三節 相關分析 39 第四節 迴歸分析 42 第五節 獨立樣本T檢定分析 47 第五章 結論與建議 50 第一節 研究結論 50 第二節 理論與實務意涵 52 第三節 研究限制與建議 54 參考文獻 57 表目錄 表1-2-1 領導型態、主管認同、領導效能之相關研究 5 表4-1-1 本研究量表各構面之信度分析 32 表4-2-1 研究樣本特性分析—次數分配、百分比 35 表4-2-2 台灣樣本特性分析—次數分配、百分比36 表4-2-3 大陸樣本特性分析—次數分配、百分比36 表4-2-4 研究樣本特性分析—平均數37 表4-2-5 研究變項之描述性統計分析 39 表4-3-1 研究變項之相關分析41 表4-4-1 轉換型領導對知覺領導效能與組織公民行為之迴歸分析 43 表4-4-2 轉換型領導對主管認同之迴歸分析 43 表4-4-3 主管認同對知覺領導效能與組織公民行為之迴歸分析44 表4-4-4 主管認同為轉換型領導與知覺領導效能中介變項之迴歸分析 46 表4-4-5 主管認同為轉換型領導與組織公民行為中介變項之迴歸分析 47 表4-5-1 台灣和大陸員工各變項之T檢定分析 48 表4-5-2 本研究假設及結果彙整表 49 圖目錄 圖1-3-1 本研究之研究流程圖 6 圖2-3-1 Yukl (1989)整合型領導架構 18 圖2-8-1 本研究之研究架構 26 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 轉換型領導 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 主管認同 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 領導效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 組織公民行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | transformational leadership | en |
| dc.subject | supervisor identification | en |
| dc.subject | leadership effectiveness | en |
| dc.subject | organizational citizenship behavior | en |
| dc.title | 從社會認同觀點探討領導型態與領導效能之關連性：
台灣與大陸製造業之比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Association between Leadership Style and Leadership Effectiveness from a Social Identification Perspective: A Comparison of the Manufacturing Industry in Taiwan and China | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳家聲,陳子昂 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 轉換型領導,主管認同,領導效能,組織公民行為, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | transformational leadership,supervisor identification,leadership effectiveness,organizational citizenship behavior, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 68 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800396 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-02-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 842.2 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。