Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69944
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張俊彥
dc.contributor.authorYi-Nung Tingen
dc.contributor.author丁怡儂zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T03:35:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-01
dc.date.copyright2018-03-01
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-02-12
dc.identifier.citation1. 江彥政、張俊彥(2009)。鄉村環境景觀生態結構對生心理反應之影響。Journal of Architecture, (67), 131-148.
2. 李坤崇(2001)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。臺北:心理。
3. 林樂健(1983)。園藝治療與遊憩活動。興大園藝,8,1-5。
4. 林穎萱、張俊彥(2012)。療癒景觀與園藝治療的相關名詞釋義。造園季刊(73),4-13。
5. 康有德(1997)。園藝概論。臺北:啟英文化。
6. 張仁和、林以正、黃金蘭(2011)。中文版 [止觀覺察注意量表] 之信效度分析。測驗學刊專刊─ 正向心理特質的測量,235-260。
7. 張元毓、蘇瑋佳、張俊彥(2010)。學生從事園藝操作之表現與其提升注意力及獲得成就感多少之關係。臺灣園藝,56(1),57-65。
8. 張俊彥(2000)。造園設計中植栽色彩對觀賞者效益之研究。造園景觀學報,7(1),45-65。
9. 張俊彥、周孟(2005)。鄉村景觀環境對觀賞者生心理效益之研究。興大園藝,30(3),97-108。
10. 郭毓仁(2005)。治療景觀與園藝療法。臺北:詹氏書局。
11. 郭毓仁(2011)。利用園藝活動促進國小學童知識及行為之研究。台灣農學會報,12(1),18-26。
12. 陳惠美、黃雅鈴(2005)。園藝治療之理論與應用。中國園藝,51(2),135-144。
13. 曾慈慧、呂文贀、何超然、林國青(2007)。園藝治療活動對護理之家失能長者治療效果之研究。臺灣園藝,53(3),345-360。
14. 盧嬿羽、郭毓仁(2013)。園藝治療活動對糖尿病友心理效益之研究。台灣農學會報,14(6),522-544。
15. Aldridge, J., & Sempik, J. (2002). Social and therapeutic horticulture: evidence and messages from research. Retrieved from
16. Aspinall, P., Mavros, P., Coyne, R., & Roe, J. (2015). The urban brain: analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG. Br J Sports Med, 49(4), 272-276.
17. Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249-259.
18. Blair, D. (2009). The Child in the Garden: An Evaluative Review of the Benefits of School Gardening. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15-38.
19. Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50.
20. Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 422-433.
21. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: Observations from experience. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 242-248.
22. Chang, C.-Y., & Chen, P.-K. (2005). Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience, 40(5), 1354-1359.
23. Coleman, D., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1993). Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(2), 111.
24. Diette, G. B., Lechtzin, N., Haponik, E., Devrotes, A., & Rubin, H. R. (2003). Distraction Therapy With Nature Sights and Sounds Reduces Pain During Flexible Bronchoscopya. Chest, 123(3), 941-948.
25. Dirks, A. E., & Orvis, K. (2005). An evaluation of the junior master gardener program in third grade classrooms. HortTechnology, 15(3), 443-447.
26. FLAGLER, J. (1993). Correctional youth and the green industry. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 7, 49-55.
27. Fredrickson, L. M., & Anderson, D. H. (1999). A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 21-39.
28. Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. American journal of preventive medicine, 20(3), 234-240.
29. Frumkin, H., Frank, L., & Jackson, R. J. (2004). Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities: Island Press.
30. Gesler, W. M. (2003). Healing places: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
31. Han, K.-T. (2017). The effect of nature and physical activity on emotions and attention while engaging in green exercise. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 24, 5-13.
32. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109-123.
33. Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26.
34. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health, 35, 207-228.
35. Hayashi, T., Tsumura, K., Suematsu, C., Okada, K., Fujii, S., & Endo, G. (1999). Walking to work and the risk for hypertension in men: the Osaka Health Survey. Annals of internal medicine, 131(1), 21-26.
36. Hefley, P. D. (1973). Horticulture: A therapeutic tool. Journal of rehabilitation, 39(1), 27.
37. Herzog, T. R., Chen, H. C., & Primeau, J. S. (2002). Perception of the restorative potential of natural and other settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(3), 295-306.
38. Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507-542.
39. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective: CUP Archive.
40. Kerr, J. H., Fujiyama, H., Sugano, A., Okamura, T., Chang, M., & Onouha, F. (2006). Psychological responses to exercising in laboratory and natural environments. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(4), 345-359.
41. Kim, E., & Mattson, R. (2002). Stress recovery effects of viewing red-flowering geraniums. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 13, 4-12.
42. Koch, S., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2006). The effect of a summer garden program on the nutritional knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of children. HortTechnology, 16(4), 620-625.
43. Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 343-367.
44. Larsen, L., Adams, J., Deal, B., Kweon, B. S., & Tyler, E. (2016). Plants in the Workplace. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 261-281.
45. Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 125-134.
46. Lineberger, S. E., & Zajicek, J. M. (2000). School gardens: Can a hands-on teaching tool affect students' attitudes and behaviors regarding fruit and vegetables? HortTechnology, 10(3), 593-597.
47. Liu, M., Kim, E., & Mattson, R. (2003). Physiological and emotional influences of cut flower arrangement and lavender fragrance on university students. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 14, 18-27.
48. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., De Vries, S., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(7), 587-592.
49. Mackay, G. J., & Neill, J. T. (2010). The effect of “green exercise” on state anxiety and the role of exercise duration, intensity, and greenness: A quasi-experimental study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(3), 238-245.
50. Marcus, C. C., & Barnes, M. (1999). Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations: John Wiley & Sons.
51. Moore, E. O. (1981). A Prison Environment's Effect on Health Care Service Demands. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11(1), 17-34.
52. Olafsdottir, G., Cloke, P., & Vogele, C. (2017). Place, green exercise and stress: An exploration of lived experience and restorative effects. Health Place, 46, 358-365.
53. a, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2009). Physiological effects of forest recreation in a young conifer forest in Hinokage Town, Japan. Silva Fennica, 43(2), 291-301.
54. Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2009). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 15(1), 18.
55. Peacock, J., Hine, R., & Pretty, J. (2007). The mental health benefits of green exercise activities and green care. Report for MIND.
56. Pretty, J. (2004). How nature contributes to mental and physical health. Spirituality and Health International, 5(2), 68-78.
57. Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. Int J Environ Health Res, 15(5), 319-337.
58. Rappe, E., & Kivelä, S.-L. (2005). Effects of garden visits on long-term care residents as related to depression. HortTechnology, 15(2), 298-303.
59. Rodiek, S. (2002). Influence of an outdoor garden on mood and stress in older persons. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 13, 13-21.
60. Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38(2), 311.
61. Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(5), e9-e9.
62. Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2002). Views of Nature and Self-Discipline: Evidence from Inner City Children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1-2), 49-63.
63. Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77-85.
64. Teychenne, M., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. (2008). Physical activity and likelihood of depression in adults: a review. Preventive medicine, 46(5), 397-411.
65. Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., & Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 1-9.
66. Ulrich, R. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery. Science, 224(4647), 224-225.
67. Ulrich, R. S. (1999). Effects of gardens on health outcomes: Theory and research. Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations, 27, 86.
68. Ulrich, R. S., & Addoms, D. L. (1981). Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park. Journal of Leisure Research, 13(1), 43.
69. Van Den Berg, A. E., & Custers, M. H. (2011). Gardening promotes neuroendocrine and affective restoration from stress. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(1), 3-11.
70. Van den Berg, A. E., Jorgensen, A., & Wilson, E. R. (2014). Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 173-181.
71. Waliczek, T., Logan, P., & Zajicek, J. (2003). Exploring the impact of outdoor environmental activities on children using a qualitative text data analysis system. HortTechnology, 13(4), 684-688.
72. Warburton, D. E., Nicol, C. W., & Bredin, S. S. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ, 174(6), 801-809.
73. Weng, P.-Y., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2014). Psychological restoration through indoor and outdoor leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(2), 203.
74. Weyerer, S., & Kupfer, B. (1994). Physical exercise and psychological health. Sports Medicine, 17(2), 108-116.
75. Whitehouse, S., Varni, J. W., Seid, M., Cooper-Marcus, C., Ensberg, M. J., Jacobs, J. R., & Mehlenbeck, R. S. (2001). Evaluating a Children's Hospital Garden Environment: Utilization and Consumer Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 301-314.
76. Williams, K., & Harvey, D. (2001). Transcendent Experience in Forest Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 249-260.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69944-
dc.description.abstract世界衛生組織(World Health Organization)對健康的定義為:「生、心理、社交完全安康的狀態,而不僅是沒有疾病而已。」(世界衛生組織憲章,2006)。然而,隨著接觸自然環境的機會減少,現代人在自然環境中從事活動的比例大幅下降,造成了程度益發嚴重的心理與生理問題(Warburton、Nicol & Bredin,2006),如此的問題對於世界衛生組織所定義的健康狀態有不容忽視的戕害,是現代人應防微杜漸的重要議題。近年來,在自然環境中從事活動時所能獲得的健康效益,以及與自然疏離的活動為何無法產生相應的好處,近年引起許多研究者的關注,通常稱之為「綠色活動(Green exercise)」(Pretty et al., 2004)。
本研究的目的為探討園藝活動其效益內涵,透過兩種自然環境中動手操作的園藝活動,紀錄並分析參與者的生理與心理反應,配合結構式訪談,深入討論園藝活動的效益機制。選定國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院附設山地實驗農場為研究地點,並於農場中設計兩項園藝活動(園藝手工藝、戶外栽植)讓受測者參與其中,於活動結束時藉由生理回饋儀器(肌電值、腦波、末梢血液流量)、心理問卷(環境知覺恢復性、環境偏好、情緒體驗、止觀覺察)及訪談受測者的主觀體驗感受來了解園藝活動帶給受測者的健康效益與效益機制。
研究結果發現,從事園藝活動顯著影響參與者的生理反應,包括肌電值與末梢血液流量;並顯著改善參與者對環境知覺恢復特徵的評價、自評情緒表現以及止觀覺察表現。此外,於溫室當中從事戶外栽植時,對於環境的偏好評估顯著高於在室內教室的園藝手工藝活動,顯示受測者較為偏好戶外的環境。最後,我們訪談活動後的主觀體驗感受,對於描述內容進行關鍵字的分析,結果顯示,相較於從事園藝活動,參與活動後的描述內容對於感受的描述詞多樣性,且大多為正向的形容詞。深入探討影響園藝活動效益因素上,可以分為活動、植物、環境以及其他因素。其中,在戶外栽植的部分,許多受測者提到較多的環境與植物因素:環境舒適、空間配置有趣、花朵的色彩、香氣、植物的質感、味道等,顯示除了對於戶外環境較為偏好外,戶外的環境確實較能引起受測者的關注,並引發正向的感受。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPeople live in urban area are much more than who live in nature nowadays that means we have less chance to participant activities in nature. This caused some physiological and psychological problems to human (Warburton, Nicol & Bredin, 2006).We have known about the healthy benefits in nature environment from lots of research. Most of them asked their participants to watch nature photograph or videos.
However, we would take different activities in the nature environment rather than sit or view (Han, 2017). Many researchers start to take attention to what benefits can people get when engaging activities in nature environment. When we engage activities in nature environment, it can be called as ‘Green exercise’(Pretty, 2004).
The aim of the study is to explore the healthy benefits from horticultural activities. We designed two kinds of horticultural activity (handcraft and outdoor planting) and asked subjects to participant all of them. We will record and analyze subjects’ physiological and psychological reaction and their subjective experience through interview and observation after they finished the activity immediately. We chose Mei Feng farm to be our study area and designed two horticultural activities (DIY with seeds and flowers and plants). The experiments will start when they finish their activity right away. We will record their physiological reaction (EEG, EMG and BVP), physiological reaction (PRS, MAAS, environment preference, pleasure and arousal) and their subjective experience about the activity and the environment.
The result of the study is that engaging green exercise significant affected subjects’ physiological reaction in EEG and BVP. It also improved their perceived restoration, emotion and MAAS. Besides, the environmental preference of plant outdoor was higher than arts & crafts, this showed that they prefer to engage activity outdoors than indoors. Summarized their subjective experience, we found that after engaging activities, their content were much more abundant and their adjective were more positive like relaxing, calming, pleasant and cozy. Explored deeply about the factors of healthy benefits, we found that might because of the contents of activities, plants, environment and others.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:35:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R04628310-1.pdf: 3816577 bytes, checksum: 504cff761c5f22f5a29c84a737964a2c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
摘要 ii
Abstract iv
目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 x
第一章 緒論 11
第一節 研究背景與動機 11
第二節 研究目的 12
第三節 研究限制與重要性 13
第二章 文獻回顧 15
第一節 療育農場 15
第二節 園藝活動 16
第二節 園藝活動的效益 19
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究架構與假設 26
第二節 研究變項 28
第三節 收集與研究操作 34
第四節 資料分析方法 39
第四章 研究結果分析 41
第一節 園藝活動與生心理反應 41
第二節 質性研究內容分析 58
第五章 結論與建議 78
第一節 結果與討論 78
第二節 研究建議 83
參考文獻 85
附錄一 實驗問卷 93
附錄二 研究參與者知情同意書 94
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject綠色活動zh_TW
dc.subject健康效益zh_TW
dc.subject療育農場zh_TW
dc.subject園藝活動zh_TW
dc.subjectGreen exerciseen
dc.subjectHealthy benefitsen
dc.subjectTherapeutic farmen
dc.subjectHorticultural activitiesen
dc.title療育農場活動之健康效益zh_TW
dc.titleHorticultural Activities Healthy Benefits in Therapeutic Farmen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee侯錦雄,歐聖榮,羅筱鳳,何立智
dc.subject.keyword綠色活動,園藝活動,療育農場,健康效益,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordGreen exercise,Horticultural activities,Therapeutic farm,Healthy benefits,en
dc.relation.page97
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201800445
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-02-12
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝暨景觀學系zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.73 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved