請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69937
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊金穆(Chin-Mu Yang),王榮麟(Rong-Lin Wang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Ting Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張雅婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:34:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-02 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-03-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-02-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alvarez, Maria. 2007. 'The Causalist/Anti-causalist Debate in the Theory of Action: What It Is and Why It Matters.' In Action in Context, edited by Anton Leist, 103-123. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
--------. 2010. Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. --------. 2016. Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy edited by Edward N. Zalta. Anscombe, G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell. Aristotle. 2012. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Rowe Christopher and Sarah Broadie, In Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics -- Translation, Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Arpaly, Nomy. 2000. 'On Acting Rationally Against One's Better Juedgment.' Ethics 110:488-513. Audi, Robert. 1979. 'Weakness of Will and Practical Judgment.' Noûs 13:173-196. --------. 1990. 'Weakness of Will and Rational Action.' Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68:270-281. Ayer, Alfred Jules. 1946. Language, Truth, and Logic. 2nd ed. London: Gollancz. Björnsson, Gunnar, Caj Strandberg, Ragnar Francén Olinder, John Eriksson, and Fredrik Björklund, eds. 2015. Motivational Internalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Blackburn, Simon. 1984. Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1993. Essays in Quasi-Realism. New York: Oxford University Press. Bratman, Michael. 1979. 'Practical Reasoning and Weakness of the Will.' Noûs 13:153-171. --------. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bricke, John. 2012. 'Hume and Davidson: Passion, Evaluation, and Truth.' In David Hume and Contemporary Philosophy, edited by Ilya Kasavin, 141-156. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Brink, David O. 1997. 'Moral Motivation.' Ethics 108:4-32. Broome, John. 2000. 'Instrumental Reasoning.' In Rationality, Rules, and Structure, edited by Julian Nida-Rümelin and Wolfgang Spohn, 195-207. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Callard, Agnes. 2013. 'Practical Reason.' In A Companion to Donald Davidson, edited by Ernie Lepore and Kirk Ludwig, 32-47. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Candlish, Stewart, and Nic Damnjanovic. 2013. 'Reasons, Actions, and the Will: The Fall and Rise of Causalism.' In The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 689-708. Oxford: Oxford University. Carroll, Lewis. 1895. 'What the Tortoise Said to Achilles.' Mind 4 (14):278-280. D'Oro, Giuseppina, and Constantine Sandis. 2013a. 'From Anti-causalism to Causalism and Back: A History of the Reasons/Causes Debate.' In Reasons and Causes-Causalism and Anti-Causalism in the Philosophy of Action, edited by Giuseppina D'Oro and Constantine Sandis, 7-48. London: Palgrave Macmillan. --------, eds. 2013b. Reasons and Causes-Causalism and Anti-Causalism in the Philosophy of Action. Edited by Michael Beaney, History of Analytic Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Dancy, Jonathan. 1995. 'Why There Is Really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation.' Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:1-18. --------. 2000. Practical Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Darwall, Stephen. 1992. 'Internalism and Agency.' Philosophical Perspectives 6:155-174. --------. 1995. 'The Brisitsh Moralists: Inventing Internalism.' In The British Moralist and the Internal 'Ought': 1640-1740, 1-22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --------. 2006a. 'Morality and Autonomy in Kant.' In The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability, 213-242. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. --------. 2006b. 'Morality and Practical Reason: A Kantian Approach.' In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by David Copp, 282-320. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Davidson, Donald. 1963. 'Actions, Reasons, and Causes.' In Essays on Actions and Events, 3-21. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1970a. 'How is Weakness of the Will Possible?' In Essays on Actions and Events, 21-42. Oxford Clarendon Press. --------. 1970b. 'Mental Events.' In Essays on Actions and Events, 207-225. Oxford Clarendon Press. --------. 1973. 'Freedom to Act.' In Essays on Actions and Events, 63-81. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1974a. 'Belief and the Basis of Meaning.' In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 141-154. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1974b. 'Psychology as Philosophy.' In Essays on Actions and Events, 229-239. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1975. 'Thought and Talk.' In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 155-170. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1978. 'Intending.' In Essays on Actions and Events, 83-102. Oxford Clarendon Press. --------. 1980. 'A Unified Theory of Thought, Meaning, and Action.' In Problems of Rationality, 151-166. Oxford Clarendon Press. --------. 1982a. 'Paradoxes of Irrationality.' In Problems of Rationality, 169-187. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1982b. 'Rational Animals.' In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, 95-105. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1984. 'Expressing Evaluations ' In Problems of Rationality, 19-37. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1985a. 'Incoherence and Irrationality.' In Problems of Rationality, 189-198. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1985b. 'Replies to Essays I-IX.' In Essays on Donald Davidson: Actions and Events, edited by Bruce Vermazen and Edith Hamilton, 195-229. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1986a. 'Deception and Division.' In Problems of Rationality, 199-212. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1986b. 'The Interpersonal Comparison of Values.' In Problems of Rationality, 59-74. Oxford Clarendon Press. --------. 1987. 'Problems in the Explanation of Action.' In Problems of Rationality, 101-116. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1990. 'Representation and Interpretation.' In Problems of Rationality, 87-99. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1995a. 'The Objectivity of Values.' In Problems of Rationality, 39-57. Oxford Clarendon Press. --------. 1995b. 'The Problem of Objectivity.' In Problems of Rationality, 3-18. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1999a. 'Reply to Ariela Lazar.' In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Library of Living Philosophers, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn, 402-405. Chicago: Open Court. --------. 1999b. 'Reply to Isaac Levi.' In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Library of Living Philosophers, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn, 571-574. Chicago Open Court. --------. 2000. 'Appendix: Objectivity and Practical Reason.' In Problems of Rationality, 52-57. Oxford Calrendon Press. --------. 2001a. 'Aristotle's Action.' In Truth, Language, and History, 277-294. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 2001b. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 2001c. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 2004. Problems of Rationaltiy Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 2005. Truth, Language, and History. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Dodd, Dylan. 2009. 'Weakness of Will as Intention-Violation.' European Journal of Philosophy 17:45-59. Dunn, Robert. 1987. The Possibility of Weakness of Will. Indianapolis: Hackett. --------. 2006. Values and the Reflective Point of View: On Expressivism, Self-Knowledge and Agency: Routledge. Everson, Stephen. 2009. 'What are Reasons for Action?' In New Essays on the Explanation of Action, edited by Constantine Sandis, 22-47. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. --------. 2010. 'Motivating Reasons.' In A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, edited by O'Connor Timothy and Constantine Sandis, 145-153. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Fleming, Patrick. 2010. 'Hume on Weakness of Will.' British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (4):597-609. Frankena, William. 1958. 'Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy.' In Essays in Moral Philosophy, edited by Abraham I. Melden, 12-23. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Geach, Peter Tomas. 1965. 'Assertion.' Philosophical Review 74:449-465. Gibbard, Allan. 1990. Wise Choises, Apt Feelings. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Gosling, Justin. 1990. Weakness of the Will. London and New York: Routledge. Gowans, Chris. 2016. Moral Relativism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy edited by Edward N. Zalta. Hare, R. M. . 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hill, Thomas. 2012. 'Kant on Weakness of Will.' In Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations, 107-128. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hills, Alison. 2015. 'Cognitivism about Moral Judgement.' In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, 1-25. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Holton, Richard. 1999. 'Intention and Weakness of Will.' Journal of Philosophy 96:241-262. --------. 2009. Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon. Original edition, 1739. Hurley, Paul. 2002. 'A Davidsonian Reconciliation of Internalism, Objectivity, and the Belief-Desire Theory.' The Journal of Ethics 6:1-20. Joyce, Richard. 2002. 'Expressivism and Motivation Internalism.' Analysis 62:336-344. Kant, Immanuel. 1997a. Critique of Practical Reason. New York: Cambridge University Press. --------. 1997b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kennett, Jeanette. 2003. 'Humean Accounts of Reasons and Motivation: Davidson and Decision Theory.' In Agency and Respondibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology, 39-71. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Kennett, Jeanette, and Michael Smith. 1996. 'Frog and Toad Lose Control.' Analysis 56:63-73. --------. 1997. 'Synchronic Self-Control Is Always Non-Actional.' Analysis 57:123-31. Kolodny, Niko. 2005. 'Why Be Rational?' Mind 114 (455):509-563. Korsgaard, Christine M. 1986. 'Skepticism about Practical Reason.' Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):5-25. --------. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --------. 2008a. 'Acting for a Reason.' In The Constitution of Agency, 207-229. Oxford: Oxford University Press. --------. 2008b. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. --------. 2008c. 'The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.' In The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology, 27-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lazar, Ariela. 1999. 'Akrasia and the Principle of Continence or What the Tortoiuse Would Say to Achilles.' In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Library of Living Philosophers, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn, 381-401. Chicago: Open Court. Levi, Isaac. 1999. 'Representing Preferences: Donald Davidson on Rational Choice.' In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Library of Living Philosophers, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn, 531-570. Chicago: Open Court. Levy, Neil. 2011. 'Resisting 'Weakness of the Will'.' Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXII:134-155. McDowell, John. 1995. 'Might There Be External Reasons?' In World, Mind, and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, edited by J.E.J Altham and Ross Harrison, 68-85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --------. 2013. 'Acting in the Light of a Fact.' In Thinking About Reasons: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy, edited by David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little and Brad Hooker, 13-28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McIntyre, Alison. 1990. 'Is Akratic Action Always Irrational?' In Identity, Character, and Morality, edited by Owen Flanagan and Amélie Rorty, 379-400. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mele, Alfred. 1987. Irrationality: An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception, and Self-Control. New York: Oxford University Press. --------. 1997. 'Underestimating Self-Control: Kennett and Smith on Frog and Toad.' Analysis 57:119-23. --------. 1998. 'Synchronic Self-Control Revisited: Frog and Toad Shape Up.' Analysis 58:305-310. --------. 2002. 'Akratics and Addicts.' American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (2):153-167. Myers, Robert. 2004. 'Finding Value in Davidson.' Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):107-136. --------. 2012. 'Desires and Normative Truth: A Holist's Response to the Sceptics.' Mind 121:375-406. --------. 2013. 'Interpretation and Value.' In A Companion to Donald Davidson, edited by Ernie Lepore and Kirk Ludwig, 314-327. Oxford: Willy-Blackwell. Myers, Robert, and Claudine Verheggen. 2016. Donald Davidson’s Triangulation Argument: A Philosophical Inquiry. New York: Routledge. O'Neill, Onora. 2004. 'Kant: Rationality as Practical Reason.' In The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, edited by Alfred Mele and Piers Rawling, 93-109. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pears, David, and David Pugmire. 1982. 'Motivated Irrationality.' Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56:157-196. Plato. 1961. Protagoras. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns, In The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Preyer, Gerhard. 2011. 'Evaluative Attitudes.' In Dialogues with Davidson: Acting, Interpreting, Understanding, edited by Jeff Malpas, 325-342. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Prinz, Jesse J. 2007. The Emotional Construction of Morals. New York Oxford University Press. Railton, Peter. 2006. 'Humean Theory of Practical Rationality.' In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by David Copp, 265-281. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Raz, Joseph. 2002. 'Incommensurability and Agency.' In Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action, 46-66. Oxford Oxford University Press. --------. 2009. 'Reasons: Explanatory and Normative.' In New Essays on the Explanation of Action, edited by Constantine Sandis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Ridge, Michael. 2006. 'Sincerity and Expressivism.' Philosophical Studies 131:487-510. Rorty, Amélie. 1980. 'Where Does Akratic Break Take Place?' Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58:333-347. Scanlon, T. M. 2014. Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schlosser, Markus. 2015. Agency. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Schroeder, Mark. 2008. Being For. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Setiya, Kieran. 2004. 'Hume on Practical Reason.' Philosophical Perspectives 18:365-389. --------. 2016. 'Akrasia and the Constitution of Agency.' In Practical Knowledge: Selected Essays, 253-271. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shafer-Landau, Russ. 2000. 'A Defense of Motivational Externalism.' Philosophical Studies 97 (3):267-291. Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 1993. 'Some problems for Gibbard's norm-expressivism.' Philosophical Studies 69:297-313. Smith, Michael. 1987. 'The Humean Theory of Motivation.' Mind:36-61. --------. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. --------. 1996. 'Normative Reasons and Full Rationality: Reply to Swanton.' Analysis 56 (3):160-168. --------. 2004. 'Philosophy and Commonsense: The Case of Weakness of Will.' In Ethics and the A Priori: Selected Essays on Moral Psychology and Meta-Ethics, 56-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sripada, Chandra Sekhar. 2010. 'Philosophical Questions About the Nature of Willpower.' Philosophy Compass 5:793-805. --------. 2014. 'How is Willpower Possible? The Puzzle of Synchronic Self-Control and the Divided Mind.' Noûs 48:41-74. Stocker, Michael. 1979. 'Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology.' The Journal of Philosophy 76 (12):738-753. --------. 1990a. 'Akrasia: The Unity of the Good, Commensurability, and Comparability.' In Plural and Conflicting Values, 211-240. Oxford: Clarendon Press. --------. 1990b. 'Plurality and Choice.' In Plural and Conflicting Values, 165-208. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Stout, Rowland. 2014. Central Problems of Philosophy : Action. Durham, GB: Routledge. Street, Sharon. 2010. 'What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?' Philosophy Compass 5 (5):363-384. Stroud, Sarah. 2003. 'Weakness of Will and Practical Judgment.' In Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, edited by Sarah Stroud and Christine Tappolet. Oxford Clarendon Press. --------. 2013. 'Irrationality.' In A Companion to Donald Davidson, edited by Ernie Lepore and Kirk Ludwig, 489-505. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. Stroud, Sarah, and Christine Tappolet, eds. 2003. Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Svavarsdóttir, Sigrún. 1999. 'Moral Cognitivism and Motivation.' The Philosophical Review 108:161-219. --------. 2006. 'Ho Do Moral Judgments Motivate?' In Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory, edited by James Dreier, 163-180. Wiley-Blackwell. Swanton, Christine. 1996. 'Is the Moral Problem Solved?' Analysis 56 (3). Tappolet, Christine. 2013. 'Weakness of Will.' In International Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by Hugh LaFolette, 4412-4421. Wiley-Blackwell. --------. 2017. 'Self-Control and Akrasia.' In The Routledge Companion to Free Will, edited by Meghan Griffith, Kevin Timpe and Neil Levy, 565-576. New York: Routledge. Tenenbaum, Sergio. 1999. 'The Judgment of a Weak Will.' Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59:875-911. --------. 2007. Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --------. 2010. 'Akrasia and Irrationality.' In A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, edited by Timothy O'Connor and Constantine Sandis, 274-281. Wiley-Blackwell. van Roojen, Mark. 2002. 'Should Motivational Humeans be Humeans About Rationality?' Topoi 21:209-215. Velleman, J. David. 2000. 'The Guise of the Good.' In The Possibility of Practical Reason, 92-122. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Walker, Arthur F. 1989. 'The Problem of Weakness of Will.' Noûs 23 (5):653-676. Watson, Gary. 1977. 'Skepticism About Weakness of Will.' Philosophical Review 86:316-339. Wiggins, David. 1998. 'Weakness of Will, Commensurability, and the Objects of Deliberation and Desires.' Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79:251-277. Wiland, Eric. 2003. 'Psychologism, Practical Reason, and the Possibility of Error.' Philosophical Quarterly 53:68-78. Williams, Bernard. 1981. 'Internal Reasons and External Reasons.' In Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69937 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文主要處理兩個關於意志軟弱的問題。第一個問題是:意志軟弱到什麼層面上是可能的? 第二個問題是:意志軟弱的問題為何? 這兩個問題直到戴維森《意志軟弱如何可能?》一文出版以後才引起廣泛討論。在此文中,戴維森提出了兩個主張。首先他主張因為違反出於全面考量的評價判斷的意圖行動是可能的,因此意志軟弱是可能的。其次,他主張意志軟弱是實踐不理性的典型。前述兩個問題即是針對戴維森這兩個主張的挑戰。然而戴維森從未直接回應過這些挑戰。本文的目標就是要藉由建立一個戴維森式的進路來替戴維森提出完整的回應。本論文將立基於戴維森所提出的關於意志軟弱、意圖行動、行動理由、實踐理性的主張,並援引近期相關議題的討論來建立一個戴維森式的進路。
在第一章中我將闡述戴維森的因果行動理論,以及戴維森如何修改此理論使其能與意志軟弱相容。在第二章中我藉由戴維森對評價與語言之基本關係的檢視,來建立一個支持判斷內在論的戴維森式評價判斷理論。接著在第三章中我論證為何嚴格的意志軟弱是不可能的。這兩章的討論將能回答關於意志軟弱的第一個問題。在第四章中我將藉由探討行動理由是什麼來辯護一個戴維森式的立場--意志軟弱必定是實踐不理性。在第五章中我主張一個良好的實踐理性理論必須要能夠解釋實踐不理性,並分析幾個常見的實踐理性理論,最後我論證只有戴維森式的理論能夠恰當地解釋意志軟弱的實踐不理性。 本論文中的討論立基於四個非常符合直覺且被廣泛接受的預設。第一個預設是意圖行動的標準觀點,此觀點認為意圖行動就是有理由的行動。第二個預設是意志軟弱是意圖行動。第三個預設是意志軟弱是實踐不理性的行動。第四個預設是理由立基於理性。本論文的結論是,如果我們接受這四個預設,則我們必定接受一戴維森式的觀點—行動理由的構成必須扮演兩個不同的角色以解釋實踐不理性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation concerns two main questions about weakness of will. The first question is: “To what extent is weakness of will possible?”. The second question is: “Must weakness of will be practically irrational?”. This dissertation is thus divided into two parts, corresponding to these two questions. These two questions did not emerge until the publication of Donald Davidson’s influential paper “How is Weakness of the Will Possible?”, in which Davidson argues for two theses. Firstly, he argues that weakness of will is possible because it is possible to act intentionally against one’s all things considered evaluative judgment. Secondly, he argues that weakness of will is a paradigm of practical irrationality. The aforementioned two questions are raised by the critics of Davidson as challenges to these two theses. However, Davidson has never directly offered full responses to the challenges. This dissertation thus aims to offer a complete reply on behalf of Davidson by constructing a Davidsonian approach. The approach is Davidsonian because I will stick to Davidson’s main theses regarding weakness of will, intentional action, and practical rationality, while my arguments may appeal to resources found in recent two decades.
In Chapter 1, I give an overview of Davidson’s causal theory of action and how Davidson amends it to cope with the possibility of weakness of will. The aim of this chapter is to lay sufficient groundwork for discussions in the following chapters. Chapter 2 and 3 are devoted to answering the first question. In Chapter 2, I reconstruct a Davidsonian theory of evaluative judgment in order to defend judgment internalism in virtue of resources found in Davidson’s investigation of the basic relation between evaluation and language. I focus on the question about why strict akrasia is impossible in Chapter 3. In Chapter 4 and 5 I then take up the issue about whether weakness of will is paradigmatically irrational. In Chapter 4, I defend the Davidsonian position that it must be irrational in virtue of a study of practical reasons. In Chapter 5, I scrutinize several theories of practical reason and argue that only the Davidsonian approach can offer satisfactory explanation to the practical irrationality of weakness of will. Discussions in this dissertation are based on four intuitive and widely accepted assumptions. First of all, I assume the standard conception of intentional action, the view that an intentional action is an action done for a reason. Secondly, I assume that a weak-willed action is an intentional action. Thirdly, I assume that weakness of will is must be practically irrational. My last assumption is that reasons for action are grounded on practical rationality. I conclude that if we accept these four assumptions altogether, we must accept the Davidsonian view that a practical reason must play two different roles in order to explain the irrationality of weakness of will—that it serves as a reason that explains the intentional dimension of a weak-willed action and that it serves as a cause that explains the irrational dimension of it. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:34:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-D98124005-1.pdf: 2554171 bytes, checksum: f101a4a8ea51301c3c9f75d8ce2dfe97 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | INTRODUCTION 1
1 INTENTIONAL ACTION, PRACTICAL REASON, AND WEAKNESS OF WILL – DAVIDSON’S FRAMEWORK 11 1.1 Davidson’s Causalism 11 1.2 The Problem of Weakness of Will 18 1.3 A Model of Practical Reasoning for Weakness of Will 25 1.4 Towards A Davidsonian Approach to Weakness of Will and Practical Rationality 37 2 A DAVIDSONIAN THEORY OF EVALUATIVE JUDGMENT 43 2.1 Evaluative Judgment Internalism 46 2.2 Language and Evaluation: Davidson’s Diagnosis 52 2.3 A Davidsonian Theory of Evaluative Judgment 58 2.4 Amoralism and Weakness of Will 72 2.5 Conclusion 76 3 STRICT AKRASIA, SELF-CONTROL, AND INCOMMENSURABILITY – HOW WE ACT IN THE FACE OF CONFLICT 77 3.1 Conditional and Unconditional Evaluative Judgment 79 3.2 The Impossibility of Strict Akrasia 82 3.3 The Dilemma of Self-Control 90 3.4 Desires, Values, Commensurability, and Agency 100 3.5 Conclusion 109 4 WEAKNESS OF WILL AND PRACTICAL REASONS 111 4.1 Practical Reasons 113 4.2 Psychologism, Factualism, and the Hybrid View 117 4.3 Motivating Reasons and Normative Reasons: How They Be the Same 123 4.4 A Davidsonian Conception of Practical Reasons 128 4.5 Weakness of Will and Practical Reasons 135 4.6 Acting On A Normative Reason 143 4.7 Conclusion 146 5 PRACTICAL REASON AND IRRATIONALITY 149 5.1 Three Questions Regarding Weakness of Will 150 5.2 Humean Theory of Practical Reason and How It Explains Akrasia 154 5.3 Kantian Theory of Practical Reason and How It Explains Akrasia 159 5.4 Michael Smith’s Mixed-View and How It Explains Akrasia 163 5.5 Davidsonian Theory of Practical Reason 168 5.6 A Davidsonian Explanation of Irrationality 179 5.7 Conclusion 183 CONCLUSION 185 REFERENCES 191 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 意志軟弱與實踐理性──一個戴維森式的進路 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Davidsonian Approach to Weakness of Will and Practical Rationality | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何志青,林從一,方萬全 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 戴維森,意志軟弱,意圖行動,評價判斷,判斷內在論,行動理由,實踐理性,實踐不理性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Davidson,Weakness of Will,Intentional Action,Evaluative Judgment,Judgment Internalism,Reasons for action,Practical Rationality,Practical Irrationality, | en |
dc.relation.page | 199 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800424 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-02-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 哲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。