請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69758
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 杜榮瑞 | |
dc.contributor.author | YANG-YANG CHEN | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳煬楊 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:26:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-05-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-05-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
陳冬華、陳信元、萬華林,2005,國有企業中的薪酬管制與在職消費,經濟研究,第2期:92-101。 陳智、徐廣成,2011,中國企業社會責任影響因素研究—基於公司治理視角的實證分析,軟科學,第04期:106-111+116。 杜勝利,翟艷玲,2005,總經理年度報酬決定因素的實證分析—以我國上市公司為例,管理世界,第8期: 14-20。 吉利,吳萌,2016,企業社會責任與高管薪酬辯護,廈門大學學報(哲學社會科學版),第6期:116-125。。 李正,2006,企業社會責任與企業價值的相關性研究—來自滬市上市公司的經驗證據,中國工業經濟,第2期:77-83。 山立威,甘犁,鄭濤,2008,公司捐款與經濟動機,經濟研究,第11期:51-60。 蘇然,2016,CEO背景特徵,CEO薪酬與企業自願性社會責任,現代財經:天津財經學院學報:第11期:76-88。 唐松,孫錚,2014,政治關聯,高管薪酬與企業未來經營績效,管理世界,第5期:93-105。 王新,李彥霖,李方舒,企業社會責任與經理人薪酬激勵有效性研究—戰略性動機還是卸責藉口?,會計研究,第10期:51-58。 張欣,2016,「限薪令」下,國有上市公司總經理薪酬大起底,中國經濟周刊,第33期:53-56。 諶新民,劉善敏,2003,上市公司經營者報酬結構性差異的實證研究,經濟研究,第8期:55-63。 二、 英文部分 Abbott, W. F., and R. J. Monsen. 1979. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal 22 (3): 501-515. Abernethy, M. A., Y. F. Kuang, and B. Qin. 2015. The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design. The Accounting Review 90 (4): 1265-1306. Aiken, L. S., S. G. West, and R. R. Reno. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications. Altstiel, T., and J. Grow. 2015. Advertising Creative: Strategy, Copy, and Design. Sage Publications. Ang, J. S., R. A. Cole, and J. W. Lin. 2000. Agency costs and ownership structure. the Journal of Finance 55 (1): 81-106. Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll, and J. D. Hatfield. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28 (2): 446-463. Bansal, P., and K. Roth. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 717-736. Barnea, A., and A. Rubin. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1): 71-86. Becchetti, L., R. Ciciretti, I. Hasan, and N. Kobeissi. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder's value. Journal of Business Research 65 (11): 1628-1635. Berman, S. L., A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha, and T. M. Jones. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 488-506. ———. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 488-506. Bertrand, M., and K. F. Hallock. 2001. The gender gap in top corporate jobs. ILR Review 55 (1): 3-21. Bhattacharya, C. B., and S. Sen. 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review 47 (1): 9-24. Boatsman, J. R., and S. Gupta. 1996. Taxes and corporate charity: empirical evidence from microlevel panel data. National Tax Journal 49(2): 193-213. Bowen, H. R. 2013. Social responsibilities of the businessman: University of Iowa Press. Bowman, E. H., and M. Haire. 1975. A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review 18 (2): 49-58. Brammer, S., C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin. 2006. Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management 35 (3): 97-116. Bryan, S., and L. Hwang. 1997. CEO compensation in a regulatory environment: An analysis of the electric utility industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 12 (3): 223-251. Cai, Y., H. Jo, and C. Pan. 2012. Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4): 467-480. Callan, S. J., and J. M. Thomas. 2011. Executive compensation, corporate social responsibility, and corporate financial performance: a multi‐equation framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18 (6): 332-351. ———. 2014. Relating CEO Compensation to Social Performance and Financial Performance: Does the Measure of Compensation Matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 21 (4): 202-227. Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society 38 (3): 268-295. Cespa, G., and G. Cestone. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16 (3): 741-771. Chin, M., D. C. Hambrick, and L. K. Treviño. 2013. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly 58 (2): 197-232. Cochran, P. L., and R. A. Wood. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 27 (1): 42-56. Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2013. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge. Coombs, J. E., and K. M. Gilley. 2005. Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 26 (9): 827-840. Cordeiro, J. J., and R. Veliyath. 2003. Beyond pay for performance: A panel study of the determinants of CEO compensation. American Business Review 21 (1): 56. Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (3): 371-406. Crystal, G. S. 1991. Why CEO compensation is so high. California Management Review 34 (1): 9-29. Cyert, R., S. Kang, P. Kumar, and A. Shah. 1997. Corporate Governance and the Level of CEO Compensation. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University. De Hoogh, A. H., and D. N. Den Hartog. 2008. Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly 19 (3): 297-311. Deckop, J. R., K. K. Merriman, and S. Gupta. 2006. The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management 32 (3): 329-342. Dhaliwal, D. S., O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86 (1): 59-100. Eisenberg, T., S. Sundgren, and M. T. Wells. 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics 48 (1): 35-54. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Top Sustainability Books 8(1): 37-51. Fabrizi, M., C. Mallin, and G. Michelon. 2014. The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 124 (2): 311-326. Faleye, O., and E. A. Trahan. 2011. Labor-friendly corporate practices: Is what is good for employees good for shareholders? Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1): 1-27. Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301-325. Fan, J. P., T. J. Wong, and T. Zhang. 2007. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics 84 (2): 330-357. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman. Friedman, M. 1970. Comment on Tobin. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (2): 318-327. Gaver, J. J., and K. M. Gaver. 1998. The relation between nonrecurring accounting transactions and CEO cash compensation. The Accounting Review 73(2): 235-253. Gibbons, R., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Relative performance evaluation for chief executive officers. ILR Review 43 (3): 30-S-51-S. Greening, D. W., and D. B. Turban. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society 39 (3): 254-280. Groves, T., Y. Hong, J. McMillan, and B. Naughton. 1995. China's evolving managerial labor market. Journal of Political Economy 103 (4): 873-892. Hall, B. J., and J. B. Liebman. 1998. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 653-691. Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford Press. Heinkel, R., A. Kraus, and J. Zechner. 2001. The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36 (04): 431-449. Hemingway, C. A., and P. W. Maclagan. 2004. Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1): 33-44. Hillman, A. J., and G. D. Keim. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 45(4): 125-139. Hogan, S., and K. Sigler. 1998. The CEO pay-performance relationship: Pooled vs. industry models. Managerial Finance 24 (2): 59-77. Hwang, B.-H., and S. Kim. 2009. It pays to have friends. Journal of Financial Economics 93 (1): 138-158. Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance 48 (3): 831-880. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360. Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98 (2): 225-264. Jian, M., and K.-W. Lee. 2015. CEO compensation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 29: 46-65. Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Greening. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 564-576. Joskow, P., N. Rose, A. Shepard, J. R. Meyer, and S. Peltzman. 1993. Regulatory constraints on CEO compensation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 1993 (1): 1-72. Joskow, P. L., N. L. Rose, and C. D. Wolfram. 1996. Political constraints on executive compensation: Evidence from the electric utility industry. The RAND Journal of Economics 27(1): 165-182. Kato, T., and C. Long. 2006. CEO turnover, firm performance, and enterprise reform in China: Evidence from micro data. Journal of Comparative Economics 34 (4): 796-817. Kim, Y., M. S. Park, and B. Wier. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 87 (3): 761-796. Kotchen, M. J., and J. J. Moon. 2012. Corporate social responsibility for irresponsibility: National Bureau of Economic Research. Lanis, R., and G. Richardson. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 31 (1): 86-108. Lee, M. D. P. 2008. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews 10 (1): 53-73. Leone, A. J., J. S. Wu, and J. L. Zimmerman. 2006. Asymmetric sensitivity of CEO cash compensation to stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (1): 167-192. Lev, B., C. Petrovits, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2010. Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2): 182-200. Mahapatra, S. 1984. Investor reaction to a corporate social accounting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 11 (1): 29-40. Mahoney, L., and L. Thorne. 2005. Corporate social responsibility and long-term compensation: Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3): 241-253. Mahoney, L. S., and L. Thorn. 2006. An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2): 149-162. Mangel, R., and H. Singh. 1993. Ownership structure, board relationships and CEO compensation in large US corporations. Accounting and Business Research 23 (sup1): 339-350. McGuire, J., S. Dow, and K. Argheyd. 2003. CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4): 341-359. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854-872. McIntosh, M. 2003. Living corporate citizenship: Strategic routes to socially responsible business: Pearson Education. McKendall, M., C. Sánchez, and P. Sicilian. 1999. Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 7 (3): 201-223. McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117-127. ———. 2011. Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management 37 (5): 1480-1495. Morse, A., V. Nanda, and A. Seru. 2011. Are incentive contracts rigged by powerful CEOs? The Journal of Finance 66 (5): 1779-1821. Murphy, K. J. 1985. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (1-3): 11-42. Navarro, P. 1988. Why do corporations give to charity? Journal of Business 61(1): 65-93. Rose, J. M. 2007. Corporate directors and social responsibility: Ethics versus shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics 73 (3): 319-331. Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar, R. M. Brown, J. J. Janney, and K. Paul. 2001. An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (2): 143-156. Said, R., Y. Hj Zainuddin, and H. Haron. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal 5 (2): 212-226. Schaltegger, S., and F. Figge. 2000. Environmental shareholder value: economic success with corporate environmental management. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management 7 (1): 29. Schnietz, K. E., and M. J. Epstein. 2005. Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review 7 (4): 327-345. Sharma, S., and H. Vredenburg. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19(8): 729-753. Shaw, K. W., and M. H. Zhang. 2010. Is CEO cash compensation punished for poor firm performance? The Accounting Review 85 (3): 1065-1093. Smith, C. W., and R. L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32 (3): 263-292. Soloman, R., and K. Hansen. 1985. It’s Good Business (Atheneum, New York). Google Scholar. Spicer, B. H. 1978. Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. The Accounting Review 53(1): 94-111. Stanwick, P. A., and S. D. Stanwick. 1998. The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2): 195-204. Stock, J, and Yogo M. 2005. Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. In: Andrews DWK Identification and Inference for Econometric Models. New York: Cambridge University Press: 80-108. Su, Y., and X. He. 2010. Street as courtroom: state accommodation of labor protest in South China. Law & Society Review 44 (1): 157-184. Turban, D. B., and D. W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of management journal 40 (3): 658-672. Van Essen, M., J. Otten, and E. J. Carberry. 2015. Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management 41 (1): 164-202. Van Fleet, D. D., A. McWilliams, and D. S. Siegel. 2000. A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management 26 (5): 839-861. Vilanova, M., J. M. Lozano, and D. Arenas. 2009. Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1): 57-69. Waddock, S. A., and S. B. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal: 303-319. Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 691-718. ———. 2010. Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1): 50-84. Yermack, D. 1995. Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? Journal of Financial Economics 39 (2): 237-269. ———. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2): 185-211. Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15 (2): 291-334. Zhang, L., T. n. Wang, and H. G. Fung. 2014. Market reaction to corporate social responsibility announcements: Evidence from China. China & World Economy 22 (2): 81-101. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69758 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文以中國大陸2009-2015年上市公司為樣本,研究企業社會責任績效與CEO薪酬的關係,並加入產權性質和獨立董事比例,進一步探討國有企業與非國有企業中企業社會責任績效對CEO薪酬的影響是否不同,及獨立董事比例對企業社會責任績效與CEO薪酬關係的調節作用。研究結果發現,企業社會責任績效與CEO薪酬顯著正相關;這種正相關關係在非國有企業中比國有企業更強;而獨立董事比例越高,企業社會責任績效與CEO薪酬的關係並不會增強。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research takes the listed companies in mainland China from 2009 to 2015 as a sample to study the relationship between corporate social responsibility and CEO compensation. Furthermore, by combing the nature of property right and the proportion of independent directors, this study further tested if this relationship could have a difference between state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises, and also the regulation caused by the proportion of independent directors to this relationship was also discussed. The results showed a significantly positive correlation between the corporate social responsibility and CEO compensation, which was showed stronger in non-state-owned enterprises than in state-owned enterprises. However, no regulating effect of the proportion of independent directors to this relationship has been found in this study. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:26:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04722054-1.pdf: 1222059 bytes, checksum: 18f95f21f5fd951246744e63ec019af9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書................................................i
摘 要......................... ii Abstract .............................................. iii 目 錄...........................iv 表目錄...............v 第一章 緒論....................................................1 1.1 研究動機與問題.....................................1 1.2 研究貢獻.......................................5 1.3 論文結構..................................5 第二章 文獻回顧與假說發展..........................7 2.1 企業社會責任.........................................7 2.1.1 企業社會責任的意義與演變 .......................7 2.1.2 企業社會責任績效相關文獻 ................10 2.1.3 企業社會責任績效衡量方法 ......14 2.2 CEO 薪酬.............................................17 2.2.1 CEO 薪酬範疇 .............................17 2.2.2 CEO 薪酬相關文獻 ......................18 2.3 企業社會責任績效與 CEO 薪酬.........22 2.4 研究假說.............................................25 第三章 研究方法............................................27 3.1 數據來源及樣本選擇...........................27 3.2 研究模型..............................................27 3.3 變數定義及衡量...................................28 3.3.1 被解釋變數 ...................................28 3.3.2 解釋變數 .......................................29 3.3.3 控制變數 .......................................29 第四章 實證結果............................................34 4.1 敘述性統計...........................................34 4.2 相關係數...............................................36 4.3 假說檢定...............................................39 4.4 敏感性分析..........................................43 4.4.1 同期企業社會責任績效對 CEO 薪酬影響 ...............................43 4.4.2 CEO 薪酬與企業社會責任績效內生性問題 ..................45 第五章 結論與建議.........................................50 5.1 研究結論..............................................50 5.2 研究限制及建議..................................50 附錄 潤靈環球責任評級 RKS 評價指標............................52 参考文献............59 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 企業社會責任績效與CEO薪酬的關係 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and CEO Compensation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李佳玲,廖芝嫻 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 企業社會責任,企業社會責任績效,CEO薪酬,國有企業,獨立董事, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | corporate social responsibility,corporate social responsibility performance,CEO compensation,state-owned enterprises,independent directors., | en |
dc.relation.page | 72 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800763 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-05-02 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。