請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69749
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡志偉(Chi-Wei Tsai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Syuan Jhou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 周易萱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:26:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Backus EA, Cline AR, Ellerseick MR, Serrano MS. 2007. Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) feeding on cotton: new methods and parameters for analysis of nonsequential electrical penetration graph data. Ann Entomol Soc Am 100: 296-310. Bernays EA, Funk DJ. 1999. Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids. Proc R Soc Lond B 266: 151-156. Blackman RL, Eastop VF. 2000. Aphids on the world's crops: an indentification and information guide, 2nd edition. Hoboken: John Wiley Sons Ltd. 476 pp. Capinera JL. 2008a. Green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). pp 1727-1730. In: Capinera JL (ed). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. Capinera JL. 2008b. Pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). pp 2766-2770. In: Capinera JL (ed). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. Chandran P, Reese JC, Khan SA, Wang D, Schapaugh W, Campbell LR. 2013. Feeding behavior comparison of soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) biotypes on different soybean genotypes. J Econ Entomol 106: 2234-2240. George J, Ammar ED, Hall DG, Lapointe SL. 2017. Sclerenchymatous ring as a barrier to phloem feeding by Asian citrus psyllid: Evidence from electrical penetration graph and visualization of stylet pathways. PLoS ONE 12: e0173520. Douglas AE. 2003. The nutritional physiology of aphids. Adv Insect Physiol 31: 73-140. Ebert TA, Rogers ME. 2016. Effect of substrate voltage on EPG recordings of ingestion and probing behavior in Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Fla Entomol: 528-534. Elzinga DA, De Vos M, Jander G. 2014. Suppression of plant defenses by a Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) salivary effector protein. Mol Plant Microbe In 27: 747-756. Escudero-Martinez C, Leybourne DJ, Bos JI. 2020. Plant resistance in different cell layers affects aphid probing and feeding behaviour during non-host and poor-host interactions. B Entomol Res: 1-8. Goławska S. 2010. Effect of various host-plants on the population growth and development of the pea aphid. J Plant Prot Res 50: 224-228. Guedes RNC, Cervantes FA, Backus EA, Walse SS. 2019. Substrate-mediated feeding and egg-laying by spotted wing drosophila: waveform recognition and quantification via electropenetrography. J Pest Sci 92: 495-507. He Y, Zhang J, Chen J, Wu Q, Chen L, Chen L, Xiao P, Cheng Zhu Y. 2011. Influence of pymetrozine on feeding behaviors of three rice planthoppers and a rice leafhopper using electrical penetration graphs. J Econ Entomol 104: 1877-1884. Holman J. 2009. Host plant catalog of aphids. Berlin: Springer. 1216 pp. Hong F, Han HL, Pu P, Wei D, Wang J, Liu Y. 2019. Effects of five host plant species on the life history and population growth parameters of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Insect Sci 19: 15. Huang X, Liu D, Cui X, Shi X. 2018. Probing behaviors and their plasticity for the aphid Sitobion avenae on three alternative host plants. PLoS ONE13: e0203219. Jacobson AL, Kennedy GG. 2014. Electrical penetration graph studies to investigate the effects of cyantraniliprole on feeding behavior of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Capsicum annuum. Pest Manag Sci 70: 836-840. Jahn GC, Almazan LP, Pacia JB. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the intrinsic rate of increase of Hysteroneura setariae (Thomas) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ Entomol 34: 938-943. Jiang YX, Nombela G, Muñiz M. 2001. Analysis by DC–EPG of the resistance to Bemisia tabaci on an Mi‐tomato line. Entomol Exp Appl 99: 295-302. Kaakeh W, Dutcher JD. 1993. Population parameters and probing behavior of cowpea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae), on preferred and non-preferred host cover crops. J Entomol Sci 28: 145-155. Martin B, Collar JL, Tjallingii WF, Fereres A. 1997. Intracellular ingestion and salivation by aphids may cause the acquisition and inoculation of non-persistently transmitted plant viruses. J Gen Virol 78: 2701-2705. McLean DL, Kinsey MG. 1964. A technique for electronically recording aphid feeding and salivation. Nature 202: 1358-1359. Medina-Ortega KJ, Walker GP. 2015. Faba bean forisomes can function in defence against generalist aphids. Plant Cell Environ 38: 1167-1177. Milenovic M, Wosula EN, Rapisarda C, Legg JP. 2019. Impact of host plant species and whitefly species on feeding behavior of Bemisia tabaci. Front Plant Sci 10: 1. Moreno A, Tjallingii WF, Fernandez-Mata G, Fereres A. 2012. Differences in the mechanism of inoculation between a semi-persistent and a non-persistent aphid-transmitted plant virus. J Gen Virol 93: 662-667. Moreno-Delafuente A, Garzo E, Moreno A, Fereres A. 2013. A plant virus manipulates the behavior of its whitefly vector to enhance its transmission efficiency and spread. PLoS One 8: e61543. Mutti NS, Louis J, Pappan LK, Pappan K, Begum K, Chen MS, Park Y, Dittmer N, Marshall J, Reese JC, Reeck GR. 2008. A protein from the salivary glands of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, is essential in feeding on a host plant. PNAS 105: 9965-9969. Nam KJ, Hardie J. 2012. Host acceptance by aphids: probing and larviposition behaviour of the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi on host and non-host plants. J Insect Physiol 58: 660-668. Painter RH. 1958. Resistance of plants to insects. Annu Rev Entomol 3: 267-290. Pallipparambil GR, Reese JC, Avila CA, Louis JM, Goggin FL. 2010. Mi‐mediated aphid resistance in tomato: tissue localization and impact on the feeding behavior of two potato aphid clones with differing levels of virulence. Entomol Exp Appl 135: 295-307. Pompon J, Quiring D, Giordanengo P, Pelletier Y. 2010. Role of xylem consumption on osmoregulation in Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas). J Insect Physiol 56: 610-615. Powell G, Tosh CR, Hardie J. 2006. Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral, evolutionary, and applied perspectives. Annu Rev Entomol 51: 309-330. Sarria E, Cid M, Garzo E, Fereres A. 2009. Workbook for automatic parameter calculation of EPG data. Comput Electron Agric 67: 35-42. Schwartzberg EG, Böröczky K, Tumlinson JH. 2011. Pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum, suppress induced plant volatiles in broad bean, Vicia faba. J Chem Ecol 37: 1055-1062. Schwarzkopf A, Rosenberger D, Niebergall M, Gershenzon J, Kunert G. 2013. To feed or not to feed: plant factors located in the epidermis, mesophyll, and sieve elements influence pea aphid’s ability to feed on legume species. PLoS One 8: e75298. Smith CM, Chuang WP. 2014. Plant resistance to aphid feeding: behavioral, physiological, genetic and molecular cues regulate aphid host selection and feeding. Pest Manag Sci 70: 528-540. Stafford CA, Walker GP, Ullman DE. 2011. Infection with a plant virus modifies vector feeding behavior. PNAS 108: 9350-9355. Stout MJ. 2014. Host-plant resistance in pest management. pp 1-21. In: Abrol DP (ed). Integrated Pest Management. Academic Press, Cambridge. Sullivan DJ. 2008. Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae). pp 191-215. In: Capinera JL (eds). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Berlin. Tjallingii WF. 1988. Electrical recording of stylet penetration activities. pp 95-108. In: Minks AK, Harrewijn P (eds). Aphids, their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Tjallingii WF. 1990. Continuous recording of stylet penetration activities by aphids. pp 89-99. In: Campbell RK, Eikenbary RD (eds). Aphids-plant genotype interactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Tjallingii WF, Esch TH. 1993. Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. Physiol Entomol 18: 317-328. Tosh CR, Powell G, Hardie J. 2003. Decision making by generalist and specialist aphids with the same genotype. J Insect Physiol 49: 659-669. Walker GP, Medina‐Ortega KJ. 2012. Penetration of faba bean sieve elements by pea aphid does not trigger forisome dispersal. Entomol Exp Appl 144: 326-335. Wattier C, Turbant A, Sargos‐Vallade L, Pelloux J, Rustérucci C, Cherqui A. 2019. New insights into diet breadth of polyphagous and oligophagous aphids on two Arabidopsis ecotypes. Insect Sci 26: 753-769. Weibull J, Melin G. 1990. Free amino acid content of phloem sap from Brassica plants in relation to performance of Lipaphis erysimi (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Ann Appl Biol 116: 417-423. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69749 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 蚜蟲是世界上知名取食韌皮部的害蟲。桃蚜 (Myzus persicae) 是廣食性蚜蟲,主要取食十字花科、茄科以及豆科植物。豌豆蚜 (Acyrthosiphon pisum) 則是專食性蚜蟲,主要取食豆科植物。本研究探討桃蚜及豌豆蚜在油菜 (Brassica campestris) 及蠶豆 (Vicia faba) 的表現及取食行為,以留存數、體重及發育時間評估兩種蚜蟲在兩種植物上的表現,昆蟲刺探電位圖譜 (electrical penetration graph, EPG) 則用以監測蚜蟲成蟲取食油菜及蠶豆的取食行為。結果顯示相較於飼養於油菜的桃蚜,飼養於蠶豆的桃蚜偏好性較低、存活率較低、體重較輕及發育時間較長。相較於飼養於蠶豆的豌豆蚜,飼養於油菜豌豆蚜偏好性較低、存活率較低。因豌豆蚜飼養於油菜的留存數較少,其體重及發育時間無法取得。相比於取食油菜的桃蚜,桃蚜取食蠶豆時呈現較長的非刺吸時間、較久的路徑階段 (pathway) 及從第一次刺吸到第一次分泌唾液至韌皮部的時間較長,吸食韌皮部汁液時間則較短。同時,桃蚜取食蠶豆時呈現較多的刺吸次數,分泌唾液伴隨吸食韌皮部汁液的次數較少及吸食韌皮部汁液的比例較少。桃蚜取食油菜於第一個小時即開始吸食韌皮部汁液,較少非刺吸及路徑階段波形比例;相較於取食蠶豆大多呈現路徑階段波形,韌皮部活動比例則較少。相比於取食蠶豆,豌豆蚜取食油菜呈現較長的非刺吸時間及較短的路徑階段時間。豌豆蚜於油菜並無韌皮部活動,亦無取食韌皮部汁液。大多的豌豆蚜沒有刺吸油菜;相較於蠶豆,豌豆蚜吸食韌皮部汁液的比例隨著監測時間增加而提升。本實驗結果證明蠶豆為桃蚜的非偏好寄主,油菜則為偏好寄主。蠶豆為豌豆蚜的偏好寄主,而豌豆蚜則拒絕取食非寄主—油菜。本研究成果可能有助於間作作物的選擇,用以防止蚜蟲媒介之非持續性病毒的傳播,以及提供在不同作物上防治蚜蟲的建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Aphid is a well-known phloem-feeding pest worldwide. Myzus persicae is a notorious generalist aphid which mainly feeds on families Brassicaceae, Solanaceae and Fabaceae. Acyrthosiphon pisum is known as a specialist aphid which mainly feeds on family Fabaceae. In this study, the performance and feeding behavior of M. persicae and A. pisum were examined on rape (Brassica campestris) and faba bean (Vicia faba). The survival rate, body weight, and developmental time were evaluated to assess the performance of both aphid species on these two plants. Electrical penetration graph (EPG) was used to monitor the feeding behavior of them fed on rape and faba bean. The results showed M. persicae reared on faba bean had lower preference, lower survival rate, lower body weight, and longer developmental time than those of aphids reared on rape. Acyrthosiphon pisum reared on rape had lower preference, and lower survival rate than that of aphids reared on faba bean. Because none of A. pisum was alive on rape, its body weight and development time were not applicable. Myzus persicae started to ingest phloem sap of rape at the first hour, performing less proportion of non-probe and pathway on rape, on the contrary M. persicae performed majority of pathway on faba bean with less proportion of phloem phase activities. Comparing to feeding on faba bean, A. pisum performed longer non-probe duration and shorter duration of pathway on rape. None of A. pisum performed phloem phase activity on rape, and no aphid reached phloem sap ingestion. Majority of A. pisum remained non-probe on rape, contrary to fed on rape, proportion of phloem sap ingestion of A. pisum fed on faba bean increased with time. The results demonstrated that faba bean is a non-preferred host of M. persicae comparing with rape as a preferred host. Faba bean is a preferred host of A. pisum, whereas the aphid refused to feed on rape, a non-host. The results can assist the choice of intercropping to prevent the transmission of aphid-borne non-persistently transmitted viruses and provide suggestions for the control of aphid on different crops. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:26:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1808202002351700.pdf: 1590024 bytes, checksum: 6618901ef79d461b6d9f37b652061d04 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CONTENTS 誌謝……………………………………………………………………….i 中文摘要……………………………………………………………...….ii ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………..iii CONTENTS……………………………………………………………...v LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………....vii LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………….viii INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………..1 MATERIALS AND METHODS…………………………………………3 Aphids and plants……………….……………………………………3 Host plant preference………….…………………………………..…4 Aphid performance……………….………………………………….4 Feeding behavior……………….…………………………………….5 Electrical penetration graph (EPG) ………………………………….5 Statistical analysis…………….……………………………………...6 RESULTS………………………………………………………………...7 Host plant preference………….…………………………………..…7 Performance of M. persicae……………………………………….....7 Performance of A. pisum………………………………………..........8 Feeding behavior of M. persicae…………………………..................8 Feeding behavior of A. pisum...........…………………………..........10 DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………...11 REFERENCES………………………………………………………….15 APPENDIX……………………………………………………………..34 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 桃蚜及豌豆蚜在油菜及蠶豆上的取食行為及發育表現 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Feeding behavior and performance of Myzus persicae and Acyrthosiphon pisum on rape and faba bean | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李後晶(How-Jing Lee),黃莉欣(Li-Hsin Huang),莊汶博(Wen-Po Chuang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 桃蚜,豌豆蚜,寄主,表現,取食行為, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Myzus persicae,Acyrthosiphon pisum,host plant,performance,probing behavior, | en |
dc.relation.page | 35 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003908 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1808202002351700.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。