請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69736完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 許文馨(Wen-Hsin Hsu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Ying Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林佳瑩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:25:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-06-26 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-06-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-05-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Andreou, P. C., Karasamani, I., Louca, C., & Ehrlich, D. (2017). The Impact of Managerial Ability on Crisis-Period Corporate Investment. Journal of Business Research, 79, 107-122.
Bange, M. M., & De Bondt, W. F. M. (1998). R&D Budgets and Corporate Earnings Targets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4(2), 153-184. Baran, L., Forst, A., & Via, M. (2017). Dual Class Firm Structure and Innovation. Paper Presented at the Financial Management Association (Working Paper). Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111(5), 1043-1075. Chemmanur, T. J., & Jiao, Y. (2012). Dual Class IPOs: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(1), 305-319. Chemmanur, T. J., & Paeglis, I. (2005). Management Quality, Certification, and Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 331-368. Chemmanur, T. J., Paeglis, I., & Simonyan, K. (2009). Management Quality, Financial and Investment Policies, and Asymmetric Information. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(5), 1045-1079. Chemmanur, T. J., Paeglis, I., & Simonyan, K. (2010). Management Quality and Equity Issue Characteristics: A Comparison of SEOs and IPOs. Financial Management, 39(4), 1601-1642. Chen, S.-S., & Lin, C.-Y. (2017). Managerial Ability and Acquirer Returns. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. Chen, Y., Podolski, E. J., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2015). Does Managerial Ability Facilitate Corporate Innovative Success? Journal of Empirical Finance, 34, 313-326. Choi, W., Han, S., Jung, S. H., & Kang, T. (2015). CEO's Operating Ability and the Association between Accruals and Future Cash Flows. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(5/6), 619-634. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. Demerjian, P., Lev, B., Lewis, M. F., & McVay, S. E. (2013). Managerial Ability and Earnings Quality. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 463-498. Demerjian, P., Lev, B., & McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying Managerial Ability: A New Measure and Validity Tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229-1248. Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365-395. Francis, J., Huang, A. H., Rajgopal, S., & Zang, A. Y. (2008). CEO Reputation and Earnings Quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 109-147. Francis, J., Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2005). Earnings and Dividend Informativeness When Cash Flow Rights Are Separated from Voting Rights. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 329-360. Galasso, A., & Simcoe, T. S. (2011). CEO Overconfidence and Innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469-1484. Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2010). Extreme Governance: An Analysis of Dual-Class Firms in the United States. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 1051-1088. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1988). One Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 175-202. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. In (pp. 8498). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Hansen, G. S., & Hill, C. W. L. (1991). Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time-Series Study of Four Technology-Driven Industries. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 1. Helfat, C. E. (1994). Evolutionary Trajectories in Petroleum Firm R&D. Management Science, 40(12), 1720-1747. Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257-274. Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators? The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457-1498. Holmstrom, B. (1989). Agency Costs and Innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 12(3), 305-327. Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2012). Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth. In (pp. 17769-n/a). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95. Li, T., & Zaiats, N. (2017). Information Environment and Earnings Management of Dual Class Firms around the World. Journal of Banking & Finance, 74, 1-23. Manowan, P. (2010). Dual Class Ownership Structure and Insider Entrenchment. (D.B.A. 3430403), Boston University. Manso, G. (2011). Motivating Innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823-1860. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. Martin, X., & Mitchell, W. (1998). The Influence of Local Search and Performance Heuristics on New Design Introduction in a New Product Market. Research Policy, 26(7), 753-771. Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2009). Agency Problems at Dual‐Class Companies. The Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1697-1727. Park, K. J. (2015). Superstar CEOs and Innovation. (Ph.D. 3717433), University of Oregon. S., C. J. (2017). Managerial Ability, Growth Opportunities, and IPO Performance. Managerial Finance, 43(4), 488-507. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81-112. Sorescu, A. B., & Spanjol, J. (2008). Innovation's Effect on Firm Value and Risk: Insights from Consumer Packaged Goods. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 114-132. Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 21-38. Yuk Ying, C., Dasgupta, S., & Hilary, G. (2010). CEO Ability, Pay, and Firm Performance. Management Science, 56(10), 1633-1652. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69736 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討雙重股權結構、經理人能力與企業創新間之關係。首先,研究結果發現,在採用雙重股權結構的企業較少進行創新活動,顯示代理成本讓掌握控制權的經理人較不願意投資需要較長時間才有成果及風險較高的創新活動;其次,經營人能力會正向促進企業創新,顯示經營人能力愈高會傾向提升企業長期價值及創新發展;最後,在經理人能力作為雙重股權結構與創新活動間調節變相方面,本研究進一步發現,一旦能力較高的企業經營者在雙重股權下,會弱化雙重股權特性(代理成本等)對創新活動的負面影響,而提高創新活動,產生正向調節效果。此外,研究結果也發現經營者會傾向於進行探索性創新相較於開發性創新,顯示經營者能力較高時,在雙重股權結構下,經營者能夠不須擔心失去對企業的控制權而偏好高風險的創新投資計劃。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study exams the relationship among dual class structure, managerial ability and corporate innovation. The results show that dual class structure is negatively associated with innovative activities, suggesting that dual class firms are less likely than single class firms to engage in corporate innovation. The risk aversion and the control of private benefit that characterize the dual class structure can lead to weak long-term and risky innovative projects. In addition, I find that managerial ability affects positively corporate innovation. It is suggested that the higher level of managerial ability promotes higher level of corporate innovation and long-term value. Finally, investigation shows that when a better skilled manager in the context of dual class structure, his/her managerial ability will have a positive moderating effect that enhances corporate innovation, especially in the firms with relatively little deviations from control rights an ownership. Furthermore, the results show that managerial ability is positively associated with more exploratory innovations, which are outside of the firm’s knowledge base, suggesting that managers at dual class firms are not afraid of losing their controlling positions for pursuing challenging innovation activities. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:25:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05749003-1.pdf: 729638 bytes, checksum: f3f9a0a4f445248bbb299f0b9fe586a3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract i
1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development 4 2.1. Management Entrenchment and Agency Costs 4 2.2. Managerial Ability and Innovation 5 2.3. Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation 7 3. Research Design 9 3.1. Measure of Managerial Ability 9 3.2. Measure of the Corporate Innovation 10 3.3. Measure of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation 10 3.4. Tests for H1 11 3.5. Tests for H2 11 3.6. Tests for H3 12 3.7. Sample Selection 13 4. Empirical Results 14 4.1. Descriptive Statistics 14 4.2. Empirical Results: H1 15 4.3. Empirical Results: H2 15 4.4. Empirical Results: H3 16 5. Conclusion 17 References 19 Appendix 22 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 調節效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創新活動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經營能力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙重股權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 探索性創新/開發性創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Dual class structure | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate innovation | en |
| dc.subject | Moderating effect | en |
| dc.subject | Managerial ability | en |
| dc.subject | Exploratory innovation/Exploitative innovation | en |
| dc.title | 雙重股權與經理人能力對企業創新的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Dual Class Structure and Managerial Ability on Corporate Innovation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖芝嫻,劉心才 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 雙重股權,經營能力,創新活動,調節效果,探索性創新/開發性創新, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Dual class structure,Managerial ability,Corporate innovation,Moderating effect,Exploratory innovation/Exploitative innovation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 29 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800812 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-05-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 712.54 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
