請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69730完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Min-qian Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李閩茜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:25:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-05-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-05-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-05-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, M. (2014). 88% Of Consumers Trust Online Reviews As Much As Personal Recommendations. Retrieved from https://searchengineland.com/88-consumers-trust-online-reviews-much-personal-recommendations-195803
Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E., Bluck, S., DeVries, B., Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1992). Scoring manual for integrative and conceptual complexity. Handbook of thematic analysis, 401-418. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. Bei, L.-T., Chen, E. Y., & Widdows, R. (2004). Consumers' online information search behavior and the phenomenon of search vs. experience products. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(4), 449-467. Bonelli, S. (2017). 70% of consumers will leave a review for a business when asked. Retrieved from https://searchengineland.com/70-consumers-will-leave-review-business-asked-262802 Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17): Sage publications. Chen, M.-Y. (2016). Can two-sided messages increase the helpfulness of online reviews? Online Information Review, 40(3), 316-332. doi:10.1108/oir-07-2015-0225 Chen, Z., & Lurie, N. H. (2013). Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463-476. Connors, L., Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2011). Is it the review or the reviewer? A multi-method approach to determine the antecedents of online review helpfulness. Paper presented at the System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on. Crowley, A. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer research, 20(4), 561-574. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 424. Ein-Gar, D., Shiv, B., & Tormala, Z. L. (2011). When blemishing leads to blossoming: The positive effect of negative information. Journal of consumer research, 38(5), 846-859. Filieri, R. (2016). What makes an online consumer review trustworthy? Annals of Tourism Research, 58, 46-64. Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990). Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: Testing hypotheses from economics of information. Journal of consumer research, 16(4), 433-441. Ford, R. (2014). CinemaCon: Film Critics Still Have Clout, Study Finds. Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291-313. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0193 Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 399. Hao, Y., Ye, Q., Li, Y., & Cheng, Z. (2010). How does the valence of online consumer reviews matter in consumer decision making? Differences between search goods and experience goods. Paper presented at the System sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd hawaii international conference on. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling: University of Kansas, KS. He, S. X., & Bond, S. D. (2015). Why is the crowd divided? Attribution for dispersion in online word of mouth. Journal of Consumer research, 41(6), 1509-1527. IMDb.com. (2018). Browse popular genres Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/feature/genre/ Jiménez, F. R., & Mendoza, N. A. (2013). Too popular to ignore: The influence of online reviews on purchase intentions of search and experience products. Journal of interactive marketing, 27(3), 226-235. Julian McAuley, J. L. (2014). Web data: Amazon reviews. Korfiatis, N., García-Bariocanal, E., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2012). Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 205-217. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2011.10.003 Lee, I. (2016). Encyclopedia of E-Commerce Development, Implementation, and Management (Vol. 1): IGI Global. Li, M., Huang, L., Tan, C.-H., & Wei, K.-K. (2013). Helpfulness of Online Product Reviews as Seen by Consumers: Source and Content Features. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(4), 101-136. doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415170404 Luo, J., Ba, S., & Zhang, H. (2012). The effectiveness of online shopping characteristics and well-designed websites on satisfaction. MIS quarterly, 1131-1144. Mizerski, R. W. (1982). An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information. Journal of Consumer research, 9(3), 301-310. doi:Doi 10.1086/208925 Moore, S. G. (2015). Attitude predictability and helpfulness in online reviews: the role of explained actions and reactions. Journal of Consumer research, 42(1), 30-44. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. Nakayama, M., Sutcliffe, N., & Wan, Y. (2010). Has the web transformed experience goods into search goods? Electronic Markets, 20(3-4), 251-262. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of political economy, 78(2), 311-329. Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2011). Born unequal: a study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. Journal of retailing, 87(4), 598-612. Park, D.-H., & Kim, S. (2008). The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 399-410. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306-307. Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 805-818. PowerReviews. (2015). Survey Confirms the Value of Reviews, Provides New Insights. Reinstein, D. A., & Snyder, C. M. (2005). The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. The journal of industrial economics, 53(1), 27-51. Schlosser, A. E. (2011). Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 226-239. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.04.002 Weathers, D., & Makienko, I. (2006). Assessing the relationships between e‐tail success and product and Web site factors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(2), 41-54. Weathers, D., Sharma, S., & Wood, S. L. (2007). Effects of online communication practices on consumer perceptions of performance uncertainty for search and experience goods. Journal of retailing, 83(4), 393-401. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (1981). Stages in the analysis of persuasive messages: The role of causal attributions and message comprehension. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 246. Wu, P. F. (2013). In search of negativity bias: An empirical study of perceived helpfulness of online reviews. Psychology & Marketing, 30(11), 971-984. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69730 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究的主要目的是探究網路口碑的片面性效應。提供了正負兩面意見的網路評論比起只提供一個面向意見的網路評論更能真實地反映產品使用經驗，但同時也更難解讀。過去的研究中尚未就雙面性的網路評論是否比片面的網路評論（僅有正面或負面評價）更有幫助得出一致的結論。因此，本研究從資訊處理的角度，提出消費者對網路評論片面性所做出的歸因（將評論歸因到與產品品質相關或僅受評論者偏好影響的程度）可能作為中介影響網路評論片面性與知覺助益程度之間的關係，且該中介效應被證實顯著。同時，我們猜測產品類型和認知需求的不同將影響消費者在閱讀網路評論時所投入的認知資源，從而干擾他們對該評論的產品歸因程度和知覺助益程度。我們在實驗中同時考慮了正面評論和負面評論。一方面，本研究發現，當雙面性的網路評論是針對搜尋性商品而非經驗性商品的時候，更可能被歸因到是與產品品質高度相關的資訊。另一方面，我們發現認知需求高的個體比起認知需求低的個體，更有可能將雙面性的產品評論歸因到與產品品質高度相關。而在知覺助益程度上的研究結果表明，當雙面性的評論只和正面評論比較的時候，他們對於搜尋性商品而非經驗性商品有更強烈的效應，對認知需求低而非高的個體也有更強烈的效應，這並不完全符合我們的假設。在文中我們也將試圖解釋這一現象。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of sidedness of electronic WOM on perceived helpfulness. Two-sided online reviews are more truthful than one-sided online reviews to reflect product experience but also harder to process. From the perspective of information processing, we proposed product-related attribution (the extent to attribute a review caused by product quality rather than reviewer’s preference) as a mediator on the effect of review sidedness onto perceived helpfulness and verified a significant mediation effect. Product type and need for cognition were considered as moderator to influence attribution and perceived helpfulness of a review due to different cognitive resources invested in review reading. Positive and negative reviews were all included in our experiments to represent one-sided conditions. On the one hand, two-sided reviews were more likely to generate a higher level of product-related attribution on search goods rather than experience goods. On the other hand, individuals with high need for cognition are more likely to attributed two-sided reviews on product-related factors. As for perceived helpfulness, when only compared two-sided reviews with one-sided positive reviews, review sidedness showed a stronger effect for search goods than experience goods, and also a stronger effect for participants low in need for cognition rather than those high in need for cognition, which did not fully support our hypothesis. We also tried to explain this phenomenon in this paper. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:25:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04725051-1.pdf: 3357794 bytes, checksum: 8244ba5c4343fec55fd849ee0fb7b85b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
口試委員審定書 2 誌謝 3 中文摘要 i Abstract ii Table of Contents iii List of Figures v List of Tables vi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 Two-sided reviews vs. One-sided reviews 5 2.2 Product-related attribution as a mediator 6 2.3 Search goods vs. Experience goods 8 2.4 Need for cognition 10 Chapter 3 Study 1 13 3.1 Research Methodology 13 3.1.1 Experimental Design 13 3.1.2 Manipulation of the review sidedness 13 3.1.3 Product selection 14 3.1.4 Pilot study 15 3.1.5 Measurement of dependent variables 17 3.1.6 Participants 18 3.1.7 Procedure 19 3.2 Empirical Results 20 3.2.1 Reliability of Measurement and Manipulation Check 20 3.2.2 Test of Hypotheses 20 Chapter 4 Study 2 25 4.1 Research Methodology 25 4.1.1 Experiment Design 25 4.1.2 Participants 25 4.1.3 Procedure 26 4.2 Empirical Results 27 4.2.1 Reliability of Measurement and Manipulation Check 27 4.2.2 Test of Hypotheses 27 Chapter 5 Conclusion 32 5.1 Conclusion and Implications 32 5.2 Limitations and Future research 34 References 36 Appendix A 39 Appendix B 42 Appendix C 45 List of Figures Figure 2‑1: The research model 12 Figure 3‑1: The interaction of review sidedness (three conditions) and product type on attribution 22 Figure 3‑2: The interaction of review sidedness and product type on attribution 23 Figure 3‑3: The interaction of review sidedness (three conditions) and product type on perceived helpfulness 24 Figure 4‑1: The interaction of review sidedness (three conditions) and need for cognition on attribution 29 Figure 4‑2: The interaction of review sidedness and need for cognition on attribution 30 Figure 4‑3: The interaction of review sidedness (three conditions) and need for cognition on perceived helpfulness 31 List of Tables Table 3‑1: Treatment conditions of Study 2. 15 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 網路口碑之片面性效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The effects of review sidedness in electronic word of mouth | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 翁崇雄,黃俊堯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 網路口碑的片面性,產品歸因,認知需求,經驗性商品,搜尋性商品, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | sidedness of eWOM,product-related attribution,need for cognition,experience goods,search goods, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 46 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800831 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-05-22 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。